ImageImageImage

Fixing the NBA

Moderators: bwgood77, Qwigglez, lilfishi22

User avatar
King4Day
RealGM
Posts: 13,603
And1: 9,812
Joined: Dec 11, 2010
Location: Pandora
         

Re: Fixing the NBA 

Post#21 » by King4Day » Sun Jun 11, 2017 5:39 pm

ginobiliflops wrote:
DarkHawk wrote:Maybe something where, even if you are willing to take a pay cut, you still count against the cap as a max player. How to determine what a player is worth is tbd, but I think it can work.

Do you think something all NBA team, Team USA spot, or all star appearances could determine that?


It'd probably have to be some hard numbers. So All NBA stuff and maybe a statistical baseline. Certain number of points per game, rebounds, etc.
Like baseball, maybe use an arbitrator to determine what the real worth is.
"Sometimes, the dragon wins" #RallyTheValley
Zelaznyrules
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,776
And1: 995
Joined: Dec 18, 2013
     

Re: Fixing the NBA 

Post#22 » by Zelaznyrules » Sun Jun 11, 2017 5:44 pm

DarkHawk wrote:
ginobiliflops wrote:
DarkHawk wrote:Maybe something where, even if you are willing to take a pay cut, you still count against the cap as a max player. How to determine what a player is worth is tbd, but I think it can work.

Do you think something all NBA team, Team USA spot, or all star appearances could determine that?


It'd probably have to be some hard numbers. So All NBA stuff and maybe a statistical baseline. Certain number of points per game, rebounds, etc.
Like baseball, maybe use an arbitrator to determine what the real worth is.


I don't like the idea of adding even more incentive for players to focus on stats instead of winning.
User avatar
King4Day
RealGM
Posts: 13,603
And1: 9,812
Joined: Dec 11, 2010
Location: Pandora
         

Re: Fixing the NBA 

Post#23 » by King4Day » Sun Jun 11, 2017 6:12 pm

Zelaznyrules wrote:
DarkHawk wrote:
ginobiliflops wrote:Do you think something all NBA team, Team USA spot, or all star appearances could determine that?


It'd probably have to be some hard numbers. So All NBA stuff and maybe a statistical baseline. Certain number of points per game, rebounds, etc.
Like baseball, maybe use an arbitrator to determine what the real worth is.


I don't like the idea of adding even more incentive for players to focus on stats instead of winning.


Then the idea of an arbitrator to value each player every season could be the way to go. They could use metrics beyond numbers.
"Sometimes, the dragon wins" #RallyTheValley
User avatar
RaisingArizona
RealGM
Posts: 15,787
And1: 7,669
Joined: Apr 23, 2009
 

Re: Fixing the NBA 

Post#24 » by RaisingArizona » Sun Jun 11, 2017 6:46 pm

I like the use of an arbitrator. I think we're on to something here!
Image
User avatar
thamadkant
Suns Forum Picker of Cherries
Posts: 16,916
And1: 8,599
Joined: Jan 06, 2007
 

Re: Fixing the NBA 

Post#25 » by thamadkant » Mon Jun 12, 2017 2:54 am

bwgood77 wrote:
WeekapaugGroove wrote:I think the best solution would be to do away with max contracts and have a hard cap. This would allow the stars to get huge contracts but make it much harder to assemble super teams because you wouldn't be able to spend over the cap. This should spread the talent out around the league.

But unfortunately I don't think the players association would ever go for this idea because it would benefit a small number of stars while suppressing the salaries of the middle class that would make up the majority. I just can't see the majority of players voting against their own self interest.


Yes, these threads pop up on the General Board a lot and I always mention hard cap.

I also think non guaranteed contracts would fix a lot of things, but not specifically in regard to the star teams, but more in regard to getting rid of dead weight and players who got paid and don't care or are not that good, which basically hamper a lot of the avg to bad teams from doing anything because they have all these large contracts on their books.



Player union will never allow non guaranteed contracts. But perhaps a modified one that allows teams to put incentives on contracts and if not adhered to teams can buy out players at 50% ofthe contract value. Players still get money but teams get out of players who stop trying much.
asudevil
Analyst
Posts: 3,246
And1: 689
Joined: Apr 29, 2004

Re: RE: Re: Fixing the NBA 

Post#26 » by asudevil » Mon Jun 12, 2017 6:06 am

WeekapaugGroove wrote:
asudevil wrote:
bwgood77 wrote:
Yes, these threads pop up on the General Board a lot and I always mention hard cap.

I also think non guaranteed contracts would fix a lot of things, but not specifically in regard to the star teams, but more in regard to getting rid of dead weight and players who got paid and don't care or are not that good, which basically hamper a lot of the avg to bad teams from doing anything because they have all these large contracts on their books.


Yeah, the whole argument of doing away with max contracts and having a hard cap is extremely shortsighted....and the PA would see its flaws and never allow it.

I like the idea of non guaranteed contracts, but it would be something that the PA would never agree to either.

There's no rule in the nba that says contracts have to be guaranteed its just kind of the norm. Just like in the NFL its not a rule they are unguaranteed.

Sent from my SM-G930V using RealGM mobile app


But the NFL has WAY more than just non-guaranteed contracts.

Guaranteed money
Signing bonuses
Dead money

All of these things fit together in order to maximize money for the player and minimize the risk for the owners. the NBA has barely scratched the surface of this. Yes, they have PO and TO, but the salary construct of the NBA is simplistic when comparing to the NFL.
Zelaznyrules
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,776
And1: 995
Joined: Dec 18, 2013
     

Re: RE: Re: Fixing the NBA 

Post#27 » by Zelaznyrules » Mon Jun 12, 2017 7:51 am

asudevil wrote:
WeekapaugGroove wrote:
asudevil wrote:
Yeah, the whole argument of doing away with max contracts and having a hard cap is extremely shortsighted....and the PA would see its flaws and never allow it.

I like the idea of non guaranteed contracts, but it would be something that the PA would never agree to either.

There's no rule in the nba that says contracts have to be guaranteed its just kind of the norm. Just like in the NFL its not a rule they are unguaranteed.

Sent from my SM-G930V using RealGM mobile app


But the NFL has WAY more than just non-guaranteed contracts.

Guaranteed money
Signing bonuses
Dead money

All of these things fit together in order to maximize money for the player and minimize the risk for the owners. the NBA has barely scratched the surface of this. Yes, they have PO and TO, but the salary construct of the NBA is simplistic when comparing to the NFL.


I agree with most of what you're saying but if you really meant "simplistic", I'd have to disagree with that label. The NFL, for a myriad of reasons, has developed a fairly complex salary and compensation process that the NBA just doesn't need. Simplistic would mean that the NBA is backward or primitive in some way which I just don't think is the case. Their plan is sufficiently complex and intricate to meet the needs of both player and league. And if you really meant "simpler" and were just casual in your word choice, forget everything I said after "I agree"
starbosa10
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,548
And1: 4,387
Joined: Aug 18, 2006
     

Re: Fixing the NBA 

Post#28 » by starbosa10 » Tue Jun 13, 2017 4:12 am

LeBron started this nonsense

Return to Phoenix Suns