ImageImage

Bucks ownership: Lowe/Windhorst ESPN piece pg 5

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis

User avatar
ackypoo
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,543
And1: 3,358
Joined: Jan 03, 2013
 

Re: Your view of Bucks ownership 

Post#141 » by ackypoo » Fri Jun 30, 2017 2:58 pm

4xBuck wrote:
ackypoo wrote:and none of that **** truly matters to us


Yeah... That's very telling.

If you want a comp, just go north east a bit and look at what the Packers have done to their infrastructure. Or even south east and look what the Cubs are doing.

This is all part of the process. If you want to ignore this part of the process because it doesn't fir your agenda to complain about the owners, that's on you.

it is part of the process. but if the other part of the process is diarrhea then it doesnt matter.

its great we have fancy infrastructure and its essential to building a winning team, but it doesnt matter if youre incapable of building a winning team.
User avatar
emunney
RealGM
Posts: 62,921
And1: 41,310
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: where takes go to be pampered

Re: Bucks ownership: Lowe/Windhorst ESPN piece pg 5 

Post#142 » by emunney » Fri Jun 30, 2017 2:59 pm

Not giving them a lot of credit for taking 3 years to be like the 25th NBA franchise to have a 1:1 D league relationship. It's good that we have it now; also, we are way behind.
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
DingleJerry
RealGM
Posts: 15,213
And1: 10,836
Joined: Jul 09, 2015
       

Re: Bucks ownership: Lowe/Windhorst ESPN piece pg 5 

Post#143 » by DingleJerry » Fri Jun 30, 2017 2:59 pm

JimmyTheKid wrote:
DingleJerry wrote:They've done well with all the marketing and re-branding.

But basketball has been a mess. Long story short, without Giannis this team/organization would still be a laughing stock of the league. They fell ass backwards into a superstar, that's all they have going for them.

Reminds me of that Hoosiers line: My nerves are shot. But with Jimmy, all the pistons are firing.

Basically, everything is a mess. But with Giannis anything could happen in spite of it.


Not really though. We have a stable of young talent and no terrible contracts.


Really? They're capped out with a mediocre team with 3 bad contracts on the books now. Likely about to have a fourth in Jabari. Snell is debatable on 10ish mill being bad. Gave Plumlee one of the worst contracts ever handed out. The stable of young talent is Giannis, and he was here already, they fell into him out of pure luck. Take away Giannis and they really don't have much. One 25 yr old solid starter, a 24 yr old rookie solid starter, Thon (who looks promising but still a long way to go). That's it, look around the leauge and it's not much. With no owed picks coming to them. MCW trade, then throw in Vasquez trade on top of it all. I don't how anyone could call the basketball ops anything besides terrible. Giannis is covering all the warts and that was pure luck for them.

Throw in the Kidd backdoor hiring and what the GM hiring looks like as of now too
Resident Lillard truther since 2015.
User avatar
crkone
RealGM
Posts: 29,171
And1: 9,769
Joined: Aug 16, 2006

Re: Your view of Bucks ownership 

Post#144 » by crkone » Fri Jun 30, 2017 3:00 pm

Max Green wrote:
Matches Malone wrote:
skones wrote:I guess I was under the impression that Lasry was the one with governor power. It seemed like he was spearheading a lot of what was going on.


That's what I thought too. Everyone kept saying this is all Lasry's doing and Edens was the smart one that will get us back on the right path when he takes his turn. Guess Edens sucks? ...


It shows a lot of people didn't know what they were talking about. Stun.



I mean this was known 3 years ago so I don't really know what people are talking about.

But the partnership between Edens and Lasry is symbolized by their friendship, and it's a good place to start. They joked as they told of the way Edens became the team representative on the NBA Board of Governors — by a coin flip.

"It was a sad, sad day," Lasry said. "Well, Wes can tell you.

