ImageImageImageImageImage

2017 Lakers Draft Pick Discussion

Moderators: Danny Darko, TyCobb, Kilroy

Who do the Lakers draft on June 22nd with the 2nd overall pick?

Poll ended at Thu Jun 22, 2017 6:11 pm

Lonzo Ball
90
73%
Josh Jackson
33
27%
 
Total votes: 123

User avatar
Optms
RealGM
Posts: 23,925
And1: 20,408
Joined: Jun 11, 2009
 

Re: 2017 Lakers Draft Pick Discussion 

Post#1861 » by Optms » Tue Jun 20, 2017 6:57 pm

Michael Lucky wrote:
Optms wrote:I wouldn't hesitate on dealing the second pick for Porzingis if it was offered. His ceiling is AD/Giannis like. Its a no brainer.


If that's the case he's going to seriously need to improve his game and fast.


Well, Giannis took some several seasons before he ended up being the product of today.

The universe is working against Porzingis in that the Knicks are the worst situation for any young player to end up on. The team is a cluster of off and on the court toxicity. He didn't exactly take off last season like many expected, then again, can you really blame him? Porzingis almost anywhere else would see a rapid increase in his development. Some place where he's appreciated the way AD was in NO and Giannis on the Bucks.
User avatar
iamworthy
RealGM
Posts: 20,137
And1: 8,916
Joined: Jul 20, 2007
Location: Ring City!!!
   

Re: 2017 Lakers Draft Pick Discussion 

Post#1862 » by iamworthy » Tue Jun 20, 2017 6:57 pm

:lol:
Michael Lucky wrote:
iamworthy wrote:Ty, Ben Simmons or lonzo?

Lonzo > Stephen curry
Image
User avatar
iamworthy
RealGM
Posts: 20,137
And1: 8,916
Joined: Jul 20, 2007
Location: Ring City!!!
   

Re: 2017 Lakers Draft Pick Discussion 

Post#1863 » by iamworthy » Tue Jun 20, 2017 6:58 pm

iamworthy wrote:
Danny Darko wrote:
Read on Twitter


Double
Image
Michael Lucky
RealGM
Posts: 15,168
And1: 6,816
Joined: Jan 02, 2012
Location: Los Angeles, CA
       

Re: 2017 Lakers Draft Pick Discussion 

Post#1864 » by Michael Lucky » Tue Jun 20, 2017 6:59 pm

Optms wrote:
Michael Lucky wrote:
Optms wrote:I wouldn't hesitate on dealing the second pick for Porzingis if it was offered. His ceiling is AD/Giannis like. Its a no brainer.


If that's the case he's going to seriously need to improve his game and fast.


Well, Giannis took some several seasons before he ended up being the product of today.

The universe is working against Porzingis in that the Knicks are the worst situation for any young player to end up on. The team is a cluster of off and on the court toxicity. He didn't exactly take off last season like many expected, then again, can you really blame him? Porzingis almost anywhere else would see a rapid increase in his development. Some place where he's appreciated the way AD was in NO and Giannis on the Bucks.
Gianni's was two years younger entering the league. He is only 1 year older currently.
User avatar
Mirjalovic
Head Coach
Posts: 7,053
And1: 1,780
Joined: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Forza Lazio & LA Lakers !
   

Re: 2017 Lakers Draft Pick Discussion 

Post#1865 » by Mirjalovic » Tue Jun 20, 2017 7:23 pm

Michael Lucky wrote:
iamworthy wrote:Ty, Ben Simmons or lonzo?

Lonzo > Stephen curry

why are you so against Lonzo Ball ?

let me hear your explanation. Pros cons and stuffs
shawn_hemp wrote: a guy who is far worse than Robert Covington in Brandon Ingram, and a guy who is no better than TJ McConnell or Tony Wroten in D'Angelo Russell.

Sixers fans...

Image
ROballer
General Manager
Posts: 9,764
And1: 3,012
Joined: Sep 06, 2009
Location: Romania
   

Re: 2017 Lakers Draft Pick Discussion 

Post#1866 » by ROballer » Tue Jun 20, 2017 7:28 pm

Stay put m'ers, don't do anything stupid for once.


