please.
Some players make there teammates better. Westbrook clearly doesn't do that. He just chucks chucks chucks.
Moderators: Domejandro, ken6199, Dirk, infinite11285, Clav, bwgood77, bisme37, zimpy27, KingDavid, cupcakesnake
Shock Defeat wrote:MartinToVaught wrote:Shock Defeat wrote:Listen, I was ready to give Westbrook his kudos during the first three quarters. He was amazing and made great decisions, every player was involved and when offensive players are involved they end up playing better defense too.
Then the 4th quarter happened and he basically chucked the game away from OKC.
Which player(s) do you think should have been carrying more of the offensive load in the 4th quarter for OKC? And why do you think the results would have been any different?
Take Oladipo for example, he's a slasher not a shooter. The Rockets were not guarding him sell when he was slashing to the basket. Westbrook ISO ball relegates a lot of OKC's players away from their strengths, so of course if you make them stand around for 20 seconds just in case they get the ball, they are not going to shoot well.

MartinToVaught wrote:Shock Defeat wrote:MartinToVaught wrote:Which player(s) do you think should have been carrying more of the offensive load in the 4th quarter for OKC? And why do you think the results would have been any different?
Take Oladipo for example, he's a slasher not a shooter. The Rockets were not guarding him sell when he was slashing to the basket. Westbrook ISO ball relegates a lot of OKC's players away from their strengths, so of course if you make them stand around for 20 seconds just in case they get the ball, they are not going to shoot well.
Oladipo was 4-14 tonight. 1-7 from three. I see no reason to believe that the Thunder would have had a better chance to win with him taking more shots in the 4th.
donnieme wrote:Harden is better with talent. Sometime in the first half I wondered why he wasn't shooting more when Ryan Anderson was stinking it up and it looked like OKC could run away with it. Harden stayed calm and exploded at the right time. Just because your teammates miss shots doesn't mean you should start shooting every other possession. But damn doesn't mean the Thunder don't suck

donnieme wrote:Harden is better with talent. Sometime in the first half I wondered why he wasn't shooting more when Ryan Anderson was stinking it up and it looked like OKC could run away with it. Harden stayed calm and exploded at the right time. Just because your teammates miss shots doesn't mean you should start shooting every other possession. But damn doesn't mean the Thunder don't suck
Patches Perry wrote:donnieme wrote:Harden is better with talent. Sometime in the first half I wondered why he wasn't shooting more when Ryan Anderson was stinking it up and it looked like OKC could run away with it. Harden stayed calm and exploded at the right time. Just because your teammates miss shots doesn't mean you should start shooting every other possession. But damn doesn't mean the Thunder don't suck
I can't say Harden is "better with talent" until he matches Westbrook's playoff resume. When Westbrook had Durant, they made finals and 3 WCF. Harden needs to prove himself beyond the 1st round.
rapskar wrote:Wow, Rockets fans must be the saltiest fans in the NBA. You guys won, no need to cry at Westbrook like little kids.
About the game I just want to point out one thing. Semaj Christon (Westbrook´s replacement) had a plus/minus of -15 in 6 minutes.
-15
In 6 minutes.
Patches Perry wrote:donnieme wrote:Harden is better with talent. Sometime in the first half I wondered why he wasn't shooting more when Ryan Anderson was stinking it up and it looked like OKC could run away with it. Harden stayed calm and exploded at the right time. Just because your teammates miss shots doesn't mean you should start shooting every other possession. But damn doesn't mean the Thunder don't suck
I can't say Harden is "better with talent" until he matches Westbrook's playoff resume. When Westbrook had Durant, they made finals and 3 WCF. Harden needs to prove himself beyond the 1st round.
HotTubMike wrote:Patches Perry wrote:donnieme wrote:Harden is better with talent. Sometime in the first half I wondered why he wasn't shooting more when Ryan Anderson was stinking it up and it looked like OKC could run away with it. Harden stayed calm and exploded at the right time. Just because your teammates miss shots doesn't mean you should start shooting every other possession. But damn doesn't mean the Thunder don't suck
I can't say Harden is "better with talent" until he matches Westbrook's playoff resume. When Westbrook had Durant, they made finals and 3 WCF. Harden needs to prove himself beyond the 1st round.
Well Durant is lightyears ahead of any talent Harden has played with in Houston so that's not very fair.
Patches Perry wrote:donnieme wrote:Harden is better with talent. Sometime in the first half I wondered why he wasn't shooting more when Ryan Anderson was stinking it up and it looked like OKC could run away with it. Harden stayed calm and exploded at the right time. Just because your teammates miss shots doesn't mean you should start shooting every other possession. But damn doesn't mean the Thunder don't suck
I can't say Harden is "better with talent" until he matches Westbrook's playoff resume. When Westbrook had Durant, they made finals and 3 WCF. Harden needs to prove himself beyond the 1st round.
Dadouv47 wrote:donnieme wrote:Harden is better with talent. Sometime in the first half I wondered why he wasn't shooting more when Ryan Anderson was stinking it up and it looked like OKC could run away with it. Harden stayed calm and exploded at the right time. Just because your teammates miss shots doesn't mean you should start shooting every other possession. But damn doesn't mean the Thunder don't suck
He wasn't doing anything. His team could be down 25 during the 3th quarter if our roster was slightly better. Westbrook sat and the lead went down to 3. Some rockets players played GREAT tonight (Lou williams is insane, but Harden? come on...)

