Did MJ really go against tougher competition?

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

Pg81
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,425
And1: 2,662
Joined: Apr 20, 2014
 

Re: Did MJ really go against tougher competition? 

Post#201 » by Pg81 » Tue Mar 28, 2017 2:42 pm

druggas wrote:
Pg81 wrote:

















Yeah since MJ met those centers with regularity in the playoffs. Oh, wait. He never met Hakeem. He never met Robinson. He met a young and inexperienced Shaq twice, lost once and won once when Grant was out with an injury. He went up against Ewing like what, twice? How often did he meet Mutombo again?
In fact MJ never met a GOAT level center the likes of Wilt, Russel, Hakeem or Kareem in their primes on their best teams and he was lucky he never has.

Yeah MJ would dominate this era in terms of scoring. He would have dominated any era for that matter, because he was one of the best scorers ever, but that is completely beside the point.
What he would not do is the ridiculous stuff people claim here like easily scoring 50 ppg, something he has never even remotly done close. It is not even clear cut if he really could increase his scoring average, more likely that his efficiency go up.
People overestimate handchecking to a laughable degree, and it is even more hilarious how they claim players nowadays could not have been able to adapt to it.

LeBorn has?


He met prime KG and Duncan, two big men better than most of what MJ met in the playoffs, not that it matter since I never said anything about Lebron. Heck Dirk was better than most players MJ met in the playoffs during the 90s sans maybe young (and inexperienced) Shaq.
That being said, nice strawman.
If you're asking me who the Mavs best player is, I'd say Luka. A guy like Delon Wright probably rivals his impact though at this stage in his career. KP may as well if he gets his **** together.
GeorgeMarcus, 17/11/2019
Wolfgang630
RealGM
Posts: 21,541
And1: 20,689
Joined: Feb 07, 2016
 

Re: Did MJ really go against tougher competition? 

Post#202 » by Wolfgang630 » Tue Mar 28, 2017 2:47 pm

Pg81 wrote:
druggas wrote:
Pg81 wrote:

Yeah since MJ met those centers with regularity in the playoffs. Oh, wait. He never met Hakeem. He never met Robinson. He met a young and inexperienced Shaq twice, lost once and won once when Grant was out with an injury. He went up against Ewing like what, twice? How often did he meet Mutombo again?
In fact MJ never met a GOAT level center the likes of Wilt, Russel, Hakeem or Kareem in their primes on their best teams and he was lucky he never has.

Yeah MJ would dominate this era in terms of scoring. He would have dominated any era for that matter, because he was one of the best scorers ever, but that is completely beside the point.
What he would not do is the ridiculous stuff people claim here like easily scoring 50 ppg, something he has never even remotly done close. It is not even clear cut if he really could increase his scoring average, more likely that his efficiency go up.
People overestimate handchecking to a laughable degree, and it is even more hilarious how they claim players nowadays could not have been able to adapt to it.

LeBorn has?


He met prime KG and Duncan, two big men better than most of what MJ met in the playoffs, not that it matter since I never said anything about Lebron. Heck Dirk was better than most players MJ met in the playoffs during the 90s sans maybe young (and inexperienced) Shaq.
That being said, nice strawman.


Lebron met prime KG?
User avatar
Throwback24
RealGM
Posts: 31,072
And1: 41,652
Joined: Jun 17, 2008

Re: Did MJ really go against tougher competition? 

Post#203 » by Throwback24 » Tue Mar 28, 2017 2:49 pm

lol Kobe had the easiest competition
Remember when’ is the lowest form of conversation.
User avatar
druggas
General Manager
Posts: 7,610
And1: 6,028
Joined: Dec 27, 2007

Re: Did MJ really go against tougher competition? 

Post#204 » by druggas » Tue Mar 28, 2017 3:10 pm

Wolfgang630 wrote:
Pg81 wrote:
druggas wrote: LeBorn has?


He met prime KG and Duncan, two big men better than most of what MJ met in the playoffs, not that it matter since I never said anything about Lebron. Heck Dirk was better than most players MJ met in the playoffs during the 90s sans maybe young (and inexperienced) Shaq.
That being said, nice strawman.


Lebron met prime KG?

