Banks2Pierce wrote:Defense was 5 pp100 better with Sullinger than it has been with Horford on the court this year. You're fighting a tough uphill argument against the stats if you think Sullinger was a definite below average defender.
just askin questions cos idk the asnwers but i'm rdy to climb this hill to prove horford is a better defender than sullinger. Sullinger ex gf syndrome makes people think of the good more than the bad. I mean, the ironic part of Sullinger was that he was in the best shape of his career this year, the year he wasn't a Celtic. And he got hurt. Again.
-how are those pp100 stats this year vs last year across the board in the leauge. Follow up: if D rtgs are generally worse than last year, how do we account for that adjustment?
-what were teh specific lineups that sullinger was in and how did they do against other celtic lineups, follow up: 4th quarter lineups? Follow up: how do we account for the time played at each lineup? Let's figure out where the cut-off is for MPG of each lineup used.
-how often did Celtics play sullinger at PF/C? Essentially, how often was Sullinger with another 'big' versus horford playing with a crowder at the 4.
-how often did Sullinger see the floor in 4th quarters of games, if so, what were the team drtg and his adj +/-
-do you think that Sullinger is a better defender than Horford because of the stats you mentioned?
-let's have a long philosophical debate on stats usage, we can get into all sorts of topics: have stats learned to accurately measure individual defense? Correlation between interior D strength versus overall team D rtg (myth or reality?) let's get into tangents whetehr 'clutch' exists and how exactly do stats measure p&r efficiency on the roller versus the ball-handler. Omg so many topics let's spend years figuring it out, you wanna? i'm down.