ImageImageImage

2017 Draft Thread

Moderators: Domejandro, Calinks, Worm Guts

Worm Guts
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 27,513
And1: 12,388
Joined: Dec 27, 2003
     

Re: 2017 Draft Thread 

Post#1181 » by Worm Guts » Wed May 17, 2017 7:19 pm

Murphs56 wrote:
wildvikeswolves wrote:I'm good with either Isaac or Markkanen right now. I like Monk, but is there enough minutes to go around for Wiggins, Lavine, Dunn, and Monk?


Monk is going to be your main scorer off the bench or would possibly even start if LaVine is brought back slow. There are minutes.


I don't see how you have minutes for Lavine and Monk long term, unless you want to play one at PG, which seems like a bad idea.
vagelis
Starter
Posts: 2,371
And1: 1,128
Joined: Jan 04, 2015

Re: 2017 Draft Thread 

Post#1182 » by vagelis » Wed May 17, 2017 7:49 pm

vagelis wrote:
PharmD wrote:Karl Anthony Towns led the NBA in paint points this last season.


Yes, maybe I was wrong about that because I see him shoot many long 2's and 3's.


I searched a little bit about this now that I found a little bit time and I found this site http://www.nbaminer.com/player-shot-zones/ that has a lot of stats.

I will use restricted area usage which refers to the closest to the basket range.
Towns has restricted area usage 41.31% and in the paint usage 20.89%.
This means that he is 137th in restricted area usage which means that a lot of centers in the league play closer to the basket than Towns.
For example Deandre Jordan has 92.37 restricted area usage, Dwight Howard 79% , Nerlens Noel 66%, Whiteside 50% and Antetokoumpo 52% although he is not a center. There are many other players in this list.

That is the reason that makes me to have the opinion that we need a big who will play closer to the basket than Towns plays.
And we need a big that plays better defense than Towns.
Markannen is not this type of player but he is a good talent. I think that he will not fit well with Towns but he can give a lot of help from the bench.
If we draft Markannen I think that we will need to find another big in the free agency to play in the starting five.
If we want to draft a big we could also consider players like Jarret Allen and John Collins who may have not the talent of Markkanen but they play more like big guys than small forwards.
The best players in this draft are pg's and wings but if all the good players are off the table we can select a big who can play defense, grab rebounds and protects the rim.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,879
And1: 23,170
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: 2017 Draft Thread 

Post#1183 » by Klomp » Wed May 17, 2017 7:54 pm

vagelis wrote:
vagelis wrote:
PharmD wrote:Karl Anthony Towns led the NBA in paint points this last season.


Yes, maybe I was wrong about that because I see him shoot many long 2's and 3's.


I searched a little bit about this now that I found a little bit time and I found this site http://www.nbaminer.com/player-shot-zones/ that has a lot of stats.

I will use restricted area usage which refers to the closest to the basket range.
Towns has restricted area usage 41.31% and in the paint usage 20.89%.
This means that he is 137th in restricted area usage which means that a lot of centers in the league play closer to the basket than Towns.
For example Deandre Jordan has 92.37 restricted area usage, Dwight Howard 79% , Nerlens Noel 66%, Whiteside 50% and Antetokoumpo 52% although he is not a center. There are many other players in this list.

That is the reason that makes me to have the opinion that we need a big who will play closer to the basket than Towns plays.
And we need a big that plays better defense than Towns.
Markannen is not this type of player but he is a good talent. I think that he will not fit well with Towns but he can give a lot of help from the bench.
If we draft Markannen I think that we will need to find another big in the free agency to play in the starting five.
If we want to draft a big we could also consider players like Jarret Allen and John Collins who may have not the talent of Markkanen but they play more like big guys than small forwards.
The best players in this draft are pg's and wings but if all the good players are off the table we can select a big who can play defense, grab rebounds and protects the rim.

