ImageImageImageImage

The case for Jonathan Isaac

Moderators: ChosenSavior, UCF, Knightro, UCFJayBird, Def Swami, Howard Mass

Darth Magic
Veteran
Posts: 2,849
And1: 820
Joined: Feb 24, 2010

Re: RE: Re: The case for Jonathan Isaac 

Post#521 » by Darth Magic » Sat Jun 17, 2017 3:01 pm

Knightro wrote:
Darth Magic wrote:Could it Be that Issac plays the 4 defensively and the 3 offensively, while Aaron plays the 3 defensively and the 4 offensively? :dontknow:


IF Isaac is able to hit threes at a respectable clip, then he could play the 3 offensively and cross match defensively with Gordon.

If he can't, then the Magic would once again have some major spacing problems.


Sigh
"Real Gs move in silence; like lasagna" Jeff Weltman
cedric76
RealGM
Posts: 16,248
And1: 3,725
Joined: May 28, 2005

Re: The case for Jonathan Isaac 

Post#522 » by cedric76 » Sun Jun 18, 2017 3:17 am

Suggs, AB, Tyus, Jase
Bane, AB, TDS , Jett
Franz, TDS, Panda
P5, JI, Panda, Moe
Wcj, Goga, Moe
Skin
RealGM
Posts: 18,515
And1: 8,804
Joined: Jul 03, 2009
   

Re: The case for Jonathan Isaac 

Post#523 » by Skin » Sun Jun 18, 2017 5:57 am

cedric76
RealGM
Posts: 16,248
And1: 3,725
Joined: May 28, 2005

Re: RE: Re: The case for Jonathan Isaac 

Post#524 » by cedric76 » Sun Jun 18, 2017 7:34 am

Skin wrote:

A great MUST read.

I knew you d enjoy that one :-)
Suggs, AB, Tyus, Jase
Bane, AB, TDS , Jett
Franz, TDS, Panda
P5, JI, Panda, Moe
Wcj, Goga, Moe
User avatar
fendilim
RealGM
Posts: 31,897
And1: 5,494
Joined: Jun 11, 2002
Location: 孫悟空, 时间太?!

Re: The case for Jonathan Isaac 

Post#525 » by fendilim » Sun Jun 18, 2017 8:17 am

The key for Isaac is whether he can be that guy who can takeover.

He reminds me so much of Iguodala who has all the physical tools in the world, has the skills to be great, but doesn't have the mentality to be so.
Image
User avatar
rusoopE
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,543
And1: 683
Joined: Dec 16, 2013
Location: Patagonia
   

Re: The case for Jonathan Isaac 

Post#526 » by rusoopE » Sun Jun 18, 2017 8:22 am

If isaac is drafted by the magic and shows a high ceiling upside. I really dont care about trading AG
"It's like 60 minutes on acid" - David Byrne

Vuc and Isaac supporter
User avatar
SOUL
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 59,046
And1: 40,938
Joined: Dec 11, 2006
Location: Orl★ndo
     

Re: The case for Jonathan Isaac 

Post#527 » by SOUL » Sun Jun 18, 2017 10:30 am

rusoopE wrote:If isaac is drafted by the magic and shows a high ceiling upside. I really dont care about trading AG


Or.. keep both? :o :o :o
www.rareslums.com // please support my writing!
User avatar
rusoopE
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,543
And1: 683
Joined: Dec 16, 2013
Location: Patagonia
   

Re: RE: Re: The case for Jonathan Isaac 

Post#528 » by rusoopE » Sun Jun 18, 2017 12:02 pm

SOUL wrote:
rusoopE wrote:If isaac is drafted by the magic and shows a high ceiling upside. I really dont care about trading AG


Or.. keep both? :o :o :o

The only way i see the magic keeping both is if isaac can play center that would be awesome (sry vooch). I dont believe in switching positions in every posession ( season games at least). I was one of the many on this board Who was excited to watch Gordon playing SF. But totally blew up in our faces. It will take time for isaac to be a threat playing SF imo, he will be better suited at pf. And knowing how this organization has no patience in developing i expect gordon to be traded if isaac shows some kind of sparks on the court. Btw im not sold on AG as i never been
"It's like 60 minutes on acid" - David Byrne

Vuc and Isaac supporter
cedric76
RealGM
Posts: 16,248
And1: 3,725
Joined: May 28, 2005

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: The case for Jonathan Isaac 

Post#529 » by cedric76 » Sun Jun 18, 2017 12:23 pm

rusoopE wrote:
SOUL wrote:
rusoopE wrote:If isaac is drafted by the magic and shows a high ceiling upside. I really dont care about trading AG


