ImageImageImage

All Things 2017 Draft

Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts

User avatar
greenroom31
General Manager
Posts: 7,936
And1: 11,423
Joined: Nov 06, 2004

Re: '17 Draft Thread 3.0 

Post#141 » by greenroom31 » Thu Mar 23, 2017 3:27 pm

Kolkmania wrote:
greenroom31 wrote:Sorry but that's crazy to say... you could make the case that he has the HIGHEST superstar potential, but there are guys littered throughout the league who became superstars who got drafted outside the top 5 or even lottery. Look at Steve Nash (#15), Steph Curry (#7), Jimmy Butler (#30), Ginobili (#57) and even Isaiah Thomas (#60). There is always the chance to pick a superstar, the risk is just much higher. Jackson, Tatum, Fox, Monk, and more all have superstar POTENTIAL -- the problem is that they have a lower likelihood of achieving that potential relative to Fultz.


Yeah of course, becoming a superstar within a reasonable likelihood.

I guess Bam Adebayo could become a superstar if he grew another 3 inches, adds the three to his offensive arsenal, learns how to dribble, rebound and defend.


My point was that the "reasonable likelihood" piece is very hard to gauge. If you really think only one guy in this class has superstar POTENTIAL, you're wrong... that's not a matter of opinion. If you think only one guy will FULFILL that potential and become a superstar, well that's fine and you're entitled to whatever opinion you want. May seem like I'm splitting hairs but it's an important distinction.
Kolkmania
Analyst
Posts: 3,463
And1: 1,737
Joined: Feb 11, 2015

Re: '17 Draft Thread 3.0 

Post#142 » by Kolkmania » Thu Mar 23, 2017 5:11 pm

greenroom31 wrote:
Kolkmania wrote:
greenroom31 wrote:Sorry but that's crazy to say... you could make the case that he has the HIGHEST superstar potential, but there are guys littered throughout the league who became superstars who got drafted outside the top 5 or even lottery. Look at Steve Nash (#15), Steph Curry (#7), Jimmy Butler (#30), Ginobili (#57) and even Isaiah Thomas (#60). There is always the chance to pick a superstar, the risk is just much higher. Jackson, Tatum, Fox, Monk, and more all have superstar POTENTIAL -- the problem is that they have a lower likelihood of achieving that potential relative to Fultz.


Yeah of course, becoming a superstar within a reasonable likelihood.

I guess Bam Adebayo could become a superstar if he grew another 3 inches, adds the three to his offensive arsenal, learns how to dribble, rebound and defend.


My point was that the "reasonable likelihood" piece is very hard to gauge. If you really think only one guy in this class has superstar POTENTIAL, you're wrong... that's not a matter of opinion. If you think only one guy will FULFILL that potential and become a superstar, well that's fine and you're entitled to whatever opinion you want. May seem like I'm splitting hairs but it's an important distinction.


I understand that, drafting isn't an exact science. There's so many variables that can't be accurately measured, even after the draft. My point about Adebayo was that this forum would be very tedious if we had to state every opinion this nuanced.
cl2117
General Manager
Posts: 9,007
And1: 7,634
Joined: Jun 14, 2013
 

Re: '17 Draft Thread 3.0 

Post#143 » by cl2117 » Thu Mar 23, 2017 5:35 pm

Anybody else turned off by the idea of drafting Ball with all the crap his dad has been getting up to?

I'm not educated enough on the pair to have a strong preference between Fultz and Ball for their on the court performance, but I certainly would prefer to deal with Fultz than the Balls.
UHar_Vinnie wrote:If you don't lean forward while hugging a dude, you are gonna have a wiener touching incident. You know this.
London2Boston
RealGM
Posts: 10,128
And1: 13,003
Joined: Apr 14, 2014
     

Re: '17 Draft Thread 3.0 

Post#144 » by London2Boston » Thu Mar 23, 2017 5:43 pm

cl2117 wrote:Anybody else turned off by the idea of drafting Ball with all the crap his dad has been getting up to?

I'm not educated enough on the pair to have a strong preference between Fultz and Ball for their on the court performance, but I certainly would prefer to deal with Fultz than the Balls.


Not much. Lonzo by all means is a chill,well mannered kid. Brad will most likely love his personality and Work ethic. He handles questions about his dad fairly well every time too. LaVar is a fool, but he's not dumb enough to **** with his Son's future once he's actually drafted on a team. At the moment he just thinks if he keeps talking then he will keep his boys in the news.
Homerclease
RealGM
Posts: 30,672
And1: 32,706
Joined: Dec 09, 2015

Re: '17 Draft Thread 3.0 

Post#145 » by Homerclease » Thu Mar 23, 2017 5:48 pm

cl2117 wrote:Anybody else turned off by the idea of drafting Ball with all the crap his dad has been getting up to?

