ImageImageImageImage

Tankapolooza: Draft Lottery Odds/Watch thread

Moderators: Knightro, UCFJayBird, Def Swami, Howard Mass, ChosenSavior, UCF

User avatar
VFX
RealGM
Posts: 18,317
And1: 16,197
Joined: May 30, 2016

Re: RE: Re: Tankapolooza: UPDATED 3/15/17; 02:21 EST 

Post#1481 » by VFX » Sat Apr 1, 2017 12:44 am

Jameerthefear wrote:
EAS Law wrote:
MagicFan101 wrote:
Ball has a lot of talent, but there are question marks about how his shot and style of play will translate to the modern NBA. If those are your concerns then that it understandable.

But if you are passing on a believed to be better talent because their dad talks a lot ... wow.

The reason it matters is because you don't want to place the hopes and future of your franchise on a guy that is going to do everything in their power to place you in a position to trade them where they want to go.

From what I see of Lonzo, he seems like a quiet kid that I notice really looks up to his dad like a best friend. You can see this by how he reacts to the stupid things his dad says in interviews. Lonzo is probably a good dude, but if his father determines that your team isn't doing what he wants to do, all it will take is a bit of influence and you have a train wreck on your hands.

Remember Dwight? There wasn't much reason for him to destroy our franchise when he did. He had people in his circle that convinced him he could be the face of the NBA but for Orlando. That's what happens.

And yet if you did the '04 NBA Draft over again, I would draft Dwight every single time and you would too. If you think his talent level is that high, you draft him.


You are 100% correct. BUT if we had Dwights dad telling everyone he "only" wants to play for LA and his two younger brothers are destined to play for UCLA and he is from the area, are you willing to put it past him that he won't jump ship like Paul George claims he might?
User avatar
Viper1500
Head Coach
Posts: 6,923
And1: 2,801
Joined: Apr 15, 2009
Location: Orlando, FL
   

Re: Tankapolooza: UPDATED 3/15/17; 02:21 EST 

Post#1482 » by Viper1500 » Sat Apr 1, 2017 12:45 am

No melo or rose tonight for New York lol.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
MagicFan101
RealGM
Posts: 11,253
And1: 6,575
Joined: Jul 04, 2012
 

Re: RE: Re: Tankapolooza: UPDATED 3/15/17; 02:21 EST 

Post#1483 » by MagicFan101 » Sat Apr 1, 2017 1:42 am

MagicMatic wrote:
Jameerthefear wrote:
EAS Law wrote:The reason it matters is because you don't want to place the hopes and future of your franchise on a guy that is going to do everything in their power to place you in a position to trade them where they want to go.

From what I see of Lonzo, he seems like a quiet kid that I notice really looks up to his dad like a best friend. You can see this by how he reacts to the stupid things his dad says in interviews. Lonzo is probably a good dude, but if his father determines that your team isn't doing what he wants to do, all it will take is a bit of influence and you have a train wreck on your hands.

Remember Dwight? There wasn't much reason for him to destroy our franchise when he did. He had people in his circle that convinced him he could be the face of the NBA but for Orlando. That's what happens.

And yet if you did the '04 NBA Draft over again, I would draft Dwight every single time and you would too. If you think his talent level is that high, you draft him.


You are 100% correct. BUT if we had Dwights dad telling everyone he "only" wants to play for LA and his two younger brothers are destined to play for UCLA and he is from the area, are you willing to put it past him that he won't jump ship like Paul George claims he might?


Paul George has given Indiana 7 years and some great memories. They had a nice couple of years but just couldn't get over the top. What else does he owe that city?

I'm not super high on Ball. I don't think he will take over the league at a level worth all of this debate, but the hypothetical "future superstar with baggage" is worth talking about.

Are we really so scared of losing a guy in 7 years that we pass and draft a guy we believe is worse? You could draft a hometown kid who loves the Magic but lose him on the first night of his career to an injury. How can you be so scared of free agency 7 years away?
User avatar
KillMonger
RealGM
Posts: 20,638
And1: 11,180
Joined: Oct 13, 2012
     

Re: Tankapolooza: UPDATED 3/15/17; 02:21 EST 

Post#1484 » by KillMonger » Sat Apr 1, 2017 2:03 am

tatum is my guy, total iso killer we need one
Image
User avatar
VFX
RealGM
Posts: 18,317
And1: 16,197
Joined: May 30, 2016

Re: RE: Re: Tankapolooza: UPDATED 3/15/17; 02:21 EST 

Post#1485 » by VFX » Sat Apr 1, 2017 2:12 am

MagicFan101 wrote:
MagicMatic wrote:
Jameerthefear wrote:And yet if you did the '04 NBA Draft over again, I would draft Dwight every single time and you would too. If you think his talent level is that high, you draft him.


