RealGM Top 100 List 2017: #12

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,527
And1: 10,013
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: RealGM Top 100 List 2017: #12 

Post#141 » by penbeast0 » Thu Jul 13, 2017 5:14 pm

wojoaderge wrote:
Doctor MJ wrote:I think anyone championing Rose in this project is focusing far too much on a single award rather than thinking about what Rose contributed to the Bulls.

. . . and yet i'm still gonna vote for him. I'm not understanding the expending of energy on putting down a single voter's vote for a guy who's probably not gonna make it.


It's not a put down, it's engaging a different and potentially interesting point of view. Just think about the other guys who are his competition . . . Nate Archibald's best year was better than Rose's best, he just didn't get an MVP. Walton and Hawkins were considerably better players for their day than Rose was for his, and they did win MVP's. If you think about it and still vote for Derrick Rose, that's just fine.
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 53,803
And1: 22,717
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Cali
     

Re: RealGM Top 100 List 2017: #12 

Post#142 » by Doctor MJ » Thu Jul 13, 2017 5:20 pm

penbeast0 wrote:
Doctor MJ wrote: ...


The thing is that things were weird back then. Hawkins played in the ABL long before the ABA and when he came into the ABA the veteran nature of his game was so clear cut. This was a guy who could play point guar and center with the air game of Baylor and a much better sense of what a good shot was. So I struggle to see him as a bad longevity guy. He only is one if you stick quite literally to NBA/ABA accolades.

This isn't to say that I don't give others a longevity edge over Hawkins, but I don't see his longevity like Walton or Rose.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums


Hawkins may make my top 100, I don't know. I'd have to look seriously at him v. Dandridge/Wilkes/whoever is his competition at whatever point I start thinking about him. And yes, he was a great player for 10 years before making it to the NBA . . . ABL MVP at age 19 (over solid NBA players like Bill Bridges and George Yardley though the ABL wasn't impressive overall) then 7 playground years as the greatest player not in the NBA until his ABA MVP and dominating before his injury in ABA's 1st two seasons, which were well below NBA level at that point.

Trouble is, I don't think we are including any but the NBA/ABA seasons . . . so no Euroleague years for Sabonis and no Bob Kurland or Marques Haynes so I don't see how you can give Hawkins or Sabonis a longevity bonus for years not in the league.


Well Sabonis' fundamental issue is that he primed outside the NBA umbrella. His time spent in the US is basically irrelevant to the project because he was too old to demonstrate his full capabilities.

Hawkins peaked in our purview and proceeded to be an all-star for the next half-decade all the way through his 20s at a time where playing only till your early 30s wasn't that crazy.

Again not saying longevity doesn't hurt Hawkins cause it does, but I don't see his career as utterly broken.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board

Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
User avatar
Winsome Gerbil
RealGM
Posts: 15,021
And1: 13,095
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

Re: RealGM Top 100 List 2017: #12 

Post#143 » by Winsome Gerbil » Thu Jul 13, 2017 5:46 pm

trex_8063 wrote:Thru post #127 (am then turning it over to you, penbeast0, I'll be back Sunday evening):

Garnett - 6
Karl Malone - 5
Mikan - 2
West - 1
Oscar - 1
Erving - 1
Moses Malone - 1


Still SMH at the Garnett thing.

Was just one of the gang of great players in his own era. Had no separation from Duncan/Kobe/Dirk/Shaq during that era. No superior playoffs! stats to magically fix all shortcomings. Only got a title because he got bounced onto a superteam later in his career, and promptly went straight into decline as soon as he got it. He's one of the all timers, but not one of THESE all timers. Not a truly legendary, defining figure. Saying, well I was great at everything...except being your goto guy, is nearly as problematic as Dirk saying that's really all I was great at. I think KG and Admiral should be in a tight neighborhood facing off with Dirk for a radically different style of candidate.
BasketballFan7
Analyst
Posts: 3,668
And1: 2,344
Joined: Mar 11, 2015
   

