OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening

Moderators: retrobro90, Dadouv47

User avatar
getrichordie
General Manager
Posts: 9,425
And1: 2,313
Joined: Oct 22, 2015
 

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening 

Post#1881 » by getrichordie » Sun Jul 2, 2017 6:24 am

What do you guys think about Vincent Hunter getting a real shot instead of Huestis if we don't absolutely love Huestis' offensive repertoire?

I feel like he could have more impact on a game than a Huestis or a McDermott and definitely a Singler.

He's 22. Deceptively athletic. Super solid rebounder and while he doesn't have a perimeter game, he would do well in transition on both ends, he can get to them and can rim-run well. He plays the 3 and the 4 and I can even see potential for a small ball 5, especially if we get rid of Kanter.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
[twitter] @thunderdustin
User avatar
spearsy23
RealGM
Posts: 19,481
And1: 7,654
Joined: Jan 27, 2012
   

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening 

Post#1882 » by spearsy23 » Sun Jul 2, 2017 6:38 am

So if we get gay we're like some bizzaro-bastard version of the warriors, where everyone iso's and nobody moves off the ball. Perfect for Billy ball.
“If you're getting stops and you're making threes and the other team's not scoring, that's when you're going to see a huge point difference there,” coach Billy Donovan said.
User avatar
spearsy23
RealGM
Posts: 19,481
And1: 7,654
Joined: Jan 27, 2012
   

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening 

Post#1883 » by spearsy23 » Sun Jul 2, 2017 6:56 am

Sergio Rodriguez would be a capable vet minimum signing for a backup unit of x/Alex/Doug/jerami/enes. If Billy implemented a real system they could have moderate success offensively.
“If you're getting stops and you're making threes and the other team's not scoring, that's when you're going to see a huge point difference there,” coach Billy Donovan said.
User avatar
retrobro90
Forum Mod - Thunder
Forum Mod - Thunder
Posts: 1,342
And1: 942
Joined: Jan 21, 2017
 

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening 

Post#1884 » by retrobro90 » Sun Jul 2, 2017 7:22 am

getrichordie wrote:What do you guys think about Vincent Hunter getting a real shot instead of Huestis if we don't absolutely love Huestis' offensive repertoire?

I feel like he could have more impact on a game than a Huestis or a McDermott and definitely a Singler.

He's 22. Deceptively athletic. Super solid rebounder and while he doesn't have a perimeter game, he would do well in transition on both ends, he can get to them and can rim-run well. He plays the 3 and the 4 and I can even see potential for a small ball 5, especially if we get rid of Kanter.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums


I like him a lot. He's not super smart defensively yet but he's definitely got the physical tools. Uses them well to compete on the glass and contest shots at the rim. He actually got a partial guarantee with the grizz a season ago but just didn't make it through the preseason as they shuffled a lot of D league dudes this past year and found some nice rotation pieces (Troy Daniels, Wayne Selden, etc). I wouldn't mind doing the same but there's no rush to fill out those spots until we know about the bigger fish.
User avatar
PerkinsFor3
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,989
And1: 2,065
Joined: Nov 10, 2004
Contact:

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening 

Post#1885 » by PerkinsFor3 » Sun Jul 2, 2017 7:23 am

Whos starting at sg? Expected Alex?
User avatar
retrobro90
Forum Mod - Thunder
Forum Mod - Thunder
Posts: 1,342
And1: 942
Joined: Jan 21, 2017
 

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening 

Post#1886 » by retrobro90 » Sun Jul 2, 2017 7:29 am

PerkinsFor3 wrote:Whos starting at sg? Expected Alex?


IMO Ideally we roll out Russ/Roberson/George/Cheap Stretch 4/Funaki
User avatar
Pillendreher
RealGM
Posts: 14,191
And1: 9,953
Joined: Jan 25, 2015
 

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening 

Post#1887 » by Pillendreher » Sun Jul 2, 2017 7:33 am

I hate this obsession with Gay. The only way a deal like that works is if he signs for the MLE or less. He might just fall off a cliff due to his injury and he's never been that good to begin with.
"I don't know of any player that, when the shot goes up, he doesn't want it to go in," Donovan said
User avatar
retrobro90
Forum Mod - Thunder
Forum Mod - Thunder
Posts: 1,342
And1: 942
Joined: Jan 21, 2017
 

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening 

Post#1888 » by retrobro90 » Sun Jul 2, 2017 7:56 am

Pillendreher wrote:I hate this obsession with Gay. The only way a deal like that works is if he signs for the MLE or less. He might just fall off a cliff due to his injury and he's never been that good to begin with.


