ImageImageImage

[RUNNER UP] Who do you NOT want the Suns to draft at #4?

Moderators: bwgood77, lilfishi22, Qwigglez

WHY WOULD YOU TAKE THIS GUY OVER THE BEST PLAYER IN THE DRAFT?

Josh Jackson
7
58%
Markelle Fultz
5
42%
 
Total votes: 12

ImNotMcDiSwear
General Manager
Posts: 8,287
And1: 6,411
Joined: Dec 14, 2013
 

Re: [DOWN TO FIVE] Who do you NOT want the Suns to draft at #4? 

Post#41 » by ImNotMcDiSwear » Tue Jun 13, 2017 11:48 am

BUMP. Need more votes.
Kyler Murray
Suns Forum Fantasy GOD
Posts: 1,481
And1: 723
Joined: Jan 17, 2011
Location: Greece
     

Re: [DOWN TO FIVE] Who do you NOT want the Suns to draft at #4? 

Post#42 » by Kyler Murray » Wed Jun 14, 2017 1:53 am

i just vote lonzo every round :lol:
Blonde
Veteran
Posts: 2,934
And1: 3,919
Joined: Jun 16, 2014
Location: Phoenix
       

Re: [RUNNER RUNNER RUNNER UP] Who do you NOT want the Suns to draft at #4? 

Post#43 » by Blonde » Wed Jun 14, 2017 7:11 am

Can't believe so many people were that low on DSJ
Damkac
Analyst
Posts: 3,143
And1: 3,062
Joined: Apr 18, 2011
Location: Poland

Re: [RUNNER RUNNER RUNNER UP] Who do you NOT want the Suns to draft at #4? 

Post#44 » by Damkac » Wed Jun 14, 2017 7:23 am

We already have our older DSJ in Bledsoe.
Bjorpa
Freshman
Posts: 95
And1: 61
Joined: Jan 26, 2016
   

Re: [RUNNER RUNNER RUNNER UP] Who do you NOT want the Suns to draft at #4? 

Post#45 » by Bjorpa » Wed Jun 14, 2017 9:08 am

Damkac wrote:We already have our older DSJ in Bledsoe.


Yeah, but Bledsoe does not fit timeline. DSJ does.

Bledsoe is great, but will be at least 31 when Booker, Chriss and Bender are ready. He might land us a draft pick, or young talent today.
User avatar
Qwigglez
Forum Mod - Suns
Forum Mod - Suns
Posts: 21,553
And1: 14,846
Joined: Jul 10, 2009
Contact:
     

Re: [RUNNER RUNNER RUNNER UP] Who do you NOT want the Suns to draft at #4? 

Post#46 » by Qwigglez » Wed Jun 14, 2017 9:20 am

Don't want Ball. He really wants to stay in LA. Even if the Suns did somehow get him at No 4, I could actually see him refusing to sign an extension with us, taking the qualifying offer just so he can sign with the Lakers.
Zelaznyrules
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,776
And1: 995
Joined: Dec 18, 2013
     

Re: [RUNNER RUNNER RUNNER UP] Who do you NOT want the Suns to draft at #4? 

Post#47 » by Zelaznyrules » Wed Jun 14, 2017 1:39 pm

Qwigglez wrote:Don't want Ball. He really wants to stay in LA. Even if the Suns did somehow get him at No 4, I could actually see him refusing to sign an extension with us, taking the qualifying offer just so he can sign with the Lakers.


I've been saying that since January but the scenario has changed IMO. I do believe he'd have run to LA the first chance he got but now, for that to happen, it would mean that LA spurned both him and his father. Given that, I believe we'd have as good of a chance of re-signing him as anyone and maybe even more so due to proximity. I guess we could lose him to the Clippers but he's shown no love for that franchise so I doubt it. So AFAIC, as long as we don't jump ahead of LA via trade, we need only worry about Lonzo, his play, and his out of this world father.
User avatar
Qwigglez
Forum Mod - Suns
Forum Mod - Suns
Posts: 21,553
And1: 14,846
Joined: Jul 10, 2009
Contact:
     

Re: [RUNNER RUNNER RUNNER UP] Who do you NOT want the Suns to draft at #4? 

Post#48 » by Qwigglez » Wed Jun 14, 2017 1:52 pm

Zelaznyrules wrote:
Qwigglez wrote:Don't want Ball. He really wants to stay in LA. Even if the Suns did somehow get him at No 4, I could actually see him refusing to sign an extension with us, taking the qualifying offer just so he can sign with the Lakers.