Re: RealGM Top 100 List 2017: #12 

Post#144 » by BasketballFan7 » Thu Jul 13, 2017 5:57 pm

Are there any other relevant data that may compel me to make Malone my alternate ahead of Dirk? I currently have the two of them side by side in my ranking.
FGA Restricted All-Time Draft

In My Hood, The Bullies Get Bullied
PG: 2013 Mike Conley, 1998 Greg Anthony
SG: 2005 Manu Ginobili, 2015 Khris Middleton
SF: 1991 Scottie Pippen
PF: 1986 Larry Bird, 1996 Dennis Rodman
C: 1999 Alonzo Mourning
therealbig3
RealGM
Posts: 29,595
And1: 16,132
Joined: Jul 31, 2010

Re: RealGM Top 100 List 2017: #12 

Post#145 » by therealbig3 » Thu Jul 13, 2017 6:06 pm

Winsome Gerbil wrote:
trex_8063 wrote:Thru post #127 (am then turning it over to you, penbeast0, I'll be back Sunday evening):

Garnett - 6
Karl Malone - 5
Mikan - 2
West - 1
Oscar - 1
Erving - 1
Moses Malone - 1


Still SMH at the Garnett thing.

Was just one of the gang of great players in his own era. Had no separation from Duncan/Kobe/Dirk/Shaq during that era. No superior playoffs! stats to magically fix all shortcomings. Only got a title because he got bounced onto a superteam later in his career, and promptly went straight into decline as soon as he got it. He's one of the all timers, but not one of THESE all timers. Not a truly legendary, defining figure. Saying, well I was great at everything...except being your goto guy, is nearly as problematic as Dirk saying that's really all I was great at. I think KG and Admiral should be in a tight neighborhood facing off with Dirk for a radically different style of candidate.


Malone wasn't great as your go to guy either, and KG was considerably better at everything else. Malone has him beat in longevity but there's something to be said about simply being a better player prime vs prime. Especially since he had a long prime himself.
Hornet Mania
General Manager
Posts: 9,098
And1: 8,592
Joined: Jul 05, 2014
Location: Dornbirn, Austria
     

Re: RealGM Top 100 List 2017: #12 

Post#146 » by Hornet Mania » Thu Jul 13, 2017 6:06 pm

My votes go to:

12. Oscar Robertson
2nd vote: Julius Erving

Robertson was an all-in-one floor general that was well ahead of his time, the best "old-school" guard imo over West and Baylor.

Dr. J also was part of a generation of high-flyers (along with David Thompson and others) who truly made basketball a game played above the rim by elite athletes. I think his lack of elite ball handling has been overstated, he was fine for his era and had he been given the latitude to basically carry the ball like today's players get he could get by. An extremely graceful player, one of the most aesthetically-pleasing ever. If you go on Youtube and watch the old Lakers/Sixers Finals games (80 and 82 especially) Brent Musburger is practically beside himself with how awesome "The Doctor" was. His impact and popularity have been mostly forgotten, but he was a generational star in every way.
Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 53,803
And1: 22,717
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Cali
     

Re: RealGM Top 100 List 2017: #12 

Post#147 » by Doctor MJ » Thu Jul 13, 2017 6:12 pm

Winsome Gerbil wrote:
trex_8063 wrote:Thru post #127 (am then turning it over to you, penbeast0, I'll be back Sunday evening):

Garnett - 6
Karl Malone - 5
Mikan - 2
West - 1
Oscar - 1
Erving - 1
Moses Malone - 1


Still SMH at the Garnett thing.

Was just one of the gang of great players in his own era. Had no separation from Duncan/Kobe/Dirk/Shaq during that era. No superior playoffs! stats to magically fix all shortcomings. Only got a title because he got bounced onto a superteam later in his career, and promptly went straight into decline as soon as he got it. He's one of the all timers, but not one of THESE all timers. Not a truly legendary, defining figure. Saying, well I was great at everything...except being your goto guy, is nearly as problematic as Dirk saying that's really all I was great at. I think KG and Admiral should be in a tight neighborhood facing off with Dirk for a radically different style of candidate.