Part of me wonders if that's because he was paired with Dieng. Pair him with Markkanen and Towns would probably spend more time in the paint.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Worm Guts
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 27,513
And1: 12,388
Joined: Dec 27, 2003
     

Re: 2017 Draft Thread 

Post#1184 » by Worm Guts » Wed May 17, 2017 7:54 pm

It's actually beneficial to have 2 bigs that play away from the basket, it opens up the middle of the floor. It especially works since Towns is more than capable of dominating the post.
Biggsohnasty
Sophomore
Posts: 208
And1: 33
Joined: Apr 13, 2017
       

Re: 2017 Draft Thread 

Post#1185 » by Biggsohnasty » Wed May 17, 2017 8:45 pm

Towns has shown he can score no matter what big is paired with him.

He can shoot, he can score in the post, he gets to the offensive glass and he can pass.

What he hasn't shown is the ability to defend at a high level. Maybe that will come. And if it does - I suspect his strength will be his ability to defend mobility. So I'm in the camp that says get a rough and rugged big to pair with him who will defend the paint, set picks and finish on easy drop offs around the rim.
Calinks
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 50,423
And1: 17,379
Joined: Mar 29, 2006
   

Re: 2017 Draft Thread 

Post#1186 » by Calinks » Wed May 17, 2017 8:47 pm

If the Lakers don't turn it around in the next 2-3 years and become a playoff team, it just goes to show how hard rebuilding is. Lakers are the marquee destination and franchise in the NBA today. On paper they have the greatest access to free agents and they have prestige to boot. They have now had back to back to back number 2 picks in the draft, and there is still a good chance they could be crap in a couple years. Ball, the jury is out until we see him on an NBA floor (if he even gets picked by them), Russell has had flashes but is still far away from being a great player, Ingram had a slow rookie year and still have a lot of questions.

Rebuilding is not as easy as fans think. When you blow it up you need a lot of luck on your said to go from zero to a contender. If the Lakers are still building their team up in 3 years that means that could happen to anybody. My hope is the wolves can get to a point where they can contend and we can just reinvent ourselves as time goes on like the Spurs have managed to do. They have basically rebuilt while being a championship level team the whole time.
When luck shuts the door skill comes in through the window.
User avatar
Vindicater
General Manager
Posts: 7,948
And1: 423
Joined: Apr 11, 2004

Re: 2017 Draft Thread 

Post#1187 » by Vindicater » Wed May 17, 2017 9:37 pm

Mattya wrote:
Vindicater wrote:
Klomp wrote:This is a big part of what excites me about Isaac:

"He tries to play the game the right way," Hamilton said. "Doesn't hold on to the ball. He tries to do everything he can to try to help the team win. And sometimes people are like, 'Would you like for him to be more aggressive?' Well, we want him to develop at his own pace and to be comfortable with it. Defensively, he takes challenges, blocks shots and rebounds. He is concerned about making the pass to the guy who gets the assist. He's not all caught up in statistics.

http://www.naplesnews.com/story/sports/college/fgcu/2017/03/15/ncaa-tournament-seminoles-jonathan-isaac-long-way-his-barron-collier-days/99231930/


Sounds like what they said about Wesley Johnson.

That worked out well.


Are you comparing Jonathan Isaac to Wes Johnson?


No, I am saying that alot of things in the quote above are similar to what they said about Wesley Johnson. Particularly discussing the aggressiveness and overpassing of the ball.
"That's why the last two years weren't guaranteed," Walsh said. "Either way, he knew it could have happened either way."
LordBaldric
General Manager
Posts: 7,611
And1: 1,970
Joined: Jul 14, 2006

Re: 2017 Draft Thread 

Post#1188 » by LordBaldric » Wed May 17, 2017 10:10 pm

vagelis wrote:
vagelis wrote:
PharmD wrote:Karl Anthony Towns led the NBA in paint points this last season.


Yes, maybe I was wrong about that because I see him shoot many long 2's and 3's.


I searched a little bit about this now that I found a little bit time and I found this site http://www.nbaminer.com/player-shot-zones/ that has a lot of stats.

I will use restricted area usage which refers to the closest to the basket range.
Towns has restricted area usage 41.31% and in the paint usage 20.89%.
This means that he is 137th in restricted area usage which means that a lot of centers in the league play closer to the basket than Towns.
For example Deandre Jordan has 92.37 restricted area usage, Dwight Howard 79% , Nerlens Noel 66%, Whiteside 50% and Antetokoumpo 52% although he is not a center. There are many other players in this list.