"We ended up flipping a coin. Wes had told me the story of what happened when the Bucks flipped a coin and we got Lew Alcindor."


http://archive.jsonline.com/sports/bucks/new-bucks-owners-embark-on-difficult-path-with-lofty-goals-b99280885z1-261400251.html/?from=global

Code: Select all

o- - -  \o          __|
   o/   /|          vv`\
  /|     |              |
   |    / \_            |
  / \   |               |
 /  |                   |
skones
RealGM
Posts: 37,108
And1: 17,267
Joined: Jul 20, 2004

Re: Your view of Bucks ownership 

Post#145 » by skones » Fri Jun 30, 2017 3:01 pm

crkone wrote:
Max Green wrote:
Matches Malone wrote:
That's what I thought too. Everyone kept saying this is all Lasry's doing and Edens was the smart one that will get us back on the right path when he takes his turn. Guess Edens sucks? ...


It shows a lot of people didn't know what they were talking about. Stun.



I mean this was known 3 years ago so I don't really know what people are talking about.

But the partnership between Edens and Lasry is symbolized by their friendship, and it's a good place to start. They joked as they told of the way Edens became the team representative on the NBA Board of Governors — by a coin flip.

"It was a sad, sad day," Lasry said. "Well, Wes can tell you.

"We ended up flipping a coin. Wes had told me the story of what happened when the Bucks flipped a coin and we got Lew Alcindor."


http://archive.jsonline.com/sports/bucks/new-bucks-owners-embark-on-difficult-path-with-lofty-goals-b99280885z1-261400251.html/?from=global


Except these aren't the same things.

NBA Board of Governors does not equal Governing Partner
User avatar
M-C-G
RealGM
Posts: 23,525
And1: 9,849
Joined: Jan 13, 2013
     

Re: Your view of Bucks ownership 

Post#146 » by M-C-G » Fri Jun 30, 2017 3:03 pm

JimmyTheKid wrote:
ackypoo wrote:
4xBuck wrote:
Yep...

As owners, they've done a great job building the infrastructure of the Bucks. When they bought the team, all they had was a bad stadium. Now, they a have G-league team, a brand new practice facility and in a year a brand new state of the art stadium with a beer garden/entertainment block.

:lift:

and none of that **** truly matters to us.

i signed up to watch basketball, not state of the art beer gardens.

and in 4 years when they dont turn it around because they continue to mismanage the basketball side, and giannis leaves, so will i.


They bought the team coming off the worst record in franchise history, 15-67. We've had two playoff appearances and significant growth from our youngsters without mortgaging the future via trade or bad FA contract.


All things considered, I agree we are in a much better place. I think the board, myself included, gets wrapped up in the "what could have been situations" like the Laker pick over MCW, not trading a 1 and 2 for Vasquez, not selling picks when rotation players were taken in those spots, etc.

So to be simple, when you compare having the Lakers unprotected pick next year, having had that Toronto pick this year, having Powell and McCaw (not saying we would have taken them but rather how people are comparing what is, to what could have been) over having Snell and Hawes (pretty sure that is all we are left with from the Knight trade now), it's not hard to see why people get frustrated.

I think there is merit in being discouraged over those individual transactions, but it shouldn't detract from the roster that we actually have, which if you add a healthy Jabari to, looks pretty damn good.
User avatar
Pachinko_
RealGM
Posts: 20,693
And1: 23,985
Joined: Jun 13, 2016
 

Re: Bucks ownership: Lowe/Windhorst ESPN piece pg 5 

Post#147 » by Pachinko_ » Fri Jun 30, 2017 3:07 pm

DingleJerry wrote:Really? They're capped out with a mediocre team with 3 bad contracts on the books now. Likely about to have a fourth in Jabari. Snell is debatable on 10ish mill being bad. Gave Plumlee one of the worst contracts ever handed out. The stable of young talent is Giannis, and he was here already, they fell into him out of pure luck. Take away Giannis and they really don't have much. One 25 yr old solid starter, a 24 yr old rookie solid starter, Thon (who looks promising but still a long way to go). That's it, look around the leauge and it's not much. With no owed picks coming to them. MCW trade, then throw in Vasquez trade on top of it all. I don't how anyone could call the basketball ops anything besides terrible. Giannis is covering all the warts and that was pure luck for them.

