ImageImageImageImageImage

Jimmy Butler

Moderators: Kilroy, Danny Darko, TyCobb

Michael Lucky
RealGM
Posts: 15,140
And1: 6,789
Joined: Jan 02, 2012
Location: Los Angeles, CA
       

Re: Jimmy Butler 

Post#41 » by Michael Lucky » Sat Apr 1, 2017 3:21 pm

Tobi wrote:
AcecardZ wrote:I didn't see it yesterday and I'm still worried...

Does that count?


I saw it earlier today and I'm worried too.. I thought we ridded of her brother who almost gave up the farm for Cousins. Please don't overpay for him.

From reports it sounded like she would have traded both Ingram and Russell and that Mitch and Jim were in part fired because they didn't consult and pull the trigger. Not surprising they got removed right after the trade happen. Kind of scary thinking about it.
User avatar
chefy
Head Coach
Posts: 7,014
And1: 658
Joined: Aug 14, 2006

Re: Jimmy Butler 

Post#42 » by chefy » Sat Apr 1, 2017 3:48 pm

russell or jc is gonna get traded for sure if we get a lottery pick.
User avatar
TylersLakers
RealGM
Posts: 10,961
And1: 2,867
Joined: Jan 20, 2006
Location: Winnipeg Canada
     

Re: Jimmy Butler 

Post#43 » by TylersLakers » Sat Apr 1, 2017 6:13 pm

These trade proposals for Butler won't even be discussed unless it includes one of the following: Top 3 pick, Russell or Ingram.

Trade Ingram, Randle, Clarkson and the Houston pick for Butler.

PG: Lonzo Ball/ Shaun Livingston/ Tyler Ennis
SG: D'Angelo Russell/ Nick Young/
SF: Jimmy Butler/ Andre Iguoudala/ David Nwaba/
PF: Larry Nance Jr/ Luol Deng/
C: Ivica Zubac/ Timofey Mozgov/ Tarik Black/

Give Livingston a 2 year deal worth 5M a season. Iguoudala a 1 year, 15M dollar deal.

That's a team that can make a run and set things up nicely for 2018, when we'll have max cap space + extra to obtain other free agents.
Image
Princeinrevolt
Rookie
Posts: 1,220
And1: 529
Joined: May 05, 2015
       

Re: Jimmy Butler 

Post#44 » by Princeinrevolt » Sat Apr 1, 2017 6:33 pm

TylersLakers wrote:These trade proposals for Butler won't even be discussed unless it includes one of the following: Top 3 pick, Russell or Ingram.

Trade Ingram, Randle, Clarkson and the Houston pick for Butler.

PG: Lonzo Ball/ Shaun Livingston/ Tyler Ennis
SG: D'Angelo Russell/ Nick Young/
SF: Jimmy Butler/ Andre Iguoudala/ David Nwaba/
PF: Larry Nance Jr/ Luol Deng/
C: Ivica Zubac/ Timofey Mozgov/ Tarik Black/

Give Livingston a 2 year deal worth 5M a season. Iguoudala a 1 year, 15M dollar deal.

That's a team that can make a run and set things up nicely for 2018, when we'll have max cap space + extra to obtain other free agents.

That's way too much for Butler. And are you saying you would rather have Lonzo Ball than Brandon Ingram? Because you could have easily put the top three pick instead of Ingram in your hypothetical trade.
User avatar
TylersLakers
RealGM
Posts: 10,961
And1: 2,867
Joined: Jan 20, 2006
Location: Winnipeg Canada
     

Re: Jimmy Butler 

Post#45 » by TylersLakers » Sat Apr 1, 2017 6:54 pm

Princeinrevolt wrote:
TylersLakers wrote:These trade proposals for Butler won't even be discussed unless it includes one of the following: Top 3 pick, Russell or Ingram.

Trade Ingram, Randle, Clarkson and the Houston pick for Butler.

PG: Lonzo Ball/ Shaun Livingston/ Tyler Ennis
SG: D'Angelo Russell/ Nick Young/
SF: Jimmy Butler/ Andre Iguoudala/ David Nwaba/
PF: Larry Nance Jr/ Luol Deng/
C: Ivica Zubac/ Timofey Mozgov/ Tarik Black/

Give Livingston a 2 year deal worth 5M a season. Iguoudala a 1 year, 15M dollar deal.

That's a team that can make a run and set things up nicely for 2018, when we'll have max cap space + extra to obtain other free agents.