No, but he met a prime Kendrick Perkins. (shudder)
Bknight4three
Junior
Posts: 436
And1: 219
Joined: Jun 20, 2012
     

Re: Did MJ really go against tougher competition? 

Post#205 » by Bknight4three » Tue Mar 28, 2017 3:10 pm

I always find myself arguing that Jordan's competition was great because it seemed difficult at the time. But then I go on youtube and rewatch Jordan's second threepeat and I come away with a different conclusion (the full games for 1998 are on youtube-- GO WATCH). The Jazz are good, but I don't get the argument that the 1990s defense was better. Jordan is conserving so much energy on defense in that series and the overall effort level is ridiculously low compared to the modern era. I understand that the rules were different, but the perimeter defenders are just nothing like they are today.
lamscott
Analyst
Posts: 3,482
And1: 3,037
Joined: Jul 09, 2010
 

Re: Did MJ really go against tougher competition? 

Post#206 » by lamscott » Tue Mar 28, 2017 3:16 pm

Why does everyone focus on just the championship when they need to focus on the playoffs as a whole?
dreadhead_htx
Junior
Posts: 352
And1: 394
Joined: Apr 06, 2015
       

Re: RE: Re: Did MJ really go against tougher competition? 

Post#207 » by dreadhead_htx » Tue Mar 28, 2017 3:57 pm

Duke4life831 wrote:
Mbrahv0528 wrote:
Heej wrote:The Utah Jazz were the best teams MJ faced and they scored 54 in Game 3 of the 98 Finals. 54 freaking points. They never eclipsed 90 that entire Finals. They wouldn't be better than a healthy Clippers team in the league right now. The competition Lebron faced was on another level compared to what MJ had to go through. The league was watered down in the 90s for 3 main reasons:

1) unusually weak late 80s drafts
2) expansion
3) foreign play hadn't taken off

There's not a chance in hell MJ wins 6 rings in today's nba. He might have won 2011 vs the Mavs but he could never provide the 2 way play Lebron played in 2016 to bring the Cavs back from the brink. LeBron produced GOAT wing defensive impact last finals. MJ is not rattling off Games 5 and 6 and leading every player in every counting stat category no matter how much you lionize him.

What in the ****? A team with 2 of the greatest players of all time wouldn't be a good as a decent LAC squad based on a few arbitrarily picked games? Please stop this nonsense. It's embarrassing.

Sent from my 2PS64 using RealGM mobile app


Haha the Utah Jazz is basically the Clips but just a lot better. PnR combo of Stockton and Malone vs CP3 and Blake. A defensive big that blocked shots left and right in Ostertag vs Jordan. And then a veteran sharp shooting SG in Hornacek vs Redick. That Jazz team would roll over this Clips team.


not to mention that jazz team was always healthy come play off time. stockton and malone were some of the best condition guys I ever seen and I hated them. clippers arent even close to their level
User avatar
mixerball
Veteran
Posts: 2,718
And1: 2,284
Joined: May 08, 2010

Re: Did MJ really go against tougher competition? 

Post#208 » by mixerball » Tue Mar 28, 2017 4:35 pm

Using expansion teams as an exuse has to be the weakest argument ever.
User avatar
Edrees
RealGM
Posts: 17,260
And1: 12,490
Joined: May 12, 2009
Contact:
         

Re: Did MJ really go against tougher competition? 

Post#209 » by Edrees » Tue Mar 28, 2017 4:40 pm

Jordan wasn't facing teams like the Atlanta Hawks and Toronto Raptors in the ECF though, his competition in the east way much better.
Pg81
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,425
And1: 2,662
Joined: Apr 20, 2014
 

Re: Did MJ really go against tougher competition? 

Post#210 » by Pg81 » Tue Mar 28, 2017 5:01 pm

mixerball wrote:Using expansion teams as an exuse has to be the weakest argument ever.


How is it an excuse for the fact that 6 terrible expansion teams who could not win more than 20 games and even as low as 11 wins in 1998 were part of the reason that some teams had record highs in terms of win column. Or do you think it was the 25+ to 35+ win teams who feasted upon them?
If you're asking me who the Mavs best player is, I'd say Luka. A guy like Delon Wright probably rivals his impact though at this stage in his career. KP may as well if he gets his **** together.
GeorgeMarcus, 17/11/2019
Pg81
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,425
And1: 2,662
Joined: Apr 20, 2014
 

Re: RE: Re: Did MJ really go against tougher competition? 