c'mon, be fair. Giannis was not pure luck, they actually scouted the guy, one of a couple of teams that went to Greece to see him. Sure nobody knew he'd grow another 2 inches and prove to be a workaholic basketball maniac but still they took a calculated risk based on good, first hand info. They drafted Brogdon and Maker based on talent and personality and it seems they drafted better than anybody last year. Khris and Jabari have real value in the NBA even with the **** ligaments. They brought in Suki who seems to have done some miracles on a few players. They got another 2 rookies coming up and they look like decent shots to be something good.

Sure there's also a tonne of crappy moves, but it's not all bad.
4xBuck
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,917
And1: 569
Joined: Sep 07, 2009

Re: Bucks ownership: Lowe/Windhorst ESPN piece pg 5 

Post#148 » by 4xBuck » Fri Jun 30, 2017 3:07 pm

emunney wrote:Not giving them a lot of credit for taking 3 years to be like the 25th NBA franchise to have a 1:1 D league relationship. It's good that we have it now; also, we are way behind.


It's a process, I guess they could have had one a year sooner, but I'm not sure... They didn't have a D/G league team when they bought the team, and now they have one. They most certainly deserve all the credit for that. If you want to down play this fact to help fit your agenda, so be it.
User avatar
crkone
RealGM
Posts: 29,171
And1: 9,769
Joined: Aug 16, 2006

Re: Your view of Bucks ownership 

Post#149 » by crkone » Fri Jun 30, 2017 3:09 pm

skones wrote:
crkone wrote:
Max Green wrote:
It shows a lot of people didn't know what they were talking about. Stun.



I mean this was known 3 years ago so I don't really know what people are talking about.

But the partnership between Edens and Lasry is symbolized by their friendship, and it's a good place to start. They joked as they told of the way Edens became the team representative on the NBA Board of Governors — by a coin flip.

"It was a sad, sad day," Lasry said. "Well, Wes can tell you.

"We ended up flipping a coin. Wes had told me the story of what happened when the Bucks flipped a coin and we got Lew Alcindor."


http://archive.jsonline.com/sports/bucks/new-bucks-owners-embark-on-difficult-path-with-lofty-goals-b99280885z1-261400251.html/?from=global


Except these aren't the same things.

NBA Board of Governors does not equal Governing Partner


Where are you seeing this? Lowe specifically said "Designated Governor" and all teams have them.

Code: Select all

o- - -  \o          __|
   o/   /|          vv`\
  /|     |              |
   |    / \_            |
  / \   |               |
 /  |                   |
skones
RealGM
Posts: 37,108
And1: 17,267
Joined: Jul 20, 2004

Re: Your view of Bucks ownership 

Post#150 » by skones » Fri Jun 30, 2017 3:14 pm

crkone wrote:
skones wrote:
crkone wrote:

I mean this was known 3 years ago so I don't really know what people are talking about.



http://archive.jsonline.com/sports/bucks/new-bucks-owners-embark-on-difficult-path-with-lofty-goals-b99280885z1-261400251.html/?from=global


Except these aren't the same things.

NBA Board of Governors does not equal Governing Partner


Where are you seeing this? Lowe specifically said "Designated Governor" and all teams have them.


The NBA Board of Governors is a separate entity. It's essentially owners talking about the state of the league, and its issues (ie. resting players) for example. It's the opposite of the NBPA.

Designated Governor is if an ownership of a team is distributed amongst a number of individuals. There is a designated governor who has the final say if necessary. Think of that as a managing partner for the franchise, as in a law firm or brokerage.

