dockingsched wrote:
Dayuuummmm
Moderators: Danny Darko, TyCobb, Kilroy
TheRealKaboom wrote:Develop a future All-Star for two years and then give him away for free.![]()
Celtics/Sixers fans please go troll somewhere else. Thanks.
meetbishop wrote:TheRealKaboom wrote:Develop a future All-Star for two years and then give him away for free.![]()
Celtics/Sixers fans please go troll somewhere else. Thanks.
Yeah that was my initial thought but what if it is something like Russell and 28th for 3rd and Okafour?
Do you think we do it? I believe Russell is going to be a very good player in the league but his personality is something that worries me a lot. The intentional turn over he caused because he had a misunderstanding with Randle comes to mind. He is going to be good but his personality is going to be a problem with this team.
Lonzo
Jackson
Ingram
Randle
Zubac
Looks like a very good team. My only problem is that it push us 2 more years back.
Michael Lucky wrote:meetbishop wrote:TheRealKaboom wrote:Develop a future All-Star for two years and then give him away for free.![]()
Celtics/Sixers fans please go troll somewhere else. Thanks.
Yeah that was my initial thought but what if it is something like Russell and 28th for 3rd and Okafour?
Do you think we do it? I believe Russell is going to be a very good player in the league but his personality is something that worries me a lot. The intentional turn over he caused because he had a misunderstanding with Randle comes to mind. He is going to be good but his personality is going to be a problem with this team.
Lonzo
Jackson
Ingram
Randle
Zubac
Looks like a very good team. My only problem is that it push us 2 more years back.
anyone that worries about personality should not be advocating a trade for Jackson in it.
meetbishop wrote:Michael Lucky wrote:meetbishop wrote:
Yeah that was my initial thought but what if it is something like Russell and 28th for 3rd and Okafour?
Do you think we do it? I believe Russell is going to be a very good player in the league but his personality is something that worries me a lot. The intentional turn over he caused because he had a misunderstanding with Randle comes to mind. He is going to be good but his personality is going to be a problem with this team.
Lonzo
Jackson
Ingram
Randle
Zubac
Looks like a very good team. My only problem is that it push us 2 more years back.
anyone that worries about personality should not be advocating a trade for Jackson in it.
There is a difference between having too much fire and being immature .
Michael Lucky wrote:meetbishop wrote:Michael Lucky wrote:
anyone that worries about personality should not be advocating a trade for Jackson in it.
There is a difference between having too much fire and being immature .
Yeah having anger/violent issues is definitely a lot worse than being immature. Glad we agree.
loveshaq786 wrote:LakersSoul wrote:TheRealKaboom wrote:Develop a future All-Star for two years and then give him away for free.![]()
Celtics/Sixers fans please go troll somewhere else. Thanks.
There is ZERO change that we trade Dlo for just the #3 pick. Why would we give away the best player on the team for the #3 pick that could be a bust? As for throwing in the #28, Magic isnt giving away the team and picks?
If we trade Dlo, we are getting more than just the #3 back. It has to be a minimum 2 first round picks and possibly swaping of other players on top. The Lakers FO doesnt mind trading Clarkson but if we are trading one of the foundation for the Lakers, we better be getting some sweet deal.
Thank you. I don't understand our fans' assessment of players' value makes any sense. It's freaking ridiculous. Dlo has way more value than the crap I see posted here. I'm down to trade him too but not for peanuts.
TyCobb wrote:Fultz has arguably the worst cardio out of Ball, Jackson, and Fox. Wonder if he can even finish the workout.
dockingsched wrote:Why is the draft thread being overtaken by baseless made up trade ideas?
dockingsched wrote:Josh Jackson's interview showed a well spoken guy, handled the question about his anger management pretty well. Responses were a lot less cliche than Ball, which made it more enjoyable. Ball has to be so careful cause of the microscope he's under.
From ESPN:
The incident in December began inside the bar when Calvert threw a drink at her ex-boyfriend, Lagerald Vick, another Kansas player. She said she was upset because Vick attended the party with his new girlfriend.
Calver[t] told police Jackson followed her to her car and "was yelling for her to get out of the car and that he would beat her ass," the affidavit says.
...
The affidavit said the bumper, grille, fender, windshield, left tail lamp assembly and driver's side front door were all damaged, with a total repair cost of about $3,150. Witnesses reported Jackson only damaging the door and tail light, with an estimated damage of $1,127, and District Attorney Charles Branson said Jackson was not charged with felony criminal damage because it couldn't be proved that the player caused all the damage.
jnick206 wrote:TyCobb wrote:Fultz has arguably the worst cardio out of Ball, Jackson, and Fox. Wonder if he can even finish the workout.
Did you go on a jog with Markelle recently? He played 36 minutes a game.
dockingsched wrote:Josh Jackson's interview showed a well spoken guy, handled the question about his anger management pretty well. Responses were a lot less cliche than Ball, which made it more enjoyable. Ball has to be so careful cause of the microscope he's under.
XXBKXX wrote:loveshaq786 wrote:LakersSoul wrote:
There is ZERO change that we trade Dlo for just the #3 pick. Why would we give away the best player on the team for the #3 pick that could be a bust? As for throwing in the #28, Magic isnt giving away the team and picks?
If we trade Dlo, we are getting more than just the #3 back. It has to be a minimum 2 first round picks and possibly swaping of other players on top. The Lakers FO doesnt mind trading Clarkson but if we are trading one of the foundation for the Lakers, we better be getting some sweet deal.
Thank you. I don't understand our fans' assessment of players' value makes any sense. It's freaking ridiculous. Dlo has way more value than the crap I see posted here. I'm down to trade him too but not for peanuts.
I'd say there are a lot of homer goggles with DLo. Look at the facts.. He's slow, not athletic, not even quick, immature, high turn over pg. People claim he is a "shooter" but he shot like 35% from three this year. He got a loose handle and makes bad decisions with the ball causing lot of turn overs. He has to play like a Wiley vet to score because he can't blow by or shake by anyone.(like a poor man's old Sam cassell) Only way he can score is in pick n rolls. And did I mention hes immature?
Dlo was a miss, Porzingis was the right pick. If Pelinka can correct Mitch's mistake from couple years ago by getting a second pick into the top half of this year's lotto then he HAS to do it. Like I said before, this is probably the last year we get high value for him based on potential. Otherwise he has to show something next year. Show consistency and a 40% three.. He can't keep having 18 pt games followed up by 6 pt games with five tos. If Dlo struggles next year then we can only trade him for peanuts after..
Sent from my XT1650 using RealGM mobile app