Kaled wrote:Bulls03 wrote:I'll still take Tony over MCW.
You have be blind, mentally challenged or extremely stupid to take MCW over any PG in this league.
Tony Snell not Parker lol
Moderators: HomoSapien, RedBulls23, Payt10, Ice Man, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, DASMACKDOWN, fleet, GimmeDat, Michael Jackson
Kaled wrote:Bulls03 wrote:I'll still take Tony over MCW.
You have be blind, mentally challenged or extremely stupid to take MCW over any PG in this league.
Kaled wrote:Bulls03 wrote:I'll still take Tony over MCW.
You have be blind, mentally challenged or extremely stupid to take MCW over any PG in this league.

Eesee1 wrote:Wow, Tony Snell has 2 pts, 2 reb and 2 ast in 31 mins during a close elimination game and messes up an important play...how can Bucks fans want him back at $9-10 mil a year?
jc23 wrote:Indy will be a very popular team this summer because of PG.
Bulls03 wrote:George is gone. Larry didn't want to rebuild

ThreeYearPlan wrote:Bulls fans defend HomoSapien more than Rose.
HomoSapien wrote:Watching the Jazz game and can't help but wonder how different our team would've been if we drafted Gobert instead of Snell. Hard to imagine Thomas getting to the hoop so easily if Gobert was there to clog the paint.



Polynice4Pippen wrote:On a happier note, there's nothing like hearing Hubie Brown talk about the "painted area" during a broadcast.

Ice Man wrote:Eesee1 wrote:Wow, Tony Snell has 2 pts, 2 reb and 2 ast in 31 mins during a close elimination game and messes up an important play...how can Bucks fans want him back at $9-10 mil a year?
If the Bucks want to advance in the playoffs they can't be starting guys like that. Tony is a legit NBA player these days, I give him credit for that. But the thing is, guys like that are available for cheap every summer. Bellinelli, Canaan, Nate Robinson, DJ, E'Twaun Moore ... we got them all for NBA minimum wage, or close to it. No point in spending real money on guys like Snell. Get one of them on the cheap and sp end the money on guys who really matter.
All that said, of course Tony is better than what we got for him in the trade. No question about that.

GimmeDat wrote:Snell had some really nice games all season for the Bucks, though. He's not a go to guy where you can single out a bad game and call him a bad player.
He's low usage but he's become uber-efficient in Milwaukee. He's valuable to them because he can swing between SG and SF and be a 3/D option. He's your Keith Bogans with a bit more positional versatility and length.
HomoSapien wrote:Watching the Jazz game and can't help but wonder how different our team would've been if we drafted Gobert instead of Snell. Hard to imagine Thomas getting to the hoop so easily if Gobert was there to clog the paint.
Payt10 wrote:Polynice4Pippen wrote:On a happier note, there's nothing like hearing Hubie Brown talk about the "painted area" during a broadcast.
"Mainly because..."