**** stay put, for Pete's sake.
Steve Nash injures his back while carrying bags

Slava wrote:I pulled a hammy while fapping. I won't make fun of Nash.
Michael Lucky
RealGM
Posts: 15,168
And1: 6,816
Joined: Jan 02, 2012
Location: Los Angeles, CA
       

Re: 2017 Lakers Draft Pick Discussion 

Post#1867 » by Michael Lucky » Tue Jun 20, 2017 7:28 pm

Mirjalovic wrote:
Michael Lucky wrote:
iamworthy wrote:Ty, Ben Simmons or lonzo?

Lonzo > Stephen curry

why are you so against Lonzo Ball ?

let me hear your explanation. Pros cons and stuffs

I have Lonzo as the second best player in this draft with a pretty big gap between him and 3rd.
ozymandias818
Sophomore
Posts: 171
And1: 48
Joined: Jul 17, 2014

Re: 2017 Lakers Draft Pick Discussion 

Post#1868 » by ozymandias818 » Tue Jun 20, 2017 7:40 pm

J_LA wrote:
AcecardZ wrote:How is Porzingis ever a good fit for a team supposedly trying to play Warrior style basketball? He's 7'3" tall. His wheels will fall off!


He's also a poor rebounder for his size, he can't do much defensively except protect the rim, similar to Zu. And he has stamina issues.

:banghead:

Porzingis would be a massive upgrade over any of the bigs we have. Poor rebounder for his size, lmao. NOBODY IS HIS SIZE. He's 21 and will be one of the best players in the league in a few years. What foolish comments.
J_LA
Junior
Posts: 465
And1: 290
Joined: Mar 21, 2017

Re: 2017 Lakers Draft Pick Discussion 

Post#1869 » by J_LA » Tue Jun 20, 2017 8:07 pm

ozymandias818 wrote:
J_LA wrote:
AcecardZ wrote:How is Porzingis ever a good fit for a team supposedly trying to play Warrior style basketball? He's 7'3" tall. His wheels will fall off!


He's also a poor rebounder for his size, he can't do much defensively except protect the rim, similar to Zu. And he has stamina issues.

:banghead:

Porzingis would be a massive upgrade over any of the bigs we have. Poor rebounder for his size, lmao. NOBODY IS HIS SIZE. He's 21 and will be one of the best players in the league in a few years. What foolish comments.


He's 7'3 and he averages 7 rebounds a game. He also gets tired quickly. Some feel its because he was diagnosed with anemia growing up. Do me a favor, since you obviously don't watch him play other than the 2x you see him on Espn, and clearly you don't take my word for it. Go ask Knicks fans.
ozymandias818
Sophomore
Posts: 171
And1: 48
Joined: Jul 17, 2014

Re: 2017 Lakers Draft Pick Discussion 

Post#1870 » by ozymandias818 » Tue Jun 20, 2017 8:16 pm

J_LA wrote:He's 7'3 and he averages 7 rebounds a game.

He's 21 and needs to add weight. Next.

J_LA wrote:He also gets tired quickly. Some feel its because he was diagnosed with anemia growing up.

http://nypost.com/2016/06/07/phil-jacksons-lakers-gloat-i-warned-you-about-porzingis/ wrote:“Watching him in the summer league, we thought he was really competitive, that’s what we wanted to see in the tapes study we did,’’ Jackson added. “But when we saw that he had the stamina to play 28 to 32 minutes, well, we thought maybe he was going to be a 20-to-22-minute guy because of his strength and his lack of size or weight. But we knew how competitive, and what an athletic talent he was, really to be able to have that stamina.’’

This honestly just sounds like something you made up. He plays plenty of minutes for a big and the production is there.

J_LA wrote:Do me a favor, since you obviously don't watch him play other than the 2x you see him on Espn, and clearly you don't take my word for it. Go ask Knicks fans.

I know far too many Knicks fans, and they don't know anything more about basketball than you do. I watch a lot more basketball than you do, and Porzingis anchored my fantasy team last year so I suffered through plenty of Knicks games last season. Your assumptions are making you look foolish.
J_LA
Junior
Posts: 465
And1: 290
Joined: Mar 21, 2017

Re: 2017 Lakers Draft Pick Discussion 

Post#1871 » by J_LA » Tue Jun 20, 2017 8:24 pm

ozymandias818 wrote:
J_LA wrote:He's 7'3 and he averages 7 rebounds a game.

He's 21 and needs to add weight. Next.