That is the reason that makes me to have the opinion that we need a big who will play closer to the basket than Towns plays.
And we need a big that plays better defense than Towns.
Markannen is not this type of player but he is a good talent. I think that he will not fit well with Towns but he can give a lot of help from the bench.
If we draft Markannen I think that we will need to find another big in the free agency to play in the starting five.
If we want to draft a big we could also consider players like Jarret Allen and John Collins who may have not the talent of Markkanen but they play more like big guys than small forwards.
The best players in this draft are pg's and wings but if all the good players are off the table we can select a big who can play defense, grab rebounds and protects the rim.

Come back to me with your list once you have filtered out the guards/wings (irrelevant to KAT), then all the players with below average usage rates (bums on offense), and finally all the players with weak TS% (more bums).
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,879
And1: 23,170
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: 2017 Draft Thread 

Post#1189 » by Klomp » Wed May 17, 2017 10:15 pm

Vindicater wrote:No, I am saying that alot of things in the quote above are similar to what they said about Wesley Johnson. Particularly discussing the aggressiveness and overpassing of the ball.

People used to say it about LeBron James too
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
ace625214
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,463
And1: 604
Joined: May 31, 2014

Re: 2017 Draft Thread 

Post#1190 » by ace625214 » Wed May 17, 2017 10:33 pm

vagelis wrote:I searched a little bit about this now that I found a little bit time and I found this site http://www.nbaminer.com/player-shot-zones/ that has a lot of stats.

I will use restricted area usage which refers to the closest to the basket range.
Towns has restricted area usage 41.31% and in the paint usage 20.89%.
This means that he is 137th in restricted area usage which means that a lot of centers in the league play closer to the basket than Towns.
For example Deandre Jordan has 92.37 restricted area usage, Dwight Howard 79% , Nerlens Noel 66%, Whiteside 50% and Antetokoumpo 52% although he is not a center. There are many other players in this list.

That is the reason that makes me to have the opinion that we need a big who will play closer to the basket than Towns plays.
And we need a big that plays better defense than Towns.
Markannen is not this type of player but he is a good talent. I think that he will not fit well with Towns but he can give a lot of help from the bench.
If we draft Markannen I think that we will need to find another big in the free agency to play in the starting five.
If we want to draft a big we could also consider players like Jarret Allen and John Collins who may have not the talent of Markkanen but they play more like big guys than small forwards.
The best players in this draft are pg's and wings but if all the good players are off the table we can select a big who can play defense, grab rebounds and protects the rim.


That's also just a percentage of the players usage by area, not overall usage. Here are his full numbers for anyone not wanting to follow the link and scroll:

Above Break 3......Mid-Range......Paint.........RA........Right Corner 3.....Left Corner 3....Backcourt(heaves)
....14.54...............19.20.........20.89.......41.31...........1.96...............1.89..............0.20

So KAT takes shot or commits a turnover from the lane 62.2% of the time. That's pretty high. None of those could be considered long-2s or 3s. Short 12ft jumpers from just outside the block aren't even captured in that since he isn't in the paint. You can see that almost all of his 3s come from above the break, which means most of them are coming in pick-and-pop action.

What these numbers say to me is that Towns scores a lot inside, but works inside-out and will knock down jumpers when left open. That doesn't mean he prefers to do that, it just means that he can do it efficiently. Having Markannen would not crowd the wings. It would provide spacing while Karl is posting up and give Ricky another shooter to sling the ball to when he and KAT are rolling to the rim.

Before the AS break, the top three lineups all featured KAT and Dieng. Post break, KAT was still in the top 3 lineups, but Gorgui was only in one of them. KAT's stats also improved a lot after the break. I read that as once some of Dieng's minutes were replaced with Casspi and Bjelica, KAT had a lot more space and did better offensively. When Towns and Dieng play together, there is less space. Dieng takes 40% of his shots from the mid-range, and 36.67% from the restricted area. Gorgui rarely gets post-up plays run for him, so that means he's either being a "spacer" in the mid-range, or he's cutting for dunks and putbacks. He's still the spacing PF to KAT's inside C game. A better, more athletic shooter at the 4 would be even better, and a traditional center would absolutely kill spacing on Rubio/Towns PnRs.
Biggsohnasty
Sophomore
Posts: 208
And1: 33
Joined: Apr 13, 2017
       

Re: 2017 Draft Thread 

Post#1191 » by Biggsohnasty » Wed May 17, 2017 11:00 pm

How would a traditional center kill spacing on Rubio/Towns PnRs?