"Never been that good"? Cmon man. Rudy's averaged damn near 20ppg over his whole career and had some career high efficiency marks last year before he went down. We don't know what he will be entirely but he was close to a star level player his whole career. Every team in the league should want this dude for the MLE. He could be a better version of what Joe Johnson was on the Jazz last year. He could the same Rudy for all we know. Imagine throwing out a lineup of Russ, three 6'7"-6'8" switchable defenders in Roberson, George, Gay, and anchor it with Adams. Thats a freaking dangerous spread pnr with some serious defensive potential.
User avatar
Pillendreher
RealGM
Posts: 14,191
And1: 9,953
Joined: Jan 25, 2015
 

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening 

Post#1889 » by Pillendreher » Sun Jul 2, 2017 8:32 am

Rudy Gay was never anywhere close to 'star level'. What he is known for tho is making teams better by leaving.
"I don't know of any player that, when the shot goes up, he doesn't want it to go in," Donovan said
CROklahoma
Junior
Posts: 451
And1: 130
Joined: Feb 22, 2017

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening 

Post#1890 » by CROklahoma » Sun Jul 2, 2017 8:49 am

Just make sure that Robes is resigning, then, try to get Gay.
Abrines has a ton of potential, he deserves the starting SG slot.
User avatar
retrobro90
Forum Mod - Thunder
Forum Mod - Thunder
Posts: 1,342
And1: 942
Joined: Jan 21, 2017
 

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening 

Post#1891 » by retrobro90 » Sun Jul 2, 2017 9:12 am

Pillendreher wrote:Rudy Gay was never anywhere close to 'star level'. What he is known for tho is making teams better by leaving.


How do you or anyone else not see the specious reasoning there? Look at both of the situations in Memphis and Toronto and why those teams actually got better when he left. They had the talent ready to replace those possessions and Rudy's role on our squad would never be the primary perimeter offense. He will be number 3 behind Russ and PG. How do people not see the bargain in signing him for 8mil per? So many guys just like him take a back seat in the latter half of their careers and they become reliable role players and bucket getters. The MLE would be a freaking steal for him.

And no where close to star level? Ever in his career? What about the fact that he received all star votes for years and was frequently considered a borderline star by fans and journalists alike during that time? 20/6/3 is no where close? Gimme a break.
User avatar
Pillendreher
RealGM
Posts: 14,191
And1: 9,953
Joined: Jan 25, 2015
 

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening 

Post#1892 » by Pillendreher » Sun Jul 2, 2017 10:56 am

retrobro90 wrote:
Pillendreher wrote:Rudy Gay was never anywhere close to 'star level'. What he is known for tho is making teams better by leaving.


How do you or anyone else not see the specious reasoning there? Look at both of the situations in Memphis and Toronto and why those teams actually got better when he left. They had the talent ready to replace those possessions and Rudy's role on our squad would never be the primary perimeter offense. He will be number 3 behind Russ and PG. How do people not see the bargain in signing him for 8mil per? So many guys just like him take a back seat in the latter half of their careers and they become reliable role players and bucket getters. The MLE would be a freaking steal for him.

And no where close to star level? Ever in his career? What about the fact that he received all star votes for years and was frequently considered a borderline star by fans and journalists alike during that time? 20/6/3 is no where close? Gimme a break.


Let me give you the facts instead. Rudy Gay is a high usg% wing who has little positive impact on his team's offense. His shooting is below average, he's not creating shots for other players and is not doing much else on the court.

You know whose stats look reasonably similar? Monta Ellis. That's not a good comparison.

