ImageImageImage

Hayward Undecided

Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts

Slax
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,579
And1: 7,076
Joined: Jul 08, 2010
Location: New York
       

Re: Hayward Undecided 

Post#841 » by Slax » Fri Jun 16, 2017 8:18 pm

Andrew McCeltic wrote:We could theoretically renounce Amir, make moves, and then use the MLE on him, if I remember right.


The non-taxpayer MLE of about $6M counts against cap space, so we will probably have to renounce the MLE as well. There is a cap room exception though, which is about half the size of the non-taxpayer MLE. I bet Amir could do much better than $3M a year, but I don't know, perhaps there's an outside chance he could be convinced to take a home town discount in order to be on a contender.
Slax
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,579
And1: 7,076
Joined: Jul 08, 2010
Location: New York
       

Re: Hayward Undecided 

Post#842 » by Slax » Fri Jun 16, 2017 8:22 pm

stitches wrote:
Read on Twitter


Image

Thurl Bailey to the Celtics? You guys are merciless.


Four leaves don't play, homie. 8-)
User avatar
ConstableGeneva
RealGM
Posts: 50,514
And1: 101,232
Joined: Sep 22, 2012
Location: Parody Account
 

Re: Hayward Undecided 

Post#843 » by ConstableGeneva » Fri Jun 16, 2017 8:37 pm

Slartibartfast wrote:
CrowderKeg wrote:
Slartibartfast wrote:
This is potentially true, but not necessarily. If say we end up moving Jae for a pick/space to make room for Hayward you could make a good case that we'd be treading water.

Just gonna keep repeating it - everyone looking at Horford vs. Sully in a vacuum thought we were gonna skyrocket. Sure our record improved but our SRS actually declined.


I feel for stitches here, though none of his arguments matter if Hayward wants to come here. Hayward is their homegrown star. They drafted him, paid him and gradually put together a very nice and young team around him. They did just about everything right. And now they face losing him for nothing.

Pierce re-signed in an even worse scenario - coming off a crappy season with no positive trendline - and we loved him for it.


Looking at Horford's on/off numbers last season, there's a net increase of 4.3 points per 100 possessions compared to Sully's 2.6 the previous season. Starting five with Horford also had a net rating of 7.5 while previous year's starting five with Sully at center was only 2.4. Surprisingly, last season's starting five also rebounded slightly better as a unit compared to the one with Sully (edge in OREB%). Horford gave us a huge boost offensively, more than made up for the dip in defensive rating. Our stronger starting unit was offset by our weak, inexperienced bench though. While the ET-led bench group might not be able to score consistently and efficiently, those guys locked opponents up and forced a ton of turnovers. Last year's bench was poor on both sides of the ball, giving up leads on the regular. Stevens' insistence on not staggering his starters most of the season was frustrating to say the least. There was also an absurd amount of injuries to key players (which contributed to the non-staggering). I think that should factor in when comparing the performances of team 2016 vs. team 2017. Horford, who I thought wasn't fully utilized, was awesome for us esp. on offense. Relative health and bench, not so much.


That's why I said in a vacuum. Horford clearly the superior player to Sully. But people got so hung up on that upgrade in the offseason that they pooh-poohed going from mediocre-but-tough ET to Rozier/Brown and having no rebounder in the rotation.

And the same issues are posed by adding Hayward. In a vacuum we can say, hey, we're adding an All-Star for free! To a 53 win team! Just like we did with Horford. And we can imagine him replacing playoff disappointments just like we did with Sully - hey, this All-Star's replacing old man Amir and freaking Gerald Green - what's the downside?

Well there are plenty of downsides. Even though Amir was awful in the playoffs a la Fat Sully in 2016, he was an advanced stat stud during the RS (3rd on the team in RPM wins just as Sully was).

Nor is losing Amir (yeah, he's probably already lost to age - but the bottom line is the same) the only thing to pencil in. We're very likely going to have to ditch one or more of AB or Jae or KO to add Hayward, just like we ditched ET (no tears here - but again, bottom line). The natural choice is AB, and like ET, there's an advanced stat case to be made that he's a lot easier to replace than his outsized role would suggest. And like Jaylen, we'll have a top-shelf rook ready to put in his place.

