Zach Collins

Draft talk all year round

Moderators: Marcus, Duke4life831

User avatar
BillyKingGM
Sophomore
Posts: 182
And1: 58
Joined: Jun 08, 2016
     

Re: Zach Collins 

Post#81 » by BillyKingGM » Tue Apr 4, 2017 1:06 pm

Fischella wrote:
BillyKingGM wrote:What do you guys think of Zach compared to Skal right now?

Skal showed nothing in terms of IQ, toughness, floor game, that's where Collins excels, Skal has a better, more proved jumpshot, good timing for blocks like Collins, I guess they share the concerns about bulking up or getting to the right level strength-wise,but other than that I dont see it.

I doubt you can ever survive with Skal as your only big, Collins can potentially anchor a defense.


Right he definitely didn't show any of those abilities at Kentucky, but he has shown all of this in the D league and so far in the NBA. I agree he probably won't ever be your "only" big, and Collins has that upside, but I don't think Collins is any farther along to being that "only" big than Skal is at this current point in time.
User avatar
TurboTitan
Starter
Posts: 2,188
And1: 1,940
Joined: Jul 12, 2013
Location: Windsor, ON
       

Re: Zach Collins 

Post#82 » by TurboTitan » Thu Apr 6, 2017 8:35 pm

someone takes him in the top 10 imo
“We don't see ourselves as All-Stars. We see ourselves as one unit. It's like five fingers on a hand. You can do more damage together as a fist than spread out flat.” ~SHEED
RipCity71252
Pro Prospect
Posts: 839
And1: 220
Joined: Jul 19, 2008
Location: Just South of Rip City

Re: Zach Collins 

Post#83 » by RipCity71252 » Thu Apr 6, 2017 9:12 pm

Dallas is probably his ceiling wherever that pick falls, but I think Cuban will want to take a bigger swing so I'd see them going with a guy like Bridges over him.

One of Chicago, Denver or Charlotte seems most likely though.
Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 29,821
And1: 9,274
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: Zach Collins 

Post#84 » by Chi town » Wed Apr 12, 2017 11:05 pm

TurboTitan wrote:someone takes him in the top 10 imo


He declared and hired an agent.


I think he will rise and go 8-10. After he tests out and shoots well from 3 in workouts scouts will see him as a potential 3D Center which could be an absolute game changer. He can protect the rim and PnR while also spacing the floor on offense with that 3 ball.
Upperclass
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,892
And1: 2,210
Joined: Aug 09, 2005

Re: Zach Collins 

Post#85 » by Upperclass » Wed Apr 12, 2017 11:54 pm

BillyKingGM wrote:
Fischella wrote:
BillyKingGM wrote:What do you guys think of Zach compared to Skal right now?

Skal showed nothing in terms of IQ, toughness, floor game, that's where Collins excels, Skal has a better, more proved jumpshot, good timing for blocks like Collins, I guess they share the concerns about bulking up or getting to the right level strength-wise,but other than that I dont see it.

I doubt you can ever survive with Skal as your only big, Collins can potentially anchor a defense.


Right he definitely didn't show any of those abilities at Kentucky, but he has shown all of this in the D league and so far in the NBA. I agree he probably won't ever be your "only" big, and Collins has that upside, but I don't think Collins is any farther along to being that "only" big than Skal is at this current point in time.


skal will end up alot like Frye. Collins is tougher and has room for a more complete game.
User avatar
GimmeDat
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 23,930
And1: 16,927
Joined: Sep 27, 2013
Location: Australia
 

Re: Zach Collins 

Post#86 » by GimmeDat » Thu Apr 13, 2017 12:16 am

Yep my gut is he goes top 10 as well, and quite easily at that.
doordoor123
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,776
And1: 1,234
Joined: Jul 23, 2013

Re: Zach Collins 

Post#87 » by doordoor123 » Thu Apr 13, 2017 12:22 am

Upperclass wrote:
BillyKingGM wrote:
Fischella wrote:Skal showed nothing in terms of IQ, toughness, floor game, that's where Collins excels, Skal has a better, more proved jumpshot, good timing for blocks like Collins, I guess they share the concerns about bulking up or getting to the right level strength-wise,but other than that I dont see it.

I doubt you can ever survive with Skal as your only big, Collins can potentially anchor a defense.


Right he definitely didn't show any of those abilities at Kentucky, but he has shown all of this in the D league and so far in the NBA. I agree he probably won't ever be your "only" big, and Collins has that upside, but I don't think Collins is any farther along to being that "only" big than Skal is at this current point in time.


skal will end up alot like Frye. Collins is tougher and has room for a more complete game.


Skal is only 21 and is already better than Frye ever was. Everyone thought he would be Frye before he was drafted if he worked out, but he's actually playing much better and showcasing more upside. He's pretty much the King's centerpiece moving forward.
DraftGuru
Ballboy
Posts: 7
And1: 1
Joined: Apr 11, 2017

Re: Zach Collins 

Post#88 » by DraftGuru » Fri Apr 14, 2017 2:29 am

GimmeDat wrote:Yep my gut is he goes top 10 as well, and quite easily at that.


