jbeachboy wrote:why the heck did george hill turn that down, thats crazy.
because he and his agent think he can get 5/150
Moderators: Rich Rane, NyCeEvO
jbeachboy wrote:why the heck did george hill turn that down, thats crazy.
ESPN's Fran Fraschilla highly-rates Teodosic, 30, and thinks the Serbian can succeed in the NBA playing for Nets head coach Kenny Atkinson.
"At his age, his stature, he’s going to look for a fit where someone gives him the ball, looks past his deficiencies and lets him play as what he is: one of the premier pick-and-roll players in world," Fraschilla told the New York Post. "I could see him in Kenny’s system. [Atkinson] understands the Euro game, pacing, spacing.
Offensively, he’s the best passer in the world, from a purely offensive standpoint. Chris Paul is a Hall of Famer, but as far as a pure passer, Teodosic might be the most creative passer in the world today. Now, he will not guard a chair, but he’s a brilliant offensive player and an ultra-competitor."
Paradise wrote:Yeah, I'd rather pursue him as well. The only risk of signing Teodosic would be on the defensive side.ESPN's Fran Fraschilla highly-rates Teodosic, 30, and thinks the Serbian can succeed in the NBA playing for Nets head coach Kenny Atkinson.
"At his age, his stature, he’s going to look for a fit where someone gives him the ball, looks past his deficiencies and lets him play as what he is: one of the premier pick-and-roll players in world," Fraschilla told the New York Post. "I could see him in Kenny’s system. [Atkinson] understands the Euro game, pacing, spacing.
Offensively, he’s the best passer in the world, from a purely offensive standpoint. Chris Paul is a Hall of Famer, but as far as a pure passer, Teodosic might be the most creative passer in the world today. Now, he will not guard a chair, but he’s a brilliant offensive player and an ultra-competitor."
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
Kswiss wrote:Been Watching the Utah series, and I can safely say Hill is not starting SG material, and therefore I don't see us paying (at best) ~10 mil per for a backup PG. I can't believe he turned that contract extension down... going to definitely regret that.
bws94 wrote:Kswiss wrote:Been Watching the Utah series, and I can safely say Hill is not starting SG material, and therefore I don't see us paying (at best) ~10 mil per for a backup PG. I can't believe he turned that contract extension down... going to definitely regret that.
I disagree. He's not having a great game tonight, but he's been solid. Hill plays more off the ball than other PGs, but he's a solid player. And he shoots the 3 at 40%. Shame about Hayward tonight, last game he played his heart out but his team still lost.
Kswiss wrote:bws94 wrote:Kswiss wrote:Been Watching the Utah series, and I can safely say Hill is not starting SG material, and therefore I don't see us paying (at best) ~10 mil per for a backup PG. I can't believe he turned that contract extension down... going to definitely regret that.
I disagree. He's not having a great game tonight, but he's been solid. Hill plays more off the ball than other PGs, but he's a solid player. And he shoots the 3 at 40%. Shame about Hayward tonight, last game he played his heart out but his team still lost.
Not just this game, in general he doesn't have the next gear against playoff intensity defense. Decent role player but no where near worth the money he's rumored to be commanding
Prokorov wrote:Kswiss wrote:bws94 wrote:
I disagree. He's not having a great game tonight, but he's been solid. Hill plays more off the ball than other PGs, but he's a solid player. And he shoots the 3 at 40%. Shame about Hayward tonight, last game he played his heart out but his team still lost.
Not just this game, in general he doesn't have the next gear against playoff intensity defense. Decent role player but no where near worth the money he's rumored to be commanding
hill isnt worth that max deal... but he is a beast and certainly capable of starting at pg or sg. he is better then anyone on our team currently and would be a great addition money aside.
Prokorov wrote:Kswiss wrote:bws94 wrote:
I disagree. He's not having a great game tonight, but he's been solid. Hill plays more off the ball than other PGs, but he's a solid player. And he shoots the 3 at 40%. Shame about Hayward tonight, last game he played his heart out but his team still lost.
Not just this game, in general he doesn't have the next gear against playoff intensity defense. Decent role player but no where near worth the money he's rumored to be commanding
hill isnt worth that max deal... but he is a beast and certainly capable of starting at pg or sg. he is better then anyone on our team currently and would be a great addition money aside.
Prokorov wrote:jbeachboy wrote:why the heck did george hill turn that down, thats crazy.
because he and his agent think he can get 5/150

Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
Kswiss wrote:bws94 wrote:Kswiss wrote:Been Watching the Utah series, and I can safely say Hill is not starting SG material, and therefore I don't see us paying (at best) ~10 mil per for a backup PG. I can't believe he turned that contract extension down... going to definitely regret that.
I disagree. He's not having a great game tonight, but he's been solid. Hill plays more off the ball than other PGs, but he's a solid player. And he shoots the 3 at 40%. Shame about Hayward tonight, last game he played his heart out but his team still lost.
Not just this game, in general he doesn't have the next gear against playoff intensity defense. Decent role player but no where near worth the money he's rumored to be commanding

Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
Kswiss wrote:Been Watching the Utah series, and I can safely say Hill is not starting SG material, and therefore I don't see us paying (at best) ~10 mil per for a backup PG. I can't believe he turned that contract extension down... going to definitely regret that.

Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
shakendfries wrote:Prokorov wrote:hood30 wrote:Hill vs Paul game 3......Hill is more of a shooting guard...great shooter but does not create much for his teammates.
He is a modern gaurd... a guy you can play on and off the ball and who can gaurd the 1/2/3 spots. he may not rack up assists but he does create a ton for his teammates by spacing the floor, not needing the ball in his hand an always making the right plays.... in these motion offenses, assists are secondary since the ball usually swings 3 or 4 times before a shot is up.
Hill is perfect for the motion offense where you ideally want multiple ball handlers and not necessarily a throwback 10 assist type player...
The Jazz will make the second round of the playoffs this year and there's no way in hell they'll let the Nets swoop their best guard. George Hill will suit up in Salt Lake next season
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app

Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
Keith Van Horn wrote:Milos would effectively remove Hill from all conversation it seems like. What about still throwing offer sheets at KCP and Porter then?
I still think getting Millsap would be a great offseasn. Gets us a solid 4 that goes well with Lopez and would thrive with us. Millsap, Teodosic, and 2 first rounders. And still probably have flexible cap space to boot.

Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
Kswiss wrote:Prokorov wrote:Kswiss wrote:Not just this game, in general he doesn't have the next gear against playoff intensity defense. Decent role player but no where near worth the money he's rumored to be commanding
hill isnt worth that max deal... but he is a beast and certainly capable of starting at pg or sg. he is better then anyone on our team currently and would be a great addition money aside.
Don't insult Lin or Lopez like that... Hill is a middle-of the pack PG
Prokorov wrote:Kswiss wrote:Prokorov wrote:
hill isnt worth that max deal... but he is a beast and certainly capable of starting at pg or sg. he is better then anyone on our team currently and would be a great addition money aside.
Don't insult Lin or Lopez like that... Hill is a middle-of the pack PG
So is Lin. and lopez is a one way player who prevents you from playing team defense. we have 0 allstars on this team. saying hill is an upgrade is no insult