ImageImageImage

Trade & FA Ideas & Discussion 3: #TheTimeline

Moderators: bwgood77, lilfishi22, Qwigglez

User avatar
8on
RealGM
Posts: 10,547
And1: 3,197
Joined: Nov 07, 2015
Location: Palookaville, ND
   

Re: Trade & FA Ideas & Discussion 3: #TheTimeline 

Post#1481 » by 8on » Sat Jul 8, 2017 11:48 pm

Let me throw my hat in the ring.....

Washington/Phoenix/Memphis

PHX out - Eric Bledsoe
PHX in - John Wall

WSH out - John Wall, Markieff Morris
WSH in - Mike Conley

MEM out - Mike Conley
MEM in - Eric Bledsoe, Markieff Morris

Phoenix upgrades at the point guard position. Wall and Booker would play great together.

Washington doesn't have to worry about paying $60M/year for Wall and Beal, when they know they'll never compete for a title with that backcourt. Conley/Beal is almost as good, and probably cheaper than Wall/Beal would be.

Memphis gets two versatile players in Bledsoe and Morris. Morris would be a fantastic addition to Marc Gasol due to his ability to stretch the floor. Bledsoe is almost as good as Conley, depending on who you ask, plus now Memphis gets Morris.

It's a situation where all three teams get what they really want without giving up much to get there.

http://www.espn.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=y88uhnlk
jredsaz
General Manager
Posts: 8,887
And1: 3,148
Joined: May 25, 2012
         

Re: RE: Re: Trade & FA Ideas & Discussion 3: #TheTimeline 

Post#1482 » by jredsaz » Sat Jul 8, 2017 11:50 pm

dantley4prez wrote:Let me throw my hat in the ring.....

Washington/Phoenix/Memphis

PHX out - Eric Bledsoe
PHX in - John Wall

WSH out - John Wall, Markieff Morris
WSH in - Mike Conley

MEM out - Mike Conley
MEM in - Eric Bledsoe, Markieff Morris

Phoenix upgrades at the point guard position. Wall and Booker would play great together.

Washington doesn't have to worry about paying $60M/year for Wall and Beal, when they know they'll never compete for a title with that backcourt. Conley/Beal is almost as good, and probably cheaper than Wall/Beal would be.

Memphis gets two versatile players in Bledsoe and Morris. Morris would be a fantastic addition to Marc Gasol due to his ability to stretch the floor. Bledsoe is almost as good as Conley, depending on who you ask, plus now Memphis gets Morris.

It's a situation where all three teams get what they really want without giving up much to get there.

http://www.espn.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=y88uhnlk

Wall>>>Conley>>>Bledsoe. Can't get Wall with Bledsoe.

Sent from my SM-N920V using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
Christine-In-AZ
Starter
Posts: 2,423
And1: 1,539
Joined: Nov 27, 2007

Re: Trade & FA Ideas & Discussion 3: #TheTimeline 

Post#1483 » by Christine-In-AZ » Sun Jul 9, 2017 12:23 am

Bledsoe becomes eligible for a raise & extension come late September.

Suns offer to change Eric's 14.5/15.0m in '18/'19 to 22/24/26m in '18/'19/'20 ...that's 16.5 million added to his current deal plus one year at 26. No options.

The Bledsoe camp goes for it...deal is signed

Do you like it?

Liking it or disliking does not mean you're pro EB trade or an EB "long termer" as a deal like this plays to both ideas fairly equally imo.

I bring up the hypothetical because the Suns FO could very well be considering an early extension/raise something like this.
BobbieL
RealGM
Posts: 15,353
And1: 8,997
Joined: Jun 24, 2009

Re: Trade & FA Ideas & Discussion 3: #TheTimeline 

Post#1484 » by BobbieL » Sun Jul 9, 2017 12:43 am

ChrisInAZ wrote:Bledsoe becomes eligible for a raise & extension come late September.

Suns offer to change Eric's 14.5/15.0m in '18/'19 to 22/24/26m in '18/'19/'20 ...that's 16.5 million added to his current deal plus one year at 26. No options.

The Bledsoe camp goes for it...deal is signed

Do you like it?

Liking it or disliking does not mean you're pro EB trade or an EB "long termer" as a deal like this plays to both ideas fairly equally imo.

I bring up the hypothetical because the Suns FO could very well be considering an early extension/raise something like this.


