2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread Pt 2

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

Who will win MVP?

Curry
12
3%
Durant
3
1%
Harden
112
31%
LeBron
42
12%
Leonard
60
17%
Westbrook
109
30%
Other
20
6%
 
Total votes: 358

User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread Pt 2 

Post#1701 » by bondom34 » Thu Mar 30, 2017 12:39 am

Pablo Novi wrote:Did anybody see how Westbrook and Harden treated each other after their head-to-head match-up? They hugged like the long-time true friends they are.

Besides each of them is giving us, the fans, MAXIMUM entertainment (and beautiful b-ball to boot).

Why the BLEEP do their FANS need to hate either of them?

TBH, I don't. Durant I do, Harden's cool by me.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
Pablo Novi
Senior
Posts: 683
And1: 233
Joined: Dec 11, 2015
Location: Mexico City, Mexico
Contact:
   

Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread Pt 2 

Post#1702 » by Pablo Novi » Thu Mar 30, 2017 12:46 am

bondom34 wrote:
Pablo Novi wrote:Did anybody see how Westbrook and Harden treated each other after their head-to-head match-up? They hugged like the long-time true friends they are.

Besides each of them is giving us, the fans, MAXIMUM entertainment (and beautiful b-ball to boot).

Why the BLEEP do their FANS need to hate either of them?

TBH, I don't. Durant I do, Harden's cool by me.

Too funny!

Btw, for some reason, I can't stop myself from admitting my weaknesses in public; so, know what? I had to look up TBH.
And to be honest, it's kind of humiliating (if I were the kind of person who got humiliated).

I never hated a player - hated dirty plays.
I DID hate Red Aeurbach - because he was so damned arrogant AND because he might have been era-wise THE greatest GM AND THE greatest COACH ever. I couldn't have lived with him winning all the time; but to rub it in with that arrogance???? Why you little BLEEP!
CobraCommander
RealGM
Posts: 25,305
And1: 16,465
Joined: May 01, 2014
       

Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread Pt 2 

Post#1703 » by CobraCommander » Thu Mar 30, 2017 12:58 am

heatwillbeback wrote:People are going to look back and wonder how three top 20 players of all time were (1) on the same team and (2) didn't win a title together. It's crazy how good that OKC team looks now.


I agree that you have to blame it on the GM, the owner and the coach and their shot sightedness and lack of patience

3 in the top 20???? Wow thats a bold pronouncement.

I dont know if Durant is going to be counted as one of the all time greats because no matter what he doesnt seem like a true "warrior". Someone who is driven to win and willing to drag his team to the mountain top. teaming up with a 2 time MVP while they are both in thier primes makes me and a lot of people question his heart.

Harden is all offense and if you gonna call him top 20 then you gotta throw Nique in there!

Westbrook is all time great by virtue of avg a triple double...when you one of two men to do something as difficult as avg a triple double for the season...there is a special place in the halls of Valhalla!
Pablo Novi
Senior
Posts: 683
And1: 233
Joined: Dec 11, 2015
Location: Mexico City, Mexico
Contact:
   

Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread Pt 2 

Post#1704 » by Pablo Novi » Thu Mar 30, 2017 1:09 am

CobraCommander wrote:
heatwillbeback wrote:People are going to look back and wonder how three top 20 players of all time were (1) on the same team and (2) didn't win a title together. It's crazy how good that OKC team looks now.


I agree that you have to blame it on the GM, the owner and the coach and their shot sightedness and lack of patience

3 in the top 20???? Wow thats a bold pronouncement.

I dont know if Durant is going to be counted as one of the all time greats because no matter what he doesnt seem like a true "warrior". Someone who is driven to win and willing to drag his team to the mountain top. teaming up with a 2 time MVP while they are both in thier primes makes me and a lot of people question his heart.

Harden is all offense and if you gonna call him top 20 then you gotta throw Nique in there!

Westbrook is all time great by virtue of avg a triple double...when you one of two men to do something as difficult as avg a triple double for the season...there is a special place in the halls of Valhalla!

For ME, a player isn't considered for MY GOAT Top 50 until he has accumulated at least 10 great years (defined as 10 times selected for either the All-League 1st-Team or 2nd-Team). All three of these guys have a long way to go for that.

