lilfishi22 wrote:Zelaznyrules wrote:lilfishi22 wrote:I'm not saying playing himself out of minutes in the first half of the season was unfair. I was saying us basically telling him to sit and not be allowed to compete for minutes was unfair. He definitely didn't look good but there were certainly games where Ulis didn't look good either and Knight could've played. He took it like a champ when asked to sit. It's unfair to ask him to do it again or not be allowed to compete for minutes.
Sitting him does him no favors and does us no favors either by having a depreciating asset not produce at all. At least if we take on a bad contract who actually plays, he could at least contribute in some way.
When did that happen? The coach kept giving him chances and from what we heard, Knight refused to do what Watson demanded of him. And it's not like Ulis played a bunch of minutes and Knight was forced to sit, Brandon actually played a few more minutes last season than Tyler did. Knight has been given more chances than his performance has warranted. He sat stoically on the sidelines, showing neither positive nor negative emotion and rarely provided anything close to the support you'd expect from someone who was really being a good teammate.
I think you're making excuses for a player that simply doesn't deserve that kind of consideration. He's shown a few flashes but for the most part he's been a huge disappointment from the moment he got here. The best I can say about him is that he didn't appear to try and cause havoc in the locker room but frankly, we have a right to expect a heck of a lot more than that from him.
There are no excuses being made for Knight. He hasn't played as well as we expect him to, that's fact. What's also a fact is, if a guy doesn't fit your roster anymore, and clearly he doesn't, you don't just bench him until his contract runs out. We asked him to come off the bench after siting 10 straight games which he refused to and we declared his season over. Maybe it was a mutual agreement, I don't know. What we know is that we no longer have a spot for him on the roster so you move him and move on.
The main issue here is, to me this is another case of McD sitting a contract too long hoping its value recovers or waiting for a deal he can't refuse to be offered to him. What I want to avoid is another Kieff situation or Dragic situation where McD sat on his hands waiting for the "perfect" deal while the affected players gets more and more disinterested, disgruntled and we get to a point where we have the stretch the guy's deal to move on.
This view of the past has no basis in reality. McD did no such thing as sit on his hands waiting for the perfect deal with Goran or with Kieff. He traded Goran right away once he said he was not going to return, otherwise he would have kept him. He got good value for Goran too. He had planned on keeping Kieff after the Marcus trade and initially hoped Keiff would back off of his trade request. He eventually traded him one he got a reasonable offer. Whose deal got stretched?
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app