Sixers and Celtics in serious talks about potential trade involving #1 pick

Brauer · Post #1 » by **Brauer** » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:05 pm

Dominator83 · Post #2 » by **Dominator83** » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:11 pm

Ainge about to take BC to school

PhillySixers22 · Post #3 » by **PhillySixers22** » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:13 pm

I'm on board with making this move if we don't give up too much, but I have an awful feeling that if this happens it's going to be BC burning through our future assets (lakers and kings picks) and our fan base (myself included) will be livid.

xxSnEaKyPxx · Post #4 » by **xxSnEaKyPxx** » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:14 pm

Do the 76ers really want Fultz that bad? If the plan is to have Simmons run the offense, why not just take Tatum at #3?

lamscott · Post #5 » by **lamscott** » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:15 pm

Ooooo. Lakers supposedly offering #2 and Julius Randle for the same pick.

EricAnderson · Post #6 » by **EricAnderson** » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:16 pm

Guess the rumors that the Celtics Love Jackson are true..Thought Fultz would be s better fit in Boston then JJ since they already have Brown

Devassa · Post #7 » by **Devassa** » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:17 pm

Probably Okafor and #3, right?

Cappy_Smurf · Post #8 » by **Cappy_Smurf** » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:18 pm

I'm gonna laugh if they switch just to acquire Okafor.

Post #9 » by **Rafael122** » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:19 pm

What is Ainge's end game here?

chrisab123 · Post #10 » by **chrisab123** » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:21 pm

Rafael122 wrote:What is Ainge's end game here?

He doesn't have to take the heat of selecting Josh Jackson 1st overall and assets. More beautiful assets.

jason bourne · Post #11 » by **jason bourne** » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:21 pm

lamscott wrote:Ooooo. Lakers supposedly offering #2 and Julius Randle for the same pick.

What's wrong with Julius Randle? No D, but is he out of shape already?

Nowitness · Post #12 » by **Nowitness** » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:21 pm

I think I'm one of the few Okafor fans left out there and I think this draft is deep, don't think it's a bad idea for Ainge to go for him and 3

EricAnderson · Post #13 » by **EricAnderson** » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:21 pm

Devassa wrote:Probably Okafor and #3, right?

Nah picks too.. so I'd guess the Lakers unprotected next year and/or Kings unprotected the following year

DaddyCool19 · Post #14 » by **DaddyCool19** » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:21 pm

3rd pick + Lakes pick maybe? Especially if BC thinks the Lakers could end up winning enough to not be a bottom 5-7 team next year.

TurboTitan · Post #15 » by **TurboTitan** » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:21 pm

Ainge wyd...

GregB · Post #16 » by **GregB** » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:21 pm

Lowe said no players involved only picks.

#1 for #3, lakers and sacramento would be glorious. Show us your incompetence Colangelo, Ainge is waiting.

EricAnderson · Post #17 » by **EricAnderson** » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:22 pm

Rafael122 wrote:What is Ainge's end game here?

To be on a episode of hoarders as his family and friends try to get him to get rid of some assets for actual players

TurboTitan · Post #18 » by **TurboTitan** » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:22 pm

Fultz will run the league one day

Concernedcad · Post #19 » by **Concernedcad** » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:24 pm

GregB wrote:Lowe said no players involved only picks.

#1 for #3, lakers and sacramento would be glorious. Show us your incompetence Colangelo, Ainge is waiting.

I can't wait to see MKG 2.0 on the Celtics

GregB · Post #20 » by **GregB** » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:25 pm

Read on Twitter