I actually think if you do something like this - its two years extended not just the one. But if the FO is confident in Bledsoe long term - its a good plan - so yes, I like the thought process of giving him more money in line with like Holiday, Teague type players and to your point, 22/24/26/28 - pretty good 100/4.
BobbieL
RealGM
Posts: 15,353
And1: 8,997
Joined: Jun 24, 2009

Re: Trade & FA Ideas & Discussion 3: #TheTimeline 

Post#1485 » by BobbieL » Sun Jul 9, 2017 12:47 am

WeekapaugGroove wrote:With reports that the knicks and rockets are discussing a melo trade I think its safe to say this was a bs rumor.

Sent from my SM-G930V using RealGM mobile app


Watching the Jump with Rachel Nichols - she had Byron Scott and Amin Elhassan on - mentioned something that Woj is hearing Rockets again are working for Melo.

And if truly the Cavs were offering pieces/parts for Melo waiting for him to bought out - Houston should jump in and see. Granted, Ryan Anderson doesn't seem like that great of a deal. And Houston doesn't have any young players left as they were traded for Chris Paul ; not sure how many draft picks the Rockets have - and they won't be good ones.

My guess, Dolan will take Ryan Anderson - as GM -- he might be Sarver-esque in ability.
carey
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,192
And1: 1,941
Joined: Feb 12, 2009
Location: New Orleans, Louisiana
     

Re: Trade & FA Ideas & Discussion 3: #TheTimeline 

Post#1486 » by carey » Sun Jul 9, 2017 12:48 am

Why? I don't understand.
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,145
And1: 61,002
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: Trade & FA Ideas & Discussion 3: #TheTimeline 

Post#1487 » by bwgood77 » Sun Jul 9, 2017 12:57 am

ChrisInAZ wrote:Bledsoe becomes eligible for a raise & extension come late September.

Suns offer to change Eric's 14.5/15.0m in '18/'19 to 22/24/26m in '18/'19/'20 ...that's 16.5 million added to his current deal plus one year at 26. No options.

The Bledsoe camp goes for it...deal is signed

Do you like it?

Liking it or disliking does not mean you're pro EB trade or an EB "long termer" as a deal like this plays to both ideas fairly equally imo.

I bring up the hypothetical because the Suns FO could very well be considering an early extension/raise something like this.


No, I don't like it as I'd rather save the cap space and get asset in trade. I don't think their camp would go for it either unless they were concerned about injury, but I think Paul is just cocky and will wait it out and go for a max. Now if the only alternative was keeping him until he expires, maybe, but I'd still rather save the cap space in case we can use it for something.
User avatar
thamadkant
Suns Forum Picker of Cherries
Posts: 16,916
And1: 8,599
Joined: Jan 06, 2007
 

Re: Trade & FA Ideas & Discussion 3: #TheTimeline 

Post#1488 » by thamadkant » Sun Jul 9, 2017 1:14 am

BobbieL wrote:
ChrisInAZ wrote:Bledsoe becomes eligible for a raise & extension come late September.

Suns offer to change Eric's 14.5/15.0m in '18/'19 to 22/24/26m in '18/'19/'20 ...that's 16.5 million added to his current deal plus one year at 26. No options.

The Bledsoe camp goes for it...deal is signed

Do you like it?

Liking it or disliking does not mean you're pro EB trade or an EB "long termer" as a deal like this plays to both ideas fairly equally imo.

I bring up the hypothetical because the Suns FO could very well be considering an early extension/raise something like this.


I actually think if you do something like this - its two years extended not just the one. But if the FO is confident in Bledsoe long term - its a good plan - so yes, I like the thought process of giving him more money in line with like Holiday, Teague type players and to your point, 22/24/26/28 - pretty good 100/4.



No... not good at all.

Suns are rebuilding and they dont know if Bledsoe should be part of that direction.
NTB
Suns Forum News Guru
Posts: 5,796
And1: 6,029
Joined: Dec 24, 2013
Contact:
   

Re: Trade & FA Ideas & Discussion 3: #TheTimeline 

Post#1489 » by NTB » Sun Jul 9, 2017 1:19 am

Read on Twitter
carey wrote:It is 2-time, every time.
BobbieL
RealGM
Posts: 15,353
And1: 8,997
Joined: Jun 24, 2009

Re: Trade & FA Ideas & Discussion 3: #TheTimeline 

Post#1490 » by BobbieL » Sun Jul 9, 2017 1:22 am

1UPZ wrote:
BobbieL wrote:
ChrisInAZ wrote:Bledsoe becomes eligible for a raise & extension come late September.

