Award Winning Lakers Board NBA Dynasty League - K>J>G Wins! B2B!!

Post #1581 » by **TyCobb** » Tue Mar 21, 2017 5:01 am

It does matter in fantasy basketball. lol The least amount of negatives against a player, the better.

Post #1582 » by **TyCobb** » Tue Mar 21, 2017 5:05 am

Ball wins in FG%, FT%, TO, AST, REB, 3PT, STL.
Fultz wins in PTS and BLKS.

ROballer · Post #1583 » by **ROballer** » Tue Mar 21, 2017 5:09 am

Lol, then let me see your face when Ball scores 5 pts in a game ..but but he was 2-3, that's 67% FG!

Percentages don't mean **** in college, 56% is not sustainable in the pros, sorry.

While Fultz's percentages on a **** team, in which he gets all the attention...while scoring over 23 ppg, are impressive.
Stop acting like 48% is **** now, that's not a negative. You win 8 out 10 matchups in fantasy when you have 48% FG

Ball has more fantasy negatives than Fultz, for the sheer fact he has those games in which he takes 5-6 shots and scores in single digits.

And yeah, I still don't give a crap about scoring on my team...but I can and will get more for Fultz than I ever will for Ball. Eventually.

ROballer · Post #1584 » by **ROballer** » Tue Mar 21, 2017 5:13 am

TyCobb wrote:Ball wins in FG%, FT%, TO, AST, REB, 3PT, STL.
Fultz wins in PTS and BLKS.

Not even 1 pro game was played, and you got this conclusion? Riiiiight.

You was talking about how Ball can do everything, well I said Fultz can do everything as well PLUS scoring.
Which one is better at which is a moot point, if you base it on ~30 games of college year.
Fultz can easily get better defensive stats, 3's and rebounds than Ball in his first year in the league, and all of the sudden we don't talk **** anymore, are we?

It's important which one falls to what team, far more important, than anything stat related in college.

Stop Kevon Looney'ing yourself for once.

Post #1585 » by **TyCobb** » Tue Mar 21, 2017 5:19 am

If Ball scores 5 in a game, it'll be on 3 attempts. If Fultz scores 5 in a game, it'll be on 10 attempts. Try digging out of that low FG%! Same with FT's. Fultz is taking 2 to 3x as much attempts as Ball, but putting up worse %'s. These are the negatives I'm talking about. Fultz will also drop FG% in NBA.... probably under 45%, but those attempts won't shrink.

Post #1586 » by **TyCobb** » Tue Mar 21, 2017 5:25 am

If you still don't get what I'm talking about look at Westbrook. Dude averaging triple-double for a season yet still 7th ranked. It's cuz TO's and %'s.

Post #1587 » by **TyCobb** » Tue Mar 21, 2017 5:32 am

Looney is about to be collecting rings. We know what type of organization appreciates him.

You are still mad that you picked Dunn over Murray. It's okay man. You got two first round picks this draft!

ROballer · Post #1588 » by **ROballer** » Tue Mar 21, 2017 6:17 am

Wtf are you smoking?

If Dunn was on the Nuggets, he would be starting, not STILL riding the bench....
I ain't mad, Dunn will come around at the slightest opportunity to play he will get.

You literally have Harden on you team, look at him, not Westbrook when comparing Fultz to'. And Westbrook is still a top 10 guy even with the TO's and%? What are you talking about? Ball will be lucky to ever sniff top 10 value with his scoring(or lack of).

Fultz won't score 5 nearly as much or often than Ball tho', that's the point.

And I will be getting which one falls to the Lakers, fact.....I don't feel like waiting, like I am with Dunn.
Bottom line is, whoever falls to Phoenix or Boston, they won't get the chance to make a big fantasy impact like they should, from the get go.

I can say whatever the **** I want meanwhile, I can say I'll draft one of Mirja's 15 siblings if I damn well choose to, it don't matter until you give the green light for the start of the draft.

Post #1589 » by **TyCobb** » Tue Mar 21, 2017 6:21 am

The Nuggets have like 12 guards yet Murray found his way.

Whoa, ho up... now you're not selecting Fultz? Haha, already progress.

I have no problems starting the draft now. It seems extremely risky in doing so, but that's up to the people who pick before me if they want to pick before the draft takes place.

ROballer · Post #1590 » by **ROballer** » Tue Mar 21, 2017 6:23 am

I was always gonna pick whoever the Lakers pick, which will be Fultz.

I won't make my decision until after the actual draft. We should start it right then, not after the SL/FA period like we normally do.

Post #1591 » by **TyCobb** » Tue Mar 21, 2017 6:25 am

You have 1st pick... you pretty much decide when we start lol.

ROballer · Post #1592 » by **ROballer** » Tue Mar 21, 2017 6:29 am

TyCobb wrote:You have 1st pick... you pretty much decide when we start lol.

Not working like that....we always somehow agreed we'll wait after the FA period to end, or at least 2 weeks of it, to see where players land.

I might have the 1st pick, and Mirja might select next, but if Wavy wants to wait, we can't force him to pick...are we stalling this 4 months then?

We all need to be on the same paper.

ak7 · Post #1593 » by **ak7** » Tue Mar 21, 2017 1:11 pm

ROballer wrote:Lol, then let me see your face when Ball scores 5 pts in a game ..but but he was 2-3, that's 67% FG!

Percentages don't mean **** in college, 56% is not sustainable in the pros, sorry.

While Fultz's percentages on a **** team, in which he gets all the attention...while scoring over 23 ppg, are impressive.
Stop acting like 48% is **** now, that's not a negative. You win 8 out 10 matchups in fantasy when you have 48% FG

Ball has more fantasy negatives than Fultz, for the sheer fact he has those games in which he takes 5-6 shots and scores in single digits.

And yeah, I still don't give a crap about scoring on my team...but I can and will get more for Fultz than I ever will for Ball. Eventually.

When did you become an expert on winning in fantasy basketball?

ROballer · Post #1594 » by **ROballer** » Tue Mar 21, 2017 1:45 pm

Huh? Having your underwear tight up your ass again so you can't think straight?

Which of my remarks do I need to stupid in it to you again?

Or are you on team Ball and don't know how to post some facts, like Ty does?

Nobody except Wavy and KJG won **** around here, so the sense of entitlement needs to cease...they can give advice on winning, not you, not anybody else. If we're talking about winning, which we are not in this instance.

Except for maybe FG%, which I mentioned....and if you take your time and check the actual stats, you could see I speak the truth. 48% does win it for you way more often than not.

tugs · Post #1595 » by **tugs** » Tue Mar 21, 2017 2:24 pm

*popcorn gif

ROballer · Post #1596 » by **ROballer** » Tue Mar 21, 2017 2:32 pm

You're the only friend I got tugsy, thanks for the no.1 pick again. :kiss

tugs · Post #1597 » by **tugs** » Tue Mar 21, 2017 2:34 pm

I remember you said you'll have a better record.

ROballer · Post #1598 » by **ROballer** » Tue Mar 21, 2017 2:38 pm

I say a lot of **** things all the time, 3 yrs of this league should have made this clear. :lol:

tugs · Post #1599 » by **tugs** » Tue Mar 21, 2017 2:55 pm

I would've added fuel to this fiery conversation of yours with Ty but I'll be neutral.

Post #1600 » by **TyCobb** » Tue Mar 21, 2017 2:56 pm

I'm curious to hear your opinion, tugs.