You are 100% correct. BUT if we had Dwights dad telling everyone he "only" wants to play for LA and his two younger brothers are destined to play for UCLA and he is from the area, are you willing to put it past him that he won't jump ship like Paul George claims he might?


Paul George has given Indiana 7 years and some great memories. They had a nice couple of years but just couldn't get over the top. What else does he owe that city?

I'm not super high on Ball. I don't think he will take over the league at a level worth all of this debate, but the hypothetical "future superstar with baggage" is worth talking about.

Are we really so scared of losing a guy in 7 years that we pass and draft a guy we believe is worse? You could draft a hometown kid who loves the Magic but lose him on the first night of his career to an injury. How can you be so scared of free agency 7 years away?


When you lack any semblance of an all star caliber player and lost most of our "once in a generation" drafted talent to LA. That's when you start reading between the lines a little more closely. Why invest in a player 5-7 years in if they are going to leave in their prime the first chance they get? Also, no one knows if Ball is going to be 'better' in the NBA than Tatum/ Isaac/ etc.
OrlandoDream
General Manager
Posts: 8,021
And1: 6,242
Joined: Jul 05, 2013
Location: Altamonte Springs Fl
 

Re: Tankapolooza: UPDATED 3/15/17; 02:21 EST 

Post#1486 » by OrlandoDream » Sat Apr 1, 2017 2:12 am

Knicks in a close one. Would be big if they drop this one
MagicFan101
RealGM
Posts: 11,253
And1: 6,575
Joined: Jul 04, 2012
 

Re: RE: Re: Tankapolooza: UPDATED 3/15/17; 02:21 EST 

Post#1487 » by MagicFan101 » Sat Apr 1, 2017 2:14 am

MagicMatic wrote:
MagicFan101 wrote:
MagicMatic wrote:
You are 100% correct. BUT if we had Dwights dad telling everyone he "only" wants to play for LA and his two younger brothers are destined to play for UCLA and he is from the area, are you willing to put it past him that he won't jump ship like Paul George claims he might?


Paul George has given Indiana 7 years and some great memories. They had a nice couple of years but just couldn't get over the top. What else does he owe that city?

I'm not super high on Ball. I don't think he will take over the league at a level worth all of this debate, but the hypothetical "future superstar with baggage" is worth talking about.

Are we really so scared of losing a guy in 7 years that we pass and draft a guy we believe is worse? You could draft a hometown kid who loves the Magic but lose him on the first night of his career to an injury. How can you be so scared of free agency 7 years away?


When you lack any semblance of an all star caliber player and lost most of our "once in a generation" drafted talent to LA. That's when you start reading between the lines a little more closely. Why invest in a player 5-7 years in if they are going to leave in their prime the first chance they get? Also, no one knows if Ball is going to be 'better' in the NBA than Tatum/ Isaac/ etc.


With that attitude, why invest in players at all? Just sell the team to Seattle investors...
User avatar
VFX
RealGM
Posts: 18,317
And1: 16,197
Joined: May 30, 2016

Re: RE: Re: Tankapolooza: UPDATED 3/15/17; 02:21 EST 

Post#1488 » by VFX » Sat Apr 1, 2017 2:18 am

MagicFan101 wrote:
MagicMatic wrote:
MagicFan101 wrote:
Paul George has given Indiana 7 years and some great memories. They had a nice couple of years but just couldn't get over the top. What else does he owe that city?

I'm not super high on Ball. I don't think he will take over the league at a level worth all of this debate, but the hypothetical "future superstar with baggage" is worth talking about.

Are we really so scared of losing a guy in 7 years that we pass and draft a guy we believe is worse? You could draft a hometown kid who loves the Magic but lose him on the first night of his career to an injury. How can you be so scared of free agency 7 years away?


When you lack any semblance of an all star caliber player and lost most of our "once in a generation" drafted talent to LA. That's when you start reading between the lines a little more closely. Why invest in a player 5-7 years in if they are going to leave in their prime the first chance they get? Also, no one knows if Ball is going to be 'better' in the NBA than Tatum/ Isaac/ etc.


With that attitude, why invest in players at all? Just sell the team to Seattle investors...


Ah yes. Seeing a red flag in a players intentions years before an incident is the same as selling the franchise. So wise. :lol:
MagicFan101
RealGM
Posts: 11,253
And1: 6,575
Joined: Jul 04, 2012
 

Re: RE: Re: Tankapolooza: UPDATED 3/15/17; 02:21 EST 

Post#1489 » by MagicFan101 » Sat Apr 1, 2017 2:28 am

MagicMatic wrote:
MagicFan101 wrote:
MagicMatic wrote:
When you lack any semblance of an all star caliber player and lost most of our "once in a generation" drafted talent to LA. That's when you start reading between the lines a little more closely. Why invest in a player 5-7 years in if they are going to leave in their prime the first chance they get? Also, no one knows if Ball is going to be 'better' in the NBA than Tatum/ Isaac/ etc.


