Yallbecrazy wrote:the blow it up is about this forum, not the team.
Poor reading comprehension, another reason to blow up the forum
Eh, an aside is no different really.
Moderators: DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX, 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford
Yallbecrazy wrote:the blow it up is about this forum, not the team.
Poor reading comprehension, another reason to blow up the forum
VanWest82 wrote:lstern wrote:Advanced stats paint a different picture. While he puts up numbers, he doesn't move the needle. DeMar is not nearly as talented as his AllStar peers. In fact, he's a definite negative on defense (50% of the time) and only passable when he has the ball in his hands on offense (34.3% or 34.3% of 50%[offense] = 17.2%). We were cruising when he was playing historically good basketball to begin the season and I fully believe that is precisely what needs to happen for him to actually improve our chances of winning, because he's less than 20% useful.
As for the Original article and premise of this thread, the point is to win. I love Masai and feel that he has done wonders for us, but without that top end talent, his efforts are futile. I would rather be Milwaukee that lost to Toronto, than Toronto, that [spoiler alert!:] advanced to lose to Cleveland. The only mistakes that Masai has made to date was overpaying for Carroll and not firing Casey upon arrival, following the loss to Brooklyn, following the Sweep by Washington or mid-season this year.
My point was Derozan is the player we could trade for the highest value package given his production + long-term nature of his deal. Everyone else on the team either hasn't proven themselves to that degree or are UFAs about to sign monster contracts (at a higher salary cap than when Derozan signed his).
Also, I disagree with your opinion on his effectiveness (outside of the defense comment). Derozan has holes in his game, sure, but he was a significant contributor (and often the most important one) in many of our wins this year. Trying to marginalize those contributions by factoring usage statistics based on incorrect interpretation of role and responsibility - he has an increased role on offense, decreased role on defense so it's not 50/50 - meanwhile completely ignoring the other ways he helps facilitate offense just isn't telling the real story.
I would rather have Giannis too. Easier said than done. My post was about alternatives. It's really easy to blame current players/coaches for past failures or blame Masai for past signings. It's much harder to look at the current roster with so many outgoing FA and chart a course to finding a superstar, especially if your plan is to let all those assets walk for nothing.
Johnny Bball wrote:Demar's contract is a complete steal at this point.
tdot56 wrote:Masai should be absolutely livid with this blowout performance against cavs... any other team in the playoffs would have done much better...anyone.. milwakee, Indiana....
Casey deserves to be fired for this.
Johnny Bball wrote:VanWest82 wrote:lstern wrote:Advanced stats paint a different picture. While he puts up numbers, he doesn't move the needle. DeMar is not nearly as talented as his AllStar peers. In fact, he's a definite negative on defense (50% of the time) and only passable when he has the ball in his hands on offense (34.3% or 34.3% of 50%[offense] = 17.2%). We were cruising when he was playing historically good basketball to begin the season and I fully believe that is precisely what needs to happen for him to actually improve our chances of winning, because he's less than 20% useful.
As for the Original article and premise of this thread, the point is to win. I love Masai and feel that he has done wonders for us, but without that top end talent, his efforts are futile. I would rather be Milwaukee that lost to Toronto, than Toronto, that [spoiler alert!:] advanced to lose to Cleveland. The only mistakes that Masai has made to date was overpaying for Carroll and not firing Casey upon arrival, following the loss to Brooklyn, following the Sweep by Washington or mid-season this year.
My point was Derozan is the player we could trade for the highest value package given his production + long-term nature of his deal. Everyone else on the team either hasn't proven themselves to that degree or are UFAs about to sign monster contracts (at a higher salary cap than when Derozan signed his).
Also, I disagree with your opinion on his effectiveness (outside of the defense comment). Derozan has holes in his game, sure, but he was a significant contributor (and often the most important one) in many of our wins this year. Trying to marginalize those contributions by factoring usage statistics based on incorrect interpretation of role and responsibility - he has an increased role on offense, decreased role on defense so it's not 50/50 - meanwhile completely ignoring the other ways he helps facilitate offense just isn't telling the real story.
I would rather have Giannis too. Easier said than done. My post was about alternatives. It's really easy to blame current players/coaches for past failures or blame Masai for past signings. It's much harder to look at the current roster with so many outgoing FA and chart a course to finding a superstar, especially if your plan is to let all those assets walk for nothing.