I don't see it. What am I missing? He'll be the first Collins taken but lottery seems really high for him.
doordoor123
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,776
And1: 1,234
Joined: Jul 23, 2013

Re: Zach Collins 

Post#89 » by doordoor123 » Fri Apr 14, 2017 4:20 am

DraftGuru wrote:
GimmeDat wrote:Yep my gut is he goes top 10 as well, and quite easily at that.


I don't see it. What am I missing? He'll be the first Collins taken but lottery seems really high for him.


You're probably missing everything. He's an athletic 7 footer with a good wingspan that can stretch the floor, guard the wing, guard he inside, draws offensive fouls, has great timing on blocks, has patience in the post and makes the right moves. He also operates well in the P&R. He just needs a more consistent jumper and he needs to gain strength.

If you're comparing him to John Collins, John Collins cannot play defense.
User avatar
GimmeDat
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 23,930
And1: 16,927
Joined: Sep 27, 2013
Location: Australia
 

Re: Zach Collins 

Post#90 » by GimmeDat » Fri Apr 14, 2017 4:23 am

Honestly, Z.Collins reminds me Bender a bit. Similar frame (and yes they're both white), versatile defenders, smart players that will play there role and have tools inside and out on offense. Jumper has nice form and has potential but not prolific shooters yet.

Bender is undoubtedly the better prospect, but there's some similarities there.
doordoor123
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,776
And1: 1,234
Joined: Jul 23, 2013

Re: Zach Collins 

Post#91 » by doordoor123 » Fri Apr 14, 2017 5:00 am

GimmeDat wrote:Honestly, Z.Collins reminds me Bender a bit. Similar frame (and yes they're both white), versatile defenders, smart players that will play there role and have tools inside and out on offense. Jumper has nice form and has potential but not prolific shooters yet.

Bender is undoubtedly the better prospect, but there's some similarities there.


Bender has less explosiveness and he's even skinnier. I'd also say Bender is the better passer, but I think Collins has a better feel for the game. Collins is also more advanced skills-wise and he just has a better feel defensively. Bender is the better wing defender and better shooter. Collins also has bigger wingspan. Bender has a 7'1 wingspan and Collins has 7'4. Collins can play power forward, but he's a center.
User avatar
BillyKingGM
Sophomore
Posts: 182
And1: 58
Joined: Jun 08, 2016
     

Re: Zach Collins 

Post#92 » by BillyKingGM » Fri Apr 14, 2017 2:52 pm

doordoor123 wrote:
GimmeDat wrote:Honestly, Z.Collins reminds me Bender a bit. Similar frame (and yes they're both white), versatile defenders, smart players that will play there role and have tools inside and out on offense. Jumper has nice form and has potential but not prolific shooters yet.

Bender is undoubtedly the better prospect, but there's some similarities there.


Bender has less explosiveness and he's even skinnier. I'd also say Bender is the better passer, but I think Collins has a better feel for the game. Collins is also more advanced skills-wise and he just has a better feel defensively. Bender is the better wing defender and better shooter. Collins also has bigger wingspan. Bender has a 7'1 wingspan and Collins has 7'4. Collins can play power forward, but he's a center.


Bender's "feel" on offense is far better than Collins'.
doordoor123
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,776
And1: 1,234
Joined: Jul 23, 2013

Re: Zach Collins 

Post#93 » by doordoor123 » Fri Apr 14, 2017 3:01 pm

BillyKingGM wrote:
doordoor123 wrote:
GimmeDat wrote:Honestly, Z.Collins reminds me Bender a bit. Similar frame (and yes they're both white), versatile defenders, smart players that will play there role and have tools inside and out on offense. Jumper has nice form and has potential but not prolific shooters yet.

Bender is undoubtedly the better prospect, but there's some similarities there.


Bender has less explosiveness and he's even skinnier. I'd also say Bender is the better passer, but I think Collins has a better feel for the game. Collins is also more advanced skills-wise and he just has a better feel defensively. Bender is the better wing defender and better shooter. Collins also has bigger wingspan. Bender has a 7'1 wingspan and Collins has 7'4. Collins can play power forward, but he's a center.


Bender's "feel" on offense is far better than Collins'.


Maybe I should have said Collins understands the game more, rather than feel. Collins just knows the places to be both on offense and defense. He thinks the game very well, while I think Bender has a more natural feel.
User avatar
BillyKingGM
Sophomore
Posts: 182
And1: 58
Joined: Jun 08, 2016
     

Re: Zach Collins 

Post#94 » by BillyKingGM » Fri Apr 14, 2017 5:13 pm

doordoor123 wrote:
BillyKingGM wrote:
doordoor123 wrote:
Bender has less explosiveness and he's even skinnier. I'd also say Bender is the better passer, but I think Collins has a better feel for the game. Collins is also more advanced skills-wise and he just has a better feel defensively. Bender is the better wing defender and better shooter. Collins also has bigger wingspan. Bender has a 7'1 wingspan and Collins has 7'4. Collins can play power forward, but he's a center.


