Mark K wrote:Rerisen wrote:If Paul came you'd have to figure a Wade restructure (with him willing) has to be part of it.
True. But what does that look like? 2-30? Paul's max will be $35m. He ain't coming for anything less. That's still half your cap spent on two ageing guards who are in their 30s.
Paul is still great, but I wouldn't want to be paying the back end of that deal.
2/30 with 9 million guaranteed for Wade in year two. He gets the same amount of money (24 million) just takes it over slightly less time. He plays next year at 15 million, Bulls stretch waive the non-guranteed money (9 million) and Wade retires at age 36. Bulls then dump Lopez, sign Cousins. Sign Bosh with the room exception. Trade Rondo for a legit 3&D F (needs to have PF flexibility if Bosh can't go), make Wade the sixth man (which I think he'd do to get Paul). That's the goal. Money doesn't get too terrible and if you have Paul, Wade, and Butler then you really only need to find like two or three guys capable of being 9-12 PER type guys. Much easier to find than another 20+ PER to run with Jimmy.
I'm worried about Paul's durability but not his PER or level of performance. The really great mind PG (Nash, Stockton, Kidd) who weren't just scorers were able to maintain high level of play well in to their 30s. I don't think this is a Tony Parker situation.





