Teams aren't exactly worried about sticking to Dieng because of his sniping ability at the elbows - if you have a traditional big sitting on the baseline ala DeAndre Jordan, you can operate a completely functional Pick and roll.

How often do the Wolves run pick and roll though? That isn't something they do a ton of and even if it is, this gets back to what people dislike about Rubio. If you have shooting from typical places like your perimeter guys, you don't need to find a big man who can shoot. Because finding bigs that can shoot while also defend at a high level are really hard to get. Rubio not being able to shoot kills spacing as much as a true center.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,879
And1: 23,170
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: 2017 Draft Thread 

Post#1192 » by Klomp » Thu May 18, 2017 1:22 am

One thing I've started to see with Markkanen is that he's quite a bit more skilled than he showed at Arizona. He's more than just a spot-up shooter. He's got a bit of Bjelica in his game, but at 2 inches taller.

tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
ace625214
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,463
And1: 604
Joined: May 31, 2014

Re: 2017 Draft Thread 

Post#1193 » by ace625214 » Thu May 18, 2017 1:35 am

Biggsohnasty wrote:How would a traditional center kill spacing on Rubio/Towns PnRs?

Teams aren't exactly worried about sticking to Dieng because of his sniping ability at the elbows - if you have a traditional big sitting on the baseline ala DeAndre Jordan, you can operate a completely functional Pick and roll.

How often do the Wolves run pick and roll though? That isn't something they do a ton of and even if it is, this gets back to what people dislike about Rubio. If you have shooting from typical places like your perimeter guys, you don't need to find a big man who can shoot. Because finding bigs that can shoot while also defend at a high level are really hard to get. Rubio not being able to shoot kills spacing as much as a true center.


Absolutely kill is probably a bit of an overstatement, but it wouldn't help. Towns gets quite a few buckets on slightly delayed rolls. Having a big waiting baseline is another defender that can come help. Dieng is not DeAndre Jordan. He can't come flying in and catch lobs 12 feet up.

I would like to have a big that can defend, too, but that's not what we're talking about right now. Vagelis was saying he thinks we need to fill the center position, not the PF spot. I disagreed with that.
Swish4
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,886
And1: 374
Joined: Oct 21, 2010

Re: 2017 Draft Thread 

Post#1194 » by Swish4 » Thu May 18, 2017 1:39 am

Isaac has Kawhi Leonard potential
Biggsohnasty
Sophomore
Posts: 208
And1: 33
Joined: Apr 13, 2017
       

Re: 2017 Draft Thread 

Post#1195 » by Biggsohnasty » Thu May 18, 2017 2:06 am

ace625214 wrote:
Biggsohnasty wrote:How would a traditional center kill spacing on Rubio/Towns PnRs?

Teams aren't exactly worried about sticking to Dieng because of his sniping ability at the elbows - if you have a traditional big sitting on the baseline ala DeAndre Jordan, you can operate a completely functional Pick and roll.

How often do the Wolves run pick and roll though? That isn't something they do a ton of and even if it is, this gets back to what people dislike about Rubio. If you have shooting from typical places like your perimeter guys, you don't need to find a big man who can shoot. Because finding bigs that can shoot while also defend at a high level are really hard to get. Rubio not being able to shoot kills spacing as much as a true center.


Absolutely kill is probably a bit of an overstatement, but it wouldn't help. Towns gets quite a few buckets on slightly delayed rolls. Having a big waiting baseline is another defender that can come help. Dieng is not DeAndre Jordan. He can't come flying in and catch lobs 12 feet up.

I would like to have a big that can defend, too, but that's not what we're talking about right now. Vagelis was saying he thinks we need to fill the center position, not the PF spot. I disagreed with that.