Had no separation from...a bunch of guys already voted in.

Yes I can see how it would be confusing for you that a peer of others voted in would potentially be the next guy to be voted in.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board

Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
User avatar
wojoaderge
Analyst
Posts: 3,102
And1: 1,689
Joined: Jul 27, 2015

Re: RealGM Top 100 List 2017: #12 

Post#148 » by wojoaderge » Thu Jul 13, 2017 6:22 pm

penbeast0 wrote:It's not a put down, it's engaging a different and potentially interesting point of view. Just think about the other guys who are his competition . . . Nate Archibald's best year was better than Rose's best, he just didn't get an MVP. Walton and Hawkins were considerably better players for their day than Rose was for his, and they did win MVP's. If you think about it and still vote for Derrick Rose, that's just fine.

Thanks to you, i'm a bit more open to Hawkins. I also agree with "Too big! Too strong! Too fast! Too good!"
"Coach, why don't you just relax? We're not good enough to beat the Lakers. We've had a great year, why don't you just relax and cool down?"
mdonnelly1989
Head Coach
Posts: 6,518
And1: 1,837
Joined: Aug 11, 2014
       

Re: RealGM Top 100 List 2017: #12 

Post#149 » by mdonnelly1989 » Thu Jul 13, 2017 6:48 pm

drza wrote:I'll be out of internet access for the entirety of tomorrow, and I've got to get up early, so I'm voting now. I hope it's reasonable for me to not write very much here as justification.

Vote: Kevin Garnett


I suppose we can let you off of the hook. Just remember this!
mdonnelly1989
Head Coach
Posts: 6,518
And1: 1,837
Joined: Aug 11, 2014
       

Re: RE: Re: RealGM Top 100 List 2017: #12 

Post#150 » by mdonnelly1989 » Thu Jul 13, 2017 6:49 pm

ardee wrote:
Pablo Novi wrote:
mdonnelly1989 wrote:
I applaud you on your knowledge of those ERA's. Basically the way you explained Dr. J sounds identical to MJ.

Dr. J has been known quite often to be the original MJ from what I've heard as well.

You have shined a new light on me with Dr. J and I suppose he was better than his stats would suggest relative to Jerry West and Oscar because as 27 year that and what I've heard/read are the only things that I can go on.

Thanx for the compliments.
Before Dr J, the "original" creator of hangtime was Elgin Baylor - although seemingly (as I remember things) a lot of his hanging didn't end in dunks as much as in late-shot flip-ins - he was noted for unusually strong wrists - so he could get those shots off and in really late. He "invented" all kinds of moves and shots approaching the rim.

btw, my All-Time FAVORITE players were/are Jerry West & Elgin Baylor - who are why I've been a life-time (58 years) Lakers fan.

Back then, it was a horribly nasty racist age - as a young man, raised in the home of an exceptionally TOLERANT dad; the nastiness just shocked the bleep out of me. (I went to high school outside of Boston and got to attend a number of C's games at the Gaaaden - that THEIR fans would boo the great Bill Russell (screaming out the "N" word at him and the other C's black players) turned me into a non-Celtics fan for life.

During highschool, I had almost "negative" "leaping" ability; so at 5'8" I was never gonna make the varsity team (although I played for several hours EVERY day. I'd go with the team to all our away games. At EVERY away game there'd be:
TWO sets of cheerleaders, leading two SEPARATE sets of fans, seated in two SEPARATE seating sections.

When a black player scored, the black cheerleaders would rise and lead the black fans. Meanwhile, the white cheerleaders and fans remained silent (if not scowling). Then, when a white player scored; it'd be the exact same thing but in reverse.

My dad would take our family some 2-4 times a year on trips into the Deep South. He'd take me off to the side before EVERY trip (as his eldest son); and he'd say to me, "Son, you know the routine; but here we go again. You will see stuff that will enrage the bleep out of you, scandalize you. But you will say NOTHING and do NOTHING - or you'll get us all killed. So, you either agree or you're not going with us.