But like ET, AB will be harder to replace than his footprint suggests and more time for young guys is likely to result in a stepback.

Put it all together and you can add an all-star for free and make no major short-term headway.


P.S.
As for injuries, they were worse than the prior year (but so was our SRS) but not really absurd. Remember 15/16 had it's own qualifying issues, including the awful David Lee experiment, Marcus Smart injuries, and lingering injury issues that made Jae and KO kinda suck down the stretch. Then of course injuries were a complete disaster in the first round.

Some of us expected Smart to make a leap in his game, take over ET duties, and steady that bench group. It didn't happen. The KO-Jerebko duo wasn't as formidable last season compared to previous seasons too.

The addition of Horford was great for the team and wasn't the reason why other aspects of the team stank (except for rebounding, transition baskets via DREB-leakouts). I will also take the upgrade from Hayward to Bradley (I'm a proponent of the Jae Stay Movement). It solves two clear areas of weakness -- shot creation and playmaking whenever defenders load up on IT and having someone competent (either Gordie or IT, maybe even Fultz too) run the offense for the entire 48. When IT sat, the offense died. The running joke of the Celtics being blowout averse last season should stop. There wouldn't be too many offensive lulls that lose the team leads and momentum. That was a huge reason why our point differential and SRS don't line up with our win totals.

I can't predict how losing AB's onball defense would affect our overall defense, but looking at their respective numbers from last season, Hayward was better in DRPM (with a huge gap in ORPM). He also trumps AB in defensive win shares (AB's) and about the same in defensive field goal % (AB's).

My assumption of course is AB's the one to go to make room for Hayward due to contract status alone. A lot will depend on how the rest of the rotation shakes out and how early in the year Stevens settles into one. Amir will be a bigger loss than most would like to admit. He looked done towards the end of the season so I don't really recommend bringing him back. It's just we need a suitable, more reliable replacement. I'm not a fan of starting Jae at PF. I'd rather we get someone using MLE/trade then have Crowder as the backup for both forward positions.

IT's condition is still a question mark. There's no word whether he's having surgery or not. Fultz taking over the Rozier/Green minutes should be net neutral at least. I'm iffy on Zizic until we see him against actual NBA competition. I'm also counting on improvements from Brown and Smart (contract year, baby!). I don't envision Yabu to be in the rotation next season. Maybe not even on the roster.
░N░0░0░D░S░ ░I░N░ ░B░I░O░
FlatearthZorro
RealGM
Posts: 20,585
And1: 12,326
Joined: Feb 12, 2010
Location: Somewhere in Boston
     

Re: Hayward Undecided 

Post#844 » by FlatearthZorro » Fri Jun 16, 2017 8:46 pm

stitches wrote:
Gant wrote:
stitches wrote:Boston shot like... 60-55-95 in those games. It's incredibly dangerous taking small samples to be representative of how good 2 teams are compared to each other. This is very unlikely to continue over large samples.

Also when talking about upward trajectory the Jazz are on the 20-30-40-50 wins trajectory right now.


The Celtics and Jazz were fairly even this year. If Hayward switches teams the Celtics will be much better than either team was in 2016-17.

It's not close. If Hayward switches he'll be playing for a much better team than if he stays.


If the Jazz keep being injured yes, If they have some modicum of health, I don't think Boston with Hayward is much better/if at all/ than healthy Utah with Hayward.


You are the bigger homer than us. Go back to your forum, lad, you're drunk. No way you can convince me our team with Hayward is worse than yours with Hayward, no way. Just no way. We challenge the best team in our division with Hayward on our team, you get swept in the 2nd round at best with Hayward on our team.

