ImageImageImage

Trade & Free Agency Ideas & Discussion 2

Moderators: bwgood77, lilfishi22, Qwigglez

jredsaz
General Manager
Posts: 8,887
And1: 3,148
Joined: May 25, 2012
         

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Trade & Free Agency Ideas & Discussion 2 

Post#1361 » by jredsaz » Fri Jun 30, 2017 9:06 pm

Zelaznyrules wrote:
jredsaz wrote:
Zelaznyrules wrote:
Yes and Billy flipped his burgers better than little Timmy but guess what, it's not the same thing. And it isn't just Bender and Chriss, we have a team full of players that are far from reaching their playing peak. If you play young players they make mistakes. If you're pulling out all stops to win games, you can't afford those mistakes.

To see the risks with this "bring in a star" approach, all you have to do is look at Len, look at the arguments that so many made in favor of the acquisition of Chandler and look where we are now. We all know that a lot of big men develop late. We all knew that Len came to the game late and had a long ways to go. We accepted the idea that Chandler would be a good mentor for Len and that he could learn what he needed in fits and spurts rather than by playing a major role. Our recent history suggests we were wrong.

And now, we have to decide whether to invest big dollars in Alex or let him walk. If we hadn't chased Chandler, we'd have a much better idea what to do right now but his presence delayed Len's growth, ate up the first contract cushion the CBA gave us, and left us in this position. I so hope we don't do this again and find ourselves having to consider letting Bender and maybe even Chriss walk, just as we're considering doing now with Len and Warren.

Chandler is not nearly the caliber of player Griffin is. I also have a hard time believing Len would be that much better had we not signed Chandler. Isnt it just as possible that he is an average player from a pretty weak draft?

In the end If you can land a top 15 player you take the shot. Period. That's what you hope and pray one of our youngsters will develop into. Griffin is that caliber of player when healthy. Given our training staff's success in the past I think the injury risk is somewhat mitigated.


I think Blake at his best is a much better player than Chandler at his. And yes, Chandler when we got him wasn't even as good as the Blake-in-decline we've seen the past few years. Signing him isn't the worst idea if you just look at one factor. But if you consider we'd have to get rid of or trade some players to make it work and if you consider our youth and you consider his age and if you consider his injury history and if you consider how limited his game is outside of his athleticism and then you look at the time and money we will have to commit to him, it starts to look an historically bad idea.

And AFAIC you help make my point on Len. Yes, it's possible that he would never amount to anything. But we don't know, can't know, because we brought in Chandler and put him in front of Alex. Without Tyson, right now, we'd have a very good idea whether Len is worth our attention going forward.

All said, if Griffin was truly a top 15 player and likely to stay there, I might be less convinced it was a horrible idea. But to me he's barely top 25 and he's on his way down. Five years ago I thought he was a top 5 player, on his way to the Best Player argument. That's a scary drop considering he really hasn't started showing the decline of age. I'd also be okay with this if he were available on a more team friendly contract but neither is the case. His presence will likely cost us in player development, tie up cap space for when we really need it, put Ryan out on the streets (forcing us to live with the growing pains of another GM in training), and set our development back several years.


First, Blake's game is limited outside if his athleticism? You must not have seen him play very much. Read the ringer article might clear some things up. He is one if the best playmaking bigs have ever seen. I like the signing because I think his game will translate as he ages as his athleticism diminishes. He is the forward we want in order to run the offense we want to run.

Second, I've seen enough of Alex Len to understand what he is. The Suns have too. He will be an average to above average player in a vacuum. However, given today's playing style paradigm, he is antiquated. He can't guard the perimeter or shoot threes. He dosn't have great hands and isn't a great rim runner. He is an average rebounder.

Sent from my SM-N920V using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,144
And1: 61,002
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: Trade & Free Agency Ideas & Discussion 2 

Post#1362 » by bwgood77 » Fri Jun 30, 2017 9:06 pm

matt131 wrote:
bwgood77 wrote:I wonder how many of our players want us to sign Blake.


Hmm good point. While you cannot have the players run the team, I do think it's important to at least gauge the locker room's interest in Blake. I wonder if Dudley has god or bad input about him from his time on the Clippers.


