2017 Lakers Draft Pick Discussion
Moderators: Kilroy, Danny Darko, TyCobb
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
- dockingsched
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 56,660
- And1: 23,965
- Joined: Aug 02, 2005
-
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
Am i watching the same interview as everyone else? It was just a bunch of cliches where he didn't really say anything of substance. Nothing wrong with that at all and probably the best course to take, i was just expecting way more from the comments in here.
"We must try not to sink beneath our anguish, Harry, but battle on." - Dumbledore
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
- Danny Darko
- Forum Mod - Lakers
- Posts: 18,555
- And1: 5,912
- Joined: Jun 24, 2005
-
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
My nightmare scenario:
Boston perceives that Ball's revenue halo gives Indy what they want for George. (in addition to xyz)
If Boston drafts ball, we end up liking some stuff a lot about Fultz or possibly moving him to Philly and grabbing Jackson. Not ideal as Ball is perfect for us offensively, but not awful. However, if they rob us of both Ball and George I think Nicholson and Adler need to put a hit out on Ainge
Boston perceives that Ball's revenue halo gives Indy what they want for George. (in addition to xyz)
If Boston drafts ball, we end up liking some stuff a lot about Fultz or possibly moving him to Philly and grabbing Jackson. Not ideal as Ball is perfect for us offensively, but not awful. However, if they rob us of both Ball and George I think Nicholson and Adler need to put a hit out on Ainge

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
- Effigy
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,494
- And1: 13,730
- Joined: Nov 27, 2001
-
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
Danny Darko wrote:My nightmare scenario:
Boston perceives that Ball's revenue halo gives Indy what they want for George. (in addition to xyz)
If Boston drafts ball, we end up liking some stuff a lot about Fultz or possibly moving him to Philly and grabbing Jackson. Not ideal as Ball is perfect for us offensively, but not awful. However, if they rob us of both Ball and George I think Nicholson and Adler need to put a hit out on Ainge
I don't know why you guys have all sold yourselves that Ball is what you need. You're a team full of guys who can't shoot, you want to add a point guard who also can't shoot? In 2017?? You should be praying to god that Fultz falls to you somehow. That is what you guys actually need.
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,108
- And1: 6,778
- Joined: Jan 02, 2012
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
-
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
Danny Darko wrote:My nightmare scenario:
Boston perceives that Ball's revenue halo gives Indy what they want for George. (in addition to xyz)
If Boston drafts ball, we end up liking some stuff a lot about Fultz or possibly moving him to Philly and grabbing Jackson. Not ideal as Ball is perfect for us offensively, but not awful. However, if they rob us of both Ball and George I think Nicholson and Adler need to put a hit out on Ainge
I don't think there's a single team in the league that would trade for that pick and not do it to grab Fultz. In fact I'm fairly certain that if another team had the #2 pick instead of us that there would be a decent chance that Jackson would be picked instead of Ball.
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
- Dr Aki
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,651
- And1: 31,883
- Joined: Mar 03, 2008
- Location: Sydney, Australia
-
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
Effigy wrote:Danny Darko wrote:My nightmare scenario:
Boston perceives that Ball's revenue halo gives Indy what they want for George. (in addition to xyz)
If Boston drafts ball, we end up liking some stuff a lot about Fultz or possibly moving him to Philly and grabbing Jackson. Not ideal as Ball is perfect for us offensively, but not awful. However, if they rob us of both Ball and George I think Nicholson and Adler need to put a hit out on Ainge
I don't know why you guys have all sold yourselves that Ball is what you need. You're a team full of guys who can't shoot, you want to add a point guard who also can't shoot? In 2017?? You should be praying to god that Fultz falls to you somehow. That is what you guys actually need.
lol what? you blind or what?


Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,624
- And1: 3,316
- Joined: Aug 15, 2012
- Location: KC, Mo
-
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
Effigy wrote:Danny Darko wrote:My nightmare scenario:
Boston perceives that Ball's revenue halo gives Indy what they want for George. (in addition to xyz)
If Boston drafts ball, we end up liking some stuff a lot about Fultz or possibly moving him to Philly and grabbing Jackson. Not ideal as Ball is perfect for us offensively, but not awful. However, if they rob us of both Ball and George I think Nicholson and Adler need to put a hit out on Ainge
I don't know why you guys have all sold yourselves that Ball is what you need. You're a team full of guys who can't shoot, you want to add a point guard who also can't shoot? In 2017?? You should be praying to god that Fultz falls to you somehow. That is what you guys actually need.
Ball can shoot. Not sure where you get the idea he can't.
Numbers rule the universe.
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
- iamworthy
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,137
- And1: 8,916
- Joined: Jul 20, 2007
- Location: Ring City!!!
-
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
dockingsched wrote:Am i watching the same interview as everyone else? It was just a bunch of cliches where he didn't really say anything of substance. Nothing wrong with that at all and probably the best course to take, i was just expecting way more from the comments in here.
Naw, it's the same interview. I know what you mean


Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
-
- Forum Mod - Lakers
- Posts: 38,223
- And1: 9,952
- Joined: Apr 17, 2005
- Location: Pitcher's Mound
-
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
Michael Lucky wrote:Danny Darko wrote:My nightmare scenario:
Boston perceives that Ball's revenue halo gives Indy what they want for George. (in addition to xyz)
If Boston drafts ball, we end up liking some stuff a lot about Fultz or possibly moving him to Philly and grabbing Jackson. Not ideal as Ball is perfect for us offensively, but not awful. However, if they rob us of both Ball and George I think Nicholson and Adler need to put a hit out on Ainge
I don't think there's a single team in the league that would trade for that pick and not do it to grab Fultz. In fact I'm fairly certain that if another team had the #2 pick instead of us that there would be a decent chance that Jackson would be picked instead of Ball.
Schultz, is that you? It might be wiser to just admit your initial impression on Lonzo was wrong instead of continuing with this angle.
Read more, learn more, change your posts.
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,860
- And1: 24,200
- Joined: Jun 28, 2014
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
Lol. How the hell is getting the best prospect in the draft (Fultz) a worst case scenario? Sometimes being on this board is like living in a bizarro world.
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
-
- Forum Mod - Lakers
- Posts: 38,223
- And1: 9,952
- Joined: Apr 17, 2005
- Location: Pitcher's Mound
-
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
That was with regards to Ball dropping past two.
Read more, learn more, change your posts.
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
- Dr Aki
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,651
- And1: 31,883
- Joined: Mar 03, 2008
- Location: Sydney, Australia
-
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
Pointgod wrote:Lol. How the hell is getting the best prospect in the draft (Fultz) a worst case scenario? Sometimes being on this board is like living in a bizarro world.
maybe it because some of us don't consider fultz the best prospect in the draft
and if boston took ball, they evidently didn't think so either

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
-
- Forum Mod - Lakers
- Posts: 21,599
- And1: 12,311
- Joined: Jul 10, 2006
- Location: The Motel 9 in Vegas
-
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
iamworthy wrote:dockingsched wrote:Am i watching the same interview as everyone else? It was just a bunch of cliches where he didn't really say anything of substance. Nothing wrong with that at all and probably the best course to take, i was just expecting way more from the comments in here.
Naw, it's the same interview. I know what you mean
Well if you expected in depth analysis of his workout and interactions with the FO, you're deluding yourself... He can't say anything about any of it...
Given that context, I think he did extremely well deflecting the prying questions while still showing the proper mind-set and somehow building the hype...
If you thought this was bad, watch a Fultz interview... The United Nations Bans use of his interviews on prisoners.
Never have rice at Hanzo's house...
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,415
- And1: 128
- Joined: Mar 20, 2006
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
Danny Darko wrote:My nightmare scenario:
Boston perceives that Ball's revenue halo gives Indy what they want for George. (in addition to xyz)
If Boston drafts ball, we end up liking some stuff a lot about Fultz or possibly moving him to Philly and grabbing Jackson. Not ideal as Ball is perfect for us offensively, but not awful. However, if they rob us of both Ball and George I think Nicholson and Adler need to put a hit out on Ainge
This Trade can't happened unless PG13 agrees to a long term deal with Boston.
Which he doesn't see to look like it.
PG13 wants to come to LAL or team up with Lebron for a title but he will have to take a big cut
So I think PG 13 wants to come to LAL and Im' not sure why Lebron would want to come to LAL or LAC
I think PG13 does not want to end up in Boston.
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
-
- Forum Mod - Lakers
- Posts: 38,223
- And1: 9,952
- Joined: Apr 17, 2005
- Location: Pitcher's Mound
-
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
Read more, learn more, change your posts.
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
- dockingsched
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 56,660
- And1: 23,965
- Joined: Aug 02, 2005
-
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
"We must try not to sink beneath our anguish, Harry, but battle on." - Dumbledore
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,202
- And1: 988
- Joined: Apr 24, 2017
-
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
Josh Jackson, Ingram and Randle, we would be the worst shooting team in history!
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,860
- And1: 24,200
- Joined: Jun 28, 2014
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
-
- Forum Mod - Lakers
- Posts: 38,223
- And1: 9,952
- Joined: Apr 17, 2005
- Location: Pitcher's Mound
-
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
Wonder if the team is higher on Jackson than Russell.
Read more, learn more, change your posts.
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
- iamworthy
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,137
- And1: 8,916
- Joined: Jul 20, 2007
- Location: Ring City!!!
-
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,108
- And1: 6,778
- Joined: Jan 02, 2012
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
-
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
Any word on how Lonzo's work out went?