2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,447
- And1: 3,143
- Joined: May 05, 2015
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
- emunney
- RealGM
- Posts: 62,922
- And1: 41,311
- Joined: Feb 22, 2005
- Location: where takes go to be pampered
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
BucksFanSD wrote:Chad Ford had Bradley as a projected mid-1st all year. His lack of athleticism/quickness at the Combine probably moves him into the mid-20s IMO. Great size, wingspan, and rebounding. Analytics like him too. I would like to draft him if we trade back into the 20s. His size and rebounding would help this team. He's another big in this draft that you would wonder if he would break out if he stayed a second year in college.
He beat most of the other bigs in his range (Ike, Rabb, Jeanne, Patton, Allen) in the quickness/agility metrics. He's got good feet.
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
- Frank Nova
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,367
- And1: 3,552
- Joined: Jul 04, 2008
- Location: Shootin’ dice with Larry Bird in Barcelona
-
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
- BucksFanSD
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,846
- And1: 1,471
- Joined: Jun 28, 2012
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
emunney wrote:BucksFanSD wrote:Chad Ford had Bradley as a projected mid-1st all year. His lack of athleticism/quickness at the Combine probably moves him into the mid-20s IMO. Great size, wingspan, and rebounding. Analytics like him too. I would like to draft him if we trade back into the 20s. His size and rebounding would help this team. He's another big in this draft that you would wonder if he would break out if he stayed a second year in college.
He beat most of the other bigs in his range (Ike, Rabb, Jeanne, Patton, Allen) in the quickness/agility metrics. He's got good feet.
Good lane agility, good shuttle run, 3rd slowest 3/4 court sprint, worst vertical jump at this year's combine. Mixed bag I guess.
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
- Pachinko_
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,693
- And1: 23,985
- Joined: Jun 13, 2016
-
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
Semi's shooting style reminds me a lot of Middleton's
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
- benultimate
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,570
- And1: 1,112
- Joined: Jul 29, 2005
-
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
How much has Kris Dunn's value taken a hit? Could we get him for pick 17?
Let the Wolves reset on their future PG search with pick 7 while taking a big man to pair with KAT at 17.
Let the Wolves reset on their future PG search with pick 7 while taking a big man to pair with KAT at 17.
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
- Badgerlander
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,064
- And1: 7,488
- Joined: Jun 29, 2007
-
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
emunney wrote:BucksFanSD wrote:Chad Ford had Bradley as a projected mid-1st all year. His lack of athleticism/quickness at the Combine probably moves him into the mid-20s IMO. Great size, wingspan, and rebounding. Analytics like him too. I would like to draft him if we trade back into the 20s. His size and rebounding would help this team. He's another big in this draft that you would wonder if he would break out if he stayed a second year in college.
He beat most of the other bigs in his range (Ike, Rabb, Jeanne, Patton, Allen) in the quickness/agility metrics. He's got good feet.
You mean like Shaqs feet?

Shoot, Move, and Communicate...
Countless waze, we pass the daze...
A little nonsense now and then is relished by the wisest men.
Spoiler:
Countless waze, we pass the daze...
A little nonsense now and then is relished by the wisest men.
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,447
- And1: 3,143
- Joined: May 05, 2015
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
benultimate wrote:How much has Kris Dunn's value taken a hit? Could we get him for pick 17?
Let the Wolves reset on their future PG search with pick 7 while taking a big man to pair with KAT at 17.
Did you miss MCW ?
28.8 % 3P .... 61.1% FT...
on top of that he drafted so high that his rookie contract is a negative right now...
3 years left .... $4,046,760.....$4,221,000.....$5,348,007
No thanks
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
-
- Junior
- Posts: 484
- And1: 431
- Joined: Jun 22, 2009
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
I'll never understand how people put any stock into watching a player sink jumper after jumper in an empty gym with no defense. A decent high school player does that. Heck my good friend who never even played high school ball could do that. It literally means nothing. Yet it certainly appears some of you become convinced of drafting a player with an NBA 1st round pick based on video of a player shooting jumpers under zero duress
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,447
- And1: 3,143
- Joined: May 05, 2015
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
Mr Anonymous wrote:I'll never understand how people put any stock into watching a player sink jumper after jumper in an empty gym with no defense. A decent high school player does that. Heck my good friend who never even played high school ball could do that. It literally means nothing. Yet it certainly appears some of you become convinced of drafting a player with an NBA 1st round pick based on video of a player shooting jumpers under zero duress
What do you got to offer to this conversation on this message board ?