Post#211 » by Pg81 » Tue Mar 28, 2017 5:16 pm

dreadhead_htx wrote:
Duke4life831 wrote:
Mbrahv0528 wrote:What in the ****? A team with 2 of the greatest players of all time wouldn't be a good as a decent LAC squad based on a few arbitrarily picked games? Please stop this nonsense. It's embarrassing.

Sent from my 2PS64 using RealGM mobile app


Haha the Utah Jazz is basically the Clips but just a lot better. PnR combo of Stockton and Malone vs CP3 and Blake. A defensive big that blocked shots left and right in Ostertag vs Jordan. And then a veteran sharp shooting SG in Hornacek vs Redick. That Jazz team would roll over this Clips team.


not to mention that jazz team was always healthy come play off time. stockton and malone were some of the best condition guys I ever seen and I hated them. clippers arent even close to their level


1998 Stockton was worse than current CP3 or any younger version. He averaged 11/8 during those playoffs, a far cry from his much more dominant prime when he scored like 18+ and dished out 12+ assists per game.
Current Paul avarages like 17/9 in the RS and avaraged 24/7 last playoffs.

Also what is that nonsense with Postertag? The guy was soft, his best season he averaged 7/7/3. Compare that with Mark Eaton, who in his prime averaged 10/11/6. The guy was roughly half of what Eaton was on offense and defense.
If you're asking me who the Mavs best player is, I'd say Luka. A guy like Delon Wright probably rivals his impact though at this stage in his career. KP may as well if he gets his **** together.
GeorgeMarcus, 17/11/2019
Duke4life831
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 36,823
And1: 67,501
Joined: Jun 16, 2015
 

Re: RE: Re: Did MJ really go against tougher competition? 

Post#212 » by Duke4life831 » Tue Mar 28, 2017 5:25 pm

Pg81 wrote:
dreadhead_htx wrote:
Duke4life831 wrote:
Haha the Utah Jazz is basically the Clips but just a lot better. PnR combo of Stockton and Malone vs CP3 and Blake. A defensive big that blocked shots left and right in Ostertag vs Jordan. And then a veteran sharp shooting SG in Hornacek vs Redick. That Jazz team would roll over this Clips team.


not to mention that jazz team was always healthy come play off time. stockton and malone were some of the best condition guys I ever seen and I hated them. clippers arent even close to their level


1998 Stockton was worse than current CP3 or any younger version. He averaged 11/8 during those playoffs, a far cry from his much more dominant prime when he scored like 18+ and dished out 12+ assists per game.
Current Paul avarages like 17/9 in the RS and avaraged 24/7 last playoffs.

Also what is that nonsense with Postertag? The guy was soft, his best season he averaged 7/7/3. Compare that with Mark Eaton, who in his prime averaged 10/11/6. The guy was roughly half of what Eaton was on offense and defense.


Ill take the Stockton that help lead that team to two straight finals appearances over any CP3. Ostertag was a really good shot blocker. The dude averaged 3.7 blocks per 36 that year, Deandre has never come close to that in his career. Im not saying Ostertag was as good as Deandre, but he was a hell of a rim protector and defender.
therealbig3
RealGM
Posts: 29,568
And1: 16,115
Joined: Jul 31, 2010

Re: Did MJ really go against tougher competition? 

Post#213 » by therealbig3 » Tue Mar 28, 2017 5:25 pm

mysticOscar wrote:
therealbig3 wrote:
chefo wrote:First of all, hand-checking was a magical tool when used by really strong guards backed by elite rim-protectors. Just like now, back then there were teams that sucked at defense. That doesn't mean hand-checking did not work. We're talking the elite Ds here like the Pistons, NY, Miami, the Bulls. So, some hand-checking goes on today. In the mid 80s to the mid 90s, these guys were in your grill the moment you crossed half-court and you had to turn your back on them or they would mug you. And the stars were not beneath dishing out some punishment of their own; how many players can say that today?