Here are his Catch and Shoot numbers over the last 4 seasons:

43/121: 35.5 % from 3
52/142: 36.6 % from 3
57/170: 33.5 % from 3
32/86: 37.2 % from 3

That's good for 184/519, ie 35.4 % on Catch and Shoot 3s in 241 games. He's taken roughly 2 Catch and Shoot 3s and makes them at an below average rate.
You can get this wild idea out of your head that Rudy freaking Gay is gonna come here and is gonna tear it up from the 3pt line. He's not. That's not his game and it never will be.

Everything - and I mean everything - about him screams mediocre. And now he's coming back from a catastrophic injury for basketball player and you're out here praising him as a 'steal' and a 'close to a star level' player? Get real. The only positive thing about this could be the fact that we might just get rid of Kanter because we don't need two iso scorers coming off the bench. Otherwise, it'll just be another ballhog who will need time to realize his limitations after the injury.
"I don't know of any player that, when the shot goes up, he doesn't want it to go in," Donovan said
User avatar
retrobro90
Forum Mod - Thunder
Forum Mod - Thunder
Posts: 1,342
And1: 942
Joined: Jan 21, 2017
 

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening 

Post#1893 » by retrobro90 » Sun Jul 2, 2017 11:44 am

Pillendreher wrote:
retrobro90 wrote:
Pillendreher wrote:Rudy Gay was never anywhere close to 'star level'. What he is known for tho is making teams better by leaving.


How do you or anyone else not see the specious reasoning there? Look at both of the situations in Memphis and Toronto and why those teams actually got better when he left. They had the talent ready to replace those possessions and Rudy's role on our squad would never be the primary perimeter offense. He will be number 3 behind Russ and PG. How do people not see the bargain in signing him for 8mil per? So many guys just like him take a back seat in the latter half of their careers and they become reliable role players and bucket getters. The MLE would be a freaking steal for him.

And no where close to star level? Ever in his career? What about the fact that he received all star votes for years and was frequently considered a borderline star by fans and journalists alike during that time? 20/6/3 is no where close? Gimme a break.


Let me give you the facts instead. Rudy Gay is a high usg% wing who has little positive impact on his team's offense. His shooting is below average, he's not creating shots for other players and is not doing much else on the court.

You know whose stats look reasonably similar? Monta Ellis. That's not a good comparison.

Here are his Catch and Shoot numbers over the last 4 seasons:

43/121: 35.5 % from 3
52/142: 36.6 % from 3
57/170: 33.5 % from 3
32/86: 37.2 % from 3

That's good for 184/519, ie 35.4 % on Catch and Shoot 3s in 241 games. He's taken roughly 2 Catch and Shoot 3s and makes them at an below average rate.
You can get this wild idea out of your head that Rudy freaking Gay is gonna come here and is gonna tear it up from the 3pt line. He's not. That's not his game and it never will be.

Everything - and I mean everything - about him screams mediocre. And now he's coming back from a catastrophic injury for basketball player and you're out here praising him as a 'steal' and a 'close to a star level' player? Get real. The only positive thing about this could be the fact that we might just get rid of Kanter because we don't need two iso scorers coming off the bench. Otherwise, it'll just be another ballhog who will need time to realize his limitations after the injury.


Monta is a terrible cross-positional comparison for Rudy especially when you're comparing their 3pt percentage. Just outright inaccurate. Monta has shot ~30% from 3 basically his whole career as a 2 guard and his percentage has dropped nearly every season since 2011. Rudy would be playing primarily as a small ball 4 for us as well and theres no way in hell his usg% would be anywhere close to where it was in sacramento. Not with Russ and PG on the roster. Also he doesn't need to "tear it up" from the 3pt line (never claimed that) although I would bet his efficiency goes up once his usg% declines and he's being set up by Russ/PG who draw much more of the defensive attention. Even if Rudy isn't shooting threes at a high clip (shot 37% from 3 last year, career 34.5%, 3% better than monta on his career) he's another guy who can get buckets from anywhere and create for himself on any given possession a la Joe Johnson these past couple years on the heat/jazz. Obviously I'm not going to change your mind though because clearly it's already been made up.
InTheSabonus
Pro Prospect
Posts: 762
And1: 548
Joined: Dec 20, 2016
 