Yeah, I always have gotten excited in the past going after big names, but watching us sign various aging players over the last 7 years to bounce around close to the playoffs, I hated. None of them were the caliber of Blake (though Aldridge was close at the time) but I was finally really excited about where this team was after the draft.

All the talk about playing our youth so they can make big strides this season was exciting. Now, we drafted two players last year who are best at the 4. Sure, they could play with Blake, but who you can guard defensively usually dictates your position as a big. And though I've seen some say they don't think it impacts their playing time, it is very likely it will.

Then as over the top as Watson can seem and be at times, I really love the team unity and chemistry and just whole feel of the team right now. Bledsoe hasn't been mentioned as part of our key core going forward, so I imagine they were probably thinking of dealing him at some point. I think with Blake, you are almost guaranteed to be forced to give Bledsoe a huge deal as well. That means our two max guys are Blake and Bledsoe, both fairly injury prone.

I fear at some point because we get into the tax, that we start trading away picks again to avoid it. So those are most of my concerns.

If we do sign him, I will be excited (this kind of reminds me of when we traded for Shaq, though of course then we were already really good) and it will likely make a lot of casual fans excited, so that will be good.

I will be really excited to watch the team with Blake out there, but I was really excited this past year watching the young guys play, and I imagine I would have been even more excited this year, with the addition of JJ, and the further development of the rest of the young guys.

But I know there are not that many who really enjoy watching the young guys out there. There were not many in the game threads and few even watched enough to vote for players of the game, etc, so I obviously can see a lot of fans, even pretty hard core fans, were not even watching much, and I imagine that would change.
User avatar
Kerrsed
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 29,876
And1: 16,578
Joined: Mar 31, 2009
Location: Land of the Internet Memes
Contact:
     

Re: Trade & Free Agency Ideas & Discussion 2 

Post#1363 » by Kerrsed » Fri Jun 30, 2017 9:07 pm

Hesh wrote:
matt131 wrote:
bwgood77 wrote:I wonder how many of our players want us to sign Blake.


Hmm good point. While you cannot have the players run the team, I do think it's important to at least gauge the locker room's interest in Blake. I wonder if Dudley has god or bad input about him from his time on the Clippers.




Did you notice the smirk he gave when he said trade Blake.

lol, i see what you did there Duds!
Its #DUMPSTERFIRE SEASON! #TeamTRAINWRECK -KERRSED- The Mod, The Myth, The Legend
Image
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,144
And1: 61,002
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: Trade & Free Agency Ideas & Discussion 2 

Post#1364 » by bwgood77 » Fri Jun 30, 2017 9:10 pm

BobbieL wrote:
Hesh wrote:
matt131 wrote:
Hmm good point. While you cannot have the players run the team, I do think it's important to at least gauge the locker room's interest in Blake. I wonder if Dudley has god or bad input about him from his time on the Clippers.




My guess Ryan has gotten input from Dudley, Chandler, and Bledsoe


Doesn't sound like he's a fan of Blake there. The Blake/Paul thing kind of reminds me of the Kobe/Shaq thing...Kobe was threatening leaving, so they traded Shaq and then Kobe knew he was the man of the team going forward. Only Blake has a better supporting cast if he stays.
User avatar
Kerrsed
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 29,876
And1: 16,578
Joined: Mar 31, 2009
Location: Land of the Internet Memes
Contact:
     

Re: Trade & Free Agency Ideas & Discussion 2 

Post#1365 » by Kerrsed » Fri Jun 30, 2017 9:14 pm

From what i understand CP3 was the one that had issues with everyone.

Had problems with Blake and Jordan (Both of whom are friends). He had problems with Austin Rivers. I saw Crawfords name thrown in there as well.
Its #DUMPSTERFIRE SEASON! #TeamTRAINWRECK -KERRSED- The Mod, The Myth, The Legend
Image
matt131
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,756
And1: 4,905
Joined: Jun 19, 2014
   

Re: Trade & Free Agency Ideas & Discussion 2 

Post#1366 » by matt131 » Fri Jun 30, 2017 9:14 pm

bwgood77 wrote:
BobbieL wrote:
Hesh wrote:


My guess Ryan has gotten input from Dudley, Chandler, and Bledsoe


Doesn't sound like he's a fan of Blake there. The Blake/Paul thing kind of reminds me of the Kobe/Shaq thing...Kobe was threatening leaving, so they traded Shaq and then Kobe knew he was the man of the team going forward. Only Blake has a better supporting cast if he stays.


