jbeachboy wrote:any of those people who wanted to keep thad young still around?
Net-Meister and Jagger-Sentence still talk up how we lost that trade.
Moderators: Rich Rane, NyCeEvO
jbeachboy wrote:any of those people who wanted to keep thad young still around?
MrDollarBills wrote:That one handed hesitation move he hit Vucevic with was nasty af.
lol @ us losing that Thad Young trade. Indiana fans will cry tears of despair in about two seasons over that move.

Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
Prokorov wrote:IF he can add the three ball to his game and consistently shoot it at 37-38% he is a keeper and potentially a longtime starter. as is i think we have a career big minutes rotation guy for sure.
plays with so much poise and competitiveness
MrDollarBills wrote:Prokorov wrote:IF he can add the three ball to his game and consistently shoot it at 37-38% he is a keeper and potentially a longtime starter. as is i think we have a career big minutes rotation guy for sure.
plays with so much poise and competitiveness
Outside of Brook Lopez, can you name or more skilled rookie drafted by this team?
I mean we may have to go some ways back![]()
He's shooting 34% as a starter, 59%TS.
Pour some seasoning on this kid and take the training wheels off next year. I say he puts up at bare minimum 15ppg in year 2.
Prokorov wrote:MrDollarBills wrote:Prokorov wrote:IF he can add the three ball to his game and consistently shoot it at 37-38% he is a keeper and potentially a longtime starter. as is i think we have a career big minutes rotation guy for sure.
plays with so much poise and competitiveness
Outside of Brook Lopez, can you name or more skilled rookie drafted by this team?
I mean we may have to go some ways back![]()
He's shooting 34% as a starter, 59%TS.
Pour some seasoning on this kid and take the training wheels off next year. I say he puts up at bare minimum 15ppg in year 2.
no i cant.... but then again we havent really had draft picks in years and the ones we have are pretty poor.
http://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/NJN/draft.html
My answer to your initial question was going to be Krstic, which was stretch, and if not him, I was going all the way back to the Calipari era (KVH). The one guy that I overlooked was Ryan Anderson, but LeVert, by nature of being a guard & a ball handler, was still more skilled as an incoming rookie.MrDollarBills wrote:This list makes me want to cry.
You either see straight up garbage, marginal players, or dudes that just did not give a rat's ass.
TheNetsFan wrote:My answer to your initial question was going to be Krstic, which was stretch, and if not him, I was going all the way back to the Calipari era (KVH). The one guy that I overlooked was Ryan Anderson, but LeVert, by nature of being a guard & a ball handler, was still more skilled as an incoming rookie.MrDollarBills wrote:This list makes me want to cry.
You either see straight up garbage, marginal players, or dudes that just did not give a rat's ass.
Prokorov wrote:IF he can add the three ball to his game and consistently shoot it at 37-38% he is a keeper and potentially a longtime starter. as is i think we have a career big minutes rotation guy for sure.
plays with so much poise and competitiveness


LeVert is ready for bigger things. He shot 45 percent overall and 33 percent from deep after a chilly start, and he just reads the game well on both ends. He has a quick first step, good passing vision, and the ability to run a pick-and-roll in a pinch. He can defend across at least three positions. He was a big part of Brooklyn's late-season friskiness. He's an easy fit in winning lineups; the Nets outscored opponents with LeVert, Lopez, and Jeremy Lin on the floor, and outscoring people is generally not what the Nets have done the past two years.

and outscoring people is generally not what the Nets have done the past two years.