Having been amazed by the Big "O" back then; I'd just LOVE to see Westbrook average a triple double for a combined 5 seasons like "O" did!

A little Big "O" story. When he came into the League, the Royals had the perennial top all-star Jack Twyman. At Oscar's first practice with the team; EVERYBODY KNEW he was better than Twyman - WAY THE BLEEP BETTER.
michaelm
RealGM
Posts: 12,183
And1: 5,224
Joined: Apr 06, 2010
 

Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread Pt 2 

Post#1705 » by michaelm » Thu Mar 30, 2017 1:13 am

bondom34 wrote:
michaelm wrote:
RightToCensor wrote:I've seen plenty of overreactions in this thread after single games, this will blow over soon.

I just want to repeat that Harden leads the league in APG, leads the league in points created, and is second in PPG. We don't have the 3rd best record in the league without him, we're not in the playoffs without him. The player keeping the Rockets in playoff position for the past five seasons is James Harden.

I would personally even argue that their pattern of play which is based on Harden is more team oriented that that of the Thunder, and hence holds together better when he is not on the court.
A pattern of play based on admittedly heroic individual efforts from Westbrook is completely bereft when he sits.

I'd argue there's 1 other ball handler on the entire roster and his backup has been bad at every level of pro basketball.

That may well be true, I don't watch either team enough to know.

Both teams were not rated before the season and both are doing much better than expected, but Harden's team to a greater extent, as I have previously said.

You are quite likely correct that the Thunder's Westbrook focused approach is of necessity, but I don't see that the rest of Harden's team, who were not I believe really rated any higher as a supporting cast than Westbrook's before the season, playing more cohesively/better, even when he sits, than the Thunder supporting cast is any argument against Harden. I am stunned that Harden has proved to be so effective playing basically as Houston's point guard, btw.

(EDIT As I was going to add anyway, perhaps it comes down to Harden's supporting cast being better coached, again hardly a knock on Harden. Like the following poster, I wonder what that coach could have done with all 3 of Westbrook, KD and Harden).
Pablo Novi
Senior
Posts: 683
And1: 233
Joined: Dec 11, 2015
Location: Mexico City, Mexico
Contact:
   

Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread Pt 2 

Post#1706 » by Pablo Novi » Thu Mar 30, 2017 1:16 am

CobraCommander wrote:
heatwillbeback wrote:People are going to look back and wonder how three top 20 players of all time were (1) on the same team and (2) didn't win a title together. It's crazy how good that OKC team looks now.


I agree that you have to blame it on the GM, the owner and the coach and their shot sightedness and lack of patience

3 in the top 20???? Wow thats a bold pronouncement.

I dont know if Durant is going to be counted as one of the all time greats because no matter what he doesnt seem like a true "warrior". Someone who is driven to win and willing to drag his team to the mountain top. teaming up with a 2 time MVP while they are both in thier primes makes me and a lot of people question his heart.

Harden is all offense and if you gonna call him top 20 then you gotta throw Nique in there!

Westbrook is all time great by virtue of avg a triple double...when you one of two men to do something as difficult as avg a triple double for the season...there is a special place in the halls of Valhalla!

I agree about 'Nique.
IF the three of these guys can keep injury free from here on out - with each passing year it's gonna get to be a bigger and bigger "What IF" item.

Let D'antoni coach THAT OKC team - KD's scoring more ppg than anybody not named Wilt; Harden breaks the FT record EVERY year; RW breaks the assists record every year that Harden doesn't. The most exquisite passing team of all time. The team breaks the all-time season-team-scoring record every year.

Fill the roster with defending role players - and look out!

Reminds me of the Shaq-Kobe break-up - biggest mistake ever in the NBA.
THIS break-up could end up passing that one!
User avatar
Hero
RealGM
Posts: 38,318
And1: 53,515
Joined: Apr 05, 2012
Location: Edward Gardens
 

Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread Pt 2 

Post#1707 » by Hero » Thu Mar 30, 2017 1:32 am

Nobody is denying that Westbrook's raw numbers aren't impressive. However there is no way he deserves MVP over Harden given his team's record.
RightToCensor
Head Coach
Posts: 6,402
And1: 7,411
Joined: Jun 23, 2014

Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread Pt 2 

Post#1708 » by RightToCensor » Thu Mar 30, 2017 1:39 am

Pablo Novi wrote:Did anybody see how Westbrook and Harden treated each other after their head-to-head match-up? They hugged like the long-time true friends they are.