With that attitude, why invest in players at all? Just sell the team to Seattle investors...


Ah yes. Seeing a red flag in a players intentions years before an incident is the same as selling the franchise. So wise. :lol:


There is nothing the player can do to force their way out of Orlando until they reach unrestricted free agency. The easiest way to facilitate their way out of town earlier is to play great for us for 5-6 years and hold the leverage in the final year as Dwight did.

It would be nice if every player spent their entire career in one spot but that isn't the reality. Getting 5-6 great years out of a draft pick is fantastic value. If fans can't see that then yes, they should sell the team off to a city with better fans.
User avatar
j-ragg
RealGM
Posts: 18,332
And1: 11,680
Joined: Mar 31, 2005
Location: the don't re-sign Hedo bandwagon.
   

Re: Tankapolooza: UPDATED 3/15/17; 02:21 EST 

Post#1490 » by j-ragg » Sat Apr 1, 2017 2:30 am

KNICKS!!!! Great win! Woohoo
BadMofoPimp wrote:Durant thinks Vooch is one of the Best Centers in the NBA. I will take his word over a couch-GM yelling at a TV.
User avatar
PrimeThyme
RealGM
Posts: 10,570
And1: 14,515
Joined: May 25, 2016
Location: Doak Campbell
 

Tankapolooza: UPDATED 3/15/17; 02:21 EST 

Post#1491 » by PrimeThyme » Sat Apr 1, 2017 2:35 am

Knicks win!!!!!!!! We needed that badly since we play the Nets tomorrow.
Image
User avatar
shadrock
Head Coach
Posts: 6,160
And1: 3,635
Joined: Oct 16, 2009
   

Re: Tankapolooza: UPDATED 3/15/17; 02:21 EST 

Post#1492 » by shadrock » Sat Apr 1, 2017 2:35 am

Pretty much always seems that the less involved Vuc is, the better our team plays. Why cant we just move on from him please? Or have him as our 6th man? Biz is just a better fit with what our team is trying to do.
Image
OrlandoDream
General Manager
Posts: 8,021
And1: 6,242
Joined: Jul 05, 2013
Location: Altamonte Springs Fl
 

Re: Tankapolooza: UPDATED 3/15/17; 02:21 EST 

Post#1493 » by OrlandoDream » Sat Apr 1, 2017 2:45 am

Enjoy this tank cushion because it all goes down from here. Our schedule is about to get considerably easier. It's undeniable that even though they are losing, team is playing much better. If the same team that played today shows up our last 6 games, I see us winning 4/6 easily.

We got Nets twice, Pacers, Bulls, and the awful Pistons.
The Effect
Magic Forum Mock Draft Co-Champ
Posts: 4,877
And1: 2,118
Joined: Jul 09, 2004

Re: RE: Re: Tankapolooza: UPDATED 3/15/17; 02:21 EST 

Post#1494 » by The Effect » Sat Apr 1, 2017 3:00 am

MagicMatic wrote:
Jameerthefear wrote:
EAS Law wrote:The reason it matters is because you don't want to place the hopes and future of your franchise on a guy that is going to do everything in their power to place you in a position to trade them where they want to go.

From what I see of Lonzo, he seems like a quiet kid that I notice really looks up to his dad like a best friend. You can see this by how he reacts to the stupid things his dad says in interviews. Lonzo is probably a good dude, but if his father determines that your team isn't doing what he wants to do, all it will take is a bit of influence and you have a train wreck on your hands.

Remember Dwight? There wasn't much reason for him to destroy our franchise when he did. He had people in his circle that convinced him he could be the face of the NBA but for Orlando. That's what happens.

And yet if you did the '04 NBA Draft over again, I would draft Dwight every single time and you would too. If you think his talent level is that high, you draft him.


You are 100% correct. BUT if we had Dwights dad telling everyone he "only" wants to play for LA and his two younger brothers are destined to play for UCLA and he is from the area, are you willing to put it past him that he won't jump ship like Paul George claims he might?

If we had a shot at him, id still take ball
Even if his desire is to play in LA, you take him, his potential is way to high to pass on the POSSIBILITY that he will leave. I mean really how many guys pass on that first big extension? Cant really remember too many guys, if any, that have passed on that. So worst case, you get him for 5-6 years and hope to build a winner around him, and if he still wants to leave, get as much as you can for him.
The Effect
Magic Forum Mock Draft Co-Champ
Posts: 4,877
And1: 2,118
Joined: Jul 09, 2004

Re: Tankapolooza: UPDATED 3/15/17; 02:21 EST 

Post#1495 » by The Effect » Sat Apr 1, 2017 3:01 am

OrlandoDream wrote:Enjoy this tank cushion because it all goes down from here. Our schedule is about to get considerably easier. It's undeniable that even though they are losing, team is playing much better. If the same team that played today shows up our last 6 games, I see us winning 4/6 easily.

