Method28 wrote:hardenASG13 wrote:Look, the point of this thread was that Chris Paul is not leading a team as the best player to winning a playoff series that matters, such as one against another superstar, late in the playoffs. Never said he wasn't capable of leading a team out of the first round, particularly against a Utah team without arguably their best player. Big deal, ultimately. He's always been regarded as this top tier star, when he's more like a borderline top 10 player, due to his size and unwillingness to shoot at times (He's great when he does, but he isn't always aggressive enough). That's about good enough to lead you to the second round, which really doesn't matter when it comes down to it.
And to many, that point is ridiculous lol how can you pin something like that on one player? To me whats even more out there is that you picked probably the worst player to argue that case against.
Cp3 is one the, if not the most efficient player in nba history. He shoots well from the field, is ball heavy yet his assist to turnover ratio is insane and plays excellent defense. If his numbers im the playoffs were to change drastically then you would have a point, but they dont! He just about always puts up star numbers no matter what.
I would argue that someone from the bayou put bad juju on him before id say his playoff failures are because of him. I have watched this guys whole career and he is simply a master of the game, it really sucks that guys who are supposed to be his right hand (West, Blake) have their shortcomings and dont come through.
Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk
Lol so 90% of the league doesnt matter...cuz most of the league is not going past the first round and any team in the west is gonna get slapped by GSW (maybe the spurs but even then the Dubs are loaded and balling)...so WB, Harden, Dwade, P.George, etc dont matter...Also, why even watch the nex Rox series then, the winner is just gonna get beat by GSW easily




























