Tukkerwolf wrote:Just for my understanding: LA has the cap space to sign George next year?
Moz and/or Deng need to be traded or stretched I believe.
Moderators: Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers
Tukkerwolf wrote:Just for my understanding: LA has the cap space to sign George next year?
8305 wrote:Wizop wrote:8305 wrote:Pacers could have gotten out in front of this and moved the rebuild forward as many as three seasons.
but that assumes that a rebuild was required. as recently as last Friday, it seemed possible that a good selection at #18 would be enough to have us competing for a top four spot in the East and that a good playoff run would have made PG happy to extend for at least one and one. in fact, if PG wanted to make Pacer fans happy, all he'd need to do was say is "My agent was wrong. I won't be making a decision about 2018 until after my Pacer contract is over and I become a free agent."
I think you and I were on the same page when it came to strategy under the assumption PG was staying. But, as this thing is playing out it would appear that PG has moved from lacking confidence in the Pacer organization (understandable) to being pissed off and vindictive. I think it's hard to believe that under any circumstances he's a Laker next year. So much could happen the contention seems illogical. How did we get to a situation seemingly PG's camp is destroying any value he could have. Has this ever been done before?
DK-All Day wrote:Andre Roberstan wrote:
Indy should take Clarkson, Randle and 28 then move on.
DK-All Day wrote:Andre Roberstan wrote:
Indy should take Clarkson, Randle and 28 then move on.
Andre Roberstan wrote:
Andre Roberstan wrote:
pacers33granger wrote:Andre Roberstan wrote:
A much better return than Clarkson and 28, but, as with Randle, DLO is repped by Mintz...
Maybe he gets sent somewhere else for a pick or something.
Andre Roberstan wrote:http://www.indystar.com/story/sports/nba/pacers/2017/06/21/trade-involving-paul-george-before-thursdays-draft-no-longer-imminent/416120001/
Pritchard apparently doesn't feel too urgent.
winter_mute_13 wrote:Andre Roberstan wrote:http://www.indystar.com/story/sports/nba/pacers/2017/06/21/trade-involving-paul-george-before-thursdays-draft-no-longer-imminent/416120001/
Pritchard apparently doesn't feel too urgent.
Well, of course he has to say that.
Unless the offers are really bad, I think KP will simply pick the best offer on draft day. Can't see what's to gain by waiting.
Andre Roberstan wrote:winter_mute_13 wrote:Andre Roberstan wrote:http://www.indystar.com/story/sports/nba/pacers/2017/06/21/trade-involving-paul-george-before-thursdays-draft-no-longer-imminent/416120001/
Pritchard apparently doesn't feel too urgent.
Well, of course he has to say that.
Unless the offers are really bad, I think KP will simply pick the best offer on draft day. Can't see what's to gain by waiting.
Agreed. This feels like an effort to reclaim some leverage.
Boneman2 wrote:If the offers are unacceptable we simply don't trade him. Who cares if this drags on into the season as long as it magnifies the position the Pacers have been put in for all to see. It would hurt the league far more than the Pacers as the damage has already been inflicted. There is no reason to give in to the pressure.
Return to Trades and Transactions