Bender's "feel" on offense is far better than Collins'.


Maybe I should have said Collins understands the game more, rather than feel. Collins just knows the places to be both on offense and defense. He thinks the game very well, while I think Bender has a more natural feel.


Yeah Collins seems to have his head in what he needs to do, but he seem a little... slow on offense. I think that's fine for a guy his age, and something he will overcome, but Bender doesn't seem to have that issue. Collins seems to realize where he needs to go and what he needs to do, but it seems like it just takes him too long to realize. Definitely better than where a lot of bigs in this class are. I don't see why anyone would prefer Collins to Hartenstein, though.
pantalones
Junior
Posts: 419
And1: 220
Joined: May 20, 2016

Re: Zach Collins 

Post#95 » by pantalones » Fri Apr 14, 2017 5:31 pm

GimmeDat wrote:Honestly, Z.Collins reminds me Bender a bit. Similar frame (and yes they're both white), versatile defenders, smart players that will play there role and have tools inside and out on offense. Jumper has nice form and has potential but not prolific shooters yet.

Bender is undoubtedly the better prospect, but there's some similarities there.


I don't agree with this at all. ZC has an advanced offensive game, is a great rebounder, great defender and great motor. He just has to work on silly fouls and not biting on fakes. My guess is he winds up going top 10.
doordoor123
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,776
And1: 1,234
Joined: Jul 23, 2013

Re: Zach Collins 

Post#96 » by doordoor123 » Fri Apr 14, 2017 10:11 pm

pantalones wrote:
GimmeDat wrote:Honestly, Z.Collins reminds me Bender a bit. Similar frame (and yes they're both white), versatile defenders, smart players that will play there role and have tools inside and out on offense. Jumper has nice form and has potential but not prolific shooters yet.

Bender is undoubtedly the better prospect, but there's some similarities there.


I don't agree with this at all. ZC has an advanced offensive game, is a great rebounder, great defender and great motor. He just has to work on silly fouls and not biting on fakes. My guess is he winds up going top 10.


They're different kinds of prospects. Bender is a stretch PF with more fluidity and Collins is a low post center that can play PF with more verticality. Bender has better offensive instincts and Collins has better defensive instincts. As a power forward Bender has a lot of upside and as a center Collins has a lot of upside. But let's be honest, I'd take them both over Markkanen.
User avatar
GimmeDat
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 23,930
And1: 16,927
Joined: Sep 27, 2013
Location: Australia
 

Re: Zach Collins 

Post#97 » by GimmeDat » Fri Apr 14, 2017 11:15 pm

Maybe my comment speaks more to my opinion on Bender. He was 3rd on my board last year.
HotelVitale
RealGM
Posts: 16,910
And1: 12,040
Joined: Sep 14, 2007
Location: West Philly, PA

Re: Zach Collins 

Post#98 » by HotelVitale » Fri Apr 14, 2017 11:28 pm

[quote="doordoor123" Skal is only 21 and is already better than Frye ever was... He's pretty much the King's centerpiece moving forward.[/quote] This is OT but what would give you the impression that Skal is 'better than Frye ever was'? Frye spent a few years as an above average starter and Skal played 600 minutes this season--95% of which were in NBA garbage season in the last 6 weeks of the season--and put up okay raw #s and bad advanced #s (negative VORP, negative BPM, #72 of PFs in RPM).

I don't mean to knock Skal and I'd be happy if I was a Kings fan, but Frye earned minutes on good, competitive teams and contributed positively to them for a while. Skal put up okay numbers for a team that didn't give a f who was playing, doesn't seem fair to compare them.
916fan
Pro Prospect
Posts: 815
And1: 366
Joined: Dec 03, 2016
 

Re: Zach Collins 

Post#99 » by 916fan » Sat Apr 15, 2017 9:19 pm

BillyKingGM wrote:
doordoor123 wrote:
BillyKingGM wrote:
Bender's "feel" on offense is far better than Collins'.


Maybe I should have said Collins understands the game more, rather than feel. Collins just knows the places to be both on offense and defense. He thinks the game very well, while I think Bender has a more natural feel.


Yeah Collins seems to have his head in what he needs to do, but he seem a little... slow on offense. I think that's fine for a guy his age, and something he will overcome, but Bender doesn't seem to have that issue. Collins seems to realize where he needs to go and what he needs to do, but it seems like it just takes him too long to realize. Definitely better than where a lot of bigs in this class are. I don't see why anyone would prefer Collins to Hartenstein, though.

With Hartenstein, it's hard to get a feel for him as a player. Hartenstein isn't getting a lot of minutes in a weak league. Upside is there, but I don't know if he can put it together. There's also many articles calling out his attitude and maturity.

Collins seems to be the much safer pick.
EricAnderson
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,783
And1: 2,261
Joined: May 28, 2008

Re: Zach Collins 

Post#100 » by EricAnderson » Sun Apr 16, 2017 4:56 pm

He'd fit perfectly next to Jokic in Denver but I don't think he lasts that far

Return to NBA Draft