Fair enough. I tend to agree that they need a center to pair with Towns myself but there are certainly arguments both ways. Realistically they just need a good player next to him - or good enough to push Dieng into a "3rd big" role.

Ideally you find a player who can both shoot and play rugged inside while defending - JaMychal Green might be the ideal FA target in that regard. But if you have to pick between 3-point shooting big and defensive-minded, paint-controlling big, I think I'd place a higher premium on paint-controlling big.
User avatar
andyhop
Analyst
Posts: 3,631
And1: 1,322
Joined: May 08, 2007
   

Re: 2017 Draft Thread 

Post#1196 » by andyhop » Thu May 18, 2017 3:04 am

Biggsohnasty wrote:Realistically they just need a good player next to him - or good enough to push Dieng into a "3rd big" role.


They need KAT to stop being terrible defensively a lot more than they need to replace the best defender on the team in Dieng.
"Football is not a matter of life and death...it's much more important than that."- Bill Shankley
Biggsohnasty
Sophomore
Posts: 208
And1: 33
Joined: Apr 13, 2017
       

Re: 2017 Draft Thread 

Post#1197 » by Biggsohnasty » Thu May 18, 2017 3:17 am

Didn't say they need to "replace" Dieng. Get another good player so that the Wolves have 3 good bigs instead of 2 - and ideally one that can be the team's "second-best" big - making Dieng the team's third best big.
User avatar
PharmD
Head Coach
Posts: 6,964
And1: 5,559
Joined: Aug 21, 2015
 

Re: 2017 Draft Thread 

Post#1198 » by PharmD » Thu May 18, 2017 4:13 am

vagelis wrote:
vagelis wrote:
PharmD wrote:Karl Anthony Towns led the NBA in paint points this last season.


Yes, maybe I was wrong about that because I see him shoot many long 2's and 3's.


I searched a little bit about this now that I found a little bit time and I found this site http://www.nbaminer.com/player-shot-zones/ that has a lot of stats.

I will use restricted area usage which refers to the closest to the basket range.
Towns has restricted area usage 41.31% and in the paint usage 20.89%.
This means that he is 137th in restricted area usage which means that a lot of centers in the league play closer to the basket than Towns.
For example Deandre Jordan has 92.37 restricted area usage, Dwight Howard 79% , Nerlens Noel 66%, Whiteside 50% and Antetokoumpo 52% although he is not a center. There are many other players in this list.

That is the reason that makes me to have the opinion that we need a big who will play closer to the basket than Towns plays.
And we need a big that plays better defense than Towns.
Markannen is not this type of player but he is a good talent. I think that he will not fit well with Towns but he can give a lot of help from the bench.
If we draft Markannen I think that we will need to find another big in the free agency to play in the starting five.
If we want to draft a big we could also consider players like Jarret Allen and John Collins who may have not the talent of Markkanen but they play more like big guys than small forwards.
The best players in this draft are pg's and wings but if all the good players are off the table we can select a big who can play defense, grab rebounds and protects the rim.

Umm, Towns' restricted area usage is lower because he scores on postups. The guys with the super high restricted area usage are garbage men that only throw down lobs and putbacks. If DeAndre Jordan is 12 feet away he might as well be in the backcourt.
shangrila
RealGM
Posts: 13,599
And1: 6,690
Joined: Dec 21, 2009
Location: Land of Aus
 

Re: 2017 Draft Thread 

Post#1199 » by shangrila » Thu May 18, 2017 5:16 am

andyhop wrote:
Biggsohnasty wrote:Realistically they just need a good player next to him - or good enough to push Dieng into a "3rd big" role.


They need KAT to stop being terrible defensively a lot more than they need to replace the best defender on the team in Dieng.

Dieng is not the best anything on this team, let alone best defender.
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,847
And1: 5,313
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: 2017 Draft Thread 

Post#1200 » by minimus » Thu May 18, 2017 5:24 am

shangrila wrote:
andyhop wrote:
Biggsohnasty wrote:Realistically they just need a good player next to him - or good enough to push Dieng into a "3rd big" role.


They need KAT to stop being terrible defensively a lot more than they need to replace the best defender on the team in Dieng.

Dieng is not the best anything on this team, let alone best defender.


He at least cares about defense.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves