RealGM Top 100 List 2017: #12

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

Purch
Veteran
Posts: 2,820
And1: 2,145
Joined: May 25, 2009

Re: RealGM Top 100 List 2017: #12 

Post#161 » by Purch » Thu Jul 13, 2017 7:50 pm

SuperDario wrote:Is this where I express my disappointment on Wilt being criminally underrated? #6 is mind-boggling to me.

Actually, Wilt's been getting more respect in recent years. Trust me, when I first joined this forum Wilt was the most criticized player, and you would have sworn he was ready to drop out the top 10.
Image
User avatar
RCM88x
RealGM
Posts: 15,237
And1: 19,168
Joined: May 31, 2015
Location: Lebron Ball
     

Re: Real Housewives of Cabin Creek 

Post#162 » by RCM88x » Thu Jul 13, 2017 8:06 pm

JoeMalburg wrote:
RCM88x wrote:Vote: Jerry West

Don't have time to provide much of an explanation here (again) but:

Jerry is most certainly the unluckiest star in NBA history, always going up against the Celtics or dealing with injuries and poor performances by his teammates despite often heroic performances by himself. To me, I think a lot of the argument against West and for Russell over the years has simply been titles... which by and large are often more a function of supporting cast than actual performance by the star player, especially when West usually played at an elite level and far exceeded what should have been asked of him to win.

He ranks 11th in RS WS/48 and a very impressive 7th in PS WS/48. He was also extremely efficient for his time and position, posting a career TS% of .55 in the RS and .541 in the PS, and also ranks in the top 25 all time for both RS and Playoff PER, a feat rare among perimeter players of his era.

To me, Jerry was the guy that made LA the great team they were in the late 60s and early 70s, Wilt was great still, but often times was not as productive as his younger self and at times was not able to lead teams like he once did. Jerry was the constant, reliable performer for that team and despite his efforts more often than not came up short due to simply playing against better team to little fault of his own.

2nd Vote: Kevin Garnett


Curious if you or anyone else would have West in the top ten if...

A) Selvy's game seven shot falls in regulation vs. the Celtics in '62 and West gets another ring.

B) The Lakers don't collapse in the second half of game seven in 1969 and West gets another ring.

C) Willis Reed doesn't hit those two early jumpers and propel the Knicks past a superior Lakers team in game seven of the 1970 Finals and West gets another ring.


And also, what if all three go Jerrys way? Is he viewed like Magic?

I think West would be in my top six all-time if those three games turned out different and everything else stayed the same.


This is a tough question because it involves things completely out of West's control yet directly impacted the way he was perceived at the time and after his career.

I don't know if I'd have him in my top 6, probably would be 9th, moving ahead of Bird and Hakeem... but its so hard to say. I think it would more depend on how his career would be changed if those things turned out differently, if he would still be the same player or a better player etc... Perhaps if LA wins over Boston in '62 they are the dynasty of the 60s and not Boston... perhaps if he wins in '69 they don't make it back in 70. Its just to hard to say with confidence if my perception would be different, or rather how it would be changed.

But I definitely do think that most fans don't appreciate him because he only had one ring. To me there is very little separation between Russell, Wilt, West, and Oscar... with the major differences being how long they played at an ATG level and how they played in crucial games (and how often they got into those games of course).
Image

LookToShoot wrote:Melo is the only player that makes the Rockets watchable for the basketball purists. Otherwise it would just be three point shots and pick n roll.
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,513
And1: 10,004
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: RealGM Top 100 List 2017: #12 

Post#163 » by penbeast0 » Thu Jul 13, 2017 9:37 pm

Alright, calling it here.