Go watch the Knicks and the Rockets finals; Kenny Smith had trouble getting the ball past half-court on more than a few occasions. Or watch any of the slugfests between NY and Miami, or the Bulls and NY or Detroit, or Indiana and NY. Earlier it was Philly, the Bucks, Boston and Detroit. One of the tactics used if a star was perceived as soft was to nail them repeatedly on multiple screens and on layups by the likes of Mahorn, Oak or the Chief. Bill Cartwright was notorious for having really sharp elbows and not taking cr@p from anybody. So were Stockton and Malone. Late 80s, early 90s Cleveland with their huge and athletic front line was considered a finesse team, but they were more psychical than any team today, maybe sans the Grizzlies.


So yeah, we'll have to agree to disagree, because I've seen plenty of 80s and 90s ball, and I don't see this huge difference in physicality, other than guys occasionally just playing dirty, which just isn't basketball at that point...nor do I think hand checking had the impact that you're saying it did, especially when mitigated by the illegal defense rules.

You obviously feel differently, I don't think we're going to convince each other here.

chefo wrote:As much as I appreciate Kwahi and Jimmy, they were not going to stay with him either.


Nobody's going to shut down MJ 1 on 1, that's not what I'm saying. But this part is also pure conjecture, and what we do know is that Kawhi and Jimmy are MUCH better defenders than the vast majority of guys that did defend MJ. In fact, I wouldn't even put Payton on their level defensively, because they're essentially just bigger and stronger versions of him on defense. It's easy to say that they wouldn't hang with him, when we never saw Jordan actually go up against defenders of that caliber on a consistent basis.

chefo wrote:As for experience, how many titles did it take for Riley, Jackson or Daley to be smart? Or George Carl? Whose Seattle teams, BTW, were zoning every chance they got, illegal defense rules be darned? Or watch the Knicks from the early 90s--straight up zone when they played the Bulls. Yes, they would get called a couple of times a game, but they would zone all game long.


It's funny that you mention those teams using zones, despite the rules...those two teams forced a prime MJ into two of his worst series (93 vs the Knicks and 96 vs the Sonics). MJ himself also complained about zone defenses, saying that they're too hard to score against. So you put him in a league that's perfected zone defense league-wide, has fully adjusted to the no-handchecking rule, and has a lot more defensive talent on the perimeter to throw at him, and I doubt that it's not at least a little harder for MJ to dominate to the same degree.

And it's human nature, the longer you study something or practice something, the better you get. Look at Pop. He's 10x the coach he is now than he was when he first started with the Spurs. He re-invented his team's offense completely from an offense centered around a traditional low post big, to more of a team approach, that emphasizes movement, passing, spacing, and shooting, and it was completely seamless, and the offenses he's produced since then have completely destroyed the offenses he built around Duncan. He never even had to rebuild his team once Duncan declined, they never won less than 50 games, even as Duncan transitioned to a role player, they won a title with him as a role player and with arguably not a single top 10 player on their roster in 2014, and have actually had some of their best seasons ever with Duncan being an old role player, or not even on the team anymore. Offense around the league has taken a huge step forward since MJ's prime, not just because of rule changes, but because of improved offensive concepts and execution, and in response, defense has gotten better too to counter that. As a result, you just have higher quality basketball on both ends of the court now.


I just want you to look at these facts to hopefully open your eyes a little bit:

#1 It did not get harder for perimeter players because of the elimination of illegal defense. Illegal defense was eliminated in 2001/02.

What does the stats show?
League average scoring stats did NOT go down during 2001/2002. You can look at the pts per game or eFG% even the ORtg. It actually went up.

http://www.basketball-reference.com/leagues/NBA_stats.html


#2 It DID become easier to score after they curtailed the handchecking rule in 2004/05.

What does the stats show?
Points per game went up by 4 pts that year and the eFG% went up from .471 (a year before) to .482 that year and it has been going up and up. Ever since that season....the eFG% has been hovering around .500 mark. Why the spike when it was trending down the previous years if handcheck has no impact?

