ImageImageImageImageImage

2017 Lakers Draft Pick Discussion

Moderators: Kilroy, Danny Darko, TyCobb

Who do the Lakers draft on June 22nd with the 2nd overall pick?

Poll ended at Thu Jun 22, 2017 6:11 pm

Lonzo Ball
90
73%
Josh Jackson
33
27%
 
Total votes: 123

User avatar
dockingsched
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 56,660
And1: 23,965
Joined: Aug 02, 2005
     

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition 

Post#741 » by dockingsched » Thu Jun 8, 2017 6:36 am

Am i watching the same interview as everyone else? It was just a bunch of cliches where he didn't really say anything of substance. Nothing wrong with that at all and probably the best course to take, i was just expecting way more from the comments in here.
"We must try not to sink beneath our anguish, Harry, but battle on." - Dumbledore
User avatar
Danny Darko
Forum Mod - Lakers
Forum Mod - Lakers
Posts: 18,555
And1: 5,912
Joined: Jun 24, 2005
         

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition 

Post#742 » by Danny Darko » Thu Jun 8, 2017 6:47 am

My nightmare scenario:

Boston perceives that Ball's revenue halo gives Indy what they want for George. (in addition to xyz)

If Boston drafts ball, we end up liking some stuff a lot about Fultz or possibly moving him to Philly and grabbing Jackson. Not ideal as Ball is perfect for us offensively, but not awful. However, if they rob us of both Ball and George I think Nicholson and Adler need to put a hit out on Ainge
Image
User avatar
Effigy
RealGM
Posts: 14,494
And1: 13,730
Joined: Nov 27, 2001
     

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition 

Post#743 » by Effigy » Thu Jun 8, 2017 6:53 am

Danny Darko wrote:My nightmare scenario:

Boston perceives that Ball's revenue halo gives Indy what they want for George. (in addition to xyz)

If Boston drafts ball, we end up liking some stuff a lot about Fultz or possibly moving him to Philly and grabbing Jackson. Not ideal as Ball is perfect for us offensively, but not awful. However, if they rob us of both Ball and George I think Nicholson and Adler need to put a hit out on Ainge



I don't know why you guys have all sold yourselves that Ball is what you need. You're a team full of guys who can't shoot, you want to add a point guard who also can't shoot? In 2017?? You should be praying to god that Fultz falls to you somehow. That is what you guys actually need.
Michael Lucky
RealGM
Posts: 15,108
And1: 6,778
Joined: Jan 02, 2012
Location: Los Angeles, CA
       

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition 

Post#744 » by Michael Lucky » Thu Jun 8, 2017 7:11 am

Danny Darko wrote:My nightmare scenario:

Boston perceives that Ball's revenue halo gives Indy what they want for George. (in addition to xyz)

If Boston drafts ball, we end up liking some stuff a lot about Fultz or possibly moving him to Philly and grabbing Jackson. Not ideal as Ball is perfect for us offensively, but not awful. However, if they rob us of both Ball and George I think Nicholson and Adler need to put a hit out on Ainge

I don't think there's a single team in the league that would trade for that pick and not do it to grab Fultz. In fact I'm fairly certain that if another team had the #2 pick instead of us that there would be a decent chance that Jackson would be picked instead of Ball.
User avatar
Dr Aki
RealGM
Posts: 35,651
And1: 31,883
Joined: Mar 03, 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
   

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition 

Post#745 » by Dr Aki » Thu Jun 8, 2017 7:12 am

Effigy wrote:
Danny Darko wrote:My nightmare scenario:

Boston perceives that Ball's revenue halo gives Indy what they want for George. (in addition to xyz)

If Boston drafts ball, we end up liking some stuff a lot about Fultz or possibly moving him to Philly and grabbing Jackson. Not ideal as Ball is perfect for us offensively, but not awful. However, if they rob us of both Ball and George I think Nicholson and Adler need to put a hit out on Ainge



I don't know why you guys have all sold yourselves that Ball is what you need. You're a team full of guys who can't shoot, you want to add a point guard who also can't shoot? In 2017?? You should be praying to god that Fultz falls to you somehow. That is what you guys actually need.


lol what? you blind or what?