I'm not educated enough on the pair to have a strong preference between Fultz and Ball for their on the court performance, but I certainly would prefer to deal with Fultz than the Balls.

Yes. Kid is off my board now and through no fault of his own.
cl2117
General Manager
Posts: 9,007
And1: 7,634
Joined: Jun 14, 2013
 

Re: '17 Draft Thread 3.0 

Post#146 » by cl2117 » Thu Mar 23, 2017 5:50 pm

London2Boston wrote:
cl2117 wrote:Anybody else turned off by the idea of drafting Ball with all the crap his dad has been getting up to?

I'm not educated enough on the pair to have a strong preference between Fultz and Ball for their on the court performance, but I certainly would prefer to deal with Fultz than the Balls.


Not much. Lonzo by all means is a chill,well mannered kid. Brad will most likely love his personality and Work ethic. He handles questions about his dad fairly well every time too. LaVar is a fool, but he's not dumb enough to **** with his Son's future once he's actually drafted on a team. At the moment he just thinks if he keeps talking then he will keep his boys in the news.

I don't know. I think LaVar will NEVER shut up. He's got 2 more kids in the pipeline, his mouth is going to be running for years. And in the Boston media market, he's going to get plenty of mics put in front of him.

I'm just not looking forward to hearing what dumb thing he says every week. I'm sure Lonzo would be absolutely pleasant and ignore his dad and not let it be a distraction to him, but it's going to be incredibly annoying regardless.
UHar_Vinnie wrote:If you don't lean forward while hugging a dude, you are gonna have a wiener touching incident. You know this.
User avatar
Bar Fight
RealGM
Posts: 12,918
And1: 17,233
Joined: Sep 30, 2013
 

Re: '17 Draft Thread 3.0 

Post#147 » by Bar Fight » Thu Mar 23, 2017 5:53 pm

Yeah, you don't pass up on a great prospect because his dad is obnoxious (although hilarious IMO). I wouldn't take him over Fultz because Fultz is the best prospect, but Lavar has absolutely no impact whatsoever on my draft board. Honestly, the Josh Jackson incident is probably a lot more concerning, and even that wouldn't effect whether I would take him or not if he's the BPA.
User avatar
greenroom31
General Manager
Posts: 7,936
And1: 11,423
Joined: Nov 06, 2004

Re: '17 Draft Thread 3.0 

Post#148 » by greenroom31 » Thu Mar 23, 2017 5:56 pm

truth18
RealGM
Posts: 38,601
And1: 42,854
Joined: Apr 17, 2011
Location: CELTICS NIGHTMARE

Re: '17 Draft Thread 3.0 

Post#149 » by truth18 » Thu Mar 23, 2017 5:56 pm

Bar Fight wrote:Yeah, you don't pass up on a great prospect because his dad is obnoxious (although hilarious IMO). I wouldn't take him over Fultz because Fultz is the best prospect, but Lavar has absolutely no impact whatsoever on my draft board. Honestly, the Josh Jackson incident is probably a lot more concerning, and even that wouldn't effect whether I would take him or not if he's the BPA.


Agree with all of this. Lavar is a **** LA homer clown who pisses me off more and more daily, but the Jackson stuff worries me way more, and neither issue would stop me from taking either player at BPA.
YOU LOSE
Homerclease
RealGM
Posts: 30,672
And1: 32,706
Joined: Dec 09, 2015

Re: '17 Draft Thread 3.0 

Post#150 » by Homerclease » Thu Mar 23, 2017 6:29 pm

truth18 wrote:
Bar Fight wrote:Yeah, you don't pass up on a great prospect because his dad is obnoxious (although hilarious IMO). I wouldn't take him over Fultz because Fultz is the best prospect, but Lavar has absolutely no impact whatsoever on my draft board. Honestly, the Josh Jackson incident is probably a lot more concerning, and even that wouldn't effect whether I would take him or not if he's the BPA.


Agree with all of this. Lavar is a **** LA homer clown who pisses me off more and more daily, but the Jackson stuff worries me way more, and neither issue would stop me from taking either player at BPA.