E-Balla wrote:TMU wrote:Dadouv47 wrote:
Are you sure? Oladipo was 1/7 from 3. McDermott only played 13 minutes, and Gibson only 20. We don't have other good shooter. You can blame Donovan more than Westbrook.
I get that his teammates aren't the best shooters. But collectively, they still shot better than Westbrook. Also when you're the only one taking shots after shots after shots, don't you think it becomes really predictable? Uhm, how about you devise some some plays and run them, Donovan?
Look, I'm not out here to single out Westbrook. The entire organization needs to figure out how to incorporate its own players.
Not by TS%. And who else is supposed to take these shots? Its hard to say Westbrook lost them the game when whenever he was on the floor prior to the last 6 minutes they were killing Houston.
Shock Defeat wrote:MartinToVaught wrote:Shock Defeat wrote:Take Oladipo for example, he's a slasher not a shooter. The Rockets were not guarding him sell when he was slashing to the basket. Westbrook ISO ball relegates a lot of OKC's players away from their strengths, so of course if you make them stand around for 20 seconds just in case they get the ball, they are not going to shoot well.
Oladipo was 4-14 tonight. 1-7 from three. I see no reason to believe that the Thunder would have had a better chance to win with him taking more shots in the 4th.
How would you expect Oladipo to get into a rhythm when all he's doing is standing around on offense, knowing that the only way he will get the ball is if Westbrook needs to get bailed out. Give Oladipo opportunities early in the shot clock and let him play basketball and not stand around ball.

Patches Perry wrote:HotTubMike wrote:Patches Perry wrote:
I can't say Harden is "better with talent" until he matches Westbrook's playoff resume. When Westbrook had Durant, they made finals and 3 WCF. Harden needs to prove himself beyond the 1st round.
Well Durant is lightyears ahead of any talent Harden has played with in Houston so that's not very fair.
Oh, I didn't think team talent disparities mattered.

TMU wrote:E-Balla wrote:TMU wrote:
I get that his teammates aren't the best shooters. But collectively, they still shot better than Westbrook. Also when you're the only one taking shots after shots after shots, don't you think it becomes really predictable? Uhm, how about you devise some some plays and run them, Donovan?
Look, I'm not out here to single out Westbrook. The entire organization needs to figure out how to incorporate its own players.
Not by TS%. And who else is supposed to take these shots? Its hard to say Westbrook lost them the game when whenever he was on the floor prior to the last 6 minutes they were killing Houston.
So their TS% is low, and that means they aren't allowed to shoot ever? OKC has no offensive scheme whatsoever other than giving the ball to Westbrook and letting something happen. Their spacing sucks, their passing game isn't existent, and as a result their offense is stagnant. You can't just let 1 man try to do everything.