I can't tell if he's being facetious or not. Dudley seems like a straight shooter, but I can't tell if he was....influenced in this clip. It might have been one of those things where Dudley preferred Paul and so he couldn't side with Blake. Or, he was being honest and saying what he thought was best for the team (Clippers probably would have been okay trading Blake for two really good players since he was never on the court anyway).
User avatar
Kerrsed
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 29,876
And1: 16,578
Joined: Mar 31, 2009
Location: Land of the Internet Memes
Contact:
     

Re: Trade & Free Agency Ideas & Discussion 2 

Post#1367 » by Kerrsed » Fri Jun 30, 2017 9:15 pm

bwgood77 wrote:Doesn't sound like he's a fan of Blake there. The Blake/Paul thing kind of reminds me of the Kobe/Shaq thing...Kobe was threatening leaving, so they traded Shaq and then Kobe knew he was the man of the team going forward. Only Blake has a better supporting cast if he stays.


I think just the opposite. Im sure McD probably talked to Dudley about his time with Blake and probably mentioned our interest in him. I think thats the reason he said Blake followed up with the sly smirk.
Its #DUMPSTERFIRE SEASON! #TeamTRAINWRECK -KERRSED- The Mod, The Myth, The Legend
Image
matt131
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,756
And1: 4,905
Joined: Jun 19, 2014
   

Re: Trade & Free Agency Ideas & Discussion 2 

Post#1368 » by matt131 » Fri Jun 30, 2017 9:15 pm

Kerrsed wrote:From what i understand CP3 was the one that had issues with everyone.

Had problems with Blake and Jordan (Both of whom are friends). He had problems with Austin Rivers. I saw Crawfords name thrown in there as well.


I think everyone has a problem with Austin except for his dad
matt131
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,756
And1: 4,905
Joined: Jun 19, 2014
   

Re: Trade & Free Agency Ideas & Discussion 2 

Post#1369 » by matt131 » Fri Jun 30, 2017 9:16 pm

Kerrsed wrote:
bwgood77 wrote:Doesn't sound like he's a fan of Blake there. The Blake/Paul thing kind of reminds me of the Kobe/Shaq thing...Kobe was threatening leaving, so they traded Shaq and then Kobe knew he was the man of the team going forward. Only Blake has a better supporting cast if he stays.


I think just the opposite. Im sure McD probably talked to Dudley about his time with Blake and probably mentioned our interest in him. I think thats the reason he said Blake followed up with the sly smirk.


Oh that video is from May 11, 2017. I thought it was older, from Dudley's time with the Clippers
GDFTony
Sophomore
Posts: 220
And1: 216
Joined: Mar 13, 2014
Location: Colorado
     

Re: Trade & Free Agency Ideas & Discussion 2 

Post#1370 » by GDFTony » Fri Jun 30, 2017 9:17 pm

I think Blake's a long shot but I don't see why everyone's upset about signing him if it's possible. Bender/Chriss will still be able to develop and that kind of attention to Blake will only make things easier.

If he gets injured then of course the contract is bad. But all of you that are intent on rebuilding only through the draft have to realize it will take 3-5 years to start getting some real returns on all these young prospects... IF we get any at all. So what's the big deal if we take a risk with Blake? Best case we create a winning culture as we develop.

Worst case he's injured or sucks and we continue with the youth rebuild.
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,144
And1: 61,002
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: Trade & Free Agency Ideas & Discussion 2 

Post#1371 » by bwgood77 » Fri Jun 30, 2017 9:19 pm

matt131 wrote:
bwgood77 wrote:
BobbieL wrote:
My guess Ryan has gotten input from Dudley, Chandler, and Bledsoe


Doesn't sound like he's a fan of Blake there. The Blake/Paul thing kind of reminds me of the Kobe/Shaq thing...Kobe was threatening leaving, so they traded Shaq and then Kobe knew he was the man of the team going forward. Only Blake has a better supporting cast if he stays.


I can't tell if he's being facetious or not. Dudley seems like a straight shooter, but I can't tell if he was....influenced in this clip. It might have been one of those things where Dudley preferred Paul and so he couldn't side with Blake. Or, he was being honest and saying what he thought was best for the team (Clippers probably would have been okay trading Blake for two really good players since he was never on the court anyway).


Well, it was probably taped earlier, and he probably knew Paul and Blake didn't enjoy playing together, so you had to get rid of him. Then he probably just thought that Paul is the better player so stick with him since you have Jordan in the middle. The team played almost as well when Blake was out and they had all shooters, Paul, and Jordan on the floor.

I guess I wouldn't read into the fact that he's not a fan, but that he's the guy they should trade (prior to Chris leaving)....actually this could have been a lot earlier too since you can't trade Blake unless it's a sign and trade.

Clipper nation probably likes Blake more I would imagine since they drafted him and they've seen him since day one of his career.
User avatar
MrMiyagi
Suns Forum Eternal Optimist
Posts: 8,108
And1: 7,657
Joined: Jan 10, 2010
   

Re: Trade & Free Agency Ideas & Discussion 2 

Post#1372 » by MrMiyagi » Fri Jun 30, 2017 9:19 pm

Kerrsed wrote:Sorry guys, im a no go on PG13.

He has already stated he wants the Lakers. Teams like Cleveland and Boston can afford to take the risk on him as they are Finals contenders already, and think they have a good shot at retaining him due to that fact.

We have been nowhere near Final contenders, let alone Playoff contenders.

I just think if we did trade for him, he would walk next season and take his talents to Long Beach.

Well, the Lakers aren't suddenly overnight contenders, despite Lavar's big mouth.
SHAZAM!

Suns traded Mikal Bridges, Cam Johnson, Jae Crowder and 4 1st round picks and a swap so some Vegas Bookies would like us.
User avatar
thamadkant
Suns Forum Picker of Cherries
Posts: 16,916
And1: 8,599
Joined: Jan 06, 2007
 

Re: Trade & Free Agency Ideas & Discussion 2 

Post#1373 » by thamadkant » Fri Jun 30, 2017 9:22 pm

Griffin's latest injury is not a typical basketball injury. Its not an ankle, knee or even back injury

He'll recover and he has a jump shot, great passer for his size. He can layoff the highlight dunks and let Chriss do that... If he signs with Suns I want to see a grounded Griffin making impact with his skills rather than his athleticism.

I think Suns need a player like him to attract FAs and put Suns back on the map.
Hesh
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,250
And1: 1,142
Joined: Sep 27, 2014
 

Re: Trade & Free Agency Ideas & Discussion 2 

Post#1374 » by Hesh » Fri Jun 30, 2017 9:24 pm



For anyone who hasn't seen this, it was a great interview and Dudley gave a lot of insight.

Mark 7:20 is when he starts talking about the Clippers organization as a team, as individual players, the coach, franchise and the moves they should make going forward.
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,144
And1: 61,002
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: Trade & Free Agency Ideas & Discussion 2 

Post#1375 » by bwgood77 » Fri Jun 30, 2017 9:24 pm

GDFTony wrote:I think Blake's a long shot but I don't see why everyone's upset about signing him if it's possible. Bender/Chriss will still be able to develop and that kind of attention to Blake will only make things easier.

If he gets injured then of course the contract is bad. But all of you that are intent on rebuilding only through the draft have to realize it will take 3-5 years to start getting some real returns on all these young prospects... IF we get any at all. So what's the big deal if we take a risk with Blake? Best case we create a winning culture as we develop.

Worst case he's injured or sucks and we continue with the youth rebuild.


Good points. I think it's more losing the cap flexibility than anything, for me, but I also would rather have a real good read on the rookie contract guys when their rookie contract is up instead of playing them behind vets like we've been doing. Personally I'll be fine signing him but would probably slightly prefer not to at this point in time. I do play devils advocate and I do think there are risks..cap problems, potential chemistry issues, he likely doesn't really get us anywhere far, potential injuries. But at the same time he would be exciting to watch.
User avatar
8on
RealGM
Posts: 10,547
And1: 3,197
Joined: Nov 07, 2015
Location: Palookaville, ND
   

Re: Blake Griffin Your NEWEST*** PF 

Post#1376 » by 8on » Fri Jun 30, 2017 9:31 pm

BobbieL
RealGM
Posts: 15,353
And1: 8,997
Joined: Jun 24, 2009

Re: Trade & Free Agency Ideas & Discussion 2 

Post#1377 » by BobbieL » Fri Jun 30, 2017 9:41 pm

bwgood77 wrote:
GDFTony wrote:I think Blake's a long shot but I don't see why everyone's upset about signing him if it's possible. Bender/Chriss will still be able to develop and that kind of attention to Blake will only make things easier.

