Then provides some pretty amusing/infuriating responses when asked about his limited PT in the game:
Now comes the inevitable blowback and criticism of Dwight's game:
-The Ringer...a week ago I was under the assumption that Howard was one of the best players in the NBA. But then Game 1 between the Wizards and Hawks unfolded and I was left questioning everything I thought I knew about Howard.
[In Game 2][H]e never even feigned an attempt to hedge ball screens; he rarely blocked anyone out; he never bent his knees or brought his hands above his waist on defense; and he showed no desire to post up or stand in the paint on offense. It was jarring to see a 31-year-old, eight-time NBA All-Star who once averaged 20.6 points and 13.8 rebounds for a Finals team so blatantly not give a single **** in a pivotal playoff game.
He finished with six points, seven rebounds, four fouls, and three turnovers. He was such a liability for the Hawks that he didn’t even get on the floor in the fourth quarter.
Thoughts?
Predictions?
Concerns?
Is the criticism warranted? Overblown?
Was Dwight right to be frustrated? Was Bud justified in benching one of our most prominent players down the stretch in a key playoff game?
Any chance we can trade Dwight for Horford straight up before Saturday's Game Three?