Using Trex's post as a starting place and looking at votes with argument past that, it's:

Kevin Garnett 6
Karl Malone 5
Jerry West 3
Oscar Robertson 2
George Mikan 2
Julius Erving 1
Moses Malone 1

Eliminating Julius and Moses, that adds one vote for Karl Malone (6) and one for Dirk
Eliminating Oscar and George, that adds 2 votes for West (4) plus one each for Erving and Moses
Eliminating West, that adds 2 votes for Kevin Garnett (6) plus one for Oscar

The #12 spot goes to Kevin Garnett
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
Pablo Novi
Senior
Posts: 683
And1: 233
Joined: Dec 11, 2015
Location: Mexico City, Mexico
Contact:
   

Re: RE: Re: RealGM Top 100 List 2017: #12 

Post#164 » by Pablo Novi » Fri Jul 14, 2017 1:33 am

ardee wrote:
Pablo Novi wrote:
mdonnelly1989 wrote:
I applaud you on your knowledge of those ERA's. Basically the way you explained Dr. J sounds identical to MJ.

Dr. J has been known quite often to be the original MJ from what I've heard as well.

You have shined a new light on me with Dr. J and I suppose he was better than his stats would suggest relative to Jerry West and Oscar because as 27 year that and what I've heard/read are the only things that I can go on.

Thanx for the compliments.
Before Dr J, the "original" creator of hangtime was Elgin Baylor - although seemingly (as I remember things) a lot of his hanging didn't end in dunks as much as in late-shot flip-ins - he was noted for unusually strong wrists - so he could get those shots off and in really late. He "invented" all kinds of moves and shots approaching the rim.

btw, my All-Time FAVORITE players were/are Jerry West & Elgin Baylor - who are why I've been a life-time (58 years) Lakers fan.

Back then, it was a horribly nasty racist age - as a young man, raised in the home of an exceptionally TOLERANT dad; the nastiness just shocked the bleep out of me. (I went to high school outside of Boston and got to attend a number of C's games at the Gaaaden - that THEIR fans would boo the great Bill Russell (screaming out the "N" word at him and the other C's black players) turned me into a non-Celtics fan for life.

During highschool, I had almost "negative" "leaping" ability; so at 5'8" I was never gonna make the varsity team (although I played for several hours EVERY day. I'd go with the team to all our away games. At EVERY away game there'd be:
TWO sets of cheerleaders, leading two SEPARATE sets of fans, seated in two SEPARATE seating sections.

When a black player scored, the black cheerleaders would rise and lead the black fans. Meanwhile, the white cheerleaders and fans remained silent (if not scowling). Then, when a white player scored; it'd be the exact same thing but in reverse.

My dad would take our family some 2-4 times a year on trips into the Deep South. He'd take me off to the side before EVERY trip (as his eldest son); and he'd say to me, "Son, you know the routine; but here we go again. You will see stuff that will enrage the bleep out of you, scandalize you. But you will say NOTHING and do NOTHING - or you'll get us all killed. So, you either agree or you're not going with us.

And what we saw was just horrible. Gang bangs of 5 or more cowards on one or two black guys. Segregation EVERYWHERE.

And perhaps the worst, was what I called the "3 Bathroom 'System'": one for "men"; one for "women" and one labeled "Colored" - which was an absolute abomination: no running water, no electricity, never cleaned. These were as far removed into the far corner of the lot as was possible because of the stench and the huge black swarm of flies.

I had pretty much given up hope that the two races would ever get along.

I had had the great fortune to have seen the Harlem Globetrotters LIVE a number of times during the 1959-60 season; so I "experienced" their incredible Point Guard, Wilt Chamberlain. I "followed" him into the NBA (which was not nearly the draw the 'Trotters were back then.

And then, a couple of years later, I experienced West-Baylor. (There was also "O"-Jerry Lucas; but they were not equals on the court in terms of ability - so those two didn't move me nearly as much as did Jerry & Elgin). It was the virtual equality of skills of Mr. Inside and Mr. Outside, their TEAM-work, their artistry, their "bi-racial" harmony that pulled me out of my youthful "desperation" of thinking things would never change.

Those two caused me to decide to dedicate ALL my free time for the rest of my life to heavy-duty peace-justice activism.

So that's both why I've been a Lakers fan ever since West came into the League and joined Baylor; and why, they are really the only two players for whom I have a personal bias in favor of.

Which makes it not easy for me to argue ANYONE over either of them - even Dr J; but he really was a phenom.

Mind if I ask how old you are?