It could be that one may have both powers, but I don't think it should be assumed in this case.
Licensed to Il
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,630
And1: 3,206
Joined: Jan 03, 2006
 

Re: Bucks ownership: Lowe/Windhorst ESPN piece pg 5 

Post#151 » by Licensed to Il » Fri Jun 30, 2017 3:14 pm

Last week I posted that the gm search and muddled power structure had me pessimistic towards the long term future of this club, and hung over my present buy in and enjoyment. A half dozen people said I was bipolar, out of touch, emoticon circling finger around ear, etc.

I don't understand how anyone can read that article and feel any degree of confidence that our owners can run a successful team as presently structured.

I hope Im wrong, and genuinely love Giannis, Jabari, Mids, Thon, and Brogdon. Truth bomb, I even like Telletovic.

But yeah... Lowe and Windhurst just confirmed our worst fears about a tripod of instability and a puppet GM.
User avatar
paulpressey25
Senior Mod - Bucks
Senior Mod - Bucks
Posts: 62,580
And1: 29,632
Joined: Oct 27, 2002
     

Re: Bucks ownership: Lowe/Windhorst ESPN piece pg 5 

Post#152 » by paulpressey25 » Fri Jun 30, 2017 3:14 pm

We will have our usual social media drama today where a crew of folks will say "nothing to see here" or "It's all good"

Sure, things can work out well. Bucks even likely win 50 games next year. But in the end, we all know this situation isn't optimal just as what was going on during LeBron's first stint in Cleveland wasn't optimal.

To win in the NBA you've got to not only be lucky but also outsmarting 90% of the other teams. We aren't set up to do that right now.
In depth discussions here - shorter stuff on Twitter

https://twitter.com/paulpressey25
User avatar
engelmartin
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,801
And1: 2,383
Joined: Jun 03, 2013
         

Re: Bucks ownership: Lowe/Windhorst ESPN piece pg 5 

Post#153 » by engelmartin » Fri Jun 30, 2017 3:15 pm

Let's just let Giannis make the choices.
KnicksGod wrote:Middleton probably the most underrated player in NBA History
DingleJerry
RealGM
Posts: 15,213
And1: 10,836
Joined: Jul 09, 2015
       

Re: Bucks ownership: Lowe/Windhorst ESPN piece pg 5 

Post#154 » by DingleJerry » Fri Jun 30, 2017 3:18 pm

Pachinko_ wrote:
DingleJerry wrote:Really? They're capped out with a mediocre team with 3 bad contracts on the books now. Likely about to have a fourth in Jabari. Snell is debatable on 10ish mill being bad. Gave Plumlee one of the worst contracts ever handed out. The stable of young talent is Giannis, and he was here already, they fell into him out of pure luck. Take away Giannis and they really don't have much. One 25 yr old solid starter, a 24 yr old rookie solid starter, Thon (who looks promising but still a long way to go). That's it, look around the leauge and it's not much. With no owed picks coming to them. MCW trade, then throw in Vasquez trade on top of it all. I don't how anyone could call the basketball ops anything besides terrible. Giannis is covering all the warts and that was pure luck for them.

c'mon, be fair. Giannis was not pure luck, they actually scouted the guy, one of a couple of teams that went to Greece to see him. Sure nobody knew he'd grow another 2 inches and prove to be a workaholic basketball maniac but still they took a calculated risk based on good, first hand info. They drafted Brogdon and Maker based on talent and personality and it seems they drafted better than anybody last year. Khris and Jabari have real value in the NBA even with the **** ligaments. They brought in Suki who seems to have done some miracles on a few players. They got another 2 rookies coming up and they look like decent shots to be something good.

Sure there's also a tonne of crappy moves, but it's not all bad.


It was for them, he was already here before they were. And after his rookie year even the biggest optimists wouldn't have pegged him to be what he is now. Middleton was also here before them. Jabari was already coming here before them as he was the gimme pick at their spot.
Resident Lillard truther since 2015.
4xBuck
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,917
And1: 569
Joined: Sep 07, 2009

Re: Bucks ownership: Lowe/Windhorst ESPN piece pg 5 

Post#155 » by 4xBuck » Fri Jun 30, 2017 3:22 pm

paulpressey25 wrote:We will have our usual social media drama today where the group think will bitch and bellyache about every perceived error of the past decade or so, and dismiss every positive move of the past decade or so.