"Advanced stats show...." then list exactly no proof and just a complete random gorup of numbers as proof. At leats use netrtg or something.![]()
Demar's contract is a complete steal at this point.
lstern wrote:lstern wrote:Advanced stats paint a different picture. While he puts up numbers, he doesn't move the needle. DeMar is not nearly as talented as his AllStar peers. In fact, he's a definite negative on defense (50% of the time) and only passable when he has the ball in his hands on offense (34.3% or 34.3% of 50%[offense] = 17.2%). We were cruising when he was playing historically good basketball to begin the season and I fully believe that is precisely what needs to happen for him to actually improve our chances of winning, because he's less than 20% usefulJohnny Bball wrote:VanWest82 wrote:
My point was Derozan is the player we could trade for the highest value package given his production + long-term nature of his deal. Everyone else on the team either hasn't proven themselves to that degree or are UFAs about to sign monster contracts (at a higher salary cap than when Derozan signed his).
Also, I disagree with your opinion on his effectiveness (outside of the defense comment). Derozan has holes in his game, sure, but he was a significant contributor (and often the most important one) in many of our wins this year. Trying to marginalize those contributions by factoring usage statistics based on incorrect interpretation of role and responsibility - he has an increased role on offense, decreased role on defense so it's not 50/50 - meanwhile completely ignoring the other ways he helps facilitate offense just isn't telling the real story.
I would rather have Giannis too. Easier said than done. My post was about alternatives. It's really easy to blame current players/coaches for past failures or blame Masai for past signings. It's much harder to look at the current roster with so many outgoing FA and chart a course to finding a superstar, especially if your plan is to let all those assets walk for nothing.
"Advanced stats show...." then list exactly no proof and just a complete random group of numbers as proof. At leats use netrtg or something.![]()
Demar's contract is a complete steal at this point.
I didn't think that I needed to validate that point. Hasn't it been discussed on the board in depth many times how he isn't an impressive player using advanced stats?
I'll just provide you with a link:
http://www.82games.com/1617/16TOR6.HTM
raf1995 wrote:I just don’t think he has that kind of potential. I think we will regret not trading him for a haul in a few years when he’s a mid-tier starter with nice playmaking and defense and a shaky jumper.
Johnny Bball wrote:lstern wrote:lstern wrote:Advanced stats paint a different picture. While he puts up numbers, he doesn't move the needle. DeMar is not nearly as talented as his AllStar peers. In fact, he's a definite negative on defense (50% of the time) and only passable when he has the ball in his hands on offense (34.3% or 34.3% of 50%[offense] = 17.2%). We were cruising when he was playing historically good basketball to begin the season and I fully believe that is precisely what needs to happen for him to actually improve our chances of winning, because he's less than 20% usefulJohnny Bball wrote:
"Advanced stats show...." then list exactly no proof and just a complete random group of numbers as proof. At leats use netrtg or something.![]()
Demar's contract is a complete steal at this point.
I didn't think that I needed to validate that point. Hasn't it been discussed on the board in depth many times how he isn't an impressive player using advanced stats?
I'll just provide you with a link:
http://www.82games.com/1617/16TOR6.HTM
Sorry you just gave me a link to a wall of stats, what exactly are you trying to show with that and how does it even relate to what you posted? Or is it just.... here have some stats! Guess I did have it right.
lstern wrote:Johnny Bball wrote:lstern wrote:
I didn't think that I needed to validate that point. Hasn't it been discussed on the board in depth many times how he isn't an impressive player using advanced stats?
I'll just provide you with a link:
http://www.82games.com/1617/16TOR6.HTM
Sorry you just gave me a link to a wall of stats, what exactly are you trying to show with that and how does it even relate to what you posted? Or is it just.... here have some stats! Guess I did have it right.
He has an eFG% of 47.7% (335th in the league)
His Net points per 100 possessions is -4.9
He overdribbles like crazy and is only assisted on 22% of his shots.