Until he starts ripping half the Celtics organization if things don't go his way. I agree that the Jackson stuff is cause for concern and Lonzo himself appears to be clean as a whistle but man. His dad is toxic with a capital T and with a team and locker room like ours I want no part of that ass clown. I had him behind Fultz and Jackson to begin with but I don't touch him in the top 10 now if at all
Writebloc
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,075
And1: 5,615
Joined: May 20, 2015
         

Re: '17 Draft Thread 3.0 

Post#151 » by Writebloc » Thu Mar 23, 2017 6:59 pm

Homerclease wrote:
truth18 wrote:
Bar Fight wrote:Yeah, you don't pass up on a great prospect because his dad is obnoxious (although hilarious IMO). I wouldn't take him over Fultz because Fultz is the best prospect, but Lavar has absolutely no impact whatsoever on my draft board. Honestly, the Josh Jackson incident is probably a lot more concerning, and even that wouldn't effect whether I would take him or not if he's the BPA.


Agree with all of this. Lavar is a **** LA homer clown who pisses me off more and more daily, but the Jackson stuff worries me way more, and neither issue would stop me from taking either player at BPA.

Until he starts ripping half the Celtics organization if things don't go his way. I agree that the Jackson stuff is cause for concern and Lonzo himself appears to be clean as a whistle but man. His dad is toxic with a capital T and with a team and locker room like ours I want no part of that ass clown. I had him behind Fultz and Jackson to begin with but I don't touch him in the top 10 now if at all


I know this is just your personal opinion, but it is still such a crazy train of thought. Ball is a transformational talent, one of four players in this draft with super star potential, to say that you wouldn't take him in your top ten is just irrational. Ainge can't think this way, these GM's need to be able to cut through the noise, that's what they are paid to do. It would be worse if Ball had a crazy posse (sorry, if this term is racially charged,) of hangers on that was dragging him down. No, he just has an over the top father. Once Ball gets drafted, and if the organization he goes to is professional enough, than all of this will slide into the past and Lavar will move on to pumping up his next two sons.

Lonzo would probably be best served by not going to the Lakers due to all the pressures and the proximity to his father, and frankly I don't know the organizational strength of the Lakers at this point. For the most part this is much to do about nothing. The media really plays it all up and I doubt it will be a big factor. Ainge has a way of minimizing distractions, as does Brad, I doubt they would let Lavar become a distraction for his son; and if Lavar is a good father, which aside from all of the histrionics, he likely is, he would do nothing that interferes with his son being a star in this league. I worry more about Lonzo's weird shot than anything having to do with his overenthusiastic father.
OFWGKTA
General Manager
Posts: 9,014
And1: 12,141
Joined: May 20, 2011

Re: '17 Draft Thread 3.0 

Post#152 » by OFWGKTA » Thu Mar 23, 2017 7:11 pm

Writebloc wrote:
Homerclease wrote:
truth18 wrote:
Agree with all of this. Lavar is a **** LA homer clown who pisses me off more and more daily, but the Jackson stuff worries me way more, and neither issue would stop me from taking either player at BPA.

Until he starts ripping half the Celtics organization if things don't go his way. I agree that the Jackson stuff is cause for concern and Lonzo himself appears to be clean as a whistle but man. His dad is toxic with a capital T and with a team and locker room like ours I want no part of that ass clown. I had him behind Fultz and Jackson to begin with but I don't touch him in the top 10 now if at all


I know this is just your personal opinion, but it is still such a crazy train of thought. Ball is a transformational talent, one of four players in this draft with super star potential, to say that you wouldn't take him in your top ten is just irrational. Ainge can't think this way, these GM's need to be able to cut through the noise, that's what they are paid to do. It would be worse if Ball had a crazy posse (sorry, if this term is racially charged,) of hangers on that was dragging him down. No, he just has an over the top father. Once Ball gets drafted, and if the organization he goes to is professional enough, than all of this will slide into the past and Lavar will move on to pumping up his next two sons.

Lonzo would probably be best served by not going to the Lakers due to all the pressures and the proximity to his father, and frankly I don't know the organizational strength of the Lakers at this point. For the most part this is much to do about nothing. The media really plays it all up and I doubt it will be a big factor. Ainge has a way of minimizing distractions, as does Brad, I doubt they would let Lavar become a distraction for his son; and if Lavar is a good father, which aside from all of the histrionics, he likely is, he would do nothing that interferes with his son being a star in this league. I worry more about Lonzo's weird shot than anything having to do with his overenthusiastic father.



I think "posse" is only offensive to 50s doo wop groups, so you're good here
Froob wrote:Friends is like Kyle Lowry, everyone says it's amazing but you sit down and watch it and you're just like meh...


GuyClinch wrote: Regulation is mostly to blame - also excessive medical costs.
truth18
RealGM
Posts: 38,601
And1: 42,854
Joined: Apr 17, 2011
Location: CELTICS NIGHTMARE

Re: '17 Draft Thread 3.0 

Post#153 » by truth18 » Thu Mar 23, 2017 7:16 pm

OFWGKTA wrote:
Writebloc wrote:
Homerclease wrote:Until he starts ripping half the Celtics organization if things don't go his way. I agree that the Jackson stuff is cause for concern and Lonzo himself appears to be clean as a whistle but man. His dad is toxic with a capital T and with a team and locker room like ours I want no part of that ass clown. I had him behind Fultz and Jackson to begin with but I don't touch him in the top 10 now if at all


I know this is just your personal opinion, but it is still such a crazy train of thought. Ball is a transformational talent, one of four players in this draft with super star potential, to say that you wouldn't take him in your top ten is just irrational. Ainge can't think this way, these GM's need to be able to cut through the noise, that's what they are paid to do. It would be worse if Ball had a crazy posse (sorry, if this term is racially charged,) of hangers on that was dragging him down. No, he just has an over the top father. Once Ball gets drafted, and if the organization he goes to is professional enough, than all of this will slide into the past and Lavar will move on to pumping up his next two sons.

Lonzo would probably be best served by not going to the Lakers due to all the pressures and the proximity to his father, and frankly I don't know the organizational strength of the Lakers at this point. For the most part this is much to do about nothing. The media really plays it all up and I doubt it will be a big factor. Ainge has a way of minimizing distractions, as does Brad, I doubt they would let Lavar become a distraction for his son; and if Lavar is a good father, which aside from all of the histrionics, he likely is, he would do nothing that interferes with his son being a star in this league. I worry more about Lonzo's weird shot than anything having to do with his overenthusiastic father.



I think "posse" is only offensive to 50s doo wop groups, so you're good here


Too late I already went to the Black illuminati with this. You're a racist forever Writebloc
YOU LOSE
Writebloc
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,075
And1: 5,615
Joined: May 20, 2015
         

Re: '17 Draft Thread 3.0 

Post#154 » by Writebloc » Thu Mar 23, 2017 7:19 pm

OFWGKTA wrote:
Writebloc wrote:
Homerclease wrote:Until he starts ripping half the Celtics organization if things don't go his way. I agree that the Jackson stuff is cause for concern and Lonzo himself appears to be clean as a whistle but man. His dad is toxic with a capital T and with a team and locker room like ours I want no part of that ass clown. I had him behind Fultz and Jackson to begin with but I don't touch him in the top 10 now if at all


I know this is just your personal opinion, but it is still such a crazy train of thought. Ball is a transformational talent, one of four players in this draft with super star potential, to say that you wouldn't take him in your top ten is just irrational. Ainge can't think this way, these GM's need to be able to cut through the noise, that's what they are paid to do. It would be worse if Ball had a crazy posse (sorry, if this term is racially charged,) of hangers on that was dragging him down. No, he just has an over the top father. Once Ball gets drafted, and if the organization he goes to is professional enough, than all of this will slide into the past and Lavar will move on to pumping up his next two sons.

Lonzo would probably be best served by not going to the Lakers due to all the pressures and the proximity to his father, and frankly I don't know the organizational strength of the Lakers at this point. For the most part this is much to do about nothing. The media really plays it all up and I doubt it will be a big factor. Ainge has a way of minimizing distractions, as does Brad, I doubt they would let Lavar become a distraction for his son; and if Lavar is a good father, which aside from all of the histrionics, he likely is, he would do nothing that interferes with his son being a star in this league. I worry more about Lonzo's weird shot than anything having to do with his overenthusiastic father.



I think "posse" is only offensive to 50s doo wop groups, so you're good here


You never know if LeBron is lurking, especially when in reference to Lavar. The King is about to knuckle up on Lonzo's Pops!

Image
London2Boston
RealGM
Posts: 10,128
And1: 13,003
Joined: Apr 14, 2014
     

Re: '17 Draft Thread 3.0 

Post#155 » by London2Boston » Thu Mar 23, 2017 7:29 pm



You can't watch LaVar and not see that he isn't on a huge windup :lol: . I find him funny tbh.
Gomes3PC
General Manager
Posts: 7,701
And1: 3,752
Joined: Feb 10, 2006

Re: '17 Draft Thread 3.0 

Post#156 » by Gomes3PC » Thu Mar 23, 2017 7:53 pm

cl2117 wrote:Anybody else turned off by the idea of drafting Ball with all the crap his dad has been getting up to?

