Smog wrote:Froob wrote:Is Lonzo in play?
I seriously doubt it. This feels so much like it has to be Tatum. Why? Because that's the one player they probably could feel reasonably sure was going to be there at 3. You don't do this deal if you're aiming for Ball or Jackson, knowing LA is interested in both.
My guess is the pick is Tatum, with Jackson as the fall-back in the unlikely event LA picks Tatum. Or alternatively they could trade back to 5 and 10 maybe if Tatum is gone.
But if you're interested in both Jackson and Ball, you're still guaranteed one or the other. I don't see the problem.

