Again: http://www.basketball-reference.com/leagues/NBA_stats.html

Look at the correlation between the 3pt attempts vs pace. Prior to 04/05, the more 3pt attempts the lesser the pace because it requires more ball movement to get open. LOOK AT THE CORRELATION OF PACE AND 3PT ATTEMPTS AFTER '04/'05. The 3pt attempts go up and also does the pace. Does that seem unusual? There was a real correlation before '04/'05...then all of a sudden....that disappears, infact both are going up? What could have caused that to happen?

#3 After the MJ/Bulls effect, teams wanted to be the next Bulls and players wanted to be the next Jordan. From the late 90's you can see a shift of teams going towards relying their offense on their perimeter players rather than post players. (also accelerated by the 3pt shortening in the mid 90s)

What does the stats show?

Highest Field goal attempts
Pre Y2K era
90/91 - http://www.basketball-reference.com/leagues/NBA_1991_leaders.html
91/92 - http://www.basketball-reference.com/leagues/NBA_1992_leaders.html
92/93 - http://www.basketball-reference.com/leagues/NBA_1993_leaders.html
93/94 - http://www.basketball-reference.com/leagues/NBA_1994_leaders.html
94/95 - http://www.basketball-reference.com/leagues/NBA_1995_leaders.html
95/96 - http://www.basketball-reference.com/leagues/NBA_1996_leaders.html
96/97 - (At this stage more and more perimeter players taking the burden of offense)
-
-

Post Y2K era (Look at how much FGA these perimeter players take even tho games were played at lower pace compared to early 90's. And when you have Allen Iverson, Kobe Bryan and Tracy Mcgrady etc.. shooting at close to 2000 attempts per year at a FG% avg of about .450....that really pushed the scoring stats down in the league)

00/01 - http://www.basketball-reference.com/leagues/NBA_2001_leaders.html
01/02 - http://www.basketball-reference.com/leagues/NBA_2002_leaders.html
02/03 - http://www.basketball-reference.com/leagues/NBA_2003_leaders.html
03/04 - http://www.basketball-reference.com/leagues/NBA_2004_leaders.html
04/05 - (Handchecking curtailed since the perimeter oriented offense in the league was dragging the offense and the game down)
-
-
15/16 - http://www.basketball-reference.com/leagues/NBA_2016_leaders.html
16/17 - http://www.basketball-reference.com/leagues/NBA_2016_leaders.html

Bonus
-There has been more 20pt+ scoring the past 10 years by perimeter players than the previous 15-20 years combined.
-All the MVP's has been all perimeter oriented players since '04/'05
-The seasons of perimeter players having 25+Per since '04/'05 has jumped up dramatically.

Lastly.....the former executive of NBA operations has stated the reasons why they changed the rules in '04 which clearly outlines their intensions
http://www.nba.com/2009/news/features/04/09/stujackson/
(What does an NBA executive who implemented the 2004/05 rules know right?)


In Summary
-The rules of the game today cater (this is not even debatable) more perimeter guards
-Jordan would have loved....i mean LOVED to play in todays environment where you play with more space, with no hand checking (to slow u down enough to give the defenders team mates time to crowd the paint) and no big defenders like Ewing, Shaq, Olajuwon, Robinsons, Mutombo camping under the ring.


I'm just going to respond to your summary:

-I wouldn't say it's the rules that cater to the guards, I would say it's the increased emphasis on the 3pt shot...and the fact that coaches have realized that perimeter-oriented offense is much more efficient than just having the traditional post up big. So perimeter play is more emphasized now. But I would say the elimination of illegal defense with the defensive 3 second rule actually makes it tougher on players that want to attack the basket. When it was first eliminated, teams hadn't adjusted to it yet, but I think teams now have perfected zone principles and how to shade and camp a big close to the rim using Thib's 2.9 second defensive principles. That's tougher on a slashing player than putting 1-2 offensive bums out there, forcing the defense to guard them, clearing out one side of the court to let your best player go 1 on 1, and then hoping that your big man can run from the other side of the court in time to contest the shot once Jordan gets by his defender...btw, you answered your own question: perimeter player shot attempts have gone up, so of course, perimeter scoring has gone up. That's because there's a lot more perimeter talent now, and smarter offensive concepts.

BTW, yes, hand checking was implemented to open up the game more...because defense had gotten TOO good. The game was ugly and boring to watch in the early 00s. But even with that, average ORating around the league never reached the level it used to be at in the 80s and early 90s...because defense is better than it used to be, despite increased offensive talent and improved offensive concepts.

-Jordan would have benefited from less hand checking and increased spacing, of course. But he also would have to adjust to no illegal defense and more advanced defensive principles and much better defensive talent on the perimeter.

-Another point: if taking away hand checking is such a big handicap for defenders (who imo, have learned to adjust without it and it just makes them better for it...and coaches now design their defenses to hedge offensive players and basically allow them to drive past their primary defender, but right into the teeth of the defense...so they're not actually getting open lanes to the basket)...then Jordan wouldn't have been nearly as good defensively as his reputation suggests.
therealbig3
RealGM
Posts: 29,568
And1: 16,115
Joined: Jul 31, 2010

Re: Did MJ really go against tougher competition? 

Post#214 » by therealbig3 » Tue Mar 28, 2017 5:34 pm

Also, pointing to random players and saying "well look at what they're doing today, imagine what MJ would do!" is a terrible argument.

First of all, Westbrook and Harden are generational-level players. They would also dominate any era. So pointing to superstars doing great things today doesn't prove anything. And I don't agree with Westbrook simply being a smaller, less skilled MJ.

I saw Isaiah Thomas being mentioned. Ok...were Muggsy Bogues and Spudd Webb (smaller than Isaiah) not productive players back in the 80s and 90s? And they weren't nearly as skilled as Isaiah. Isaiah Thomas is a much better player, and that's why he's doing a lot more than they did, but don't try to act like there's no way someone like Isaiah could play and play well back in Jordan's day.
therealbig3
RealGM
Posts: 29,568
And1: 16,115
Joined: Jul 31, 2010

Re: Did MJ really go against tougher competition? 

Post#215 » by therealbig3 » Tue Mar 28, 2017 5:40 pm

BTW, I know that they played in the 90s, and so they're held to god-like status by some people here...but Ewing and Robinson were NOT super skilled offensive players, and yet they were scoring like crazy. Nique, English, Drexler, Aguirre, Dantley...I would say A LOT of more modern perimeter players clearly trump them in terms of offensive skill, and yet they were putting up a ton of high-scoring seasons in the 80s and 90s.

So this argument works both ways, how were defenses allowing those guys to do that?
Pg81
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,425
And1: 2,662
Joined: Apr 20, 2014
 

Re: RE: Re: Did MJ really go against tougher competition? 

Post#216 » by Pg81 » Tue Mar 28, 2017 5:40 pm

Duke4life831 wrote:
Pg81 wrote:
dreadhead_htx wrote:
not to mention that jazz team was always healthy come play off time. stockton and malone were some of the best condition guys I ever seen and I hated them. clippers arent even close to their level


1998 Stockton was worse than current CP3 or any younger version. He averaged 11/8 during those playoffs, a far cry from his much more dominant prime when he scored like 18+ and dished out 12+ assists per game.
Current Paul avarages like 17/9 in the RS and avaraged 24/7 last playoffs.

Also what is that nonsense with Postertag? The guy was soft, his best season he averaged 7/7/3. Compare that with Mark Eaton, who in his prime averaged 10/11/6. The guy was roughly half of what Eaton was on offense and defense.


Ill take the Stockton that help lead that team to two straight finals appearances over any CP3. Ostertag was a really good shot blocker. The dude averaged 3.7 blocks per 36 that year, Deandre has never come close to that in his career. Im not saying Ostertag was as good as Deandre, but he was a hell of a rim protector and defender.


Per 36 is a meaningless stat. What matters is what you produce, not "what if only" there is a reason when these guys are not getting 36 minutes or more.
Hell of a rim protector? That is the first time I hear that about Postertag.

And let us not pretend like Malone isn't vastly superior to Griffin. Give CP3 prime Malone and he wins the WCF at least once if not more often, maybe even a title.
If you're asking me who the Mavs best player is, I'd say Luka. A guy like Delon Wright probably rivals his impact though at this stage in his career. KP may as well if he gets his **** together.
GeorgeMarcus, 17/11/2019
User avatar
LLJ
RealGM
Posts: 54,043
And1: 18,294
Joined: Jul 10, 2003
Location: Unfixed

Re: Did MJ really go against tougher competition? 

Post#217 » by LLJ » Tue Mar 28, 2017 5:47 pm

Edrees wrote:Jordan wasn't facing teams like the Atlanta Hawks and Toronto Raptors in the ECF though, his competition in the east way much better.


Depends. Actually how good were those Hornets and Cavs teams he was playing against? The Knicks were a great defensive team no doubt, but look at some of those other teams they played in the East. The biggest threats to the Bulls were the Magic, Knicks and Pacers during the Bulls' run.
Duke4life831
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 36,823
And1: 67,501
Joined: Jun 16, 2015
 

Re: RE: Re: Did MJ really go against tougher competition? 

Post#218 » by Duke4life831 » Tue Mar 28, 2017 5:49 pm

Pg81 wrote:
Duke4life831 wrote:
Pg81 wrote:
1998 Stockton was worse than current CP3 or any younger version. He averaged 11/8 during those playoffs, a far cry from his much more dominant prime when he scored like 18+ and dished out 12+ assists per game.
Current Paul avarages like 17/9 in the RS and avaraged 24/7 last playoffs.

Also what is that nonsense with Postertag? The guy was soft, his best season he averaged 7/7/3. Compare that with Mark Eaton, who in his prime averaged 10/11/6. The guy was roughly half of what Eaton was on offense and defense.


Ill take the Stockton that help lead that team to two straight finals appearances over any CP3. Ostertag was a really good shot blocker. The dude averaged 3.7 blocks per 36 that year, Deandre has never come close to that in his career. Im not saying Ostertag was as good as Deandre, but he was a hell of a rim protector and defender.


Per 36 is a meaningless stat. What matters is what you produce, not "what if only" there is a reason when these guys are not getting 36 minutes or more.
Hell of a rim protector? That is the first time I hear that about Postertag.

And let us not pretend like Malone isn't vastly superior to Griffin. Give CP3 prime Malone and he wins the WCF at least once if not more often, maybe even a title.


Okay Ostertag in 98 put up 2 blocks a game in just 20 minutes a game. Deandre Jordan this year is averaging 1.7 blks a game while playing 12 more minutes a game. Ostertag's 2 blocks per game wouldve been good enough for 5th this year, even though he only played 20 minutes a game. His Blk% was 7.7% that year, Rudy Gobert this year is only at 6.4% and his career high is 7.4%. Ostertag had a 3.4 DBPM that year compared to Jordan's 2.9 this year. What other stats would you like me to throw your way to show that Ostertag was a hell of a rim protector?
Pg81
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,425
And1: 2,662
Joined: Apr 20, 2014
 

Re: Did MJ really go against tougher competition? 

Post#219 » by Pg81 » Tue Mar 28, 2017 5:51 pm

druggas wrote:
Wolfgang630 wrote:
Pg81 wrote:
He met prime KG and Duncan, two big men better than most of what MJ met in the playoffs, not that it matter since I never said anything about Lebron. Heck Dirk was better than most players MJ met in the playoffs during the 90s sans maybe young (and inexperienced) Shaq.
That being said, nice strawman.


Lebron met prime KG?

No, but he met a prime Kendrick Perkins. (shudder)


Yeah, let us forget the 3 times he met Tim Duncan in the playoffs in 2007, 2013 and 2014.
If you're asking me who the Mavs best player is, I'd say Luka. A guy like Delon Wright probably rivals his impact though at this stage in his career. KP may as well if he gets his **** together.
GeorgeMarcus, 17/11/2019
Duke4life831
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 36,823
And1: 67,501
Joined: Jun 16, 2015
 

Re: Did MJ really go against tougher competition? 

Post#220 » by Duke4life831 » Tue Mar 28, 2017 5:53 pm

Pg81 wrote:
druggas wrote:
Wolfgang630 wrote:
Lebron met prime KG?

No, but he met a prime Kendrick Perkins. (shudder)


Yeah, let us forget the 3 times he met Tim Duncan in the playoffs in 2007, 2013 and 2014.


Duncan was not in his prime in 2013 and 2014.

Return to The General Board