If he gets injured then of course the contract is bad. But all of you that are intent on rebuilding only through the draft have to realize it will take 3-5 years to start getting some real returns on all these young prospects... IF we get any at all. So what's the big deal if we take a risk with Blake? Best case we create a winning culture as we develop.

Worst case he's injured or sucks and we continue with the youth rebuild.


Good points. I think it's more losing the cap flexibility than anything, for me, but I also would rather have a real good read on the rookie contract guys when their rookie contract is up instead of playing them behind vets like we've been doing. Personally I'll be fine signing him but would probably slightly prefer not to at this point in time. I do play devils advocate and I do think there are risks..cap problems, potential chemistry issues, he likely doesn't really get us anywhere far, potential injuries. But at the same time he would be exciting to watch.


For me - there is no guarantee that if Blake isn't signed that the young players progress. Granted, the odds are better the more they play, the better the odds

That being said - if not for the injury situation - its a no brainer yes, the cap is something to consider but with contract rolling off in two years like Dudley and Chandler; unless they give away draft picks - they have first round picks over the next four years, six now, should end up with three at worst if not four. Plus many young players - if healthy, I say do it
Biff
Veteran
Posts: 2,739
And1: 1,533
Joined: Jun 10, 2007
Contact:
 

Re: Blake Griffin Your NEWEST*** PF 

Post#1378 » by Biff » Fri Jun 30, 2017 9:55 pm

bwgood77 wrote:
cosmofizzo wrote:
bwgood77 wrote:
Well I certainly don't want him playing. If they are really planning on signing Blake, they should do whatever they have to do to dump one or more of Knight, Chandler and Dudley and let Len play on the QO or a small deal with a team option in 2nd year. At least it gives us some rim protection and rebounding.


I wouldn't want to play Tyson either, but not because I would want Len to play in his stead. I'd want to focus on making sure a Blake-focused spread offense works. Start one of Chriss and Bender next to Blake, have Blake play the C. Rim protection we might lack, but I think the danger we'd pose offensively would offset the concern. Moreover, it would maximize PT for the young guys, which is still a priority, Blake or no Blake, IMO.

I definitely agree Id rather play with those guys next to him. I was more considering the potential issue of getting dominated on the boards and easy scores at the rim...if that posed a significant problem I'd rather have Len on a small deal as an option than Chandler at his age and cost.


Len is a good rebounder and shot blocker but damn is he just clueless on the court half the time. He averaged 5.6 fouls per 36 last year. I'm not sure if he's a net positive even with the rebounds and shot blocking. We need a mobile big man that can rebound badly. Chandler would be ideal if he were 10 years younger.

I think Chandler can hold down the fort for 1 more year but I'm not sure where we're headed if we sign Blake. We'd be too good to net a low lottery pick and though McD has shown some decent drafting decisions, your chances of grabbing an impactful player are still less the higher your pick is. Maybe we could see if the Jazz are interested in trading Favors or something.
"Now everybody wanna play for the heat and the Lakers? Let's go back to being competitive and going at these peoples!" - Kevin Durant
NTB
Suns Forum News Guru
Posts: 5,796
And1: 6,029
Joined: Dec 24, 2013
Contact:
   

Re: Trade & Free Agency Ideas & Discussion 2 

Post#1379 » by NTB » Fri Jun 30, 2017 9:56 pm

Read on Twitter
carey wrote:It is 2-time, every time.
User avatar
Kerrsed
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 29,876
And1: 16,578
Joined: Mar 31, 2009
Location: Land of the Internet Memes
Contact:
     

Re: Trade & Free Agency Ideas & Discussion 2 

Post#1380 » by Kerrsed » Fri Jun 30, 2017 9:58 pm

The Jazz absolutely stole Rubio.

No question about that!
Its #DUMPSTERFIRE SEASON! #TeamTRAINWRECK -KERRSED- The Mod, The Myth, The Legend
Image

Return to Phoenix Suns