That's way too much for Butler. And are you saying you would rather have Lonzo Ball than Brandon Ingram? Because you could have easily put the top three pick instead of Ingram in your hypothetical trade.


Yeah, I'd rather have Ball than Ingram, because of the player we'd getting.

Is Ingram going to be as good as Butler? I don't think so. It's certainly possible, but if he ended up as good as Butler, we'd all be happy. When you add on the fact that Butler's contract is no where near a max in the years that we'll have cap space, it's an easy decision for me.

Hopefully we could get him without giving up Randle. However, if that's what had to be done, I'd do it.

The eventual hope is to attain George in 2018, so you have a line-up of Ball/Butler/George/Nance/Zubac with Russell off the bench playing 32+ minutes a game.
Image
User avatar
AcecardZ
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,770
And1: 541
Joined: May 09, 2011
Location: Watching the Lakers play basketball...

Re: Jimmy Butler 

Post#46 » by AcecardZ » Sat Apr 1, 2017 9:06 pm

Is it feesible to have Deng, Mozgov, George and Butler all under contract? That's a crap ton of $$$...
Sometimes being wrong is awesome!!! :D
larry14r
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,265
And1: 131
Joined: Jun 08, 2006

Re: Jimmy Butler 

Post#47 » by larry14r » Sat Apr 1, 2017 10:22 pm

TylersLakers wrote:
Princeinrevolt wrote:
TylersLakers wrote:These trade proposals for Butler won't even be discussed unless it includes one of the following: Top 3 pick, Russell or Ingram.

Trade Ingram, Randle, Clarkson and the Houston pick for Butler.

PG: Lonzo Ball/ Shaun Livingston/ Tyler Ennis
SG: D'Angelo Russell/ Nick Young/
SF: Jimmy Butler/ Andre Iguoudala/ David Nwaba/
PF: Larry Nance Jr/ Luol Deng/
C: Ivica Zubac/ Timofey Mozgov/ Tarik Black/

Give Livingston a 2 year deal worth 5M a season. Iguoudala a 1 year, 15M dollar deal.

That's a team that can make a run and set things up nicely for 2018, when we'll have max cap space + extra to obtain other free agents.

That's way too much for Butler. And are you saying you would rather have Lonzo Ball than Brandon Ingram? Because you could have easily put the top three pick instead of Ingram in your hypothetical trade.


Yeah, I'd rather have Ball than Ingram, because of the player we'd getting.

Is Ingram going to be as good as Butler? I don't think so. It's certainly possible, but if he ended up as good as Butler, we'd all be happy. When you add on the fact that Butler's contract is no where near a max in the years that we'll have cap space, it's an easy decision for me.

Hopefully we could get him without giving up Randle. However, if that's what had to be done, I'd do it.

The eventual hope is to attain George in 2018, so you have a line-up of Ball/Butler/George/Nance/Zubac with Russell off the bench playing 32+ minutes a game.


Bulls are going to ask for the pick before Ingram and you know this, and thanks to Jeanie's big mouth there goes our leverage.
User avatar
AcecardZ
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,770
And1: 541
Joined: May 09, 2011
Location: Watching the Lakers play basketball...

Re: Jimmy Butler 

Post#48 » by AcecardZ » Sat Apr 1, 2017 11:36 pm

The Bulls can ask for whatever they want. We don't have to give it to them regardless of what Jeanie implied earlier.
Sometimes being wrong is awesome!!! :D
Dez
General Manager
Posts: 7,679
And1: 9,234
Joined: Jul 23, 2011
Location: Melbourne, Australia
 

Re: Jimmy Butler 

Post#49 » by Dez » Sun Apr 2, 2017 3:13 am

The earliest he can become a FA is 2019, so it's a bit stupid of whoever that came from in that article to jump to a conclusion of "Butler is gone".
LALifer49
Rookie
Posts: 1,006
And1: 862
Joined: Mar 22, 2015
 

Re: Jimmy Butler 

Post#50 » by LALifer49 » Sun Apr 2, 2017 5:26 pm

If things fell the right way I'd be open to trading for Butler. We land a top pick and can get Ball, and have as close to a guarantee as we can get that Pgeorge is coming as a fa in 2018 and I'm willing to do a deal based around Dlo as the primary trade piece for Butler.