Suns offer to change Eric's 14.5/15.0m in '18/'19 to 22/24/26m in '18/'19/'20 ...that's 16.5 million added to his current deal plus one year at 26. No options.

The Bledsoe camp goes for it...deal is signed

Do you like it?

Liking it or disliking does not mean you're pro EB trade or an EB "long termer" as a deal like this plays to both ideas fairly equally imo.

I bring up the hypothetical because the Suns FO could very well be considering an early extension/raise something like this.


I actually think if you do something like this - its two years extended not just the one. But if the FO is confident in Bledsoe long term - its a good plan - so yes, I like the thought process of giving him more money in line with like Holiday, Teague type players and to your point, 22/24/26/28 - pretty good 100/4.



No... not good at all.

Suns are rebuilding and they dont know if Bledsoe should be part of that direction.


I am on the pro-trade EB train like BW - get an asset while you can. But Chris was just asking about thought process if they do want to keep him. And if the Suns think long term - better to try to get him at a fairer value than wait two years and have a 4/150 on your hands.

More than likely, Rich Paul would not take - so that is why, I am probably trading Bledsoe now.
NTB
Suns Forum News Guru
Posts: 5,796
And1: 6,029
Joined: Dec 24, 2013
Contact:
   

Re: Trade & FA Ideas & Discussion 3: #TheTimeline 

Post#1491 » by NTB » Sun Jul 9, 2017 1:38 am

Read on Twitter
carey wrote:It is 2-time, every time.
User avatar
Qwigglez
Forum Mod - Suns
Forum Mod - Suns
Posts: 21,553
And1: 14,846
Joined: Jul 10, 2009
Contact:
     

Re: Trade & FA Ideas & Discussion 3: #TheTimeline 

Post#1492 » by Qwigglez » Sun Jul 9, 2017 1:50 am

Anyone see this guys tweets?
Read on Twitter
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,145
And1: 61,002
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: Trade & FA Ideas & Discussion 3: #TheTimeline 

Post#1493 » by bwgood77 » Sun Jul 9, 2017 2:00 am

Qwigglez wrote:Anyone see this guys tweets?
Read on Twitter


I think this was already discussed earlier in the thread and someone mentioned the Knicks forum talked about how that guy has no cred.
Mulhollanddrive
RealGM
Posts: 12,555
And1: 8,337
Joined: Jan 19, 2013

Re: Trade & FA Ideas & Discussion 3: #TheTimeline 

Post#1494 » by Mulhollanddrive » Sun Jul 9, 2017 2:58 am

Do we have to keep a roster spot open in the main 15 to convert two way contracts?
User avatar
Qwigglez
Forum Mod - Suns
Forum Mod - Suns
Posts: 21,553
And1: 14,846
Joined: Jul 10, 2009
Contact:
     

Re: Trade & FA Ideas & Discussion 3: #TheTimeline 

Post#1495 » by Qwigglez » Sun Jul 9, 2017 3:06 am

I am very surprised we haven't done anything yet. Are we just going to keep our salary below the floor minimum? That would be a good gesture for our team.
Mulhollanddrive
RealGM
Posts: 12,555
And1: 8,337
Joined: Jan 19, 2013

Re: Trade & FA Ideas & Discussion 3: #TheTimeline 

Post#1496 » by Mulhollanddrive » Sun Jul 9, 2017 3:26 am

Williams and Len would get us to within a few $m.
carey
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,192
And1: 1,941
Joined: Feb 12, 2009
Location: New Orleans, Louisiana
     

Re: Trade & FA Ideas & Discussion 3: #TheTimeline 

Post#1497 » by carey » Sun Jul 9, 2017 3:49 am

Mulhollanddrive wrote:Do we have to keep a roster spot open in the main 15 to convert two way contracts?


When you convert it they must be added to the 15 man roster so yes.
BobbieL
RealGM
Posts: 15,353
And1: 8,997
Joined: Jun 24, 2009

Re: Trade & FA Ideas & Discussion 3: #TheTimeline 

Post#1498 » by BobbieL » Sun Jul 9, 2017 4:04 am

bwgood77 wrote:
Qwigglez wrote:Anyone see this guys tweets?
Read on Twitter


I think this was already discussed earlier in the thread and someone mentioned the Knicks forum talked about how that guy has no cred.


