ImageImageImage

All Things #1 Pick 2017 Take 2

Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts

Sven
Sophomore
Posts: 106
And1: 141
Joined: May 20, 2017
     

Re: All Things #1 Pick 2017 Take 2 

Post#1781 » by Sven » Sun Jun 18, 2017 4:58 am

sully00 wrote:
PierceFan4ever wrote:If Ainge thinks there isn't much separation between Fultz and the other 3 prospects take him anyways unless Sixers were offering a godfather offer. Almost everyone had Fultz as the best why try to make a super risky move???


What is the risk? Most of the time these deals are about money or a useless future pick. Ainge just got a top 5 pick next year or an unrestricted Kings pick in '19. I get that because Ainge keeps doing this that Boston fans don't understand how rare these type of assets are but to get this from a lottery dwelling team is ridiculous.

Bottom line Fultz isn't Lebron James or Kevin Durant, what do you do? If you can double down.

If we have top 5 lotto odds for two picks next year and we end up keeping the Lakers pick, Danny is a genius. He's a double genius if they lower the age restriction and the 2018 draft is flooded with people like Zion and Bagley. If it's top 3 in 2019, he's a genius.

If it gets to 2019 and then the Kings are good for some reason and the pick sucks, we lost.
ViperGTS
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,385
And1: 4,398
Joined: Jul 04, 2016

Re: All Things #1 Pick 2017 Take 2 

Post#1782 » by ViperGTS » Sun Jun 18, 2017 4:59 am

Captain_Caveman wrote:Celts will now pursue Butler while retaining two out of Jaylen/3rd pick/Nets 2018.

Plus two out of Smart/Crowder/Rozier.

Plus IT Horford, Zizic, Yabu.

Then land Hayward for Griffin in free agency.

LMAO @ THE HATERS


That team is good but ain't winning jack. If people had questions about Fultz being a winner...Butler sure isn't. Get off the Butler train. He's not that good. People only bring him up because it's the sexy name that is remotely available. No one of the legit superstars are available.

People who say trade for Butler need to be put in a time out automatically.
Jakeopp
General Manager
Posts: 9,770
And1: 10,414
Joined: Feb 20, 2017
     

Re: All Things #1 Pick 2017 Take 2 

Post#1783 » by Jakeopp » Sun Jun 18, 2017 4:59 am

Captain_Caveman wrote:Celts will now pursue Butler while retaining two out of Jaylen/3rd pick/Nets 2018.

Plus two out of Smart/Crowder/Rozier.

Plus IT Horford, Zizic, Yabu.

Then land Hayward for Griffin in free agency.

LMAO @ THE HATERS


You can laugh at us after that actually happens and we get a championship out of it...
User avatar
Asian Celtic
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,819
And1: 7,002
Joined: Jun 10, 2016
 

Re: All Things #1 Pick 2017 Take 2 

Post#1784 » by Asian Celtic » Sun Jun 18, 2017 4:59 am

The Corey's wrote:
Rexperez wrote:
The Corey's wrote:
Maybe I wasn't clear since you intend to use me as your outlet.

Jackson can't shoot.

No guarantee Hayward comes here.

Butler for everything that he is isn't a shooter.

After tonight I don't have trust in Ainge. Get over it bruh


If you want Ainge fired that bad, who do you want that is better than him?


Who knows


So you want ainge fired but do not have someone better to replace him. Sounds like a plan. 8-)
fallguy
General Manager
Posts: 7,859
And1: 12,714
Joined: Jun 12, 2009

Re: All Things #1 Pick 2017 Take 2 

Post#1785 » by fallguy » Sun Jun 18, 2017 5:00 am

Jakeopp wrote:
fallguy wrote:
Bar Fight wrote:I just can't convince myself there's a chance we win a title with a team led by Jimmy Butler and Gordon Hayward/Blake Griffin. Much better duos than that haven't even sniffed the Finals.

I wanna trade down to 5 and 10 and take DSJ and maybe Collins I guess.


Butler/Hayward/Griffin combos wouldn't win a title. Totally agree.

But that is not the endgame.

are we sure of that? Many people seem convinced we are moving these picks and Butler/PG13 are the guys likely on the market


The Celtics operate through a pretty clear paradigm for building a title team. And they target guys years out.

