Moderators: HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi
AllanHoustonFan wrote:SelbyCobra wrote:The insider poster that everyone trusts on the Rockets board has chimed in to say that he believes the Grizzlies are the 4th team, and they are going to make it all work.
What do they have that we would want besides picks?
VirginiaKnickFan wrote:phatmanscoop wrote:the only way I'd agree to take on Reggie Jackson is if someone is taking Joakim off our hands
Now you're in Mission Impossible territory.
Reggie Jackson contract is terrible it would stick us in cap hell for the next 3 years...then again with the Grizzlies apparently involved watch us take on Chandler Parson's. 
boomann21 wrote:https://www.si.com/nba/2016/12/29/pistons-reggie-jackson-thunder-andre-drummond-stan-van-gundyThe meeting—which reportedly centered around Jackson’s shot selection—took on the air of an intervention. Frankly, few of Jackson’s offensive possessions over the games leading into the meeting were particularly egregious; there were some ill-advised three-pointers, a handful of too-difficult runners, and possessions where Jackson should have moved the ball along. Yet all of this was pretty characteristic of Jackson’s play as a Piston. Pressing a bit has always been a part of his role in Detroit. It should shock no one to see him pressing still, even after Kentavious Caldwell-Pope and Tobias Harris took on bigger, more creative roles in his absence.
Whether Jackson’s play is actually a problem effectively matters less than the fact that his teammates have identified it as one. In reality, the return of a player like Jackson really only taxes a player of a shot or two per game. Yet those shots can feel different based on a player’s role in creating them, and that feeling plays a role in Detroit’s effort and focus elsewhere. The thought that Jackson’s ball-dominance could hurt the Pistons’ defense might at first seem absurd, but basketball is a game of constant, invisible connection. Tweaking any one part of a team’s ecosystem can have real consequences elsewhere—including the level of investment a team feels when suddenly seeing the ball a lot less.
Do not get Reggie Jackson. He thinks he is equal to or greater than Russel Westbrook. He is a selfish ball player. Stay AWAY!!!
moocow007 wrote:Ryan Anderson = bite in the grown by a Great White shark during a blood frenzy
Evan Turner = gore in the butt hole by an adult male white rhino in heat
Reggie Jackson = ???
magnumt wrote:AllanHoustonFan wrote:SelbyCobra wrote:The insider poster that everyone trusts on the Rockets board has chimed in to say that he believes the Grizzlies are the 4th team, and they are going to make it all work.
What do they have that we would want besides picks?
CLee, KOQ, maybe some youth.
--Mags
Greenie wrote:I'm going to get suspended if Reggie Jackson is traded here.
Hell no Steve. Don't you dare. I rather have Randle.
HarthorneWingo wrote:nykballa2k4 wrote:Blue Ninja wrote:
IT type of move right there. Hope that doesn't happen.
Not only are we going to get Reggie Jackson, but we are going to also manage to cough up a future 1st.
No way Jose
BLACKFEET 2010 wrote:MDA talking about defense LOL.
Saying that's their biggest area of concern
Greenie wrote:Let Melo expire before you do some dumb ****!
Greenie wrote:Let Melo expire before you do some dumb ****!
BLACKFEET 2010 wrote:Greenie wrote:I'm going to get suspended if Reggie Jackson is traded here.
Hell no Steve. Don't you dare. I rather have Randle.
Whoa.
Cuz I know you hate Casson.
phatmanscoop wrote:VirginiaKnickFan wrote:phatmanscoop wrote:the only way I'd agree to take on Reggie Jackson is if someone is taking Joakim off our hands
Now you're in Mission Impossible territory.
Greenie wrote:Let Melo expire before you do some dumb ****!
Greenie wrote:Let Melo expire before you do some dumb ****!