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening 

Post#1894 » by InTheSabonus » Sun Jul 2, 2017 11:47 am

If Rudy Gay is what gets Russ to sign that extension, then I'll be pro-Gay all the way.
User avatar
spearsy23
RealGM
Posts: 19,481
And1: 7,654
Joined: Jan 27, 2012
   

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening 

Post#1895 » by spearsy23 » Sun Jul 2, 2017 11:54 am

retrobro90 wrote:
Pillendreher wrote:
retrobro90 wrote:
How do you or anyone else not see the specious reasoning there? Look at both of the situations in Memphis and Toronto and why those teams actually got better when he left. They had the talent ready to replace those possessions and Rudy's role on our squad would never be the primary perimeter offense. He will be number 3 behind Russ and PG. How do people not see the bargain in signing him for 8mil per? So many guys just like him take a back seat in the latter half of their careers and they become reliable role players and bucket getters. The MLE would be a freaking steal for him.

And no where close to star level? Ever in his career? What about the fact that he received all star votes for years and was frequently considered a borderline star by fans and journalists alike during that time? 20/6/3 is no where close? Gimme a break.


Let me give you the facts instead. Rudy Gay is a high usg% wing who has little positive impact on his team's offense. His shooting is below average, he's not creating shots for other players and is not doing much else on the court.

You know whose stats look reasonably similar? Monta Ellis. That's not a good comparison.

Here are his Catch and Shoot numbers over the last 4 seasons:

43/121: 35.5 % from 3
52/142: 36.6 % from 3
57/170: 33.5 % from 3
32/86: 37.2 % from 3

That's good for 184/519, ie 35.4 % on Catch and Shoot 3s in 241 games. He's taken roughly 2 Catch and Shoot 3s and makes them at an below average rate.
You can get this wild idea out of your head that Rudy freaking Gay is gonna come here and is gonna tear it up from the 3pt line. He's not. That's not his game and it never will be.

Everything - and I mean everything - about him screams mediocre. And now he's coming back from a catastrophic injury for basketball player and you're out here praising him as a 'steal' and a 'close to a star level' player? Get real. The only positive thing about this could be the fact that we might just get rid of Kanter because we don't need two iso scorers coming off the bench. Otherwise, it'll just be another ballhog who will need time to realize his limitations after the injury.


Monta is a terrible cross-positional comparison for Rudy especially when you're comparing their 3pt percentage. Just outright inaccurate. Monta has shot ~30% from 3 basically his whole career as a 2 guard and his percentage has dropped nearly every season since 2011. Rudy would be playing primarily as a small ball 4 for us as well and theres no way in hell his usg% would be anywhere close to where it was in sacramento. Not with Russ and PG on the roster. Also he doesn't need to "tear it up" from the 3pt line (never claimed that) although I would bet his efficiency goes up once his usg% declines and he's being set up by Russ/PG who draw much more of the defensive attention. Even if Rudy isn't shooting threes at a high clip (shot 37% from 3 last year, career 34.5%, 3% better than monta on his career) he's another guy who can get buckets from anywhere and create for himself on any given possession a la Joe Johnson these past couple years on the heat/jazz. Obviously I'm not going to change your mind though because clearly it's already been made up.

Calling him a borderline star was definitely an over sell, but yeah if he was healthy he'd be a steal for the mle. Unfortunately there's just no way of knowing what you'll actually get after an Achilles injury. I hope he signs and comes back strong, but if I were presti I wouldn't be gambling on him.
“If you're getting stops and you're making threes and the other team's not scoring, that's when you're going to see a huge point difference there,” coach Billy Donovan said.
User avatar
retrobro90
Forum Mod - Thunder
Forum Mod - Thunder
Posts: 1,342
And1: 942
Joined: Jan 21, 2017
 

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening 

Post#1896 » by retrobro90 » Sun Jul 2, 2017 12:23 pm

spearsy23 wrote:
retrobro90 wrote:
Pillendreher wrote:
Let me give you the facts instead. Rudy Gay is a high usg% wing who has little positive impact on his team's offense. His shooting is below average, he's not creating shots for other players and is not doing much else on the court.