They will still be looking for a headliner for the title team next year.

Big step forward in 2017. Final piece as soon as possible afterwards.
The Corey's
RealGM
Posts: 12,791
And1: 8,574
Joined: Jan 29, 2006

Re: All Things #1 Pick 2017 Take 2 

Post#1786 » by The Corey's » Sun Jun 18, 2017 5:00 am

I wonder if kings are dumb enough to give us 5 and 10 for 3.

Id do it.
The Corey's
RealGM
Posts: 12,791
And1: 8,574
Joined: Jan 29, 2006

Re: All Things #1 Pick 2017 Take 2 

Post#1787 » by The Corey's » Sun Jun 18, 2017 5:00 am

Rexperez wrote:
The Corey's wrote:
Rexperez wrote:
If you want Ainge fired that bad, who do you want that is better than him?


Who knows


So you want ainge fired but do not have someone better to replace him. Sounds like a plan. 8-)


Sometimes you need change. Ask the Bruins
fallguy
General Manager
Posts: 7,859
And1: 12,714
Joined: Jun 12, 2009

Re: All Things #1 Pick 2017 Take 2 

Post#1788 » by fallguy » Sun Jun 18, 2017 5:01 am

Jakeopp wrote:
Captain_Caveman wrote:Celts will now pursue Butler while retaining two out of Jaylen/3rd pick/Nets 2018.

Plus two out of Smart/Crowder/Rozier.

Plus IT Horford, Zizic, Yabu.

Then land Hayward for Griffin in free agency.

LMAO @ THE HATERS


You can laugh at us after that actually happens and we get a championship out of it...


I think laughing now is appropriate.
24istheLAW
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,798
And1: 5,031
Joined: Jul 09, 2012
     

Re: All Things #1 Pick 2017 Take 2 

Post#1789 » by 24istheLAW » Sun Jun 18, 2017 5:02 am

Dan Z wrote:
24istheLAW wrote:
Dan Z wrote:
Butler just has his best statistical season and played in 76 games. How is he not aging well? Or are you making a guess that he won't age well going forward?

6"7" 220lbs is undersized for a SF? That's an inch taller than Jae Crowder and 15 pounds lighter. It's also an inch shorter than Gordon Hayward and 1 pound less.


Crowder is way undersized for PF himself... Which you see in Boston's rebounding numbers.

The SF who have the size to age well more often than not become small ball 4s. That option is off the table for Butler.

No, I can't see him aging well going forward at all. He's a great competitor and an easy player to root for, but between his style of play and the tread on his tires, seeing him as an All-Star at 32 is practically impossible imo.

Hayward doesn't look like he can transition to PF either. But he's a more natural shooter, and less reliant on defensive value, so it's easier to see him staying effective with diminished athleticism.

George is the only one of the three whose profile really suggests they can be as good at 32 as they are now. And if you're trading for what they are now, given the lay of the NBA... what the hell are you doing?


Why do players have to transition to a new position when they get older? Many players have stayed at one position their entire careers and did just fine. Stockton for example. He played PG until he retired at the age of 40. Now I'm not saying Butler is on Stockton's level (two completely different players), but I'm just pointing out that a player can be okay at one position as they age.

Are you against the Celtics signing Hayward?


Indifferent.

The first and biggest difference is that you don't have to trade for Hayward, he costs only cap space. Second, Butler with his opt out needs a new deal. So a Hayward contract is shorter and cheaper than the end of Butler's deal plus a new contract for Butler. Third, like I said, I'll take Hayward's aging curve over Butler. The flip side is that Hayward is not as good now as Butler. Especially on a team which features IT and could use Butler's toughness on the court.