And what we saw was just horrible. Gang bangs of 5 or more cowards on one or two black guys. Segregation EVERYWHERE.

And perhaps the worst, was what I called the "3 Bathroom 'System'": one for "men"; one for "women" and one labeled "Colored" - which was an absolute abomination: no running water, no electricity, never cleaned. These were as far removed into the far corner of the lot as was possible because of the stench and the huge black swarm of flies.

I had pretty much given up hope that the two races would ever get along.

I had had the great fortune to have seen the Harlem Globetrotters LIVE a number of times during the 1959-60 season; so I "experienced" their incredible Point Guard, Wilt Chamberlain. I "followed" him into the NBA (which was not nearly the draw the 'Trotters were back then.

And then, a couple of years later, I experienced West-Baylor. (There was also "O"-Jerry Lucas; but they were not equals on the court in terms of ability - so those two didn't move me nearly as much as did Jerry & Elgin). It was the virtual equality of skills of Mr. Inside and Mr. Outside, their TEAM-work, their artistry, their "bi-racial" harmony that pulled me out of my youthful "desperation" of thinking things would never change.

Those two caused me to decide to dedicate ALL my free time for the rest of my life to heavy-duty peace-justice activism.

So that's both why I've been a Lakers fan ever since West came into the League and joined Baylor; and why, they are really the only two players for whom I have a personal bias in favor of.

Which makes it not easy for me to argue ANYONE over either of them - even Dr J; but he really was a phenom.

Mind if I ask how old you are?

Sent from my SM-J700F using RealGM mobile app


If I had to guess he's probably in his mid to late 60's.
User avatar
Winsome Gerbil
RealGM
Posts: 15,021
And1: 13,095
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

Re: RealGM Top 100 List 2017: #12 

Post#151 » by Winsome Gerbil » Thu Jul 13, 2017 6:57 pm

Doctor MJ wrote:
Had no separation from...a bunch of guys already voted in.



I keep wondering as to when it will strike people as a tad odd that amazingly nearly 50% of the Top 12 NBA players of all time apparently played within the last 5 years. And I can assume that the Dirk thing will start up soon too, and maybe we can get a few spare votes for Wade, CP3, Curry and KD and take a run at half of the Top 20.
User avatar
wojoaderge
Analyst
Posts: 3,102
And1: 1,689
Joined: Jul 27, 2015

Re: RealGM Top 100 List 2017: #12 

Post#152 » by wojoaderge » Thu Jul 13, 2017 7:04 pm

Winsome Gerbil wrote:
Doctor MJ wrote:
Had no separation from...a bunch of guys already voted in.



I keep wondering as to when it will strike people as a tad odd that amazingly nearly 50% of the Top 12 NBA players of all time apparently played within the last 5 years. And I can assume that the Dirk thing will start up soon too, and maybe we can get a few spare votes for Wade, CP3, Curry and KD and take a run at half of the Top 20.

I think it's 33%. But I agree
"Coach, why don't you just relax? We're not good enough to beat the Lakers. We've had a great year, why don't you just relax and cool down?"
User avatar
wojoaderge
Analyst
Posts: 3,102
And1: 1,689
Joined: Jul 27, 2015

Re: RealGM Top 100 List 2017: #12 

Post#153 » by wojoaderge » Thu Jul 13, 2017 7:04 pm

Winsome Gerbil wrote:
Doctor MJ wrote:
Had no separation from...a bunch of guys already voted in.



I keep wondering as to when it will strike people as a tad odd that amazingly nearly 50% of the Top 12 NBA players of all time apparently played within the last 5 years. And I can assume that the Dirk thing will start up soon too, and maybe we can get a few spare votes for Wade, CP3, Curry and KD and take a run at half of the Top 20.