Image
Image
Pythagoras
Analyst
Posts: 3,624
And1: 3,316
Joined: Aug 15, 2012
Location: KC, Mo
     

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition 

Post#746 » by Pythagoras » Thu Jun 8, 2017 9:48 am

Effigy wrote:
Danny Darko wrote:My nightmare scenario:

Boston perceives that Ball's revenue halo gives Indy what they want for George. (in addition to xyz)

If Boston drafts ball, we end up liking some stuff a lot about Fultz or possibly moving him to Philly and grabbing Jackson. Not ideal as Ball is perfect for us offensively, but not awful. However, if they rob us of both Ball and George I think Nicholson and Adler need to put a hit out on Ainge



I don't know why you guys have all sold yourselves that Ball is what you need. You're a team full of guys who can't shoot, you want to add a point guard who also can't shoot? In 2017?? You should be praying to god that Fultz falls to you somehow. That is what you guys actually need.


Ball can shoot. Not sure where you get the idea he can't.
Numbers rule the universe.
User avatar
iamworthy
RealGM
Posts: 20,137
And1: 8,916
Joined: Jul 20, 2007
Location: Ring City!!!
   

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition 

Post#747 » by iamworthy » Thu Jun 8, 2017 12:58 pm

dockingsched wrote:Am i watching the same interview as everyone else? It was just a bunch of cliches where he didn't really say anything of substance. Nothing wrong with that at all and probably the best course to take, i was just expecting way more from the comments in here.


Naw, it's the same interview. I know what you mean :rofl:
Image
TyCobb
Forum Mod - Lakers
Forum Mod - Lakers
Posts: 38,223
And1: 9,952
Joined: Apr 17, 2005
Location: Pitcher's Mound
     

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition 

Post#748 » by TyCobb » Thu Jun 8, 2017 2:51 pm

Michael Lucky wrote:
Danny Darko wrote:My nightmare scenario:

Boston perceives that Ball's revenue halo gives Indy what they want for George. (in addition to xyz)

If Boston drafts ball, we end up liking some stuff a lot about Fultz or possibly moving him to Philly and grabbing Jackson. Not ideal as Ball is perfect for us offensively, but not awful. However, if they rob us of both Ball and George I think Nicholson and Adler need to put a hit out on Ainge

I don't think there's a single team in the league that would trade for that pick and not do it to grab Fultz. In fact I'm fairly certain that if another team had the #2 pick instead of us that there would be a decent chance that Jackson would be picked instead of Ball.


Schultz, is that you? It might be wiser to just admit your initial impression on Lonzo was wrong instead of continuing with this angle.
Read more, learn more, change your posts.
Pointgod
RealGM
Posts: 23,860
And1: 24,200
Joined: Jun 28, 2014

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition 

Post#749 » by Pointgod » Thu Jun 8, 2017 3:17 pm

Lol. How the hell is getting the best prospect in the draft (Fultz) a worst case scenario? Sometimes being on this board is like living in a bizarro world.
TyCobb
Forum Mod - Lakers
Forum Mod - Lakers
Posts: 38,223
And1: 9,952
Joined: Apr 17, 2005
Location: Pitcher's Mound
     

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition 

Post#750 » by TyCobb » Thu Jun 8, 2017 3:19 pm

That was with regards to Ball dropping past two.
Read more, learn more, change your posts.
User avatar
Dr Aki
RealGM
Posts: 35,651
And1: 31,883
Joined: Mar 03, 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
   

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition 

Post#751 » by Dr Aki » Thu Jun 8, 2017 3:41 pm

Pointgod wrote:Lol. How the hell is getting the best prospect in the draft (Fultz) a worst case scenario? Sometimes being on this board is like living in a bizarro world.


maybe it because some of us don't consider fultz the best prospect in the draft

and if boston took ball, they evidently didn't think so either
Image
Kilroy
Forum Mod - Lakers
Forum Mod - Lakers
Posts: 21,599
And1: 12,311
Joined: Jul 10, 2006
Location: The Motel 9 in Vegas
       

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition 

Post#752 » by Kilroy » Thu Jun 8, 2017 5:58 pm

iamworthy wrote:
dockingsched wrote:Am i watching the same interview as everyone else? It was just a bunch of cliches where he didn't really say anything of substance. Nothing wrong with that at all and probably the best course to take, i was just expecting way more from the comments in here.