Really, the only one whose acquisition I'd really endorse is Paul George. I think he's meaningfully more attractive than either.
Parasite
Veteran
Posts: 2,510
And1: 2,956
Joined: May 06, 2005
     

Re: All Things #1 Pick 2017 Take 2 

Post#1790 » by Parasite » Sun Jun 18, 2017 5:03 am

viewtopic.php?p=55499798#p55499798

And I was laughed at. This was a month ago.
PierceFan4ever
RealGM
Posts: 35,807
And1: 41,926
Joined: Dec 17, 2011

Re: All Things #1 Pick 2017 Take 2 

Post#1791 » by PierceFan4ever » Sun Jun 18, 2017 5:03 am

The only way I like this pick as of now is if Silver comes out tomorrow and says players can come straight out of high school which means the 2018 draft features Marvin Bagley, Zion Williamson, Ayton, Bamba, and Porter JR.
User avatar
31to6
RealGM
Posts: 20,707
And1: 31,254
Joined: Nov 20, 2004
Location: Tatum train

Re: All Things #1 Pick 2017 Take 2 

Post#1792 » by 31to6 » Sun Jun 18, 2017 5:03 am

sully00 wrote:
PierceFan4ever wrote:If Ainge thinks there isn't much separation between Fultz and the other 3 prospects take him anyways unless Sixers were offering a godfather offer. Almost everyone had Fultz as the best why try to make a super risky move???


What is the risk? Most of the time these deals are about money or a useless future pick. Ainge just got a top 5 pick next year or an unrestricted Kings pick in '19. I get that because Ainge keeps doing this that Boston fans don't understand how rare these type of assets are but to get this from a lottery dwelling team is ridiculous.

Bottom line Fultz isn't Lebron James or Kevin Durant, what do you do? If you can double down.


Amen. We're drowning in riches. If the reported deal is correct there's a great chance we just acquired a guy like Porter, Ayton, Bamba, Doncic, or even Bagley and half the board's like 'shrug'. It's a move with some risk to it, sure, but also amazing potential reward.
Paul Pierce appreciation society.
User avatar
Effigy
RealGM
Posts: 14,692
And1: 14,062
Joined: Nov 27, 2001
     

Re: All Things #1 Pick 2017 Take 2 

Post#1793 » by Effigy » Sun Jun 18, 2017 5:04 am

Froob wrote:
sully00 wrote:
Effigy wrote:
So don't make the trade, draft the consensus best player and have him play for your team?


Because you know on your team he is back up and Jackson might be a starter.

That only matters if you think you can contend. Not seeing it....Celts reasons seems real dumb if it's not winning and overflow of guards.


Yep. Take the best player. Worry about the rest later.

And what if Josh doesn't start also?
ViperGTS
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,385
And1: 4,398
Joined: Jul 04, 2016

Re: All Things #1 Pick 2017 Take 2 

Post#1794 » by ViperGTS » Sun Jun 18, 2017 5:04 am

The Corey's wrote:
Rexperez wrote:
The Corey's wrote:
Who knows


So you want ainge fired but do not have someone better to replace him. Sounds like a plan. 8-)


Sometimes you need change. Ask the Bruins


Agreed. He got taken to the cleaners. IF it turns out in his favor it will be entirely on luck. I still can't believe Wyc bought his BS. I hope he reads this forum. You know someone from there probably does.
Patsfan1081
RealGM
Posts: 12,251
And1: 5,743
Joined: Jan 06, 2015

Re: All Things #1 Pick 2017 Take 2 

Post#1795 » by Patsfan1081 » Sun Jun 18, 2017 5:04 am

AgentGreen wrote:
Jingles wrote:
AgentGreen wrote:
I've seen plenty of Kansas games and i've put out an solid argument why he is a promising talent. You think you can diminish that with some cheap oneliners?

Give credit where its due.

I'm not a Fultz guy but i give him credit for his offensive qualities, he has the potential to be a very good scorer in the league. But he isn't the type of player that fits in Brad's system, sorry.


Then neither is the starting point guard who they now seem destined to max.


Isaiah isn't Fultz, he has way more fire in him and is a elite scorer. Fultz isn't. Plus IT has proven that he is the missing link in our system when he gets injured. Fultz hasn't, Washington kept sucking like they did with or without him.