Or.. keep both? :o :o :o

The only way i see the magic keeping both is if isaac can play center that would be awesome (sry vooch). I dont believe in switching positions in every posession ( season games at least). I was one of the many on this board Who was excited to watch Gordon playing SF. But totally blew up in our faces. It will take time for isaac to be a threat playing SF imo, he will be better suited at pf. And knowing how this organization has no patience in developing i expect gordon to be traded if isaac shows some kind of sparks on the court. Btw im not sold on AG as i never been

Guys the days r long gone when we had 5 positions on the floor.
Suggs, AB, Tyus, Jase
Bane, AB, TDS , Jett
Franz, TDS, Panda
P5, JI, Panda, Moe
Wcj, Goga, Moe
Orlando Tragic
Junior
Posts: 435
And1: 87
Joined: Jul 09, 2012
     

Re: The case for Jonathan Isaac 

Post#530 » by Orlando Tragic » Sun Jun 18, 2017 12:42 pm


Interesting little tidbit...
"Orlando might trade down if Denver takes Evan Fournier’s contract off their hands, but it’s tough to find the right deal."
User avatar
MartinsIzAfraud
Head Coach
Posts: 6,437
And1: 4,821
Joined: Mar 07, 2017
Location: Work
   

Re: The case for Jonathan Isaac 

Post#531 » by MartinsIzAfraud » Sun Jun 18, 2017 12:55 pm

Orlando Tragic wrote:

Interesting little tidbit...
"Orlando might trade down if Denver takes Evan Fournier’s contract off their hands, but it’s tough to find the right deal."


I'll give em 25+Fournier to move up but not down lol we have to take BPA at 6.
A scoring guard.. never heard of one. :roll:
User avatar
tiderulz
RealGM
Posts: 36,936
And1: 14,865
Joined: Jun 16, 2010
Location: Atlanta
 

Re: The case for Jonathan Isaac 

Post#532 » by tiderulz » Sun Jun 18, 2017 1:16 pm

Orlando Tragic wrote:

Interesting little tidbit...
"Orlando might trade down if Denver takes Evan Fournier’s contract off their hands, but it’s tough to find the right deal."


except Evan isnt a contract that needs to be taken off someone's hands. not saying we cant trade him, but it isnt something we need to be saved from

And his body comparisons only ring true with Durant. Isaac body is not like Kawhi or Giannis.
p0peye
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,843
And1: 3,353
Joined: Feb 27, 2006
 

Re: The case for Jonathan Isaac 

Post#533 » by p0peye » Sun Jun 18, 2017 2:03 pm

If Aaron had better length, we might try playing him at C. It could be interesting. At PF, he's OK, but nothing spectacular. At SF, he's great fit defensively, but lack of skills turns him into net negative. Since his length isn't likely to ever improve, unless he gets better in skills department we might have "only" solid PF at our hands in AG. I'm OK with trading that piece considering where we are now.

Isaac is intriguing prospect and we might try him at SF or PF. Bucks tried putting Giannis in every position possible except coach and referee, but it didn't "ruin" him at all.
User avatar
Jameerthefear
Starter
Posts: 2,379
And1: 1,716
Joined: Jul 30, 2013
Location: Amway Center
   

Re: RE: Re: The case for Jonathan Isaac 

Post#534 » by Jameerthefear » Sun Jun 18, 2017 3:49 pm

Orlando Tragic wrote:

Interesting little tidbit...
"Orlando might trade down if Denver takes Evan Fournier’s contract off their hands, but it’s tough to find the right deal."

Lol Evan doesn't need to be salary dumped. This guy has no idea what he's talking about.

Sent from my SM-G930P using Tapatalk
Image
Darth Magic
Veteran
Posts: 2,849
And1: 820
Joined: Feb 24, 2010

Re: The case for Jonathan Isaac 

Post#535 » by Darth Magic » Sun Jun 18, 2017 5:03 pm

tiderulz wrote:
Orlando Tragic wrote:

Interesting little tidbit...
"Orlando might trade down if Denver takes Evan Fournier’s contract off their hands, but it’s tough to find the right deal."


except Evan isnt a contract that needs to be taken off someone's hands. not saying we cant trade him, but it isnt something we need to be saved from

And his body comparisons only ring true with Durant. Isaac body is not like Kawhi or Giannis.


Exactly. I think its laughable to suggest we somehow need to trade Fournier. He's an asset not a liability. We trade 6 and Fournier to move down into the teens. Are these people high? :lol:
"Real Gs move in silence; like lasagna" Jeff Weltman
Skin
RealGM
Posts: 18,515
And1: 8,804
Joined: Jul 03, 2009
   

Re: The case for Jonathan Isaac 

Post#536 » by Skin » Sun Jun 18, 2017 5:18 pm

fendilim wrote:The key for Isaac is whether he can be that guy who can takeover.

