Image ImageImage Image

The Zach Lavine Problem

Moderators: HomoSapien, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10, Ice Man

Zipserino
Sophomore
Posts: 113
And1: 41
Joined: Apr 19, 2017
   

Re: The Zach Lavine Problem 

Post#61 » by Zipserino » Fri Jun 23, 2017 11:08 am

Doncic in NBA is definitely a SF, not a PG
Just_Bullz
Veteran
Posts: 2,543
And1: 629
Joined: Nov 24, 2008

Re: The Zach Lavine Problem 

Post#62 » by Just_Bullz » Fri Jun 23, 2017 11:12 am

packforfreedom wrote:You will love him. I still think, he's got more upside than Wiggins. His shot is wonderful, he has great range even beyond the tree point line, he moves very well without the ball, he is a good catch and shooter, improving as a cutter, he's improved a lot in terms of playmaking, last year he was attacking the rim more often, which worked out pretty well for him, he's a major tough shot maker and the type of player who can save the game by making 3 long threes in a row. He's a great fastbreak player and his work ethic might be one of the best in the league. He also seems like a really nice guy.

His defense is still bad, but he's getting better. his shot selection is still suspect at times, but this is what great scorers do.
In my opinion he's a max player without a question.


You made me feel like we got a younger Melo in return :lol:
WindyCityBorn
RealGM
Posts: 22,130
And1: 11,815
Joined: Jun 26, 2014
     

Re: The Zach Lavine Problem 

Post#63 » by WindyCityBorn » Fri Jun 23, 2017 11:16 am

packforfreedom wrote:You will love him. I still think, he's got more upside than Wiggins. His shot is wonderful, he has great range even beyond the tree point line, he moves very well without the ball, he is a good catch and shooter, improving as a cutter, he's improved a lot in terms of playmaking, last year he was attacking the rim more often, which worked out pretty well for him, he's a major tough shot maker and the type of player who can save the game by making 3 long threes in a row. He's a great fastbreak player and his work ethic might be one of the best in the league. He also seems like a really nice guy.

His defense is still bad, but he's getting better. his shot selection is still suspect at times, but this is what great scorers do.
In my opinion he's a max player without a question.


Thanks for the insight. I'm happy to have him in Chicago. Dunn and Levine can be a very dynamic backcourt.

Question. Does Minnesota do this deal if Lavine is not injured?
stl705
Senior
Posts: 526
And1: 152
Joined: May 29, 2010

Re: The Zach Lavine Problem 

Post#64 » by stl705 » Fri Jun 23, 2017 11:27 am

TheSuzerain wrote:
DanTown8587 wrote:The Bulls traded up in Lavines draft, passed on him, and then talked up trading for him after he's torn his ACL and he's a year away from FA even though they gave up an All-NBA talent and a mid first to do it. All of us hope we could be this bad at a job that has this much pay and status.

Was hilarious when Paxson said the package wasn't good enough when talking to the TWolves last year about Jimmy.

Since then, Lavine tore his ACL and Dunn had a horrible rookie season. TIME TO STRIKE!


Wow just shows how stupid our FO is. How did these guys get their jobs anyway? Are they at all qualified to run any organization?
sco
RealGM
Posts: 27,302
And1: 9,157
Joined: Sep 22, 2003
Location: Virtually Everywhere!

Re: The Zach Lavine Problem 

Post#65 » by sco » Fri Jun 23, 2017 11:32 am

There is a big risk to Lavine...But, the silver lining is:

1) He was pretty good pre-injury, and won't be able to add many wins to this season
2) I can't recall many guys who come back mid-season after an ACL that played well enough to warrant a max contract - odds are we can resign him to long-term reasonable deal
:clap:
User avatar
Minalt
Analyst
Posts: 3,241
And1: 1,140
Joined: Apr 30, 2014
       

Re: The Zach Lavine Problem 

Post#66 » by Minalt » Fri Jun 23, 2017 11:37 am

I agree with the consensus here. But let me plau devil's advocate.

There might now be any big TV deals coming. But this injury could turn be a "mini-steph" contract. Guy has a serious injury. If we can get him on something that isn't a max deal, then this could make room for a big FA signing going forward.

A type of deal that teams can't pull off unless they luck out

Sent from my SM-G930T using RealGM mobile app
Ice Man
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 26,924
And1: 15,963
Joined: Apr 19, 2011

Re: The Zach Lavine Problem 

Post#67 » by Ice Man » Fri Jun 23, 2017 11:51 am

HoopsterJones wrote:The problem is that he tore his ACL in February. Which means best case scenario, he plays his first game for the Bulls after the all star break.


Recovery time is typically 9 months. He should be practicing with the team since the get-go, and back on the court early in the season.
SkyhookinUrMom
Junior
Posts: 264
And1: 351
Joined: Mar 09, 2012

Re: The Zach Lavine Problem 

Post#68 » by SkyhookinUrMom » Fri Jun 23, 2017 2:41 pm

Minesotta fan here, I would have preferred to give you Wiggins before Lavine
League Circles
RealGM
Posts: 35,550
And1: 10,043
Joined: Dec 04, 2001
       

Re: The Zach Lavine Problem 

Post#69 » by League Circles » Fri Jun 23, 2017 2:42 pm

He should most definitely be packaged in a trade by the deadline. I'll be furious if not. He's an asset, but not for much longer.
https://august-shop.com/ - sneakers and streetwear
User avatar
Shill
RealGM
Posts: 20,956
And1: 5,977
Joined: Nov 14, 2006
Location: Rebuild Loop
 

Re: The Zach Lavine Problem 

Post#70 » by Shill » Fri Jun 23, 2017 2:44 pm

sh0ck wrote:Maybe you can use LaVine's injury as an excuse to sit him for a good portion of the year and slowly bring him along.