I've been saying that since January but the scenario has changed IMO. I do believe he'd have run to LA the first chance he got but now, for that to happen, it would mean that LA spurned both him and his father. Given that, I believe we'd have as good of a chance of re-signing him as anyone and maybe even more so due to proximity. I guess we could lose him to the Clippers but he's shown no love for that franchise so I doubt it. So AFAIC, as long as we don't jump ahead of LA via trade, we need only worry about Lonzo, his play, and his out of this world father.


Did you watch him on the Kimmel Show? He said he wants to stay in LA. I could easily see his father driving a wedge between Lonzo and our front office if we decided to draft him. I just don't want to take that risk.
Zelaznyrules
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,776
And1: 995
Joined: Dec 18, 2013
     

Re: [RUNNER RUNNER RUNNER UP] Who do you NOT want the Suns to draft at #4? 

Post#49 » by Zelaznyrules » Wed Jun 14, 2017 1:57 pm

Qwigglez wrote:
Zelaznyrules wrote:
Qwigglez wrote:Don't want Ball. He really wants to stay in LA. Even if the Suns did somehow get him at No 4, I could actually see him refusing to sign an extension with us, taking the qualifying offer just so he can sign with the Lakers.


I've been saying that since January but the scenario has changed IMO. I do believe he'd have run to LA the first chance he got but now, for that to happen, it would mean that LA spurned both him and his father. Given that, I believe we'd have as good of a chance of re-signing him as anyone and maybe even more so due to proximity. I guess we could lose him to the Clippers but he's shown no love for that franchise so I doubt it. So AFAIC, as long as we don't jump ahead of LA via trade, we need only worry about Lonzo, his play, and his out of this world father.


Did you watch him on the Kimmel Show? He said he wants to stay in LA. I could easily see his father driving a wedge between Lonzo and our front office if we decided to draft him. I just don't want to take that risk.


I understand but seriously, how will he feel once LA chooses to not draft him? Right now he thinks it's a lock because his dad keeps telling him it's his destiny but those emotional ties will be brutally severed if they can draft him and opt not to.
ImNotMcDiSwear
General Manager
Posts: 8,287
And1: 6,411
Joined: Dec 14, 2013
 

Re: [RUNNER RUNNER RUNNER UP] Who do you NOT want the Suns to draft at #4? 

Post#50 » by ImNotMcDiSwear » Wed Jun 14, 2017 2:13 pm

Zelaznyrules wrote:
Qwigglez wrote:
Zelaznyrules wrote:
I've been saying that since January but the scenario has changed IMO. I do believe he'd have run to LA the first chance he got but now, for that to happen, it would mean that LA spurned both him and his father. Given that, I believe we'd have as good of a chance of re-signing him as anyone and maybe even more so due to proximity. I guess we could lose him to the Clippers but he's shown no love for that franchise so I doubt it. So AFAIC, as long as we don't jump ahead of LA via trade, we need only worry about Lonzo, his play, and his out of this world father.


Did you watch him on the Kimmel Show? He said he wants to stay in LA. I could easily see his father driving a wedge between Lonzo and our front office if we decided to draft him. I just don't want to take that risk.


I understand but seriously, how will he feel once LA chooses to not draft him? Right now he thinks it's a lock because his dad keeps telling him it's his destiny but those emotional ties will be brutally severed if they can draft him and opt not to.


My thoughts exactly. I'd be worried about taking him ahead of where the Lakers drafted, or in any event if the Lakers did not have a pick. But if he's spurned by the Lakers, I imagine there's at least the potential for the Balls to turn into the world's most famous Laker haters. And what better team for Lakers haters than the Suns?

Ultimately, I do think the FO will select whomever remains of the 4 players left on this list. Personally, I'd rather we deal down for Collins.
Zelaznyrules
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,776
And1: 995
Joined: Dec 18, 2013
     

Re: [RUNNER RUNNER RUNNER UP] Who do you NOT want the Suns to draft at #4? 

Post#51 » by Zelaznyrules » Wed Jun 14, 2017 3:18 pm

cosmofizzo wrote:
Zelaznyrules wrote:
Qwigglez wrote:
Did you watch him on the Kimmel Show? He said he wants to stay in LA. I could easily see his father driving a wedge between Lonzo and our front office if we decided to draft him. I just don't want to take that risk.


I understand but seriously, how will he feel once LA chooses to not draft him? Right now he thinks it's a lock because his dad keeps telling him it's his destiny but those emotional ties will be brutally severed if they can draft him and opt not to.


