ImageImageImage

2017 Draft Thread

Moderators: Domejandro, Calinks, Worm Guts

Neeva
General Manager
Posts: 7,594
And1: 2,952
Joined: Jun 03, 2016

Re: 2017 Draft Thread 

Post#1261 » by Neeva » Tue May 30, 2017 12:26 pm

Crazy-Canuck wrote:I don't think Isaac lasts until the 7th.

Weltman loves those long rangey upside guys and Isaac fits the bill.


Good let him be a bust for some other team.
I am telling you Smith, Monk and Fox will be the best players from this class,Wolves will regret passing up on Smith, if they do.
Midw35t
Senior
Posts: 627
And1: 564
Joined: Jan 28, 2017
       

Re: 2017 Draft Thread 

Post#1262 » by Midw35t » Tue May 30, 2017 3:55 pm

Klomp wrote:Watched some more Smith highlights.....a lot of flash! Got me thinking Smith and Towns could be the modern-day Marbury and Garnett....


Im a big fan of Smith and still am with Dunn. A rotation of Rubio, Smith, Dunn, LaVine, and Wiggins at the guard spots for at least the next two years is intriguing.
Midw35t
Senior
Posts: 627
And1: 564
Joined: Jan 28, 2017
       

Re: 2017 Draft Thread 

Post#1263 » by Midw35t » Tue May 30, 2017 4:03 pm

Krapinsky wrote:
derek360 wrote:
Neeva wrote:
I remember lack of size is mainly why the Wolves passed on both Westbrook and Curry, past two NBA MVPS. :banghead:
Smith has the athleticism to make it big in the league.


Well, Jonny Flynn was 3 inches shorter than Curry and only 15 lbs lighter and Westbrook was 6'2" but had a 6'7 wingspan so...don't know about that lack of size... But does Smith really want to win? Besides that Duke game, didn't really light it up the rest of the year and sometimes looked like he didn't want to win or even play. Athleticism can only get you so far.... if you can't shoot...Against GA tech, he took 5 3s when there were more than 20 secs left in the shot clock...not very smart...


Marbury actually seems like a pretty good comp for Smith.

The worry with Smith is his effort on the defensive end is apparently abysmal. With Thibs trying to change the culture of guys like Thibs, Wiggins, and Lavine to get them to focus on defensive, I have a hard time seeing him taking a guy with the same issue magnified x 3.


The guard defense effect is far overblown. Sure it is great to have two way players at those slots, but you better have modern defensive bigs at the 3,4, and 5 as well or you will just get switched on at the big stage. I'd prefer to target potential offensive stars at the 1 and 2 while targeting mobile defense with a passable offensive skill set at the 3,4, and 5.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,880
And1: 23,171
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: 2017 Draft Thread 

Post#1264 » by Klomp » Wed May 31, 2017 12:21 am

Read on Twitter
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Biggsohnasty
Sophomore
Posts: 208
And1: 33
Joined: Apr 13, 2017
       

Re: 2017 Draft Thread 

Post#1265 » by Biggsohnasty » Wed May 31, 2017 2:34 am

Please don't be a smokescreen please don't be a smokescreen please don't be a smokescreen please...
Crazy-Canuck
RealGM
Posts: 30,389
And1: 8,454
Joined: Nov 24, 2003

Re: 2017 Draft Thread 

Post#1266 » by Crazy-Canuck » Wed May 31, 2017 2:50 am

if we take a point, wiggs better get on that lebron james/dwade steroid diet to bulk up because he will be playing quite a few minutes as a small ball 4. We'd probably giving up 130 ppg, but damn it would be fun to watch.

rubio
monk/dsj/nkitilna
lavine
wiggins
kat
Biggsohnasty
Sophomore
Posts: 208
And1: 33
Joined: Apr 13, 2017
       

Re: 2017 Draft Thread 

Post#1267 » by Biggsohnasty » Wed May 31, 2017 4:06 am

Or the team could add a big wing in FA/trade and you basically have 5 guys for 3 spots in Rubio-Smith-Lavine-Wiggins-Unnamed SF

If you draft Smith/Nkitilna, they won't play 30 mpg next season. The idea would be to bring them along slowly in low-leverage minutes and as they prove they can take on more, they take on more. It's a long game play because the hope is that they would develop into a significant starter in a year or two when the team is further along or its contending window starts to open up a bit.

