RIPskaterdude wrote:If Rondo wanted a one year $$$ deal, he would have stayed with the bulls
but they waived him
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
RIPskaterdude wrote:If Rondo wanted a one year $$$ deal, he would have stayed with the bulls
Bertrob wrote:RIPskaterdude wrote:If Rondo wanted a one year $$$ deal, he would have stayed with the bulls
but they waived him

MrBaynes wrote:I am someone who still thinks Rondo has a place in this league.
But.......why? Why for the Lakers and why for Rondo?
MrBaynes wrote:I am someone who still thinks Rondo has a place in this league.
But.......why? Why for the Lakers and why for Rondo?
Jagic Mohnson wrote:MrBaynes wrote:I am someone who still thinks Rondo has a place in this league.
But.......why? Why for the Lakers and why for Rondo?
I have a feeling Kobe vouched for Rondo. Rondo's defensive rating is top notch and Lakers guards play defense like the Washington Generals
My RealGM account is old enough to drink.
RCM88x wrote:Wwwwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat?
Is it possible to aquire someone worse on a team with a rookie PG?
NBAfan3024 wrote:Why would they have interest in either rondo or iggy. Thought they learnt their lesson from last year
lamscott wrote:NBAfan3024 wrote:Why would they have interest in either rondo or iggy. Thought they learnt their lesson from last year
You're not an iggy fan?
BigLurch92 wrote:LAL should jump at this. I read that from his time in Chicago that he is known to be great around young players.

I think talking with Iggy was just an obligatory conversation, Lakers well aware he's looking for a big deal and longer years. Wouldn't make too much out of that contact.NBAfan3024 wrote:lamscott wrote:NBAfan3024 wrote:Why would they have interest in either rondo or iggy. Thought they learnt their lesson from last year
You're not an iggy fan?
Huge fan but for a rebuilding team spending stupid money on a 33-34 year old is not smart not for the amount of years he likely wants.
SmartWentCrazy wrote:It's extremely unlikely that they end up in the top 3.They're probably better off trying to win and giving Philly the 8th pick than tanking and giving them the 4th.