I think it's 33%. But I agree with the sentiment
"Coach, why don't you just relax? We're not good enough to beat the Lakers. We've had a great year, why don't you just relax and cool down?"
User avatar
Winsome Gerbil
RealGM
Posts: 15,021
And1: 13,095
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

Re: RealGM Top 100 List 2017: #12 

Post#154 » by Winsome Gerbil » Thu Jul 13, 2017 7:08 pm

wojoaderge wrote:
Winsome Gerbil wrote:
Doctor MJ wrote:
Had no separation from...a bunch of guys already voted in.



I keep wondering as to when it will strike people as a tad odd that amazingly nearly 50% of the Top 12 NBA players of all time apparently played within the last 5 years. And I can assume that the Dirk thing will start up soon too, and maybe we can get a few spare votes for Wade, CP3, Curry and KD and take a run at half of the Top 20.

I think it's 33%. But I agree


I was counting KG as a done deal, but yes, math was off.
User avatar
GeorgeMarcus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 18,870
And1: 24,025
Joined: Jun 17, 2006
     

Re: RealGM Top 100 List 2017: #12 

Post#155 » by GeorgeMarcus » Thu Jul 13, 2017 7:14 pm

Is this where I express my disappointment on Wilt being criminally underrated? #6 is mind-boggling to me.
The Legend of George Marcus

"Where I'm from, bullies get bullied." - Zach Randolph
User avatar
RCM88x
RealGM
Posts: 15,238
And1: 19,169
Joined: May 31, 2015
Location: Lebron Ball
     

Re: RealGM Top 100 List 2017: #12 

Post#156 » by RCM88x » Thu Jul 13, 2017 7:26 pm

Vote: Jerry West

Don't have time to provide much of an explanation here (again) but:

Jerry is most certainly the unluckiest star in NBA history, always going up against the Celtics or dealing with injuries and poor performances by his teammates despite often heroic performances by himself. To me, I think a lot of the argument against West and for Russell over the years has simply been titles... which by and large are often more a function of supporting cast than actual performance by the star player, especially when West usually played at an elite level and far exceeded what should have been asked of him to win.

He ranks 11th in RS WS/48 and a very impressive 7th in PS WS/48. He was also extremely efficient for his time and position, posting a career TS% of .55 in the RS and .541 in the PS, and also ranks in the top 25 all time for both RS and Playoff PER, a feat rare among perimeter players of his era.

To me, Jerry was the guy that made LA the great team they were in the late 60s and early 70s, Wilt was great still, but often times was not as productive as his younger self and at times was not able to lead teams like he once did. Jerry was the constant, reliable performer for that team and despite his efforts more often than not came up short due to simply playing against better team to little fault of his own.

2nd Vote: Kevin Garnett
Image

LookToShoot wrote:Melo is the only player that makes the Rockets watchable for the basketball purists. Otherwise it would just be three point shots and pick n roll.
JoeMalburg
Pro Prospect
Posts: 885
And1: 520
Joined: May 23, 2015
     

Re: RealGM Top 100 List 2017: #12 

Post#157 » by JoeMalburg » Thu Jul 13, 2017 7:36 pm

I hate Karl Malone, but there is something to be said for what is pretty much, short of a ring, the cleanest resume remaining.

Here are his combined regular season PER, WS, VORP, BPM and ( Ortg -Drtg x .1) and his rank among NBA players.

1988 - 37.6, 15th
1989 - 53.8, 4th
1990 - 53.8, 5th
1991 - 54.1, 5th
1992 - 52.9, 4th
1993 - 59.5, 3rd
1994 - 50.6, 4th
1995 - 52.2, 3rd
1996 - 57.3, 3rd
1997 - 63.7, 1st
1998 - 59.8, 1st
1999 - 47.7, 2nd
2000 - 59.4, 2nd
2001 - 50.7, 3rd
2002 - 39.6, 15th

13 consecutive years in the top five is pretty amazing. Especially considering his prime seasons overlap the careers of 7 of the 11 players ranked ahead of him.
Purch
Veteran
Posts: 2,820
And1: 2,145
Joined: May 25, 2009

Re: RealGM Top 100 List 2017: #12 

Post#158 » by Purch » Thu Jul 13, 2017 7:36 pm

Karl Malone

His averages for 16 years between 1986-2003

22/10/2
28/12/2
29/11/3
31/11/3
29/12/3
28/11/3
27/11/4
25/12/4
27/11/4
26/10/4
27/10/4
27/10/5
24/9/4

26/10/4
23/8/5
22/9/4
21/8/5


In the 11 straight bolded seasons from 1989-1999 he was all nba 1st team.