I think you can take a PG and live with said PG playing 16-20 mpg over the course of the season.

Though I do agree with your idea that Wiggins should bulk some so that he can play up to a PF spot in some instances. It'd be nice to have a host of wings that you can play together and cross match with defensive assignments if necessary. Wiggins needs to get stronger - there's no doubt about that.
TwolvesFanRome
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,434
And1: 666
Joined: Aug 25, 2014
Location: Roma
   

Re: 2017 Draft Thread 

Post#1268 » by TwolvesFanRome » Wed May 31, 2017 5:01 am

I have fear of our draft history about PG..... :D
"...I want to compliment him, we all expected that he would take up the game, we have prepared the plan race on him, we have doubled. And, as usual, he did what he wanted..."

Zelimir Obradovic, talking about Dejan Bodiroga
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,847
And1: 5,314
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: 2017 Draft Thread 

Post#1269 » by minimus » Wed May 31, 2017 5:57 am

Crazy-Canuck wrote:if we take a point, wiggs better get on that lebron james/dwade steroid diet to bulk up because he will be playing quite a few minutes as a small ball 4. We'd probably giving up 130 ppg, but damn it would be fun to watch.


I always forget about this steroid thing. We want Wiggins, LaVine to bulk up quickly but I doubt it will be possible next two years without steroids.
titantron91
Junior
Posts: 366
And1: 32
Joined: Apr 21, 2014
 

Re: 2017 Draft Thread 

Post#1270 » by titantron91 » Wed May 31, 2017 6:56 am

Trade Zach Lavine, Jordan Hill, and Shabazz Muhammad and our 1st round pick for #3 pick and an SG

Draft Josh Jackson as the new starting SF
Move Wiggins to #2
Sign James Johnson and CJ Miles from free agency

PG: Rubio, Dunn, Tyus
SG: Wiggins, Miles, SG
SF: Jackson, Casspi, Rush
PF: Johnson, Dieng, Bjelica
C: Towns, Aldrich
rugbyrugger23
RealGM
Posts: 10,243
And1: 1,336
Joined: Jun 07, 2011

Re: 2017 Draft Thread 

Post#1271 » by rugbyrugger23 » Wed May 31, 2017 10:07 am

titantron91 wrote:Trade Zach Lavine, Jordan Hill, and Shabazz Muhammad and our 1st round pick for #3 pick and an SG

Draft Josh Jackson as the new starting SF
Move Wiggins to #2
Sign James Johnson and CJ Miles from free agency

PG: Rubio, Dunn, Tyus
SG: Wiggins, Miles, SG
SF: Jackson, Casspi, Rush
PF: Johnson, Dieng, Bjelica
C: Towns, Aldrich

That is crazy bad. LaVine + to move up 4 spots? Please no.
titantron91
Junior
Posts: 366
And1: 32
Joined: Apr 21, 2014
 

Re: 2017 Draft Thread 

Post#1272 » by titantron91 » Wed May 31, 2017 1:48 pm

rugbyrugger23 wrote:
titantron91 wrote:That is crazy bad. LaVine + to move up 4 spots? Please no.


LaVine has gotta go. Too many scorers. No versatile players other than Rubio and Towns.

Jackson will help the team more than LaVine will.

If it pains you to let Shabazz and Jordan Hill go, then try Lavine and our pick for 3rd pick and SG. Easy.

I dunno what's so hard about letting Bazz and Hill go. They both ass. Bazz is extra firepower but he sucks at D.
Worm Guts
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 27,513
And1: 12,388
Joined: Dec 27, 2003
     

Re: 2017 Draft Thread 

Post#1273 » by Worm Guts » Wed May 31, 2017 1:56 pm

titantron91 wrote:
rugbyrugger23 wrote:
titantron91 wrote:That is crazy bad. LaVine + to move up 4 spots? Please no.


LaVine has gotta go. Too many scorers. No versatile players other than Rubio and Towns.

Jackson will help the team more than LaVine will.

If it pains you to let Shabazz and Jordan Hill go, then try Lavine and our pick for 3rd pick and SG. Easy.

I dunno what's so hard about letting Bazz and Hill go. They both ass. Bazz is extra firepower but he sucks at D.


