Peak wise: Paul Pierce vs Ray Allen

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

Superior peak

Ray Allen
3
27%
Paul Pierce
5
45%
Basically a tie
3
27%
 
Total votes: 11

mischievous
General Manager
Posts: 7,675
And1: 3,485
Joined: Apr 18, 2015

Peak wise: Paul Pierce vs Ray Allen 

Post#1 » by mischievous » Fri May 12, 2017 12:01 am

Which hall of famer peaked higher for one season?
mischievous
General Manager
Posts: 7,675
And1: 3,485
Joined: Apr 18, 2015

Re: Peak wise: Paul Pierce vs Ray Allen 

Post#2 » by mischievous » Fri May 12, 2017 9:54 am

No answers is pathetic
70sFan
RealGM
Posts: 29,892
And1: 25,222
Joined: Aug 11, 2015
 

Re: Peak wise: Paul Pierce vs Ray Allen 

Post#3 » by 70sFan » Fri May 12, 2017 9:59 am

I believe Pierce, although I'm not comfortable with that statement
User avatar
picc
RealGM
Posts: 19,499
And1: 21,063
Joined: Apr 08, 2009
 

Re: Peak wise: Paul Pierce vs Ray Allen 

Post#4 » by picc » Fri May 12, 2017 10:20 am

I'd give a slight edge to Pierce peak-wise. Offensively I think they're about a wash. Ray could be both an on-ball scorer and an off-ball one (better than Pierce, obviously). He was as good a playmaker as Pierce was. Not as good a "throw it to him and go" scorer. There are different strengths to each you could prefer on different teams, but on an average, randomized team they'd come out to about as useful as the other.

Its every other aspect of basketball where Pierce gets his edge. If shots aren't falling, god forbid, he can still contribute through rebounding and spot defense. And if we're talking today's league, you could definitely masquerade with peak Pierce as a small ball 4 in some lineups for extra versatility.

Allen does have more value as a specialist, if that's what you need. And he has universal value as a lead guard, on any team. Pierce has more overall utility to a random basketball team, however, and as such would be my choice.
Image
User avatar
Ron Swanson
RealGM
Posts: 25,565
And1: 29,376
Joined: May 15, 2013

Re: Peak wise: Paul Pierce vs Ray Allen 

Post#5 » by Ron Swanson » Fri May 12, 2017 1:41 pm

Even accounting for defense, I don't see Pierce as ever having a single statistical year better than Ray's 2001 campaign (22/4/4 on 61% TS, led the league in OWS, led 52-win Bucks team and #1 offense to within a game of the Finals). He was arguably the 2nd best offensive player in the league that season behind Shaq.
User avatar
Quotatious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,999
And1: 11,144
Joined: Nov 15, 2013

Re: Peak wise: Paul Pierce vs Ray Allen 

Post#6 » by Quotatious » Fri May 12, 2017 2:01 pm

Wash. 2001 for Allen and 2002 for Pierce, were their best years,IMO. Probably a slight edge to Ray because of his awesome playoff run (offensively he was pretty much on prime Kobe level in '01 playoffs, and showcased his ability to create offense for others while keeping his turnovers low, he wasn't just an absurdly efficient shooter).

Return to Player Comparisons