FTFY

8-)
User avatar
SupremeHustle
RealGM
Posts: 28,424
And1: 30,982
Joined: Feb 11, 2005
Location: Cloud 9
 

Re: Bucks ownership: Lowe/Windhorst ESPN piece pg 5 

Post#156 » by SupremeHustle » Fri Jun 30, 2017 3:23 pm

Instead of donating to a billboard, you guys should have pooled your money and invested in a fund that took advantage of the housing crisis. Then you could have bought the Bucks. But you had to have instant gratification, didn't you?
jschligs wrote:Am I the only one who doesn't know who the **** SupremeHustle is?
User avatar
M-C-G
RealGM
Posts: 23,525
And1: 9,849
Joined: Jan 13, 2013
     

Re: Bucks ownership: Lowe/Windhorst ESPN piece pg 5 

Post#157 » by M-C-G » Fri Jun 30, 2017 3:25 pm

SupremeHustle wrote:Instead of donating to a billboard, you guys should have pooled your money and invested in a fund that took advantage of the housing crisis. Then you could have bought the Bucks. But you had to have instant gratification, didn't you?


Just giving money to someone to do all the work with the billboard was just easier....plus, if we bought the team, we'd have to bitch about ourselves making stupid moves all the time. Who has time for that?
User avatar
paulpressey25
Senior Mod - Bucks
Senior Mod - Bucks
Posts: 62,580
And1: 29,632
Joined: Oct 27, 2002
     

Re: Bucks ownership: Lowe/Windhorst ESPN piece pg 5 

Post#158 » by paulpressey25 » Fri Jun 30, 2017 3:25 pm

4xBuck wrote:
paulpressey25 wrote:We will have our usual social media drama today where the group think will bitch and bellyache about every perceived error of the past decade or so, and dismiss every positive move of the past decade or so.


FTFY

8-)


Scoreboard

http://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/MIL/
In depth discussions here - shorter stuff on Twitter

https://twitter.com/paulpressey25
User avatar
ackypoo
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,543
And1: 3,358
Joined: Jan 03, 2013
 

Re: Bucks ownership: Lowe/Windhorst ESPN piece pg 5 

Post#159 » by ackypoo » Fri Jun 30, 2017 3:28 pm

4xBuck wrote:
emunney wrote:Not giving them a lot of credit for taking 3 years to be like the 25th NBA franchise to have a 1:1 D league relationship. It's good that we have it now; also, we are way behind.


It's a process, I guess they could have had one a year sooner, but I'm not sure... They didn't have a D/G league team when they bought the team, and now they have one. They most certainly deserve all the credit for that. If you want to down play this fact to help fit your agenda, so be it.

stop saying anyone who disagrees with you has an agenda.

i and others, dont have the power to have an agenda. im sounding off on a message board. jesus christ.
User avatar
Rockmaninoff
General Manager
Posts: 7,710
And1: 1,713
Joined: Jan 11, 2008
   

Re: RE: Re: Bucks ownership: Lowe/Windhorst ESPN piece pg 5 

Post#160 » by Rockmaninoff » Fri Jun 30, 2017 3:28 pm

Turk Nowitzki wrote:
Zeezprah wrote:I actually feel ok about Horst, we just need a new HC who doesn't meddle

Unfortunately, I feel like Horst barely matters. I can't imagine his opinion overriding LED's or Kidd's on anything important.

In that war room video, to me it felt like Horst was interested in trading down, and was trying to express that, but nobody was listening.
MilBucksBackOnTop06 wrote:The fight for civil rights just like for liberty and justice and peace won't be won by man. It will take a god...so lets move on to sports.

Magic Giannison wrote:Giannis is god but even god's cannot save our **** team.

Return to Milwaukee Bucks