I'm pretty sure no one cares about the Hill part, and we can't trade Shabazz, but it doesn't make any sense to give up Lavine to move up 4 spots. There's not that type of gap in talent in this draft.
rugbyrugger23
RealGM
Posts: 10,243
And1: 1,336
Joined: Jun 07, 2011

Re: 2017 Draft Thread 

Post#1274 » by rugbyrugger23 » Wed May 31, 2017 4:08 pm

titantron91 wrote:
rugbyrugger23 wrote:
titantron91 wrote:That is crazy bad. LaVine + to move up 4 spots? Please no.


LaVine has gotta go. Too many scorers. No versatile players other than Rubio and Towns.

Jackson will help the team more than LaVine will.

If it pains you to let Shabazz and Jordan Hill go, then try Lavine and our pick for 3rd pick and SG. Easy.

I dunno what's so hard about letting Bazz and Hill go. They both ass. Bazz is extra firepower but he sucks at D.

LaVine doesn't have to go. Wow crazy statement. Bottomline, his value is worth plenty more vs. moving up 4 spots. Not a debate really.

And who cares about Hill and Bazz -- I want Bazz to be gone.
fattymcgee
Senior
Posts: 559
And1: 301
Joined: Apr 03, 2008

Re: 2017 Draft Thread 

Post#1275 » by fattymcgee » Wed May 31, 2017 5:30 pm

Am I the only guy here who would rather have LaVine than the #3 pick in the draft?

Even if you don't like LaVine, using him to move up 3 spots is beyond assinine. That package you mentioned should be enough to get Jimmy Butler.
FinnTheHuman
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,553
And1: 3,720
Joined: Nov 22, 2012
   

Re: 2017 Draft Thread 

Post#1276 » by FinnTheHuman » Wed May 31, 2017 5:46 pm

titantron91 wrote:
rugbyrugger23 wrote:
titantron91 wrote:That is crazy bad. LaVine + to move up 4 spots? Please no.


LaVine has gotta go. Too many scorers. No versatile players other than Rubio and Towns.

Jackson will help the team more than LaVine will.

If it pains you to let Shabazz and Jordan Hill go, then try Lavine and our pick for 3rd pick and SG. Easy.

I dunno what's so hard about letting Bazz and Hill go. They both ass. Bazz is extra firepower but he sucks at D.


It's funny of how unaware you are of the Wolves situation. Nobody is in pain over Shabazz and Jordan Hill. In fact, Shabazz's contract expires this summer and we probably won't extend him, and I'm not sure Jordan Hill even stepped on the court for the Wolves this season, he's irrelevant.

What we do care about is Lavine tho. It's absurd to think we'd use him to move up 4 spots. He averaged 19 points on .575 TS% and he's by far our best 3pt shooter at 39% on 1.8 makes, and he's that on a team who has issues with spacing. I'd love to have your confidence when talking about things I know nothing about in a group of people, it can be a helpful skill.
Biggsohnasty
Sophomore
Posts: 208
And1: 33
Joined: Apr 13, 2017
       

Re: 2017 Draft Thread 

Post#1277 » by Biggsohnasty » Wed May 31, 2017 6:06 pm

If it were Lavine straight up the 3rd pick I'd do that. Attaching the 7th pick to it though would be asinine.
fattymcgee
Senior
Posts: 559
And1: 301
Joined: Apr 03, 2008

Re: 2017 Draft Thread 

Post#1278 » by fattymcgee » Wed May 31, 2017 8:09 pm

Biggsohnasty wrote:If it were Lavine straight up the 3rd pick I'd do that. Attaching the 7th pick to it though would be asinine.


Who would you take at #3 that you think would be better than LaVine?
Biggsohnasty
Sophomore
Posts: 208
And1: 33
Joined: Apr 13, 2017
       

Re: 2017 Draft Thread 

Post#1279 » by Biggsohnasty » Wed May 31, 2017 8:44 pm

Josh Jackson
User avatar
Mattya
RealGM
Posts: 17,555
And1: 7,956
Joined: Aug 08, 2008
   

Re: 2017 Draft Thread 

Post#1280 » by Mattya » Wed May 31, 2017 10:08 pm

Read on Twitter

Read on Twitter

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves