Watching the Suns without Bledsoe has been very very hard.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Game 72: Suns (22-49) @ Nets (14-56)
Moderators: bwgood77, Qwigglez, lilfishi22
Re: Game 72: Suns (22-49) @ Nets (14-56)
-
Jdiddy701
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,145
- And1: 6,555
- Joined: Jun 05, 2006
Re: Game 72: Suns (22-49) @ Nets (14-56)
-
Mulhollanddrive
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,555
- And1: 8,337
- Joined: Jan 19, 2013
Re: Game 72: Suns (22-49) @ Nets (14-56)
The win now strategy lost us 16 games by over 15 points and had us 2nd last, wasn't so great with Bledsoe either.
Re: RE: Re: Game 72: Suns (22-49) @ Nets (14-56)
-
MathiasPW
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,688
- And1: 2,807
- Joined: Jan 02, 2010
- Location: Brazil
-
Re: RE: Re: Game 72: Suns (22-49) @ Nets (14-56)
Mulhollanddrive wrote:The win now strategy lost us 16 games by over 15 points and had us 2nd last, wasn't so great with Bledsoe either.
It wasn't Bledsoe, it was Knight playing major minutes back then.
Re: Game 72: Suns (22-49) @ Nets (14-56)
-
bigfoot
- Suns Forum Anti-Tank Commander
- Posts: 9,838
- And1: 6,483
- Joined: Sep 16, 2010
-
Re: Game 72: Suns (22-49) @ Nets (14-56)
Mulhollanddrive wrote:Make the lottery more even then:
8% for 1-10
5% for 11-14
People will want whatever is best for their team, if there's no difference between 1-10 nobody will want to finish last.
30 balls for Nets (7.98%)
29 balls for Lakers (7.71%)
28 balls for Suns (7.45%)
27 balls for Magic (7.18%)
...
17 balls for Bulls (4.52%)
And every spot is drawn (not just the top 3) so technically the worst team could get the 14th pick.