Then you can extend him for something less than the max because it would be a risk for teams to bid up his RFA status. Kind of how Milwaukee is probably going to extend Jabari Parker for much less than the Max.



This. He tore his ACL in February. He may not even be ready by the start of the season.

We have every incentive to bring him along slowly.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Scottie Pippen's response to whom he would pick for his running mate, Michael or LeBron: "That's a dumbass question. I've never done anything with LeBron. I wouldn't take LeBron to the movies."
Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 29,315
And1: 9,056
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: The Zach Lavine Problem 

Post#71 » by Chi town » Fri Jun 23, 2017 2:45 pm

Zipserino wrote:Doncic in NBA is definitely a SF, not a PG


He's both. Hes a generational talent.
Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 29,315
And1: 9,056
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: The Zach Lavine Problem 

Post#72 » by Chi town » Fri Jun 23, 2017 2:47 pm

I think Lavine is going to be a great asset. He will get paid much less due to his recovery. He will be an uber efficient 22ppg shooter for us.
Just_Bullz
Veteran
Posts: 2,543
And1: 629
Joined: Nov 24, 2008

Re: The Zach Lavine Problem 

Post#73 » by Just_Bullz » Fri Jun 23, 2017 2:49 pm

SkyhookinUrMom wrote:Minesotta fan here, I would have preferred to give you Wiggins before Lavine


Hey, care to share more on this?
Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 29,315
And1: 9,056
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: The Zach Lavine Problem 

Post#74 » by Chi town » Fri Jun 23, 2017 2:51 pm

Mark K wrote:He also happens to play the same position as Luka Doncic, who is probably the target at #1, assuming the Bulls are dedicated fully to a tank.


Luka can play 1-3.
Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 29,315
And1: 9,056
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: The Zach Lavine Problem 

Post#75 » by Chi town » Fri Jun 23, 2017 2:54 pm

Lavine is who I wanted when we traded for Dougie. I watched almost every game he played in at UCLA.

It will be fun having him.
RebuildaBulls
Analyst
Posts: 3,171
And1: 756
Joined: Jul 14, 2004

Re: The Zach Lavine Problem 

Post#76 » by RebuildaBulls » Fri Jun 23, 2017 2:56 pm

As long as his knee heals right Im not worried about Lavine, if he proves hes worth the max so be it but he is a long way from that after his ACL tear. I think he was a good pick up but not centerpiece
User avatar
TankOverlord
Junior
Posts: 290
And1: 185
Joined: Dec 11, 2013

Re: The Zach Lavine Problem 

Post#77 » by TankOverlord » Fri Jun 23, 2017 3:00 pm

Guys listen to the Minny fans. This guy is very good.

I'd much rather max him than Jimmy in 2 years. He's already a better scorer than Jimmy will ever be. Plus we got 2 good prospects in Lauri and Dunn? No brainer and exactly what the board has been clamoring for.

Thibs love for Jimmy made him overpay. No other team was offering anything close. We now have flexibility, youth and potential. What did we have at this time yesterday?
theanimal23
RealGM
Posts: 17,748
And1: 927
Joined: Mar 02, 2005

Re: The Zach Lavine Problem 

Post#78 » by theanimal23 » Fri Jun 23, 2017 3:03 pm

Didn't read much of the thread but my thought is simple:
He is not a max player. He should not get the max. If he wants the max, move on via S&T.
User avatar
TheSuzerain
RealGM
Posts: 17,389
And1: 11,404
Joined: Mar 29, 2012

Re: The Zach Lavine Problem 

Post#79 » by TheSuzerain » Fri Jun 23, 2017 3:05 pm

TankOverlord wrote:Guys listen to the Minny fans. This guy is very good.

I'd much rather max him than Jimmy in 2 years. He's already a better scorer than Jimmy will ever be. Plus we got 2 good prospects in Lauri and Dunn? No brainer and exactly what the board has been clamoring for.

Thibs love for Jimmy made him overpay. No other team was offering anything close. We now have flexibility, youth and potential. What did we have at this time yesterday?

Jimmy scores with more volume than Lavine on better efficiency. And that was before Lavine did his knee.

This time yesterday, we had an All-NBA player in his prime and flexibility.
Bulls_Fan
Head Coach
Posts: 6,363
And1: 815
Joined: Oct 20, 2002
Location: Don't mess with the BULLS young man, you'll get the horns

Re: The Zach Lavine Problem 

Post#80 » by Bulls_Fan » Fri Jun 23, 2017 3:06 pm

TheSuzerain wrote:
TankOverlord wrote:Guys listen to the Minny fans. This guy is very good.

I'd much rather max him than Jimmy in 2 years. He's already a better scorer than Jimmy will ever be. Plus we got 2 good prospects in Lauri and Dunn? No brainer and exactly what the board has been clamoring for.

Thibs love for Jimmy made him overpay. No other team was offering anything close. We now have flexibility, youth and potential. What did we have at this time yesterday?

Jimmy scores with more volume than Lavine on better efficiency. And that was before Lavine did his knee.

This time yesterday, we had an All-NBA player in his prime and flexibility.

Flexibility for what? Some mystery free agent that would never come here?

Return to Chicago Bulls