Whatever it's up to him. You can't convince me your team is better than ours, we're a nightmare matchup for you guys and we've pretty much shown it. unless something dramatic happens I don't see how you have as much of a championship oppotunity or more than us with us having the chance of adding 2 stars and at ur best u retain Hayward and Hill, how's that better than Hayward and Butler for example on our team or Hayward and George? 20-30-40-50, for 3 years we went from bottom 3-4 to #1 in the East we improved by 6 wins from last season. We got the #1 overall pick and cap to sign a max FA (potential at least top 10 pick in next year's draft).
Good assessment:

PLO wrote:Tatum played OK - took advantage of a few mismatches - decent on the defensive end. He is what we thought he was going into the season - a technically very proficient player operating close to his career ceiling as a rookie.
FlatearthZorro
RealGM
Posts: 20,585
And1: 12,326
Joined: Feb 12, 2010
Location: Somewhere in Boston
     

Re: Hayward Undecided 

Post#845 » by FlatearthZorro » Fri Jun 16, 2017 8:53 pm

stitches wrote:
Boston34Bg wrote:
stitches wrote:Being an efficient player doesn't mean the player is not a ballhog. The rest is very debatable. Especially if the Jazz are healthy. the Jazz had much higher net-rating(which is the best known predictor for wins) with severely injured roster and while playing in the West.


Our starting 5 was top 3 in players games missed. It's not debatable at all. I think both times we beat you this season Hayward played. Thomas ran circles around George Hill. I'm not trynna burst your bubble or flame you, but your team is not a championship caliber George Hill, Hayward and Gobert aren't winning you a championship, you need 2 more stars on that team. We ain't gonna either, but we got the assets to add another star, the money to sign 1 outright and we're in the East. Currently the Warriors are leaps and bounds in front of everybody as shown in the Finals.

People really underestimate how close Brad and Hayward are. Brad knows basically knows Hayward since he was like what 15? He knows his parents and family and is on a team on the rise.

It's not debatable by the way. Thomas does have a bad play here and there, but what he does on offense is literally beautiful, it's art. Go check his stats 29 pts a game on .463 from the field, .380 from 3,.910 from the FT line, 26.50 PER. You haven't watched us enough to call Thomas a ballhog, dude had a legit MVP type season with All-time stats for a guy averaging around 30. You don't have that guy on your roster. Not to mention Celtics fans and the fact that Hayward would become a huge national star if he's on the C's and a bunch of endorsement deals.


The Jazz were the team most impacted by injury this season(and this doesn't even take into account the games where Favors played but his form was obviously subpar because he was playing injured):
https://www.mangameslost.com/end-of-2016-17-regular-season-nba-games-missed-due-to-injury-april-14-2017/

According to various analytical projections the Jazz lost 9 wins due to injury this season. Yes, the Jazz were around 60 wins team if relatively healthy.

I've watched enough to know how IT plays. I didn't call him bad player or anything. He's a tremendous offensive player(and horrendous defensive player I might add). Again - this doesn't mean he's not a ballhog. It's a style of play not a quality of play thing. I don't know why you are giving me efficiency stats. I never said he's inefficient or bad offensive player. I said he's a ballhog. And he IS!

I think you are delusional if you think Boston is any closer to being a championship contender than the Jazz right now(in the next several years). Boston has the better future assets that they might turn into players that will help contend, but for example the injured Jazz were much more competitive(still not very) vs GSW than Boston were against CLE.


How many times did you watch Thomas? Actually Thomas's stats show that he's a pretty good at catch and shoot. Whatever as I said it's prespectives. Avery who's pretty important when it comes to covering for IT's weaknesses and was our 2nd best scorer at ~17 a game(410 from 3) missed the most games on our team, we started a rookie and still won more games than you guys. Horford- our only quality big missed 11 games due to concussion and a few more due to personal stuff and groin injury.

It actually made me laugh that you implied you had more championship hopes/chances than us. :lol: :lol: Good laughs, I'm off to bed. I wish I lived in your world, it's probably a beautiful place.