Besides each of them is giving us, the fans, MAXIMUM entertainment (and beautiful b-ball to boot).

Why the BLEEP do their FANS need to hate either of them?

I can't +1 this enough
User avatar
K_chile22
RealGM
Posts: 16,732
And1: 8,623
Joined: Jul 15, 2015
   

Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread Pt 2 

Post#1709 » by K_chile22 » Thu Mar 30, 2017 1:50 am

Read on Twitter
ThomYorke
Junior
Posts: 373
And1: 926
Joined: Jan 07, 2015
     

Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread Pt 2 

Post#1710 » by ThomYorke » Thu Mar 30, 2017 1:52 am

Westbrook will probably fall 5 wins short of the MVP. It's a shame but if they can strengthen their roster over this off season and can become a 55 win team he will be the heavy favourite to win next season.
QPR
Analyst
Posts: 3,182
And1: 4,357
Joined: Mar 02, 2011

Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread Pt 2 

Post#1711 » by QPR » Thu Mar 30, 2017 1:58 am

K_chile22 wrote:
Read on Twitter


Because he's on a bad team.
User avatar
NaturalThunder
General Manager
Posts: 8,491
And1: 3,907
Joined: Jun 13, 2012
     

Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread Pt 2 

Post#1712 » by NaturalThunder » Thu Mar 30, 2017 1:59 am

K_chile22 wrote:
Read on Twitter

Isn't "needing crazy comebacks against bad teams" somewhat a plus for Westbrook? Isn't it a testament to how poor his supporting cast that Russ needs crazy stat lines and impossibly clutch fourth quarters for the Thunder to eek out close wins over bad teams? Oladipo is their second best player and he's wildly inconsistent. Kanter has been outplaying Adams (who's been trash) for two months, the rest of OKC's roster other than Taj is awful, and Billy Donovan is a moron. I mean Donovan has given Semaj "I Might Be The Worst Player In The NBA" Christon 17 MPG over OKC's last 11 games.
Said in a thread about which point guards would make OKC better if they replaced Westbrook:
Coxy wrote:I think with a PG like George Hill, they'd be better than current.
User avatar
K_chile22
RealGM
Posts: 16,732
And1: 8,623
Joined: Jul 15, 2015
   

Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread Pt 2 

Post#1713 » by K_chile22 » Thu Mar 30, 2017 2:01 am

NaturalThunder wrote:
K_chile22 wrote:
Read on Twitter

Isn't "needing crazy comebacks against bad teams" somewhat a plus for Westbrook? Isn't it a testament to how poor his supporting cast that Russ needs crazy stat lines and impossibly clutch fourth quarters for the Thunder to eek out close wins over bad teams? Oladipo is their second best player and he's wildly inconsistent. Kanter has been outplaying Adams (who's been trash) for two months, the rest of OKC's roster other than Taj is awful, and Billy Donovan is a moron. I mean Donovan has given Semaj "I Might Be The Worst Player In The NBA" Christon 17 MPG over OKC's last 11 games.

Maybe. That's literally never how MVP voting has worked though.
QPR
Analyst
Posts: 3,182
And1: 4,357
Joined: Mar 02, 2011

Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread Pt 2 

Post#1714 » by QPR » Thu Mar 30, 2017 2:07 am

Doesn't mean he's not the MVP though. We all know team record plays a much bigger role in MVP voting than it should.
Thundershock88
Starter
Posts: 2,301
And1: 2,234
Joined: Jul 08, 2015

Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread Pt 2 

Post#1715 » by Thundershock88 » Thu Mar 30, 2017 2:19 am

Funny, people keep trying to make an individual award a team award. Russell is MVP.
Pablo Novi
Senior
Posts: 683
And1: 233
Joined: Dec 11, 2015
Location: Mexico City, Mexico
Contact:
   

Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread Pt 2 

Post#1716 » by Pablo Novi » Thu Mar 30, 2017 2:24 am

michaelm wrote:
bondom34 wrote:
michaelm wrote:I would personally even argue that their pattern of play which is based on Harden is more team oriented that that of the Thunder, and hence holds together better when he is not on the court.
A pattern of play based on admittedly heroic individual efforts from Westbrook is completely bereft when he sits.

