ardee wrote:
How come you count Hakeem as 1-way but Duncan and Garnett as 2 way?
Where did I do that? :/
Moderators: trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal, Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ
ardee wrote:
How come you count Hakeem as 1-way but Duncan and Garnett as 2 way?
Jaivl wrote:ardee wrote:
How come you count Hakeem as 1-way but Duncan and Garnett as 2 way?
Where did I do that? :/
ardee wrote:Jaivl wrote:Where did I do that? :/
In your GOAT list you have Garnett labelled as a 2 way GOAT and Hakeem with the 1 way GOAT bigs
Sent from my SM-J700F using RealGM mobile app
1-way GOAT bigs (I don't think highly of Kareem's defense overall)
+ Hakeem (elite 2-way)
Jaivl wrote:ardee wrote:Jaivl wrote:Where did I do that? :/
In your GOAT list you have Garnett labelled as a 2 way GOAT and Hakeem with the 1 way GOAT bigs
Sent from my SM-J700F using RealGM mobile app
No lol1-way GOAT bigs (I don't think highly of Kareem's defense overall)
+ Hakeem (elite 2-way)
MyUniBroDavis wrote:Not voting but I'll go to 20. Made it quickly so would Change a bit if I put more thought
1. Jordan
2. Duncan
3. Kareem
4. Lebron
5. Russell
6. Wilt
7. Magic
8. Hakeem
9. Shaq
10. Kobe
11. Bird
12. Oscar
13. Garnett
14. Erving
15. Malone
16 Logo
17 dirk
18 Admiral
19. Charles Barkley
20. Nash
MyUniBroDavis wrote:Not voting but I'll go to 20. Made it quickly so would Change a bit if I put more thought
1. Jordan
2. Duncan
3. Kareem
4. Lebron
5. Russell
6. Wilt
7. Magic
8. Hakeem
9. Shaq
10. Kobe
11. Bird
12. Oscar
13. Garnett
14. Erving
15. Malone
16 Logo
17 dirk
18 Admiral
19. Charles Barkley
20. Nash
trex_8063 wrote:MyUniBroDavis wrote:Not voting but I'll go to 20. Made it quickly so would Change a bit if I put more thought
1. Jordan
2. Duncan
3. Kareem
4. Lebron
5. Russell
6. Wilt
7. Magic
8. Hakeem
9. Shaq
10. Kobe
11. Bird
12. Oscar
13. Garnett
14. Erving
15. Malone
16 Logo
17 dirk
18 Admiral
19. Charles Barkley
20. Nash
Need you to specify which Malone you're talking about there.
trex_8063 wrote:....
Devin Booker wrote:Bro.
PockyCandy wrote:I have no idea where to put Mikan.
MyUniBroDavis wrote:trex_8063 wrote:MyUniBroDavis wrote:Not voting but I'll go to 20. Made it quickly so would Change a bit if I put more thought
1. Jordan
2. Duncan
3. Kareem
4. Lebron
5. Russell
6. Wilt
7. Magic
8. Hakeem
9. Shaq
10. Kobe
11. Bird
12. Oscar
13. Garnett
14. Erving
15. Malone
16 Logo
17 dirk
18 Admiral
19. Charles Barkley
20. Nash
Need you to specify which Malone you're talking about there.
Karl at 15, put Moses at 18 and shift up cuz I forgot lol.
mischievous wrote:Texas Chuck wrote:mischievous wrote:Did you ever think I didn't see it? I'm not insulting anyone so relax.
if someone accused you of bias, you wouldn't feel insulted?
I always admit to my own biases.
~Regarding Denver Nuggets, May 2025hardenASG13 wrote:They are better than the teammates of SGA, Giannis, Luka, Brunson, Curry etc. so far.
wojoaderge wrote:MyUniBroDavis wrote:Not voting but I'll go to 20. Made it quickly so would Change a bit if I put more thought
1. Jordan
2. Duncan
3. Kareem
4. Lebron
5. Russell
6. Wilt
7. Magic
8. Hakeem
9. Shaq
10. Kobe
11. Bird
12. Oscar
13. Garnett
14. Erving
15. Malone
16 Logo
17 dirk
18 Admiral
19. Charles Barkley
20. Nash
Which Malone? I have the champion Malone 11 spots ahead of the runner-up Malone
Winsome Gerbil wrote:wojoaderge wrote:MyUniBroDavis wrote:Not voting but I'll go to 20. Made it quickly so would Change a bit if I put more thought
1. Jordan
2. Duncan
3. Kareem
4. Lebron
5. Russell
6. Wilt
7. Magic
8. Hakeem
9. Shaq
10. Kobe
11. Bird
12. Oscar
13. Garnett
14. Erving
15. Malone
16 Logo
17 dirk
18 Admiral
19. Charles Barkley
20. Nash
Which Malone? I have the champion Malone 11 spots ahead of the runner-up Malone
you have Moses 11 spots about the 2nd leading scorer of all time?
wojoaderge wrote:Winsome Gerbil wrote:wojoaderge wrote:Which Malone? I have the champion Malone 11 spots ahead of the runner-up Malone
you have Moses 11 spots about the 2nd leading scorer of all time?
Actually 10, I moved him up a spot
Winsome Gerbil wrote:wojoaderge wrote:Winsome Gerbil wrote:
you have Moses 11 spots about the 2nd leading scorer of all time?
Actually 10, I moved him up a spot
suffice it to say that once things get going that's going to require some explanation.![]()
14x All NBA, 4x All Defense, 2x MVP, 2nd leading all time scorer, 7th leading all time rebounder, 3rd in AT win shares...is Moses in your Top 5 by any chance?
wojoaderge wrote:Winsome Gerbil wrote:wojoaderge wrote:Actually 10, I moved him up a spot
suffice it to say that once things get going that's going to require some explanation.![]()
14x All NBA, 4x All Defense, 2x MVP, 2nd leading all time scorer, 7th leading all time rebounder, 3rd in AT win shares...is Moses in your Top 5 by any chance?
My list is on the first page of this thread
trex_8063 wrote:Winsome Gerbil wrote:An interesting thing I want to see play out is this:
Bill Walton, for example, played in 468 career games, most of them in decline, had career averages of 13.3pts 10.5reb 3.4ast. Yet most, including me somewhere back there 50ish or something, will credit him with a prominent position on this list.
Well, even ignoring the other short career guys, a number of current players have played in more games, and more games at high levels than Walton. Steph has played in 574gms. Durant 703. Cousins 487. Westbrook 668. Harden 615. Blake 471. etc. All of those guys have career numbers dwarfing what Walton put up (6215 career pts 4923 rebs). So in order for Walton to be so elevated we just have to be applying a "coulda been greater than his numbers and put up much bigger numbers" standard. But then I am almost sure we're going to turn around in many other cases and say, oops partial career, not enough numbers etc.
That's not entirely a "you guys suck" argument. I am wary/aware of myself doing it both ways as well.
Couple of points......
Firstly, you're sort of assuming people will give him a position of prominence ("50ish or something"), when we don't know that to be the case at all (well, I KNOW that to NOT be the case for me). I'm the one tracking all the stuff itt, and I only see ONE person who has so far listed him at all (at #30); and that person has stated that longevity is a minor consideration.
I'd secondly note that Walton appears (clearly) to be a guy whose impact went well beyond his box numbers (in '77 and '78, at least), fwiw.
wojoaderge wrote:PockyCandy wrote:I have no idea where to put Mikan.
I feel he should be no less than 14th