If you want to talk about player durability look no further than Karl Malone.

In 17 out of his 19 seasons he played 80 or more games
For comparison Kevin Garnett has only played 80 games 8 out of the 19 years of his career
Not only that but Malone accomplished this whiles playing 2,624 more playoff minutes than Garnett in his career


He's the oldest player in Nba history to win Mvp at age 35.


His longevity in the playoffs is just as impressive

22/8/1
20/10/1
30/12/2
31/16/1
25/10/2
30/13/3
29/11/3
24/10/2
27/12/3
30/13/4
27/10/4
26/11/3
26/10/3
22/11/5
27/9/3
28/9/3
20/8/5
20/7/4

That's an 18 year span in the post season

So if you guys are criticizing Magic and Bird for their durability and longevity, that same focus should be propelling Malone up in these rankings.


Also for you guys who put great value in the "player efficency stat" or "PER"rating, Malone's consistency in that statistic speaks for itself.

For 13 seasons from 1988-2001 Karl Malone was top 5 in "PER" in a league that included extremely efficient players like ; David Robinson, Shaq, Barkley, Ewing, Hakeem and Jordan all in their prime


1988-1989 - #5 In PER (24.4)
1989-1990- #2 In PER (27.2)
1990-1991- #5 In Per (24.8)
1991-1992- #3 in PER (25.4)
1992-1993- #3 in PER (26.2)
1993-1994- #5 in PER (22.9)
1994-1995- #5 In Per (25.1)
1995-1996- #4 in PER (26.0)
1996-1997- #1 in Per (28.9)
1997-1998- #2 in Per (27.9)
1998-1999- #2 in Per (25.6)
1999-2000- #2 in PER (27.1)
2000-2001- #4 In Per (24.7)

That shows ridiculous efficiency over such a long period of time. That very few can match

Also for you guys who seem to value win shares as a legitimate stat.. Malone was consistently elite in that as well


1988-1989 - #5 in Win Shares (15.2)
1989-1990- #4 in Win Shares (15.9)
1990-1991- #3 in Win Shares (15.5)
1991-1992- #2 in Win Shares (15.1)
1992-1993- #3 in Win Shares (15.4)
1993-1994- #4 In Win Shares (13.4)
1994-1995- #4 in Win Shares (13.8)
1995-1996- #3 in Win Shares (15.1)
1996-1997- #2 in Win Shares (16.7)
1997-1998- #1 in Win Shares (16.4)
1998-1999- #1 in Win Shares (9.6)
1999-2000- #2 in Win Shares (15.3)
2000-2001- #5 in Win Shares (13.1)

That again is 13 straight years of being top 5 in the league in Win Shares.

In Offensive win Shares he's 6th all time trailing only Jordan, Oscar, Kareem, Wilt and Stockton.

In Defensive win shares he's a 6th all time (Ahead of Garnett) only trailing Russell, Duncan,Kareem , Hakeem and Wilt

For his career he only trails Wilt Chamberlin and Kareem in total win shares, he's 3rd all time.