Here comes all the 180 opinions crapping all over Fultz know..... Trader Danny wins another won, traded back and still got his man. Pew Pew The truth is this is a very risky move by Ainge, he better be sure he didn't pass on a franchise player. What sucks is whoever he drafts will most likely see 10-15 minutes off the bench his rookie season, so everyone will say we can't judge the trade till four years down the road. My opinion is this team is desperate for a franchise player and the concencous thought was Fultz was the best bet to be that. Now Philly will have three players that when healthy have are bigger assets then anything here in Boston.
User avatar
D1SGRUNTL3D
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,104
And1: 2,080
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Location: Minnesota
   

Re: All Things #1 Pick 2017 Take 2 

Post#1796 » by D1SGRUNTL3D » Sun Jun 18, 2017 5:04 am

GoCeltics123 wrote:
Read on Twitter

I had this feeling as well... top pick in the nba should lead his college team to more than 9 wins...with the best being rpi ranked number 99.

5 sub 100 RPI losses.
sully00
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 28,105
And1: 7,738
Joined: Jan 08, 2004
Location: Providence, RI
       

Re: All Things #1 Pick 2017 Take 2 

Post#1797 » by sully00 » Sun Jun 18, 2017 5:05 am

Novocaine wrote:
sully00 wrote:
StojkoVrankovic wrote:An interesting aspect is that Ainge traded down to possibly select a player, Ball/Jackson, that hasn't worked out for us yet. Granted, we have the next couple of days, but that is crazy.


I think that this was intentional. I think Boston is selling PHI that this is about a trade for a superstar not about moving from 1 to 3. Not having Ball or Jackson in makes it less likely that PHI feels like Boston just wants another player and are fleecing them for assets.


Why would Philly really care? If they allowed Boston's opinion on prospects to change theirs, they would never make the trade in the first place. Plus, why would they trust Boston? And calling it a fleecing would make more sense if there was more than just another pick.

The reason those guys haven't worked out with Boston yet is because they refused, not because Boston didn't ask. I'd still refuse if I were their agents, and for the same reasons: if they wanted my guy, then pick him at the 1 and give him the salary he deserves.


For a couple of reasons. First PHI and BOS do not make trades, division rivals and on top of that they have been somewhat been warring over how to rebuild of late. So if Boston has a lead guard in IT and two other high value guards in Bradley and Smart if Boston is bringing in Jackson, the Lakers have their love affair with Ball for the Sixers to give up anything in this situation makes them look like they are getting fleeced.

No idea what the playout on this is going to be. But if it holds and it is Fultz, Ball, Jackson then Magic did Ainge a huge solid.
Celtics_Champs
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 53,597
And1: 8,077
Joined: Jan 13, 2005
Location: TD Garden
 

Re: All Things #1 Pick 2017 Take 2 

Post#1798 » by Celtics_Champs » Sun Jun 18, 2017 5:06 am

Maybe this is for a different thread but why do people say our team adding a Blake Hayward Butler or George isn't going to contend with the cavs. unless IT drips off the face of the earth that teams going seven with the cavs
The Corey's
RealGM
Posts: 12,791
And1: 8,574
Joined: Jan 29, 2006

Re: All Things #1 Pick 2017 Take 2 

Post#1799 » by The Corey's » Sun Jun 18, 2017 5:07 am

Parasite wrote:viewtopic.php?p=55499798#p55499798

And I was laughed at. This was a month ago.


Tomorrow there are gonna be MANY celtic fans waking up.to this news and **** really gonna hit the fan
JJtheBricklayer
Junior
Posts: 308
And1: 436
Joined: Jun 18, 2017
       

Re: All Things #1 Pick 2017 Take 2 

Post#1800 » by JJtheBricklayer » Sun Jun 18, 2017 5:07 am

I thought Ainge said he was only moving the #1 pick for " Transcendent talent" or some such nonsense? How is the #3 pick and a lottery ticket worth what is more than likely atleast a 2nd option on a good team with potential for more?

This makes more sense if its for a trade and I could realistically see he celts landing 2 of Hayward/GRiffin/Butler/PG13. But if we are being honest we know that team barely has a shot at the Cavs and almost zero shot vs GS or SA.

Honestly if all Ainge pulls out of this is a 2nd tier older star like Butler or PG13 this is an unmitigated disaster. Guys like that arent doing anything except making us The Clippers East. If this isnt the precursor to landing an Anthony DAvis or similar superstar level talent the celtics may have just guranteed they cant get by the cavs now, or 76ers later.

Return to Boston Celtics