The TJ Warren Thread!

Damkac · Post #681 » by **Damkac** » Tue Apr 25, 2017 5:25 am

No thank you!

Saberestar · Post #682 » by **Saberestar** » Tue Apr 25, 2017 6:53 am

youngthegiant wrote:Denver needs a sf who can score. #13 for Warren????

No. Thank you.

Is not Gallinari under contract for the next season? He is a good SF and he can really score the ball.

darealjuice · Post #683 » by **darealjuice** » Tue Apr 25, 2017 2:54 pm

Saberestar wrote:
youngthegiant wrote:Denver needs a sf who can score. #13 for Warren????

No. Thank you.

Is not Gallinari under contract for the next season? He is a good SF and he can really score the ball.

Nope, he's taking the player option on the last year of his contract to be an FA. He said he would like to stay in Denver, but considering he's opting out of $16 million I assume he's going to get paid more than Denver should be giving a ~30 year old when Jokic looks like their future.

I'd rather keep TJ than the 13 though.

Post #684 » by **Qwigglez** » Tue Apr 25, 2017 3:15 pm

Saberestar wrote:
youngthegiant wrote:Denver needs a sf who can score. #13 for Warren????

No. Thank you.

Is not Gallinari under contract for the next season? He is a good SF and he can really score the ball.

Got just the player you are looking for!!

Spoiler:

NTB · Post #685 » by **NTB** » Wed Apr 26, 2017 5:29 am

GMATCallahan · Post #686 » by **GMATCallahan** » Wed Apr 26, 2017 6:50 am

darealjuice wrote:Nope, he's taking the player option on the last year of his contract to be an FA. He said he would like to stay in Denver, but considering he's opting out of $16 million I assume he's going to get paid more than Denver should be giving a ~30 year old when Jokic looks like their future.

I'd rather keep TJ than the 13 though.

I concur. I am not sure just how valuable Warren is now or will be in the future, but at least he can do some things and produce; he adds something, at least. At thirteen, who knows ... the Suns could end up with the next Kendall Marshall or Earl Clark ...

Post #687 » by **bwgood77** » Wed Apr 26, 2017 6:18 pm

NTB wrote:

I take it he deleted that? I don't see it. I just see this a little later...

Read on Twitter

TOO · Post #688 » by **TOO** » Wed Apr 26, 2017 7:14 pm

TJ Warren, underappreciated. Bums me out.

Saberestar · Post #689 » by **Saberestar** » Wed Apr 26, 2017 7:17 pm

bwgood77 wrote:
NTB wrote:

I take it he deleted that? I don't see it. I just see this a little later...

Read on Twitter

Terrible article, way too negative.

The guy who wrote that was just speaking about 3p shots, like there are not other things in basketball.

Warren is a great mid range shooter, and he can be an average shooter from three in the future. 77% at the free throws. He is not Robertson shooting the ball ...come on.

T.J. is our third best player and is just 23 years old, there are a lot of good things to talk about him and his overall improvement.

BSOTS have to upgrade the quality of their articles in my opinion.

PackSuns · Post #690 » by **PackSuns** » Wed Apr 26, 2017 7:35 pm

TJ will have plenty of motivation this summer. Not that he needed it.

darealjuice · Post #691 » by **darealjuice** » Wed Apr 26, 2017 7:41 pm

I get all of the questions about his 3-point shot, but in the end isn't the whole appeal to 3-point shooting the increase in efficiency? TJ is plenty efficient already, he had 59.5 TS% after the ASB on about 18 points a game with minimal plays ran for him. His outside shooting might hurt spacing, but he's too good moving and scoring off the ball for the defense to just leave alone. I have no doubt he has a place on this team, dude is a gym rat.

itlnsunsfan · Post #692 » by **itlnsunsfan** » Wed Apr 26, 2017 8:49 pm

Lol ya let's trade a good, young player for a dice roll that could turn into a good, young player.

darealjuice · Post #693 » by **darealjuice** » Tue May 16, 2017 10:27 pm

Read on Twitter

Rare picture of TJ Warren smiling (I think?)/working out with PG, Julius Randle, and various draft prospects

MathiasPW · Post #694 » by **MathiasPW** » Tue May 16, 2017 10:45 pm

darealjuice wrote:

Read on Twitter

Rare picture of TJ Warren smiling (I think?)/working out with PG, Julius Randle, and various draft prospects

That pic will be worth many moneys in the future.