He reminds me so much of Iguodala who has all the physical tools in the world, has the skills to be great, but doesn't have the mentality to be so.

In the article that cedric just posted they made several interesting comments... like this one..

The truth is “role player” is a silly, outdated term. It implies that each NBA team has one, maybe two, stars who score all the points and get the attention, that everyone else on the team just does the dirty work. We talk about three-and-D guys like they’re something special, but nowadays, anyone that does not have a passable three or play decent defense is almost unplayable. In 2017, almost every good player is a 3-and-D guy. And on good teams, almost everyone has a role to fill.

In 2017, every NBA contender is trying to figure out how to get someone that can defend LeBron or Durant and be at useful on the other end of the court. Through seven years of LeBron Finals, every single Conference Finals team had a versatile athletic wing that could defend any position. By comparison, just 18 of the 28 teams had a top-level point guard, and only 12 or 13 had a great traditional center. You can win in the modern NBA without a top notch point guard or big man, but you can’t even get close without one of these wings anymore.
OrlChamps2030
General Manager
Posts: 8,036
And1: 4,336
Joined: Jul 18, 2009
     

Re: The case for Jonathan Isaac 

Post#537 » by OrlChamps2030 » Sun Jun 18, 2017 5:22 pm

I'm okay with Isaac at 6 but what will be the difference between him being a high level role player versus fulfilling his potential will be whether or not he can attack a set defense in the half court off the dribble.
User avatar
Knightro
Forum Mod - Magic
Forum Mod - Magic
Posts: 28,602
And1: 29,690
Joined: Dec 18, 2010
Location: Jersey
 

Re: The case for Jonathan Isaac 

Post#538 » by Knightro » Sun Jun 18, 2017 6:32 pm

Darth Magic wrote:Exactly. I think its laughable to suggest we somehow need to trade Fournier. He's an asset not a liability. We trade 6 and Fournier to move down into the teens. Are these people high? :lol:


Fournier is definitely more liability than asset if he continues to play as poorly as he did this past year.

If he bounces back to his form under Skiles, then it's a different story.
User avatar
Xatticus
Head Coach
Posts: 6,794
And1: 8,285
Joined: Feb 18, 2016
Location: the land of the blind
         

Re: The case for Jonathan Isaac 

Post#539 » by Xatticus » Sun Jun 18, 2017 6:34 pm

Zmill wrote:I'm okay with Isaac at 6 but what will be the difference between him being a high level role player versus fulfilling his potential will be whether or not he can attack a set defense in the half court off the dribble.


Agreed. I think a big part of that will be how his physical development enhances his offensive game. He has the ability to create, but he didn't cope with physicality well last year. He doesn't shy away from it, but it really disrupted his ability to create.
"Xatticus has always been, in my humble opinion best poster here. Should write articles or something."
-pepe1991
Darth Magic
Veteran
Posts: 2,849
And1: 820
Joined: Feb 24, 2010

Re: The case for Jonathan Isaac 

Post#540 » by Darth Magic » Sun Jun 18, 2017 6:38 pm

Skin wrote:
fendilim wrote:The key for Isaac is whether he can be that guy who can takeover.

He reminds me so much of Iguodala who has all the physical tools in the world, has the skills to be great, but doesn't have the mentality to be so.

In the article that cedric just posted they made several interesting comments... like this one..

The truth is “role player” is a silly, outdated term. It implies that each NBA team has one, maybe two, stars who score all the points and get the attention, that everyone else on the team just does the dirty work. We talk about three-and-D guys like they’re something special, but nowadays, anyone that does not have a passable three or play decent defense is almost unplayable. In 2017, almost every good player is a 3-and-D guy. And on good teams, almost everyone has a role to fill.

In 2017, every NBA contender is trying to figure out how to get someone that can defend LeBron or Durant and be at useful on the other end of the court. Through seven years of LeBron Finals, every single Conference Finals team had a versatile athletic wing that could defend any position. By comparison, just 18 of the 28 teams had a top-level point guard, and only 12 or 13 had a great traditional center. You can win in the modern NBA without a top notch point guard or big man, but you can’t even get close without one of these wings anymore.


Hmmmmm? That bolded part intrigues me. I'm starting to think this way as well. I'm not sure it is fair to say that you can win without a top notch point guard. I'd go the opposite of that. Just a look at the teams in the playoff kinda debunks that I think. But he makes a great point regarding the wings. It is becoming extremely important to get dem athletic, long wings. Which is why I am leaning close to Issac because of his length and ability.
"Real Gs move in silence; like lasagna" Jeff Weltman

Return to Orlando Magic