I'd argue there's 1 other ball handler on the entire roster and his backup has been bad at every level of pro basketball.

That may well be true, I don't watch either team enough to know.

Both teams were not rated before the season and both are doing much better than expected, but Harden's team to a greater extent, as I have previously said.

You are quite likely correct that the Thunder's Westbrook focused approach is of necessity, but I don't see that the rest of Harden's team, who were not I believe really rated any higher as a supporting cast than Westbrook's before the season, playing more cohesively/better, even when he sits, than the Thunder supporting cast is any argument against Harden. I am stunned that Harden has proved to be so effective playing basically as Houston's point guard, btw.

(EDIT As I was going to add anyway, perhaps it comes down to Harden's supporting cast being better coached, again hardly a knock on Harden. Like the following poster, I wonder what that coach could have done with all 3 of Westbrook, KD and Harden).


Seeing as I was "the following poster"; is this kind of, sort of, maybe a compliment to me? lol
The same back to you. lol
User avatar
RunOKC
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,504
And1: 3,991
Joined: Dec 29, 2012
Location: Oklahoma
 

Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread Pt 2 

Post#1717 » by RunOKC » Thu Mar 30, 2017 2:26 am

Read on Twitter
Pablo Novi
Senior
Posts: 683
And1: 233
Joined: Dec 11, 2015
Location: Mexico City, Mexico
Contact:
   

Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread Pt 2 

Post#1718 » by Pablo Novi » Thu Mar 30, 2017 2:28 am

RightToCensor wrote:
Pablo Novi wrote:Did anybody see how Westbrook and Harden treated each other after their head-to-head match-up? They hugged like the long-time true friends they are.

Besides each of them is giving us, the fans, MAXIMUM entertainment (and beautiful b-ball to boot).

Why the BLEEP do their FANS need to hate either of them?

I can't +1 this enough

Well, (there's no chance that tech-handicapped me could) but isn't there some way YOU can rig it so that you can +1 my post endlessly?

A bit more seriously; for better or for worse, being end-of-the-bell-curve uniquely-weird or weirdly-unique - always leaves me quite unsure if what I post is idiotic, worse or better. So, I much appreciate the compliment - otoh, this probably means I'll surely keep posting away - it'll be your fault! lol
Patches Perry
RealGM
Posts: 13,336
And1: 18,627
Joined: May 11, 2016
 

Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread Pt 2 

Post#1719 » by Patches Perry » Thu Mar 30, 2017 2:29 am

Westbrook is MVP.
michaelm
RealGM
Posts: 12,183
And1: 5,224
Joined: Apr 06, 2010
 

Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread Pt 2 

Post#1720 » by michaelm » Thu Mar 30, 2017 2:43 am

Pablo Novi wrote:
michaelm wrote:
bondom34 wrote:I'd argue there's 1 other ball handler on the entire roster and his backup has been bad at every level of pro basketball.

That may well be true, I don't watch either team enough to know.

Both teams were not rated before the season and both are doing much better than expected, but Harden's team to a greater extent, as I have previously said.

You are quite likely correct that the Thunder's Westbrook focused approach is of necessity, but I don't see that the rest of Harden's team, who were not I believe really rated any higher as a supporting cast than Westbrook's before the season, playing more cohesively/better, even when he sits, than the Thunder supporting cast is any argument against Harden. I am stunned that Harden has proved to be so effective playing basically as Houston's point guard, btw.

(EDIT As I was going to add anyway, perhaps it comes down to Harden's supporting cast being better coached, again hardly a knock on Harden. Like the following poster, I wonder what that coach could have done with all 3 of Westbrook, KD and Harden).


Seeing as I was "the following poster"; is this kind of, sort of, maybe a compliment to me? lol
The same back to you. lol

Yes. I had already had the thought that It might well be down to D''Antoni that Harden's supporting cast which appeared no better than Westbrook's pre-season were playing better than Westbrook's but entirely agreed with your post with its implication that D'Antoni is a great coach, and particularly that a team coached by him with all 3 of those players would have been amazing.

Return to The General Board