sco wrote:I wonder if there's a deal with Milwaukee to get Middleton. I know he's coming off injury, but I'm a huge fan of the guy.
RoLo, Portis and 16?
Hilariously lopsided in our favor.
Moderators: HomoSapien, GimmeDat, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, RedBulls23, Michael Jackson, Ice Man, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN
sco wrote:I wonder if there's a deal with Milwaukee to get Middleton. I know he's coming off injury, but I'm a huge fan of the guy.
RoLo, Portis and 16?
TheSuzerain wrote:sco wrote:I wonder if there's a deal with Milwaukee to get Middleton. I know he's coming off injury, but I'm a huge fan of the guy.
RoLo, Portis and 16?
Hilariously lopsided in our favor.


sco wrote:See Detroit still wants to trade Drummond.
The bad - big contract for 3 more years, only averaged 1.1 blocks, 40% FT
The good - 14/14, Only 23
Wonder if 2 1sts and Lopez gets it done. I think Detroit was just a mess...he has value.
Chi town wrote:So Lebron gets swept and goes to the Lakers
Chi town wrote:So Lebron gets swept and goes to the Lakers...
East is now wide open.
What does GarPax do? IMO it changes a lot.

realEAST wrote:What would you guys think about trade like this:
Valentine, Portis, Grant, 2017 1st (#16) for Mudiay, Barton
Nuggets get another almost lotto pick, and three solid prospects - Valentine can cover hole at SF, Portis is developing and could be good fit along Jokic, while Grant can slide in that backup combo role he performed well in this season and develop from there.
Barton already stated that he will be testing FA waters, and Mudiay was benched half way through the season due to struggles. However, if Bulls aren't trading Jimmy, this would be nice move towards becoming more serious team. I think both of them can start for us.
I posted it at Nuggets board and two responses were positive (skywalker33 and NuggetsWY), so I guess value is more or less fine.
I'd be satisfied with this trade in isolation,
but my idea was that we could trade for Melo with Rondo, Payne and Zipser (we have cap space to absorb the rest of salary), completing interesting starting lineup of Mudiay-Barton-Butler-Melo-Lopez.
With Wade expiring and Melo on Early termination, along low Barton cap hold, we could have considerable cap space next summer if needed, and few good pieces in place.
realEAST wrote:What would you guys think about trade like this:
Valentine, Portis, Grant, 2017 1st (#16) for Mudiay, Barton
Nuggets get another almost lotto pick, and three solid prospects - Valentine can cover hole at SF, Portis is developing and could be good fit along Jokic, while Grant can slide in that backup combo role he performed well in this season and develop from there.
Barton already stated that he will be testing FA waters, and Mudiay was benched half way through the season due to struggles. However, if Bulls aren't trading Jimmy, this would be nice move towards becoming more serious team. I think both of them can start for us.
I posted it at Nuggets board and two responses were positive (skywalker33 and NuggetsWY), so I guess value is more or less fine.
I like Barton, but not a huge fan of Mudiay. I'd try to keep 16 or Portis in that deal and leave out Mudiay.
I'd be satisfied with this trade in isolation,
but my idea was that we could trade for Melo with Rondo, Payne and Zipser (we have cap space to absorb the rest of salary), completing interesting starting lineup of Mudiay-Barton-Butler-Melo-Lopez.
With Wade expiring and Melo on Early termination, along low Barton cap hold, we could have considerable cap space next summer if needed, and few good pieces in place.