My thoughts exactly. I'd be worried about taking him ahead of where the Lakers drafted, or in any event if the Lakers did not have a pick. But if he's spurned by the Lakers, I imagine there's at least the potential for the Balls to turn into the world's most famous Laker haters. And what better team for Lakers haters than the Suns?

Ultimately, I do think the FO will select whomever remains of the 4 players left on this list. Personally, I'd rather we deal down for Collins.


From where I sit, I hate the idea of drafting Collins anywhere in the first round. His undeveloped mental game along with his Len-like propensity to pick up stupid fouls scares the heck out of me. For the life of me I don't understand the Zach bandwagon. Having said that, if the front office has done their work and they still believe that they can turn him into a modern center, I'm all for that even if we have to do it at 4. I figure once you have your target, you're playing with fire if you play the trade-down game.
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,140
And1: 61,000
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: [RUNNER RUNNER RUNNER UP] Who do you NOT want the Suns to draft at #4? 

Post#52 » by bwgood77 » Wed Jun 14, 2017 5:01 pm

Qwigglez wrote:
Zelaznyrules wrote:
Qwigglez wrote:Don't want Ball. He really wants to stay in LA. Even if the Suns did somehow get him at No 4, I could actually see him refusing to sign an extension with us, taking the qualifying offer just so he can sign with the Lakers.


I've been saying that since January but the scenario has changed IMO. I do believe he'd have run to LA the first chance he got but now, for that to happen, it would mean that LA spurned both him and his father. Given that, I believe we'd have as good of a chance of re-signing him as anyone and maybe even more so due to proximity. I guess we could lose him to the Clippers but he's shown no love for that franchise so I doubt it. So AFAIC, as long as we don't jump ahead of LA via trade, we need only worry about Lonzo, his play, and his out of this world father.


Did you watch him on the Kimmel Show? He said he wants to stay in LA. I could easily see his father driving a wedge between Lonzo and our front office if we decided to draft him. I just don't want to take that risk.


If the Lakers pass on him they obviously don't want him that bad. You think he will still beg to go play for them and take far less money taking the QO?
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,140
And1: 61,000
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: [RUNNER RUNNER RUNNER UP] Who do you NOT want the Suns to draft at #4? 

Post#53 » by bwgood77 » Wed Jun 14, 2017 5:05 pm

Zelaznyrules wrote:
cosmofizzo wrote:
Zelaznyrules wrote:
I understand but seriously, how will he feel once LA chooses to not draft him? Right now he thinks it's a lock because his dad keeps telling him it's his destiny but those emotional ties will be brutally severed if they can draft him and opt not to.


My thoughts exactly. I'd be worried about taking him ahead of where the Lakers drafted, or in any event if the Lakers did not have a pick. But if he's spurned by the Lakers, I imagine there's at least the potential for the Balls to turn into the world's most famous Laker haters. And what better team for Lakers haters than the Suns?

Ultimately, I do think the FO will select whomever remains of the 4 players left on this list. Personally, I'd rather we deal down for Collins.


From where I sit, I hate the idea of drafting Collins anywhere in the first round. His undeveloped mental game along with his Len-like propensity to pick up stupid fouls scares the heck out of me. For the life of me I don't understand the Zach bandwagon. Having said that, if the front office has done their work and they still believe that they can turn him into a modern center, I'm all for that even if we have to do it at 4. I figure once you have your target, you're playing with fire if you play the trade-down game.


I wouldn't exactly say there is a bandwagon for Collins. I mean he did finish 11th in this poll. I wouldn't mind taking him at 10 or 12 if better prospects are gone and our FO likes him (if we had that pick). I wouldn't want to trade down for that unless we got a major asset for doing that though, and I don't see a major asset that we could get unless somehow Sac thought someone else was going to trade up with us to nab Fox, panicked, and offered us 5 and 10 for 4.
ImNotMcDiSwear
General Manager
Posts: 8,287
And1: 6,411
Joined: Dec 14, 2013
 

Re: [RUNNER RUNNER RUNNER UP] Who do you NOT want the Suns to draft at #4? 

Post#54 » by ImNotMcDiSwear » Wed Jun 14, 2017 5:15 pm

Zelaznyrules wrote:
cosmofizzo wrote:
Zelaznyrules wrote:
I understand but seriously, how will he feel once LA chooses to not draft him? Right now he thinks it's a lock because his dad keeps telling him it's his destiny but those emotional ties will be brutally severed if they can draft him and opt not to.


My thoughts exactly. I'd be worried about taking him ahead of where the Lakers drafted, or in any event if the Lakers did not have a pick. But if he's spurned by the Lakers, I imagine there's at least the potential for the Balls to turn into the world's most famous Laker haters. And what better team for Lakers haters than the Suns?