Well...would have been worth.

Saberestar · Post #695 » by **Saberestar** » Sat Jun 10, 2017 10:32 pm

Read on Twitter

I want to see this season how good we can be without a traditional C clogging the paint in our lineup.

Bledsoe/Ulis
Booker/Barbosa
Warren
Bender/Dudley
Chriss

With all those capable three point shooters on the court, Warren can make a bigger impact around the lane. He is sooo good finishing.

Damkac · Post #696 » by **Damkac** » Sat Jun 10, 2017 11:44 pm

Sorry, but according to most of this board TJ is just a trade asset and should be traded in the offseason. He clearly have no future with this team.

Here is my new trade idea:
#54 + Warren to Boston for #53
Do you think it's enought?

Zelaznyrules · Post #697 » by **Zelaznyrules** » Sun Jun 11, 2017 12:16 am

Damkac wrote:Sorry, but according to most of this board TJ is just a trade asset and should be traded in the offseason. He clearly have no future with this team.

Here is my new trade idea:
#54 + Warren to Boston for #53
[b]Do you think it's enought?[/b]

I don't know? Will Jackson or Markkanen still be available at 53?

I get the frustration and sarcasm here but I'm not sure that "most of this board" is actually accurate (I'm not sure it's not, either?). I'm still concerned over his mysterious head injury but I think a lot of us haven't lost sight of the fact that he was our most effective player for that stretch at the start and then again at the end of the season.

Post #698 » by **bwgood77** » Sun Jun 11, 2017 1:23 am

Zelaznyrules wrote:
Damkac wrote:Sorry, but according to most of this board TJ is just a trade asset and should be traded in the offseason. He clearly have no future with this team.

Here is my new trade idea:
#54 + Warren to Boston for #53
[b]Do you think it's enought?[/b]

I don't know? Will Jackson or Markkanen still be available at 53?

I get the frustration and sarcasm here but I'm not sure that "most of this board" is actually accurate (I'm not sure it's not, either?). I'm still concerned over his mysterious head injury but I think a lot of us haven't lost sight of the fact that he was our most effective player for that stretch at the start and then again at the end of the season.

I think there are many that don't watch the games that will blog about trade ideas and just throw Warren in there because there isn't a lot of hype...he scores his points effectively and quietly...and Warren's name pops up in trades. Then you have the people who didn't watch many games run with that here. Clearly the people watching, at least the ones who participated in who was our most valuable player in the Nashty and game threads voted him as the mvp this year on a per game and per minute basis.

He is extremely consistent when healthy.

sunsbum · Post #699 » by **sunsbum** » Sun Jun 11, 2017 1:48 am

Zelaznyrules wrote:
Damkac wrote:Sorry, but according to most of this board TJ is just a trade asset and should be traded in the offseason. He clearly have no future with this team.

Here is my new trade idea:
#54 + Warren to Boston for #53
[b]Do you think it's enought?[/b]

I don't know? Will Jackson or Markkanen still be available at 53?

I get the frustration and sarcasm here but I'm not sure that "most of this board" is actually accurate (I'm not sure it's not, either?). I'm still concerned over his mysterious head injury but I think a lot of us haven't lost sight of the fact that he was our most effective player for that stretch at the start and then again at the end of the season.

It wasnt a head injury, he took some bad medication and it **** his whole body.

Zelaznyrules · Post #700 » by **Zelaznyrules** » Sun Jun 11, 2017 2:05 am

sunsbum wrote:
Zelaznyrules wrote:
Damkac wrote:Sorry, but according to most of this board TJ is just a trade asset and should be traded in the offseason. He clearly have no future with this team.

Here is my new trade idea:
#54 + Warren to Boston for #53
[b]Do you think it's enought?[/b]

I don't know? Will Jackson or Markkanen still be available at 53?

I get the frustration and sarcasm here but I'm not sure that "most of this board" is actually accurate (I'm not sure it's not, either?). I'm still concerned over his mysterious head injury but I think a lot of us haven't lost sight of the fact that he was our most effective player for that stretch at the start and then again at the end of the season.

It wasnt a head injury, he took some bad medication and it **** his whole body.

Are you talking about the infection he got from his ear piercing and the medication he took as a result? Has that been confirmed in any way, or even "leaked"?