Woodsanity wrote:HTowns Finest wrote:Woodsanity wrote:This is honestly a very tight race with not much separation. Lebron, WB, Harden, Kawhi are all close together. Its going to come down to the wire. I actually think Lebron deserves more credit here.
I can't vote for a guy that's takes nights off like LeBron does.
There are a lot of nights were LeBron is not even the best player on his team. I'm a huge Kawhi fan but I think the Spurs would still be a playoff team with no Kawhi because of their system.
Plus Kawhi's stats are not overly impressive. Kawhi is the best 2 way player in the league but he's been the best 2 way player now for several years now. But I don't know if just being the best 2 way player on the second best team in the league constitutes making him the MVP. Westbrook's triple doubles have definitely impressed but his team's record is not great. IMO a player could average 50 points a game but if his team is barely winning or not in a top 3 conference spot that disqualifies that player for the MVP.
What Harden has done this season is extraordinary. 2 50 triple double games in the same calendar month. 7 40 point triple doubles this season. Leading the league in assists. Embracing a new position and excelling at it. 3rd best record in the West and the 3rd best record in the league. Going from being a me first player to a team first player. While not having a single all star or former all star player on his team. Guys like Anderson and Gordon are having careers seasons playing with Harden. James is doing all of this without a missing a single game. It's not just about stats and it's not just about wins, it's a combination of the two. What player has a better combination of wins, stats, and historic triple double games this year than Harden? HARDEN is the REAL MVP.
I heavily disagree with the bolded. Kawhi has very impressive stats 26 ppg on 61 TS% with a PER of 28 while playing very good defense.
Sure Harden has better raw stats but that doesn't account for the defensive gap. Lebron does take some nights off which is expected for someone with as much mileage he has but he is the clear cut best player on his team by a large margin on pretty much every given night. Irving can score more occasionally but his impact is nowhere close to Lebron's. Lebron is far better at every aspect of the game and it shows since the Cavs can't even beat scrub teams when he sits. Irving is a great scorer but a **** defender, a poor playmaker and pretty much mediocre at every other aspect of basketball.
Currently Harden is probably the frontrunner but it certainly is close.
I think WB shouldn't qualify strictly because of how MVP's have previously been decided (not enough wins). This is not necessarily WB's fault though, his team is really bad.
The last 2 seasons since Aldridge has been aboard, the Spurs have gone 13-4 without Kawhi Leonard. This year currently Kawhi has 8 double doubles on the season, count them 8. While Harden has 56 and Westbrook has 52 double doubles on the season. Kawhi doesn't lead the league in not a single statistical category. Again Kawhi is having a good but not great season and if removed from the Spurs for any given reason that team would still win. People are pushing the Kawhi narrative imo because he is the best 2 way player currently in the league. Aside from the stats I just presented, I can't personally see Leonard leading a team to a 55+ win season without former all-stars and benefiting from Pops system.
I will agree with you in regards to LeBron being good at a lot of aspects of the game but their are plenty of nights were Irving simply has to will that team to a W. If the game were on the line Kyrie would get the ball for the go ahead basket more times than LeBron. Although I get your Kyrie plays crap defense comment, we both know that the NBA has always been 80% offense 15% defense and 5% luck. You can't stop a great player, most times you can't even contain them but you can limit them to a degree. And Kyrie is a great offensive player, much better than LeBron is on most occasions that was my initial point. But you are correct that LeBron is the better overall player.
I don't agree that Westbrook has a bad team. There are some good players on that roster who plenty of teams could use. Gibson, Oladipo, Sabonis, McDermott, Kanter, Adams all have positive trade value around the league. It's your job as the leader of the team to make all of these parts click. If you can't then you shouldn't be considered for the MVP. Which is my reason for giving the MVP nod to James Harden.