Ultimately, I do think the FO will select whomever remains of the 4 players left on this list. Personally, I'd rather we deal down for Collins.


From where I sit, I hate the idea of drafting Collins anywhere in the first round. His undeveloped mental game along with his Len-like propensity to pick up stupid fouls scares the heck out of me. For the life of me I don't understand the Zach bandwagon. Having said that, if the front office has done their work and they still believe that they can turn him into a modern center, I'm all for that even if we have to do it at 4. I figure once you have your target, you're playing with fire if you play the trade-down game.


I don't think his propensity to foul or anything else about Collins is "Len-like". His fouls result from toughness and aggression. Len's have often resulted from weakness - an inability to put his body on his man so having to resort to shoving and hacking. A lack of balance and confidence on offense.

Whereas Len had the physique and athleticism, Collins just strikes me as having the right mentality and approach. I wouldn't be at all disappointed to see us take him at 4, 6 or 7. That bandwagon is relatively small - basically, me, sunsbum, frank... and maybe one or two more I've missed.

Admittedly, if C were our strength and not our weakness, I would not have him #4 on my board. I can also see why some would prefer Lauri - he has a chance to be the next evolution of Nowizki. I think whoever drafts him will have made a wise selection. But Collins is my pick.
User avatar
Qwigglez
Forum Mod - Suns
Forum Mod - Suns
Posts: 21,553
And1: 14,846
Joined: Jul 10, 2009
Contact:
     

Re: [RUNNER RUNNER RUNNER UP] Who do you NOT want the Suns to draft at #4? 

Post#55 » by Qwigglez » Wed Jun 14, 2017 5:29 pm

bwgood77 wrote:
Qwigglez wrote:
Zelaznyrules wrote:
I've been saying that since January but the scenario has changed IMO. I do believe he'd have run to LA the first chance he got but now, for that to happen, it would mean that LA spurned both him and his father. Given that, I believe we'd have as good of a chance of re-signing him as anyone and maybe even more so due to proximity. I guess we could lose him to the Clippers but he's shown no love for that franchise so I doubt it. So AFAIC, as long as we don't jump ahead of LA via trade, we need only worry about Lonzo, his play, and his out of this world father.


Did you watch him on the Kimmel Show? He said he wants to stay in LA. I could easily see his father driving a wedge between Lonzo and our front office if we decided to draft him. I just don't want to take that risk.


If the Lakers pass on him they obviously don't want him that bad. You think he will still beg to go play for them and take far less money taking the QO?


Yes, his friends and family would still tell him to go to LA. The Lakers could easily switch management in 4 years time or whatever and new faces could tell Ball they want him in LA. I wouldn't touch Ball, unless Fultz, Jackson, and Tatum are off the board. And even then I may even trade the pick.
Zelaznyrules
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,776
And1: 995
Joined: Dec 18, 2013
     

Re: [RUNNER RUNNER RUNNER UP] Who do you NOT want the Suns to draft at #4? 

Post#56 » by Zelaznyrules » Wed Jun 14, 2017 5:32 pm

cosmofizzo wrote:
Zelaznyrules wrote:
cosmofizzo wrote:
My thoughts exactly. I'd be worried about taking him ahead of where the Lakers drafted, or in any event if the Lakers did not have a pick. But if he's spurned by the Lakers, I imagine there's at least the potential for the Balls to turn into the world's most famous Laker haters. And what better team for Lakers haters than the Suns?

Ultimately, I do think the FO will select whomever remains of the 4 players left on this list. Personally, I'd rather we deal down for Collins.


From where I sit, I hate the idea of drafting Collins anywhere in the first round. His undeveloped mental game along with his Len-like propensity to pick up stupid fouls scares the heck out of me. For the life of me I don't understand the Zach bandwagon. Having said that, if the front office has done their work and they still believe that they can turn him into a modern center, I'm all for that even if we have to do it at 4. I figure once you have your target, you're playing with fire if you play the trade-down game.


I don't think his propensity to foul or anything else about Collins is "Len-like". His fouls result from toughness and aggression. Len's have often resulted from weakness - an inability to put his body on his man so having to resort to shoving and hacking. A lack of balance and confidence on offense.

Whereas Len had the physique and athleticism, Collins just strikes me as having the right mentality and approach. I wouldn't be at all disappointed to see us take him at 4, 6 or 7. That bandwagon is relatively small - basically, me, sunsbum, frank... and maybe one or two more I've missed.