Naw, it's the same interview. I know what you mean :rofl:


Well if you expected in depth analysis of his workout and interactions with the FO, you're deluding yourself... He can't say anything about any of it...
Given that context, I think he did extremely well deflecting the prying questions while still showing the proper mind-set and somehow building the hype...

If you thought this was bad, watch a Fultz interview... The United Nations Bans use of his interviews on prisoners.
Never have rice at Hanzo's house...
NBAWestFan
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,415
And1: 128
Joined: Mar 20, 2006

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition 

Post#753 » by NBAWestFan » Thu Jun 8, 2017 7:45 pm

Danny Darko wrote:My nightmare scenario:

Boston perceives that Ball's revenue halo gives Indy what they want for George. (in addition to xyz)

If Boston drafts ball, we end up liking some stuff a lot about Fultz or possibly moving him to Philly and grabbing Jackson. Not ideal as Ball is perfect for us offensively, but not awful. However, if they rob us of both Ball and George I think Nicholson and Adler need to put a hit out on Ainge



This Trade can't happened unless PG13 agrees to a long term deal with Boston.

Which he doesn't see to look like it.

PG13 wants to come to LAL or team up with Lebron for a title but he will have to take a big cut
So I think PG 13 wants to come to LAL and Im' not sure why Lebron would want to come to LAL or LAC

I think PG13 does not want to end up in Boston.
TyCobb
Forum Mod - Lakers
Forum Mod - Lakers
Posts: 38,223
And1: 9,952
Joined: Apr 17, 2005
Location: Pitcher's Mound
     

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition 

Post#754 » by TyCobb » Thu Jun 8, 2017 8:03 pm

Read on Twitter


:o

:rofl:
Read more, learn more, change your posts.
User avatar
dockingsched
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 56,660
And1: 23,965
Joined: Aug 02, 2005
     

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition 

Post#755 » by dockingsched » Thu Jun 8, 2017 8:09 pm

Read on Twitter
"We must try not to sink beneath our anguish, Harry, but battle on." - Dumbledore
JHFVF07
Rookie
Posts: 1,202
And1: 988
Joined: Apr 24, 2017
   

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition 

Post#756 » by JHFVF07 » Thu Jun 8, 2017 8:11 pm

Josh Jackson, Ingram and Randle, we would be the worst shooting team in history!
Pointgod
RealGM
Posts: 23,860
And1: 24,200
Joined: Jun 28, 2014

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition 

Post#757 » by Pointgod » Thu Jun 8, 2017 10:40 pm

dockingsched wrote:
Read on Twitter


Expected.
TyCobb
Forum Mod - Lakers
Forum Mod - Lakers
Posts: 38,223
And1: 9,952
Joined: Apr 17, 2005
Location: Pitcher's Mound
     

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition 

Post#758 » by TyCobb » Fri Jun 9, 2017 12:46 am

Wonder if the team is higher on Jackson than Russell.
Read more, learn more, change your posts.
User avatar
iamworthy
RealGM
Posts: 20,137
And1: 8,916
Joined: Jul 20, 2007
Location: Ring City!!!
   

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition 

Post#759 » by iamworthy » Fri Jun 9, 2017 12:51 am

Read on Twitter
Image
Michael Lucky
RealGM
Posts: 15,108
And1: 6,778
Joined: Jan 02, 2012
Location: Los Angeles, CA
       

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition 

Post#760 » by Michael Lucky » Fri Jun 9, 2017 12:58 am

Any word on how Lonzo's work out went?

Return to Los Angeles Lakers