We got Nets twice, Pacers, Bulls, and the awful Pistons.

:o :(
OrlandoDream
General Manager
Posts: 8,021
And1: 6,242
Joined: Jul 05, 2013
Location: Altamonte Springs Fl
 

Re: Tankapolooza: UPDATED 3/15/17; 02:21 EST 

Post#1496 » by OrlandoDream » Sat Apr 1, 2017 3:07 am

The Effect wrote:
OrlandoDream wrote:Enjoy this tank cushion because it all goes down from here. Our schedule is about to get considerably easier. It's undeniable that even though they are losing, team is playing much better. If the same team that played today shows up our last 6 games, I see us winning 4/6 easily.

We got Nets twice, Pacers, Bulls, and the awful Pistons.

:o :(

Cavs are the only Auto L I see bc they always own us. The rest of the games we have left are very winnable.... Unfortunately
User avatar
PrimeThyme
RealGM
Posts: 10,570
And1: 14,515
Joined: May 25, 2016
Location: Doak Campbell
 

Tankapolooza: UPDATED 3/15/17; 02:21 EST 

Post#1497 » by PrimeThyme » Sat Apr 1, 2017 3:22 am

OrlandoDream wrote:
The Effect wrote:
OrlandoDream wrote:Enjoy this tank cushion because it all goes down from here. Our schedule is about to get considerably easier. It's undeniable that even though they are losing, team is playing much better. If the same team that played today shows up our last 6 games, I see us winning 4/6 easily.

We got Nets twice, Pacers, Bulls, and the awful Pistons.

:o :(

Cavs are the only Auto L I see bc they always own us. The rest of the games we have left are very winnable.... Unfortunately

Yeah it's entirely possible but I'm still not worried. Chicago plays much better at home and both Indiana and Chicago are going to be fighting for their lives to get into the playoffs, they have everything to play for. Tomorrow night is a toss up for me especially with how the nets have played and on a back to back. The Detroit game is a 50/50 game for me as well. None of those wins will come easy even with how we've been playing.
Image
ralphie9898
Analyst
Posts: 3,361
And1: 390
Joined: Jul 02, 2013

Re: RE: Re: Tankapolooza: UPDATED 3/15/17; 02:21 EST 

Post#1498 » by ralphie9898 » Sat Apr 1, 2017 4:47 am

j-ragg wrote:
ralphie9898 wrote:
Jameerthefear wrote:And yet if you did the '04 NBA Draft over again, I would draft Dwight every single time and you would too. If you think his talent level is that high, you draft him.

yep

That's where we don't see eye to eye. I don't think his talent level is that much higher than the next guy or two down the board. A lot of people disagree, Im just not on the wagon yet.

yeah but I think most people are. I think Ball and Fultz are just a step ahead of the rest of the field. This is still a good draft so yeah there isn't a huge gap but I think Ball and Fultz go 1 and 2 unless Boston Boston ends up at 2 and doesn't have a chance at Fultz they may decide to go with Jackson at 2. Jackson is pretty close though but for us I am not a fan of taking Jackson as I don't think he helps us that much.
User avatar
drsd
RealGM
Posts: 39,124
And1: 8,928
Joined: Mar 16, 2003
     

Re: Tankapolooza: UPDATED 3/15/17; 02:21 EST 

Post#1499 » by drsd » Sat Apr 1, 2017 5:42 am

Viper1500 wrote:No melo or rose tonight for New York lol.


The Knicks tank broke down.

Without Anthony and Rose, Knicks top Heat
IllMagic04
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,812
And1: 1,873
Joined: Jul 06, 2012
Location: Baltimore MD
     

Re: Tankapolooza: UPDATED 3/15/17; 02:21 EST 

Post#1500 » by IllMagic04 » Sat Apr 1, 2017 12:59 pm

OrlandoDream wrote:Enjoy this tank cushion because it all goes down from here. Our schedule is about to get considerably easier. It's undeniable that even though they are losing, team is playing much better. If the same team that played today shows up our last 6 games, I see us winning 4/6 easily.

We got Nets twice, Pacers, Bulls, and the awful Pistons.


Your right honestly

Nets - W
Cavs- L
Nets - W
Pacers - Toss up but I'll say L
Bulls - Toss up but Ill say W
Pistons - W

:( We are gonna need some help to not fall. Sixers will catch us but we gonna need some help from the Knicks to not fall all the way to 6th. Kings got the Lakers and the suns on their schedule so I THINK we can hold them off. Failing to 7 would be a disaster.

Return to Orlando Magic