J_LA wrote:He also gets tired quickly. Some feel its because he was diagnosed with anemia growing up.

http://nypost.com/2016/06/07/phil-jacksons-lakers-gloat-i-warned-you-about-porzingis/ wrote:“Watching him in the summer league, we thought he was really competitive, that’s what we wanted to see in the tapes study we did,’’ Jackson added. “But when we saw that he had the stamina to play 28 to 32 minutes, well, we thought maybe he was going to be a 20-to-22-minute guy because of his strength and his lack of size or weight. But we knew how competitive, and what an athletic talent he was, really to be able to have that stamina.’’

This honestly just sounds like something you made up. He plays plenty of minutes for a big and the production is there.

J_LA wrote:Do me a favor, since you obviously don't watch him play other than the 2x you see him on Espn, and clearly you don't take my word for it. Go ask Knicks fans.

I know far too many Knicks fans, and they don't know anything more about basketball than you do. I watch a lot more basketball than you do, and Porzingis anchored my fantasy team last year so I suffered through plenty of Knicks games last season. Your assumptions are making you look foolish.


I stopped reading at "21 and needs to add weight"
ozymandias818
Sophomore
Posts: 171
And1: 48
Joined: Jul 17, 2014

Re: 2017 Lakers Draft Pick Discussion 

Post#1872 » by ozymandias818 » Tue Jun 20, 2017 8:38 pm

J_LA wrote:I stopped reading at "21 and needs to add weight"

Sounds like a personal problem. We appreciate the update, though.
User avatar
EArl
RealGM
Posts: 49,980
And1: 13,482
Joined: Mar 14, 2012
Location: Columbus
   

Re: 2017 Lakers Draft Pick Discussion 

Post#1873 » by EArl » Wed Jun 21, 2017 12:49 am

At this point you can cement Lonzo as our #2
Deep into that darkness peering, long I stood there wondering, fearing, Doubting, dreaming dreams no mortal ever dared to dream before;
Jurassic_Park
Rookie
Posts: 1,035
And1: 843
Joined: May 27, 2015
 

Re: 2017 Lakers Draft Pick Discussion 

Post#1874 » by Jurassic_Park » Wed Jun 21, 2017 1:03 am

Read on Twitter
Jurassic_Park
Rookie
Posts: 1,035
And1: 843
Joined: May 27, 2015
 

Re: 2017 Lakers Draft Pick Discussion 

Post#1875 » by Jurassic_Park » Wed Jun 21, 2017 1:04 am

Read on Twitter
Michael Lucky
RealGM
Posts: 15,168
And1: 6,816
Joined: Jan 02, 2012
Location: Los Angeles, CA
       

Re: 2017 Lakers Draft Pick Discussion 

Post#1876 » by Michael Lucky » Wed Jun 21, 2017 1:05 am

EArl wrote:At this point you can cement Lonzo as our #2
yeah as long as Magic doesn't do something stupid and make him a Pacer.
Michael Lucky
RealGM
Posts: 15,168
And1: 6,816
Joined: Jan 02, 2012
Location: Los Angeles, CA
       

Re: 2017 Lakers Draft Pick Discussion 

Post#1877 » by Michael Lucky » Wed Jun 21, 2017 1:06 am

Jurassic_Park wrote:
Read on Twitter
Marc Stein debunked this by saying the Pacers want the number 2 pick.
Jurassic_Park
Rookie
Posts: 1,035
And1: 843
Joined: May 27, 2015
 

Re: 2017 Lakers Draft Pick Discussion 

Post#1878 » by Jurassic_Park » Wed Jun 21, 2017 1:07 am

Read on Twitter
TyCobb
Forum Mod - Lakers
Forum Mod - Lakers
Posts: 38,253
And1: 9,958
Joined: Apr 17, 2005
Location: Pitcher's Mound
     

Re: 2017 Lakers Draft Pick Discussion 

Post#1879 » by TyCobb » Wed Jun 21, 2017 1:08 am

Jurassic_Park wrote:
Read on Twitter


Oh wow, time for Dwight to ruin another team. GM's never learn...
Read more, learn more, change your posts.
Sushisensei26
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,652
And1: 614
Joined: May 16, 2017
     

Re: 2017 Lakers Draft Pick Discussion 

Post#1880 » by Sushisensei26 » Wed Jun 21, 2017 1:09 am

Jurassic_Park wrote:
Read on Twitter

Ahahhahahaaaa... Go do your thing Dwight.

Return to Los Angeles Lakers