Would be a much better move than the Butler trade.
Watch the Bulls instead start trying to actually put positive pieces in now....
Moderators: HomoSapien, Ice Man, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10

Ctownbulls wrote:Can't believe Bulls are going to win under 20 games next year and suck for the next 5...by the time 2022 rolls around the Bulls will have had 1 really competitive season in 25 years...
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
kulaz3000 wrote:If Wade declines his second year.
Lopez/Lauri/Felicio
Lauri/Portis
Porter (Otto)/Zipser
LaVine/Denzel
Dunn/Rondo or we get someone like Beverly
That's a pretty interesting team. We suddenly become really athletic, long and have plenty of shooters. Extremely young though, and likely to miss out on the playoffs, but I don't think we'd be a bottom 5 team though for fans of anyone from next seasons draft class.
WindyCityBorn wrote:chrispatrick wrote:WindyCityBorn wrote:
ONLY 4 years younger. 23 is pretty damn young. Jimmy wasn't doing anything at that age under Thibs.
At the time, Butler was the 2nd best player on a 40 something win team and had a great on/off court rating that he maintained every year of his career. He had not developed offensively but was a top 5-10 defensive player in the NBA.
What did Butler do his rookie season after 4 years of college?
Jcool0 wrote:TheSuzerain wrote:WindyCityBorn wrote:
ONLY 4 years younger. 23 is pretty damn young. Jimmy wasn't doing anything at that age under Thibs.
At age 23, Jimmy started 12 playoff games and averaged 40 minutes per game in the playoffs under Thibs.
Any more brain busters?
And if Jimmy actually had any offense game then the Bulls might not have got bounced 4-1 to Miami.
WindyCityBorn wrote:Ctownbulls wrote:Can't believe Bulls are going to win under 20 games next year and suck for the next 5...by the time 2022 rolls around the Bulls will have had 1 really competitive season in 25 years...
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
Give me next week's lotto numbers since you know so much.
Rerisen wrote:musiqsoulchild wrote:Wouldnt be a bad team at all. There's be a lot of free flowing offense. Especially, if you resign Niko and trade Wade for Melo.
Trying to build a team that wasn't bad, would be utterly incomprehensible right now.
This trade hasn't set up virtually anything. The best thing it could possibly set up is helping us be the worst next year. Maybe even for 2 or 3 years. If that wasn't the plan, then it was a huge blunder.

musiqsoulchild wrote:kulaz3000 wrote:If Wade declines his second year.
Lopez/Lauri/Felicio
Lauri/Portis
Porter (Otto)/Zipser
LaVine/Denzel
Dunn/Rondo or we get someone like Beverly
That's a pretty interesting team. We suddenly become really athletic, long and have plenty of shooters. Extremely young though, and likely to miss out on the playoffs, but I don't think we'd be a bottom 5 team though for fans of anyone from next seasons draft class.
Yup....folks havent got the memo yet. This team WILL NOT TANK.
Nor any other version of the Bulls. Reinsdorf (SR.) has to sign off on that. Its not going to happen. Not intentionally at least.
Rerisen wrote:I keep going back to one of the top singular complaints that served as rationale for this:
"Jimmy Butler is not a real #1, he can't lead a team to a title."
How is anything we got in this deal a good bet to become the #1 that CAN lead you to a title or to become a top 5 player in the league that Jimmy supposedly wasn't.
Rerisen wrote:Just go get Hinkie.
Would be a much better move than the Butler trade.
Watch the Bulls instead start trying to actually put positive pieces in now....
Scottie Pippen's response to whom he would pick for his running mate, Michael or LeBron: "That's a dumbass question. I've never done anything with LeBron. I wouldn't take LeBron to the movies."
TheSuzerain wrote:Jcool0 wrote:TheSuzerain wrote:At age 23, Jimmy started 12 playoff games and averaged 40 minutes per game in the playoffs under Thibs.
Any more brain busters?
And if Jimmy actually had any offense game then the Bulls might not have got bounced 4-1 to Miami.
Jimmy led the team in scoring in that series and had a TS% of 58%.
This is like debating with 8 year olds.

ThreeYearPlan wrote:Bulls fans defend HomoSapien more than Rose.
TheSuzerain wrote:Jcool0 wrote:TheSuzerain wrote:At age 23, Jimmy started 12 playoff games and averaged 40 minutes per game in the playoffs under Thibs.
Any more brain busters?
And if Jimmy actually had any offense game then the Bulls might not have got bounced 4-1 to Miami.
Jimmy led the team in scoring in that series and had a TS% of 58%.
This is like debating with 8 year olds.
TheSuzerain wrote:Jcool0 wrote:TheSuzerain wrote:At age 23, Jimmy started 12 playoff games and averaged 40 minutes per game in the playoffs under Thibs.
Any more brain busters?
And if Jimmy actually had any offense game then the Bulls might not have got bounced 4-1 to Miami.
Jimmy led the team in scoring in that series and had a TS% of 58%.
This is like debating with 8 year olds.