Agreed - because I think he had to take down the post as there was nothing valid about it or it was going nowhere based on Knicks

My guess - if they were talking the Suns were like "sure, we can probably figure out a way to take Love - but it means, we are not taking Noah; we may take Shumpert but it means Knight and Bledsoe or Knight and Chandler; and lastly, you are not getting Booker, Bender, Chriss, Josh , Reed, Ulis, and our pick in 2018. "

Knicks just have to decide
Ryan Anderson &/or Eric Gordon - as really the Rockets don't have much else to trade - maybe late first rounders
Straight up Kevin Love
Suns: Bledsoe &/or Knight, Warren possibly, first rounder from Heat
or buy him out

I can see the merit of Love with Knight or Bledsoe and Booker compared with Bledsoe, Booker and Knight for the next two years. If that's the case - I think I prefer Love, Booker and Knight. But the key thing is - getting young guys the proper minutes
NavLDO
Suns Forum Defensive Player of the Year
Posts: 2,749
And1: 1,436
Joined: Aug 25, 2014
     

Re: Trade & FA Ideas & Discussion 3: #TheTimeline 

Post#1499 » by NavLDO » Sun Jul 9, 2017 4:14 am

Zelaznyrules wrote:
NavLDO wrote:I mean...really? 5 year rebuild? There's only 5 players on the court at a time, and we've had 6 Lottery picks. Oh, so one didn't turn out? OK, we have 5 now...when does the rebuild stop? When GS is no longer at the top, because another team has found a way to beat them, either due to age, or influx of talent? Well, we can't compete then, either; might as well stay with the rebuild... :noway:


You're confusing being bad with rebuilding. We most certainly have NOT been rebuilding for 5 years, that timeline includes the wonderful pre-Ryan season with Beasley, Scola and Shannon Brown which was followed by the 48 win season that paired Bledsoe and Dragic which was followed by the playoff hopeful but extremely disappointing Isaiah Thomas season which was followed by our first real rebuilding season. And it's laughable to group all lottery picks together as if there's no difference between picking 14th vs 1st.


Oh, I know...DeAngelo Russell at 2, and Okafor at 3 has been soooo much better than Booker at 13...or Parker at 2 and Gordon at 4 have contributed so much more to their teams than Warren at 14 (meaning, they've been fairly equal in talent)...and I don't even need to elaborate on 2013...

...but you go on with that mantra that higher pick always = higher success...I mean Bender proved as much last year over Chriss, right. He should over time, but I'll believe it when I see it, until then...
Zelaznyrules
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,776
And1: 995
Joined: Dec 18, 2013
     

Re: Trade & FA Ideas & Discussion 3: #TheTimeline 

Post#1500 » by Zelaznyrules » Sun Jul 9, 2017 4:21 am

NavLDO wrote:
Zelaznyrules wrote:
NavLDO wrote:I mean...really? 5 year rebuild? There's only 5 players on the court at a time, and we've had 6 Lottery picks. Oh, so one didn't turn out? OK, we have 5 now...when does the rebuild stop? When GS is no longer at the top, because another team has found a way to beat them, either due to age, or influx of talent? Well, we can't compete then, either; might as well stay with the rebuild... :noway:


You're confusing being bad with rebuilding. We most certainly have NOT been rebuilding for 5 years, that timeline includes the wonderful pre-Ryan season with Beasley, Scola and Shannon Brown which was followed by the 48 win season that paired Bledsoe and Dragic which was followed by the playoff hopeful but extremely disappointing Isaiah Thomas season which was followed by our first real rebuilding season. And it's laughable to group all lottery picks together as if there's no difference between picking 14th vs 1st.


Oh, I know...DeAngelo Russell at 2, and Okafor at 3 has been soooo much better than Booker at 13...or Parker at 2 and Gordon at 4 have contributed so much more to their teams than Warren at 14...and I don't even need to elaborate on 2013...

...but you go on with that mantra that higher pick always = higher success...I mean Bender proved as much last year over Chriss, right. He should over time, but I'll believe it when I see it, until then...


I said no such thing and I'm quite sure you know it.

Return to Phoenix Suns