You know whose stats look reasonably similar? Monta Ellis. That's not a good comparison.

Here are his Catch and Shoot numbers over the last 4 seasons:

43/121: 35.5 % from 3
52/142: 36.6 % from 3
57/170: 33.5 % from 3
32/86: 37.2 % from 3

That's good for 184/519, ie 35.4 % on Catch and Shoot 3s in 241 games. He's taken roughly 2 Catch and Shoot 3s and makes them at an below average rate.
You can get this wild idea out of your head that Rudy freaking Gay is gonna come here and is gonna tear it up from the 3pt line. He's not. That's not his game and it never will be.

Everything - and I mean everything - about him screams mediocre. And now he's coming back from a catastrophic injury for basketball player and you're out here praising him as a 'steal' and a 'close to a star level' player? Get real. The only positive thing about this could be the fact that we might just get rid of Kanter because we don't need two iso scorers coming off the bench. Otherwise, it'll just be another ballhog who will need time to realize his limitations after the injury.


Monta is a terrible cross-positional comparison for Rudy especially when you're comparing their 3pt percentage. Just outright inaccurate. Monta has shot ~30% from 3 basically his whole career as a 2 guard and his percentage has dropped nearly every season since 2011. Rudy would be playing primarily as a small ball 4 for us as well and theres no way in hell his usg% would be anywhere close to where it was in sacramento. Not with Russ and PG on the roster. Also he doesn't need to "tear it up" from the 3pt line (never claimed that) although I would bet his efficiency goes up once his usg% declines and he's being set up by Russ/PG who draw much more of the defensive attention. Even if Rudy isn't shooting threes at a high clip (shot 37% from 3 last year, career 34.5%, 3% better than monta on his career) he's another guy who can get buckets from anywhere and create for himself on any given possession a la Joe Johnson these past couple years on the heat/jazz. Obviously I'm not going to change your mind though because clearly it's already been made up.

Calling him a borderline star was definitely an over sell, but yeah if he was healthy he'd be a steal for the mle. Unfortunately there's just no way of knowing what you'll actually get after an Achilles injury. I hope he signs and comes back strong, but if I were presti I wouldn't be gambling on him.


"He WAS close to a star level player his whole career" were my exact words fwiw and I stand by that. Feel like everyone has a short term memory when it comes to what people thought about Rudy not that long ago.
User avatar
getrichordie
General Manager
Posts: 9,425
And1: 2,313
Joined: Oct 22, 2015
 

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening 

Post#1897 » by getrichordie » Sun Jul 2, 2017 12:24 pm

What do you guys think of a trade centered around flipping Kanter for Temple & Koufous from SAC?


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
[twitter] @thunderdustin
User avatar
Old Man Game
Head Coach
Posts: 6,281
And1: 4,317
Joined: Jul 15, 2012

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening 

Post#1898 » by Old Man Game » Sun Jul 2, 2017 12:40 pm

InTheSabonus wrote:If Rudy Gay is what gets Russ to sign that extension, then I'll be pro-Gay all the way.


People said stuff like this with regard to Kanter and Durant. 'You've got to sign him. Can't give Durant that message we won't spend.' Durant left anyway and we're stuck paying his useless arse.

If Russ is leaving because we wouldn't sign Rudy $#@*ing Gay then Russ was probably leaving anyway.
alessandrux
Starter
Posts: 2,046
And1: 2,239
Joined: Dec 25, 2015

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening 

Post#1899 » by alessandrux » Sun Jul 2, 2017 12:43 pm

getrichordie wrote:What do you guys think of a trade centered around flipping Kanter for Temple & Koufous from SAC?


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums


Would love it, but why would Sacramento do this trade?

Koufos is an asset, Kanter is not.
User avatar
ThunderBolt
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,368
And1: 19,241
Joined: Dec 29, 2016
Location: Lynnwood, WA
   

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening 

Post#1900 » by ThunderBolt » Sun Jul 2, 2017 1:05 pm

Why aren't we hearing any rumors of Taj and Dre meeting with other teams?
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?

Return to Oklahoma City Thunder