darealjuice wrote:Unfair. Kings wanted us to give up Booker for Cousins, and Sixers wanted Fultz and could have beat any offer we put on the table because of Hinkie's treasure chest.
Not to mention, the draft isn't done yet. If you are the Lakers, and the Sixers just drafted Fultz, and you 'want' Ball, why wouldn't you draft Jackson then ask the Celtics/Suns...who's buyin'?? Not the Celtics...they need a 'win-now' guy, and will get him at 3 in Tatum, so likely 'our' Heat's unprotected pick in 2021, or whatever...doesn't matter. Point is, Boston is not taking Ball--Lavar would have a fit, and Lonzo refused their workout. So, either way, LAL get Ball at 2, OR 4, PLUS a great 1st Rd pick, to boot.
McD gets Jackson, but at a price. But knowing McD, he didn't trade that pic straight up. He swapped this years 2nd for the Lakers (Houston) 1st Rd pick at 28. Small consolation of 5 slots, but we'll take it. Or maybe he added a protection to our pick next year and traded that? IDK, but we get Jackson.
...OR...
Sixers take Fultz, so they can finally say they take the 1st overall pick...yay...then we trade Bledsoe, Miami's 2 1sts, and we replenish what the Sixers traded, plus more, I'm sure, and they get Fox at 4...or Jackson/Tatum (whoever Boston doesn't take) or maybe Ball if Jackson/Tatum go 2-3...
...boy, scenario #2 sure does influence me to just want to sit tight and take whoever is available, and if it's Ball, see who's interested, and allow McD to do his magic...and STILL end up with a good player...