Admittedly, if C were our strength and not our weakness, I would not have him #4 on my board. I can also see why some would prefer Lauri - he has a chance to be the next evolution of Nowizki. I think whoever drafts him will have made a wise selection. But Collins is my pick.


I watched several Gonzaga games but I haven't watched any of the draft videos on him, do they gloss over his problems when he has to match up against actual big men? Unlike Alex, Collins has good hands and I like his chance to become a court spacing big man down the road. But, IMO, like Alex, coming into the league he's more project than prospect. Right now, the gap between him and Markkanen is huge. I get why people are in love with his possible future but I'm really surprised that people think he belongs in the lottery.
Zelaznyrules
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,776
And1: 995
Joined: Dec 18, 2013
     

Re: [RUNNER RUNNER RUNNER UP] Who do you NOT want the Suns to draft at #4? 

Post#57 » by Zelaznyrules » Wed Jun 14, 2017 5:47 pm

Qwigglez wrote:
bwgood77 wrote:
Qwigglez wrote:
Did you watch him on the Kimmel Show? He said he wants to stay in LA. I could easily see his father driving a wedge between Lonzo and our front office if we decided to draft him. I just don't want to take that risk.


If the Lakers pass on him they obviously don't want him that bad. You think he will still beg to go play for them and take far less money taking the QO?


Yes, his friends and family would still tell him to go to LA. The Lakers could easily switch management in 4 years time or whatever and new faces could tell Ball they want him in LA. I wouldn't touch Ball, unless Fultz, Jackson, and Tatum are off the board. And even then I may even trade the pick.


I can't see Lavar just putting it behind him, that man can hold a grudge like no one's business. Just ask the last Chino Hills coach. And we've seen no reason to believe that anyone (ANYONE) influences him like his father does. Perhaps a change in management might produce a change in heart but I doubt it given that it's Magic Johnson that will be driving this decision and even if he's no longer with the team I can't see him being unaffiliated. Also, ownership is very present in the Lakers community and that's not likely to change either. I think you just don't want any piece of Ball and you're reaching for reasons but I think I'd stick with the more established issues; namely Dad, fit, questionable mid-range game and on the ball defense.
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,140
And1: 61,000
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: [RUNNER RUNNER RUNNER UP] Who do you NOT want the Suns to draft at #4? 

Post#58 » by bwgood77 » Wed Jun 14, 2017 6:17 pm

Zelaznyrules wrote:
Qwigglez wrote:
bwgood77 wrote:
If the Lakers pass on him they obviously don't want him that bad. You think he will still beg to go play for them and take far less money taking the QO?


Yes, his friends and family would still tell him to go to LA. The Lakers could easily switch management in 4 years time or whatever and new faces could tell Ball they want him in LA. I wouldn't touch Ball, unless Fultz, Jackson, and Tatum are off the board. And even then I may even trade the pick.


I can't see Lavar just putting it behind him, that man can hold a grudge like no one's business. Just ask the last Chino Hills coach. And we've seen no reason to believe that anyone (ANYONE) influences him like his father does. Perhaps a change in management might produce a change in heart but I doubt it given that it's Magic Johnson that will be driving this decision and even if he's no longer with the team I can't see him being unaffiliated. Also, ownership is very present in the Lakers community and that's not likely to change either. I think you just don't want any piece of Ball and you're reaching for reasons but I think I'd stick with the more established issues; namely Dad, fit, questionable mid-range game and on the ball defense.


I don't think LaVar matters. Lonzo will be a man in 4 years making his own decisions and if he came to a team, had new teammates, developed those relationships, and especially if they Suns were winning, I seriously doubt he'd want to take a QO to hopefully go play for a team he's been battling against for four years.

It's not like he'd be going to play with ex teammates and guys he knows in all likelihood.
ImNotMcDiSwear
General Manager
Posts: 8,287
And1: 6,411
Joined: Dec 14, 2013
 

Re: [RUNNER RUNNER RUNNER UP] Who do you NOT want the Suns to draft at #4? 

Post#59 » by ImNotMcDiSwear » Thu Jun 15, 2017 2:12 am

BUMP. I'm going to give this one more day. Get your votes in!! It's a nail biter!!!
itlnsunsfan
Pro Prospect
Posts: 831
And1: 877
Joined: Jul 13, 2015
   

Re: [RUNNER RUNNER RUNNER UP] Who do you NOT want the Suns to draft at #4? 

Post#60 » by itlnsunsfan » Thu Jun 15, 2017 2:34 am

I wouldn't mind any of these 4.

Return to Phoenix Suns