GimmeDat wrote:realEAST wrote:What would you guys think about trade like this:
Valentine, Portis, Grant, 2017 1st (#16) for Mudiay, Barton
Nuggets get anothe my stancer almost lotto pick, and three solid prospects - Valentine can cover hole at SF, Portis is developing and could be good fit along Jokic, while Grant can slide in that backup combo role he performed well in this season and develop from there.
Barton already stated that he will be testing FA waters, and Mudiay was benched half way through the season due to struggles. However, if Bulls aren't trading Jimmy, this would be nice move towards becoming more serious team. I think both of them can start for us.
I posted it at Nuggets board and two responses were positive (skywalker33 and NuggetsWY), so I guess value is more or less fine.
I'd be satisfied with this trade in isolation,
but my idea was that we could trade for Melo with Rondo, Payne and Zipser (we have cap space to absorb the rest of salary), completing interesting starting lineup of Mudiay-Barton-Butler-Melo-Lopez.
With Wade expiring and Melo on Early termination, along low Barton cap hold, we could have considerable cap space next summer if needed, and few good pieces in place.
I'm not a fan because Mudiay has been really bad. I like the idea of consolidating for a better prospect, but I don't think Mudiay is the guy.
sco wrote:League Circles wrote:sco wrote:
Part of the problem is thinking about the draft as 30 or 60 guys, it's the top 30 guys out of maybe a thousand possible guys.
I don't follow. What do you mean, part of the problem?
If you think of the success rate of a pool of 30 guys and that the 5th guy picked should be better than the 15th guy picked, it would seem more obvious that stats would back that. If you are looking at after-the-fact success rate of 5th vs. 15th out of 1000, you are much more likely see statistical variance - especially given that ascribed value is often on placed on unproven supposition of future performance based on physical attributes and demonstrated performance against lesser competition.
realEAST wrote:What would you guys think about trade like this:
Valentine, Portis, Grant, 2017 1st (#16) for Mudiay, Barton
Nuggets get another almost lotto pick, and three solid prospects - Valentine can cover hole at SF, Portis is developing and could be good fit along Jokic, while Grant can slide in that backup combo role he performed well in this season and develop from there.
Barton already stated that he will be testing FA waters, and Mudiay was benched half way through the season due to struggles. However, if Bulls aren't trading Jimmy, this would be nice move towards becoming more serious team. I think both of them can start for us.
I posted it at Nuggets board and two responses were positive (skywalker33 and NuggetsWY), so I guess value is more or less fine.
I'd be satisfied with this trade in isolation,
but my idea was that we could trade for Melo with Rondo, Payne and Zipser (we have cap space to absorb the rest of salary), completing interesting starting lineup of Mudiay-Barton-Butler-Melo-Lopez.
With Wade expiring and Melo on Early termination, along low Barton cap hold, we could have considerable cap space next summer if needed, and few good pieces in place.
TheSuzerain wrote:realEAST wrote:What would you guys think about trade like this:
Valentine, Portis, Grant, 2017 1st (#16) for Mudiay, Barton
Nuggets get another almost lotto pick, and three solid prospects - Valentine can cover hole at SF, Portis is developing and could be good fit along Jokic, while Grant can slide in that backup combo role he performed well in this season and develop from there.
Barton already stated that he will be testing FA waters, and Mudiay was benched half way through the season due to struggles. However, if Bulls aren't trading Jimmy, this would be nice move towards becoming more serious team. I think both of them can start for us.
I posted it at Nuggets board and two responses were positive (skywalker33 and NuggetsWY), so I guess value is more or less fine.
I'd be satisfied with this trade in isolation,
but my idea was that we could trade for Melo with Rondo, Payne and Zipser (we have cap space to absorb the rest of salary), completing interesting starting lineup of Mudiay-Barton-Butler-Melo-Lopez.
With Wade expiring and Melo on Early termination, along low Barton cap hold, we could have considerable cap space next summer if needed, and few good pieces in place.
Barton is an unrestriced FA. Mudiay is the worst PG in recent memory.
Terrible trade.
GimmeDat wrote:realEAST wrote:What would you guys think about trade like this:
Valentine, Portis, Grant, 2017 1st (#16) for Mudiay, Barton
Nuggets get another almost lotto pick, and three solid prospects - Valentine can cover hole at SF, Portis is developing and could be good fit along Jokic, while Grant can slide in that backup combo role he performed well in this season and develop from there.
Barton already stated that he will be testing FA waters, and Mudiay was benched half way through the season due to struggles. However, if Bulls aren't trading Jimmy, this would be nice move towards becoming more serious team. I think both of them can start for us.
I posted it at Nuggets board and two responses were positive (skywalker33 and NuggetsWY), so I guess value is more or less fine.
I'd be satisfied with this trade in isolation,
but my idea was that we could trade for Melo with Rondo, Payne and Zipser (we have cap space to absorb the rest of salary), completing interesting starting lineup of Mudiay-Barton-Butler-Melo-Lopez.
With Wade expiring and Melo on Early termination, along low Barton cap hold, we could have considerable cap space next summer if needed, and few good pieces in place.
I'm not a fan because Mudiay has been really bad. I like the idea of consolidating for a better prospect, but I don't think Mudiay is the guy.
realEAST wrote:TheSuzerain wrote:realEAST wrote:What would you guys think about trade like this:
Valentine, Portis, Grant, 2017 1st (#16) for Mudiay, Barton
Nuggets get another almost lotto pick, and three solid prospects - Valentine can cover hole at SF, Portis is developing and could be good fit along Jokic, while Grant can slide in that backup combo role he performed well in this season and develop from there.
Barton already stated that he will be testing FA waters, and Mudiay was benched half way through the season due to struggles. However, if Bulls aren't trading Jimmy, this would be nice move towards becoming more serious team. I think both of them can start for us.
I posted it at Nuggets board and two responses were positive (skywalker33 and NuggetsWY), so I guess value is more or less fine.
I'd be satisfied with this trade in isolation,
but my idea was that we could trade for Melo with Rondo, Payne and Zipser (we have cap space to absorb the rest of salary), completing interesting starting lineup of Mudiay-Barton-Butler-Melo-Lopez.
With Wade expiring and Melo on Early termination, along low Barton cap hold, we could have considerable cap space next summer if needed, and few good pieces in place.
Barton is an unrestriced FA. Mudiay is the worst PG in recent memory.
Terrible trade.
As long as your take is not superficial...
Barton being UFA is reason we can get both of these guys for such offer. Re-sign him if he is good.
Mudiay is nowhere near worst PG, just look at Bulls and our crop.
Besides, he is only 21 and has all the tools for a guard, wouldn't be surprised if he broke out next season, he just need to be put in right situation.
TheSuzerain wrote:realEAST wrote:TheSuzerain wrote:Barton is an unrestriced FA. Mudiay is the worst PG in recent memory.
Terrible trade.
As long as your take is not superficial...
Barton being UFA is reason we can get both of these guys for such offer. Re-sign him if he is good.
Mudiay is nowhere near worst PG, just look at Bulls and our crop.
Besides, he is only 21 and has all the tools for a guard, wouldn't be surprised if he broke out next season, he just need to be put in right situation.
Mudiay is genuinely terrible. He has none of the tools for a guard, and if you think he does, then you don't know basketball.
Cameron Payne's rookie year is better than any year of Mudiay's career. He is that bad.