I'm not educated enough on the pair to have a strong preference between Fultz and Ball for their on the court performance, but I certainly would prefer to deal with Fultz than the Balls.

If any coach/GM combo is capable of managing a guy like LaVar Ball, it's Stevens and Ainge. Stevens is used to nutso parents from his college days and has the patience of a saint. Ainge is the kind of guy who can just zone him out.

Personally I think Ainge has Lonzo 3rd on his list after Fultz and Jackson, but if we do think he's BPA, he won't be afraid to pick him.
User avatar
Edug27
RealGM
Posts: 11,733
And1: 8,205
Joined: Jun 24, 2009
   

Re: '17 Draft Thread 3.0 

Post#157 » by Edug27 » Thu Mar 23, 2017 8:02 pm

Gomes3PC wrote:
cl2117 wrote:Anybody else turned off by the idea of drafting Ball with all the crap his dad has been getting up to?

I'm not educated enough on the pair to have a strong preference between Fultz and Ball for their on the court performance, but I certainly would prefer to deal with Fultz than the Balls.

If any coach/GM combo is capable of managing a guy like LaVar Ball, it's Stevens and Ainge. Stevens is used to nutso parents from his college days and has the patience of a saint. Ainge is the kind of guy who can just zone him out.

Personally I think Ainge has Lonzo 3rd on his list after Fultz and Jackson, but if we do think he's BPA, he won't be afraid to pick him.


Brad has had players at Butler with nutso parents like Lavar? Or is it a general statement because he coached in college?
SmartWentCrazy
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 20,749
And1: 34,848
Joined: Dec 29, 2014

Re: '17 Draft Thread 3.0 

Post#158 » by SmartWentCrazy » Thu Mar 23, 2017 8:42 pm

London2Boston wrote:

You can't watch LaVar and not see that he isn't on a huge windup :lol: . I find him funny tbh.


Glad I'm not the only one.

He's hysterical, you just can't take him seriously. He's a character playing a role, no different than Banners or CoachMang or CHL. He's just trying to get people talking about his son, and, in turn, build his brand.
FlatearthZorro
RealGM
Posts: 20,585
And1: 12,326
Joined: Feb 12, 2010
Location: Somewhere in Boston
     

Re: '17 Draft Thread 3.0 

Post#159 » by FlatearthZorro » Thu Mar 23, 2017 8:44 pm

Man, I'm gettting on that Tatum hype train, if we aren't picking 1st, I like Tatum over Jackson honestly. Tatum is longer, has better standing reach and is a better shooter. Tatum has such elite size for a SF(6'11 wingspan, nearly 9 feet standing reach at 6'8). I'm still on the Fultz hype train as the #1. Dude should at least be an elite scorer.
Good assessment:

PLO wrote:Tatum played OK - took advantage of a few mismatches - decent on the defensive end. He is what we thought he was going into the season - a technically very proficient player operating close to his career ceiling as a rookie.
Gomes3PC
General Manager
Posts: 7,701
And1: 3,752
Joined: Feb 10, 2006

Re: '17 Draft Thread 3.0 

Post#160 » by Gomes3PC » Thu Mar 23, 2017 8:52 pm

Edug27 wrote:
Gomes3PC wrote:
cl2117 wrote:Anybody else turned off by the idea of drafting Ball with all the crap his dad has been getting up to?

I'm not educated enough on the pair to have a strong preference between Fultz and Ball for their on the court performance, but I certainly would prefer to deal with Fultz than the Balls.

If any coach/GM combo is capable of managing a guy like LaVar Ball, it's Stevens and Ainge. Stevens is used to nutso parents from his college days and has the patience of a saint. Ainge is the kind of guy who can just zone him out.

Personally I think Ainge has Lonzo 3rd on his list after Fultz and Jackson, but if we do think he's BPA, he won't be afraid to pick him.


Brad has had players at Butler with nutso parents like Lavar? Or is it a general statement because he coached in college?

I don't have a specific person to point to, but can tell you as someone who was involved with D-1 college basketball, with 15 scholarship players you'll have a few whose parents will be a hassle. They either want to tell you how to coach, complain about their kids playing time, or complain about other players' performances (or all three).

Ball is the extreme end of things, but there's plenty of bickering from parents & handlers.

Return to Boston Celtics