Sorry to surprise you, but this is not a proffessional scout's forum.
And most posters won't pick a player from one video. Don't get why it bothers you.
There are some indications for a player evaluation on most videos around the net.
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
- M-C-G
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,525
- And1: 9,849
- Joined: Jan 13, 2013
-
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
Mr Anonymous wrote:I'll never understand how people put any stock into watching a player sink jumper after jumper in an empty gym with no defense. A decent high school player does that. Heck my good friend who never even played high school ball could do that. It literally means nothing. Yet it certainly appears some of you become convinced of drafting a player with an NBA 1st round pick based on video of a player shooting jumpers under zero duress
I mean it can give you a chance to see a guys form, which is, ya know, important.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
- Badgerlander
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,064
- And1: 7,488
- Joined: Jun 29, 2007
-
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
Shoot, Move, and Communicate...
Countless waze, we pass the daze...
A little nonsense now and then is relished by the wisest men.
Spoiler:
Countless waze, we pass the daze...
A little nonsense now and then is relished by the wisest men.
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
- BucksFanSD
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,846
- And1: 1,471
- Joined: Jun 28, 2012
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
Trade back, 17 for two of Jeanne, Bradley, & Pasecniks. Go lengthy or go home.
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
- VooDoo7
- RealGM
- Posts: 25,953
- And1: 22,257
- Joined: Jan 14, 2012
- Location: WI
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
Been on the Pasecniks wagon for a while now. I actually like him a little better than Hartenstein.
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
- drew881
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,720
- And1: 5,529
- Joined: Aug 14, 2007
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
VooDoo7 wrote:
Been on the Pasecniks wagon for a while now. I actually like him a little better than Hartenstein.
Looks fluid, but slow. If he tries that in the NBA people are gonna drink his milkshake.
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
- Badgerlander
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,064
- And1: 7,488
- Joined: Jun 29, 2007
-
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
drew881 wrote:VooDoo7 wrote:
Been on the Pasecniks wagon for a while now. I actually like him a little better than Hartenstein.
Looks fluid, but slow. If he tries that in the NBA people are gonna drink his milkshake.
Nah because he'll have a pg
I think he's as quick as Gobert, bet his measurements are similar as hell too.

Shoot, Move, and Communicate...
Countless waze, we pass the daze...
A little nonsense now and then is relished by the wisest men.
Spoiler:
Countless waze, we pass the daze...
A little nonsense now and then is relished by the wisest men.
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
- VooDoo7
- RealGM
- Posts: 25,953
- And1: 22,257
- Joined: Jan 14, 2012
- Location: WI
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
drew881 wrote:VooDoo7 wrote:
Been on the Pasecniks wagon for a while now. I actually like him a little better than Hartenstein.
Looks fluid, but slow. If he tries that in the NBA people are gonna drink his milkshake.
Tough to judge from that vid. He may just be going thru the motion. And with his length/long steps, his speed may be deceiving. In the game film I've seen, he moves plenty well for a guy his size IMO.
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
- nmeurett
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,376
- And1: 212
- Joined: Aug 21, 2009
-
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
I'm all in on Luke Kennard. Guy can just flat out score the ball. With him, Middleton, thon on the floor it gives us a ton of good shooters around Giannis.
Sent from my SM-T810 using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-T810 using Tapatalk
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
- benultimate
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,570
- And1: 1,112
- Joined: Jul 29, 2005
-
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
Fotis St wrote:benultimate wrote:How much has Kris Dunn's value taken a hit? Could we get him for pick 17?
Let the Wolves reset on their future PG search with pick 7 while taking a big man to pair with KAT at 17.
Did you miss MCW ?
28.8 % 3P .... 61.1% FT...
on top of that he drafted so high that his rookie contract is a negative right now...
3 years left .... $4,046,760.....$4,221,000.....$5,348,007
No thanks
MCW is the perfect example of why you shouldn't judge a player solely on his rookie season.
And $4m/$4m/$5m a problem in this day and age, please
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
- Pachinko_
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,693
- And1: 23,985
- Joined: Jun 13, 2016
-
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
The next Jokic/KP hybrid is somewhere in there guys, and he will be available at 17
Bucks find him pls
Bucks find him pls
