Nemesis21 wrote:Philly lost last night.
76ers , if they are lucky enough , can end up having 4# and 5# overall pick, with not single one of them being result of their record.
Moderators: Knightro, UCFJayBird, Def Swami, Howard Mass, ChosenSavior, UCF
Nemesis21 wrote:Philly lost last night.
pepe1991 wrote:Nemesis21 wrote:Philly lost last night.
76ers , if they are lucky enough , can end up having 4# and 5# overall pick, with not single one of them being result of their record.
Nemesis21 wrote:Philly lost last night.
BadMofoPimp wrote:Durant thinks Vooch is one of the Best Centers in the NBA. I will take his word over a couch-GM yelling at a TV.
Nemesis21 wrote:8 games left, we can't afford to win more than 2 games. Both Nets games, the rest should all be a loss. That would put us at 29-53.
j-ragg wrote:Nemesis21 wrote:Philly lost last night.
I watched them beat Brooklyn what do you mean?
Oh and I didn't know you split odds in the event of a tie. I figured it was the same tie breaker as the playoffs. Like whoever has the better head to head record gets the worse pick.
Jiwol wrote:Nemesis21 wrote:8 games left, we can't afford to win more than 2 games. Both Nets games, the rest should all be a loss. That would put us at 29-53.
We can afford 3 wins and it still should give us 5th seed. It's gonna be hard to compete with the Knicks. With their wins Wolves and Sixers are not competition for the time being.
j-ragg wrote:Nemesis21 wrote:Philly lost last night.
I watched them beat Brooklyn what do you mean?
Oh and I didn't know you split odds in the event of a tie. I figured it was the same tie breaker as the playoffs. Like whoever has the better head to head record gets the worse pick.
Nemesis21 wrote:Jiwol wrote:Nemesis21 wrote:8 games left, we can't afford to win more than 2 games. Both Nets games, the rest should all be a loss. That would put us at 29-53.
We can afford 3 wins and it still should give us 5th seed. It's gonna be hard to compete with the Knicks. With their wins Wolves and Sixers are not competition for the time being.
I'd rather be at 4, better chance for Jackson/Isaac/Tatum.
Jiwol wrote:Nemesis21 wrote:Jiwol wrote:
We can afford 3 wins and it still should give us 5th seed. It's gonna be hard to compete with the Knicks. With their wins Wolves and Sixers are not competition for the time being.
I'd rather be at 4, better chance for Jackson/Isaac/Tatum.
Me too, but realistically speaking it's gonna be hard. Look at Knicks' remaining schedule. It's tougher than Magic's I think.
Nemesis21 wrote:Jiwol wrote:Nemesis21 wrote:8 games left, we can't afford to win more than 2 games. Both Nets games, the rest should all be a loss. That would put us at 29-53.
We can afford 3 wins and it still should give us 5th seed. It's gonna be hard to compete with the Knicks. With their wins Wolves and Sixers are not competition for the time being.
I'd rather be at 4, better chance for Jackson/Isaac/Tatum.
3ddman23 wrote:I think k jeff green is done for the year. That probllay isn't a good thing cause he is a tank commander. We need to shut down vuc or fournier. We gotta secure this 4th pick. We need someting substantial out of this draft. If we were to go outside the top 5 and dsj. Is their I would take him in a heart beat at 6 or 7. I think k he is gonna surprise people. If he goes outside the top 5
teefbe wrote:Nemesis21 wrote:Jiwol wrote:
We can afford 3 wins and it still should give us 5th seed. It's gonna be hard to compete with the Knicks. With their wins Wolves and Sixers are not competition for the time being.
I'd rather be at 4, better chance for Jackson/Isaac/Tatum.
Isaac will go 7-10th. Jackson locked in TOP3, i hope we get Tatum at 4, best offensive game among those 3, Isaac looks like a project and we need someone ready.
BadMofoPimp wrote:Durant thinks Vooch is one of the Best Centers in the NBA. I will take his word over a couch-GM yelling at a TV.
j-ragg wrote:Yeah Celts don't need a guy that can consistently get his own shot as we do. Tatum > Jackson for us in my eyes.
They are both great passers and would make this team instantaneously better by inserting either one in the starting lineup.Bensational wrote:j-ragg wrote:Yeah Celts don't need a guy that can consistently get his own shot as we do. Tatum > Jackson for us in my eyes.
I'd be stoked with either. Tatum is a perfect fit as a scorer that can take on Vogel's Paul George playbook. Plus he looks like he knows how and when to make a pass, too.
Jackson would be great, too. I want this team to get better passers on the wings, and he knows how to make a pass. But he's gonna take time to adapt. His shot will come, but I doubt we risk a pick on another shooting project unless he's BPA.
teefbe wrote:We're up 15 with 3 minutes to play in the 3rd. If we win today that might hurt our tank badly considering we have 2 games vs Nets ahead of us...Philly and Knicks down right now just gotta hope Westbrook somehow pulls this off
IllMagic04 wrote:teefbe wrote:We're up 15 with 3 minutes to play in the 3rd. If we win today that might hurt our tank badly considering we have 2 games vs Nets ahead of us...Philly and Knicks down right now just gotta hope Westbrook somehow pulls this off
Yea this is very alarming.