P.S You obviously feel threatened cause you're here all day arguing with us on our forum how your team is better and Hayward should stay. :lol: We will see when FA starts. Who knows, maybe MIA gets him, which would be maddening. :nod:
Good assessment:

PLO wrote:Tatum played OK - took advantage of a few mismatches - decent on the defensive end. He is what we thought he was going into the season - a technically very proficient player operating close to his career ceiling as a rookie.
Andrew McCeltic
RealGM
Posts: 23,153
And1: 8,549
Joined: Jun 18, 2004
 

Re: Hayward Undecided 

Post#846 » by Andrew McCeltic » Fri Jun 16, 2017 8:57 pm

Slax wrote:
Andrew McCeltic wrote:We could theoretically renounce Amir, make moves, and then use the MLE on him, if I remember right.


The non-taxpayer MLE of about $6M counts against cap space, so we will probably have to renounce the MLE as well. There is a cap room exception though, which is about half the size of the non-taxpayer MLE. I bet Amir could do much better than $3M a year, but I don't know, perhaps there's an outside chance he could be convinced to take a home town discount in order to be on a contender.


Isn't the MLE like 8.4 million now?

So we'd have to get under the cap to do a sign and trade with Olynyk to keep the MLE... I do think Amir would take 3 years, 25 million to stay.. Cap space is contracting around the league, too.
User avatar
CeltsfanSinceBirth
RealGM
Posts: 23,818
And1: 34,893
Joined: Jul 29, 2003
     

Re: Hayward Undecided 

Post#847 » by CeltsfanSinceBirth » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:01 pm

What's Utah's pitch going to be with Hayward? "Hey, you can go to Boston, but you guys still won't be good enough to beat the Warriors. Maybe the Cavs, but definitely not the Warriors. Therefore, you should just stay here and make an extra $30-40 million. NBA championships are overrated anyways".
User avatar
ConstableGeneva
RealGM
Posts: 50,514
And1: 101,232
Joined: Sep 22, 2012
Location: Parody Account
 

Re: Hayward Undecided 

Post#848 » by ConstableGeneva » Sat Jun 17, 2017 1:28 am

Read on Twitter
░N░0░0░D░S░ ░I░N░ ░B░I░O░
pickIBL
Head Coach
Posts: 6,508
And1: 959
Joined: Aug 12, 2008

Re: Hayward Undecided 

Post#849 » by pickIBL » Sat Jun 17, 2017 2:58 am

On the jazz forum under the draft thread they figured out how the celtics add butler, blake, and hayward while retaining horford.
I like my prospects the same way I like my women... foreign- pickIBL
pickIBL
Head Coach
Posts: 6,508
And1: 959
Joined: Aug 12, 2008

Re: Hayward Undecided 

Post#850 » by pickIBL » Sat Jun 17, 2017 3:02 am

CeltsfanSinceBirth wrote:What's Utah's pitch going to be with Hayward? "Hey, you can go to Boston, but you guys still won't be good enough to beat the Warriors. Maybe the Cavs, but definitely not the Warriors. Therefore, you should just stay here and make an extra $30-40 million. NBA championships are overrated anyways".

You need blake and hayward to beat lebron. Don't knock the jazz... plenty of winners will want to play with the best center in the league. The jazz have a real untouchable asset... he and giannis are the top young talents in this league with Porzingis.
I like my prospects the same way I like my women... foreign- pickIBL
User avatar
Higgs Boston
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,923
And1: 2,696
Joined: Feb 25, 2014

Re: Hayward Undecided 

Post#851 » by Higgs Boston » Sat Jun 17, 2017 11:29 am

Porzingis top young talent LOL

KAT should read this, pretty funny.
pickIBL
Head Coach
Posts: 6,508
And1: 959
Joined: Aug 12, 2008

Re: Hayward Undecided 

Post#852 » by pickIBL » Sat Jun 17, 2017 2:31 pm

Higgs Boston wrote:Porzingis top young talent LOL

KAT should read this, pretty funny.


He's nice too. His stats IMO are a little inflated because he's the young go to on a bad team. But in time. The only point is the celtics got none of that. At least not right now. And even if you add butler you still need a lot more to beat Lebron. Right now you are not close. Not an insult... just reality.
I like my prospects the same way I like my women... foreign- pickIBL

Return to Boston Celtics