Sixers officially acquire #1 pick per Woj and Aldridge. Will get Fultz

LongLiveHinkie · Post #1 » by **LongLiveHinkie** » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:13 pm

Read on Twitter

ckchen · Post #2 » by **ckchen** » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:18 pm

LongLiveHinkie wrote:

Read on Twitter

Huge pit in my stomach waiting to hear how Ainge fleeced BC for the Lakers and King's picks to move up.

the_process · Post #3 » by **the_process** » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:19 pm

LloydFree has been dreading this for like the past month.

I'm good with this if BC can get this done without trading Embiid, Simmons, or the Laker pick.

the_process · Post #4 » by **the_process** » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:20 pm

ckchen wrote:
LongLiveHinkie wrote:

Read on Twitter

Huge pit in my stomach waiting to hear how Ainge fleeced BC for the Lakers and King's picks to move up.

If that happens, gonna have to start up the "Fire BC now" petition.

Post #5 » by **City of Trees** » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:21 pm

the_process wrote::lol: LloydFree has been dreading this for like the past month.

I'm good with this if BC can get this done without trading Embiid, Simmons, or the Laker pick.

Rumors say no players but several picks.

This is a tough one for me because I dont believe "several picks" to be the different in Fultz and Jackson .

Sent from my SM-J700T using RealGM mobile app

Winejk · Post #6 » by **Winejk** » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:22 pm

The future pick better not be LA's 2018 pick or Sacramento's 2019 pick. If the future pick is the Sixers' own pick in 2018 or 2019 I'd be fine with that because I'm confident the Sixers will be out of the lottery. I think we also have OKC's pick top 20 protected which I'd be ok with trading as well. Boston can have as many 2nd rounders as it wants.

the_process · Post #7 » by **the_process** » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:24 pm

Winejk wrote:The future pick better not be LA's 2018 pick or Sacramento's 2019 pick. If the future pick is the Sixers' own pick in 2018 or 2019 I'd be fine with that because I'm confident the Sixers will be out of the lottery.

Could live with the SAC 2019 pick being involved. If the Laker pick is involved... time for BC to go.

Post #8 » by **sixers hoops** » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:27 pm

If they believe Fultz is the clear star, then giving up a future first is not bad.

I just have a feeling it will be even worse than we expect.

Looking at the next two years, our most valuable picks may be:
2019 Sac
2018 Lakers
2018 own
2019 own

BC will prob give up two of those in addition to the 3 pick.

If you're of the belief that Fultz is the star, then the deal is okay. If you like Love or Jackson better, then this deal is horrible.

ckchen · Post #9 » by **ckchen** » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:27 pm

the_process wrote:
Winejk wrote:The future pick better not be LA's 2018 pick or Sacramento's 2019 pick. If the future pick is the Sixers' own pick in 2018 or 2019 I'd be fine with that because I'm confident the Sixers will be out of the lottery.

Could live with the SAC 2019 pick being involved. If the Laker pick is involved... time for BC to go.

Do you honestly think Ainge would be making this trade if BC wasn't going to end up looking like Billy King when this over?
He's getting #3, the Lakers, the Kings pick, and we better hope it stops there.

Post #10 » by **sixers hoops** » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:30 pm

ckchen wrote:
the_process wrote:
Winejk wrote:The future pick better not be LA's 2018 pick or Sacramento's 2019 pick. If the future pick is the Sixers' own pick in 2018 or 2019 I'd be fine with that because I'm confident the Sixers will be out of the lottery.

Could live with the SAC 2019 pick being involved. If the Laker pick is involved... time for BC to go.

Do you honestly think Ainge would be making this trade if BC wasn't going to end up looking like Billy King when this over?
He's getting #3, the Lakers, the Kings pick, and we better hope it stops there.

I'm not much of a draft expert, but I don't want us giving up more than one future first. I just don't see the 1st pick being that valuable this year.

SelfishPlayer · Post #11 » by **SelfishPlayer** » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:31 pm

This is a Colangelo move, Bargnani!

Vince5693 · Post #12 » by **Vince5693** » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:31 pm

ckchen wrote:
the_process wrote:
Winejk wrote:The future pick better not be LA's 2018 pick or Sacramento's 2019 pick. If the future pick is the Sixers' own pick in 2018 or 2019 I'd be fine with that because I'm confident the Sixers will be out of the lottery.

Could live with the SAC 2019 pick being involved. If the Laker pick is involved... time for BC to go.

Do you honestly think Ainge would be making this trade if BC wasn't going to end up looking like Billy King when this over?
He's getting #3, the Lakers, the Kings pick, and we better hope it stops there.

According to woj it seems that it's #3 and one other pick. Hopefully it's not the lakers pick

the_process · Post #13 » by **the_process** » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:32 pm

ckchen wrote:
the_process wrote:
Winejk wrote:The future pick better not be LA's 2018 pick or Sacramento's 2019 pick. If the future pick is the Sixers' own pick in 2018 or 2019 I'd be fine with that because I'm confident the Sixers will be out of the lottery.

Could live with the SAC 2019 pick being involved. If the Laker pick is involved... time for BC to go.

Do you honestly think Ainge would be making this trade if BC wasn't going to end up looking like Billy King when this over?
He's getting #3, the Lakers, the Kings pick, and we better hope it stops there.

Ainge needs to get overpaid in deals sure... but BC can do that without the Laker pick involved.

Saric, Okafor, 2018 PHI 1st, 2019 SAC 1st, 2020 OKC 1st. Stupid overpay, but nothing back breaking or process ruining.

Vince5693 · Post #14 » by **Vince5693** » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:32 pm

Wow trade talks seem to be pretty deep. Seems like we are holding out until medical info on fultz comes back...

Lou_23 · Post #15 » by **Lou_23** » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:35 pm

Get Fultz!

sixerswillrule · Post #16 » by **sixerswillrule** » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:35 pm

I can handle trading one of the future picks (though still would be nervous about it landing at #1) but we definitely shouldn't give up both.

ckchen · Post #17 » by **ckchen** » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:36 pm

the_process wrote:
ckchen wrote:
the_process wrote:
Could live with the SAC 2019 pick being involved. If the Laker pick is involved... time for BC to go.

Do you honestly think Ainge would be making this trade if BC wasn't going to end up looking like Billy King when this over?
He's getting #3, the Lakers, the Kings pick, and we better hope it stops there.

Ainge needs to get overpaid in deals sure... but BC can do that without the Laker pick involved.

Saric, Okafor, 2018 PHI 1st, 2019 SAC 1st, 2020 OKC 1st. Stupid overpay, but nothing back breaking or process ruining.

Well, they already said "no players" and "package of picks" in addition to #3 which implies more than one.

LongLiveHinkie · Post #18 » by **LongLiveHinkie** » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:37 pm

If this goes down, my proudest moment as a message board poster lol

viewtopic.php?f=26&t=1538335&p=54180703&hilit=Fultz#p54180703

KrazySixersD · Post #19 » by **KrazySixersD** » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:37 pm

I think fultz is the best and safest player in this draft.. but we better not give up lakers or sacramento pick.

Giving our own picks is fine as Im betting we arent a lotter team even this year.. but god help us if its the lakers or sac pick

Sixersftw · Post #20 » by **Sixersftw** » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:42 pm

There is a very fair trade to be made here and I know there is no way it is going to happen. Colangelo is going to get steam rolled.

Grade the trade