Ride with Ball/Butler/Ingram/George and if he ends up good enough Zubac core? That is a great modern team with tons of switching capability, athleticism, defense, competitiveness, and I think Butler/George could be great for Ingram. Mainly the terror we'd be on defense is attractive. And im sure we'd be an attractive fa destination if we had any cap left (which would require us finding ways to rid ourselves of Deng/Mozgov contracts). And we're nicely set up at that point to compete now and in the future when Pgeorge and Butler are 30 Ball/Ingram/Zubac would be in their early primes. It's a bit of a pipe dream, but yeah I want that.
larry14r
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,265
And1: 131
Joined: Jun 08, 2006

Re: Jimmy Butler 

Post#51 » by larry14r » Sun Apr 2, 2017 5:34 pm

LALifer49 wrote:If things fell the right way I'd be open to trading for Butler. We land a top pick and can get Ball, and have as close to a guarantee as we can get that Pgeorge is coming as a fa in 2018 and I'm willing to do a deal based around Dlo as the primary trade piece for Butler.

Ride with Ball/Butler/Ingram/George and if he ends up good enough Zubac core? That is a great modern team with tons of switching capability, athleticism, defense, competitiveness, and I think Butler/George could be great for Ingram. Mainly the terror we'd be on defense is attractive. And im sure we'd be an attractive fa destination if we had any cap left (which would require us finding ways to rid ourselves of Deng/Mozgov contracts). And we're nicely set up at that point to compete now and in the future when Pgeorge and Butler are 30 Ball/Ingram/Zubac would be in their early primes. It's a bit of a pipe dream, but yeah I want that.


Then who plays the 4 because George doesn't want to, and Ingram is too thin right now.
LALifer49
Rookie
Posts: 1,006
And1: 862
Joined: Mar 22, 2015
 

Re: Jimmy Butler 

Post#52 » by LALifer49 » Sun Apr 2, 2017 6:02 pm

larry14r wrote:
LALifer49 wrote:If things fell the right way I'd be open to trading for Butler. We land a top pick and can get Ball, and have as close to a guarantee as we can get that Pgeorge is coming as a fa in 2018 and I'm willing to do a deal based around Dlo as the primary trade piece for Butler.

Ride with Ball/Butler/Ingram/George and if he ends up good enough Zubac core? That is a great modern team with tons of switching capability, athleticism, defense, competitiveness, and I think Butler/George could be great for Ingram. Mainly the terror we'd be on defense is attractive. And im sure we'd be an attractive fa destination if we had any cap left (which would require us finding ways to rid ourselves of Deng/Mozgov contracts). And we're nicely set up at that point to compete now and in the future when Pgeorge and Butler are 30 Ball/Ingram/Zubac would be in their early primes. It's a bit of a pipe dream, but yeah I want that.


Then who plays the 4 because George doesn't want to, and Ingram is too thin right now.


Well that is true, this would rely on George playing the 4 until Ingram gained size, so george would have to be willing to play the 4, which to be fair he might be if it meant playing on a contender, when he was asked to play the 4 for the pacers it was after their best seasons were past.
Pointgod
RealGM
Posts: 24,028
And1: 24,365
Joined: Jun 28, 2014

Re: Jimmy Butler 

Post#53 » by Pointgod » Tue Apr 4, 2017 3:26 pm

Butler dropped 39,6 and 5 with a block and a steal on Sunday.

Paul George dueled with LeBron to the tune of 43, 9 and 9. Giving up a 2 or 3 pick when the possibility is getting both of these guys seems a little more palatable to me.
dontforget
Senior
Posts: 700
And1: 440
Joined: Apr 10, 2012

Re: Jimmy Butler 

Post#54 » by dontforget » Tue Apr 4, 2017 6:57 pm

Pointgod wrote:Butler dropped 39,6 and 5 with a block and a steal on Sunday.

Paul George dueled with LeBron to the tune of 43, 9 and 9. Giving up a 2 or 3 pick when the possibility is getting both of these guys seems a little more palatable to me.



Ya, I was about to say, this board needs to take a look at what Butler's is doing recently. He has put the Bulls on his back to get them into the playoffs. You can scoff at that, but he put up superstar efforts recently against playoff level competition (Cavs, Bucks, Hawks, Wizards).

I'm not suggesting we trade a top 3 pick for him (if possible), but parting away from players like Russell and Randle etc etc. is not that ridiculous if you can get that type of production.

Return to Los Angeles Lakers