70% of his shots are jumpshots, where he makes eFG% of 43.4%
He is 91st in AST% at 20.4
He's 93rd in NetRTG at 3.3
He is 187th in TS% at 55.2%
He is 6th in USG% at 34.2%
He is 289th in PACE at 97.69%
He is 266th in REB% at 8.3%
If you want to break it down to only compare him with starting guards:
30th in OFFRTG
85th in DEFRTG
40th in NETRTG
61st in AST%
108th in AST/TO
134th in AST Ratio
26th in REB%
36th in TO Ratio
107th in EFG%
66th in TS%
3rd in USG%
99th in PACE
9th in PIE
In the playoffs this year:
PER 16.9
TS% 53.3
3PAr 8.6
FTr 45.7
TRB% 8.0
AST% 17.1
STL% 1.9
BLK% 0.0
TOV% 10.6
USG% 29.6
WS/48 .064
OBPM -1.2
DBPM 0.1
BPM -1.1
VORP 0.1
He was a -17.3 On-Off per 100 possessions
How do you look at those numbers and conclude that this is a maximum salaried player?
Ell Curry wrote:If we can somehow get the Knicks to do something based around DeRozan (big guard well suited to triangle) for Porzingis, that would be a fine start. Even taking on Noah's horrific deal might not kill us since Masai has been historically great at getting rid of **** contracts. Maybe he could turn Noah into a shorter but still awful contract.
lstern wrote:Johnny Bball wrote:lstern wrote:
I didn't think that I needed to validate that point. Hasn't it been discussed on the board in depth many times how he isn't an impressive player using advanced stats?
I'll just provide you with a link:
http://www.82games.com/1617/16TOR6.HTM
Sorry you just gave me a link to a wall of stats, what exactly are you trying to show with that and how does it even relate to what you posted? Or is it just.... here have some stats! Guess I did have it right.
He has an eFG% of 47.7% (335th in the league)
His Net points per 100 possessions is -4.9
He overdribbles like crazy and is only assisted on 22% of his shots.
70% of his shots are jumpshots, where he makes eFG% of 43.4%
He is 91st in AST% at 20.4
He's 93rd in NetRTG at 3.3
He is 187th in TS% at 55.2%
He is 6th in USG% at 34.2%
He is 289th in PACE at 97.69%
He is 266th in REB% at 8.3%
If you want to break it down to only compare him with starting guards:
30th in OFFRTG
85th in DEFRTG
40th in NETRTG
61st in AST%
108th in AST/TO
134th in AST Ratio
26th in REB%
36th in TO Ratio
107th in EFG%
66th in TS%
3rd in USG%
99th in PACE
9th in PIE
In the playoffs this year:
PER 16.9
TS% 53.3
3PAr 8.6
FTr 45.7
TRB% 8.0
AST% 17.1
STL% 1.9
BLK% 0.0
TOV% 10.6
USG% 29.6
WS/48 .064
OBPM -1.2
DBPM 0.1
BPM -1.1
VORP 0.1
He was a -17.3 On-Off per 100 possessions
How do you look at those numbers and conclude that this is a maximum salaried player?
CoachJReturns wrote:Ell Curry wrote:If we can somehow get the Knicks to do something based around DeRozan (big guard well suited to triangle) for Porzingis, that would be a fine start. Even taking on Noah's horrific deal might not kill us since Masai has been historically great at getting rid of **** contracts. Maybe he could turn Noah into a shorter but still awful contract.
I like where this is going. I don't see us being able to move Noah though. So if you don't want to just bite the bullet on those 3 years, then this isn't the best idea. I want a rebuild though, so I'm down for a DeMar for Porzingis trade. He'd at least fans someone to follow while the team has it's struggles. That's usually the hardest part about a rebuild: Having absolutely nothing to be excited about when the team has no talented young players.
raf1995 wrote:I just don’t think he has that kind of potential. I think we will regret not trading him for a haul in a few years when he’s a mid-tier starter with nice playmaking and defense and a shaky jumper.
LBJKB24MJ23 wrote:CoachJReturns wrote:Ell Curry wrote:If we can somehow get the Knicks to do something based around DeRozan (big guard well suited to triangle) for Porzingis, that would be a fine start. Even taking on Noah's horrific deal might not kill us since Masai has been historically great at getting rid of **** contracts. Maybe he could turn Noah into a shorter but still awful contract.
I like where this is going. I don't see us being able to move Noah though. So if you don't want to just bite the bullet on those 3 years, then this isn't the best idea. I want a rebuild though, so I'm down for a DeMar for Porzingis trade. He'd at least fans someone to follow while the team has it's struggles. That's usually the hardest part about a rebuild: Having absolutely nothing to be excited about when the team has no talented young players.
well maybe NO would want to trade AD for Derozan to balance that lineup out. LOL
i could only wish.![]()
hypothetical: if you get AD, do you keep Lowry? and Ibaka? trade JV.