So for a 13 year span from age 24-37 Malone was top 5 in PER and WIN Shares every single year, whiles being top 5 in the league in Points per game every single one of those years


Comparing the longevity of Karl Malone and Garnett

Seasons played

Malone-19
Garnett-21

Seasons played averaging 30+ Minutes

Malone-19
Garnett-15

Seasons averaging 20+ PPG

Malone-17
Garnett-9

Post Seasons averaging 20+ PPG

Malone-18
Garnett-5


All Nba 1st teams

Malone-11
Garnett-4

Seasons shooting 50%TS or more

Malone-19
Garnett-17

Seasons with an offensive rating of 100+ or more

Malone-18
Garnett-20

Seasons playing 80 or more games

Malone- 17
Garnett-8

Seasons missing 20+ games

Garnett-6
Malone-2

Seasons being Top 5 in WIN SHARES

Malone-13
Garnett-4

Seasons being Top 5 in PER

Malone-13
Garnett-5

Seasons being Top 5 in value over replacement player

Malone-10
Garnett-7
Image
JoeMalburg
Pro Prospect
Posts: 885
And1: 520
Joined: May 23, 2015
     

Real Housewives of Cabin Creek 

Post#159 » by JoeMalburg » Thu Jul 13, 2017 7:41 pm

RCM88x wrote:Vote: Jerry West

Don't have time to provide much of an explanation here (again) but:

Jerry is most certainly the unluckiest star in NBA history, always going up against the Celtics or dealing with injuries and poor performances by his teammates despite often heroic performances by himself. To me, I think a lot of the argument against West and for Russell over the years has simply been titles... which by and large are often more a function of supporting cast than actual performance by the star player, especially when West usually played at an elite level and far exceeded what should have been asked of him to win.

He ranks 11th in RS WS/48 and a very impressive 7th in PS WS/48. He was also extremely efficient for his time and position, posting a career TS% of .55 in the RS and .541 in the PS, and also ranks in the top 25 all time for both RS and Playoff PER, a feat rare among perimeter players of his era.

To me, Jerry was the guy that made LA the great team they were in the late 60s and early 70s, Wilt was great still, but often times was not as productive as his younger self and at times was not able to lead teams like he once did. Jerry was the constant, reliable performer for that team and despite his efforts more often than not came up short due to simply playing against better team to little fault of his own.

2nd Vote: Kevin Garnett


Curious if you or anyone else would have West in the top ten if...

A) Selvy's game seven shot falls in regulation vs. the Celtics in '62 and West gets another ring.

B) The Lakers don't collapse in the second half of game seven in 1969 and West gets another ring.

C) Willis Reed doesn't hit those two early jumpers and propel the Knicks past a superior Lakers team in game seven of the 1970 Finals and West gets another ring.


And also, what if all three go Jerrys way? Is he viewed like Magic?

I think West would be in my top six all-time if those three games turned out different and everything else stayed the same.
ElGee
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,041
And1: 1,208
Joined: Mar 08, 2010
Contact:

Re: RealGM Top 100 List 2017: #12 

Post#160 » by ElGee » Thu Jul 13, 2017 7:44 pm

Winsome Gerbil wrote:
trex_8063 wrote:Thru post #127 (am then turning it over to you, penbeast0, I'll be back Sunday evening):

Garnett - 6
Karl Malone - 5
Mikan - 2
West - 1
Oscar - 1
Erving - 1
Moses Malone - 1


Still SMH at the Garnett thing.

Was just one of the gang of great players in his own era. Had no separation from Duncan/Kobe/Dirk/Shaq during that era. No superior playoffs! stats to magically fix all shortcomings. Only got a title because he got bounced onto a superteam later in his career, and promptly went straight into decline as soon as he got it. He's one of the all timers, but not one of THESE all timers. Not a truly legendary, defining figure. Saying, well I was great at everything...except being your goto guy, is nearly as problematic as Dirk saying that's really all I was great at. I think KG and Admiral should be in a tight neighborhood facing off with Dirk for a radically different style of candidate.


Well, are you open to the possibility that being the "goto guy" isn't as important as you think it is?

    If no, you will always SYH and people with KG in their top 10 will look pretty :crazy: to you.
    If yes, then what part of the evidence isn't compelling to you?
Check out and discuss my book, now on Kindle! http://www.backpicks.com/thinking-basketball/

Return to Player Comparisons