Sent from my SM-J700F using RealGM mobile app

I don't mind, go ahead and ask!
lol
67
mdonnelly1989
Head Coach
Posts: 6,514
And1: 1,837
Joined: Aug 11, 2014
       

Re: RealGM Top 100 List 2017: #12 

Post#165 » by mdonnelly1989 » Fri Jul 14, 2017 1:37 am

Pablo Novi wrote:
mdonnelly1989 wrote:
Pablo Novi wrote:It's just such a pity that Dr J (and the ABA) played to such small audiences (and, much worse) had minuscule TV coverage.

There was nothing on offense that Dr J wasn't the best ever up to that point in history, imo. His handle was just phenomenal.
Picture squeezing between two defenders with no room to spare; yet dribbling between his legs to do so.

The "world would go silent and gawky-eyed" when it was time for him to go iso. No defender had a chance to stop him. Entire teams couldn't stop his drives to the basket - where he often made spectacularly delicious dunks; or truly unbelievable moves.

Except for one dunk by Elgin Baylor over Wilt (where he floated across the key, Wilt came in to squash his shot - and Elgin flipped the ball to his other hand and hammered it home); ALL my All-Time favorite dunks are Dr J's - he was that flashy, that skilled, that athletic, that gifted, that ... aesthetically pleasing an artist.

Against the definitely favored Nuggets in the last ABA Finals, led on defense by arguably THE best defender in either League in Bobby Jones, Dr J just went off, iirc, 37.7 ppg (and played killed D to boot).


I applaud you on your knowledge of those ERA's. Basically the way you explained Dr. J sounds identical to MJ.

Dr. J has been known quite often to be the original MJ from what I've heard as well.

You have shined a new light on me with Dr. J and I suppose he was better than his stats would suggest relative to Jerry West and Oscar because as 27 year that and what I've heard/read are the only things that I can go on.

Thanx for the compliments.
Before Dr J, the "original" creator of hangtime was Elgin Baylor - although seemingly (as I remember things) a lot of his hanging didn't end in dunks as much as in late-shot flip-ins - he was noted for unusually strong wrists - so he could get those shots off and in really late. He "invented" all kinds of moves and shots approaching the rim.

btw, my All-Time FAVORITE players were/are Jerry West & Elgin Baylor - who are why I've been a life-time (58 years) Lakers fan.

Back then, it was a horribly nasty racist age - as a young man, raised in the home of an exceptionally TOLERANT dad; the nastiness just shocked the bleep out of me. (I went to high school outside of Boston and got to attend a number of C's games at the Gaaaden - that THEIR fans would boo the great Bill Russell (screaming out the "N" word at him and the other C's black players) turned me into a non-Celtics fan for life.

During highschool, I had almost "negative" "leaping" ability; so at 5'8" I was never gonna make the varsity team (although I played for several hours EVERY day. I'd go with the team to all our away games. At EVERY away game there'd be:
TWO sets of cheerleaders, leading two SEPARATE sets of fans, seated in two SEPARATE seating sections.

When a black player scored, the black cheerleaders would rise and lead the black fans. Meanwhile, the white cheerleaders and fans remained silent (if not scowling). Then, when a white player scored; it'd be the exact same thing but in reverse.

My dad would take our family some 2-4 times a year on trips into the Deep South. He'd take me off to the side before EVERY trip (as his eldest son); and he'd say to me, "Son, you know the routine; but here we go again. You will see stuff that will enrage the bleep out of you, scandalize you. But you will say NOTHING and do NOTHING - or you'll get us all killed. So, you either agree or you're not going with us.

And what we saw was just horrible. Gang bangs of 5 or more cowards on one or two black guys. Segregation EVERYWHERE.

And perhaps the worst, was what I called the "3 Bathroom 'System'": one for "men"; one for "women" and one labeled "Colored" - which was an absolute abomination: no running water, no electricity, never cleaned. These were as far removed into the far corner of the lot as was possible because of the stench and the huge black swarm of flies.

I had pretty much given up hope that the two races would ever get along.

I had had the great fortune to have seen the Harlem Globetrotters LIVE a number of times during the 1959-60 season; so I "experienced" their incredible Point Guard, Wilt Chamberlain. I "followed" him into the NBA (which was not nearly the draw the 'Trotters were back then.

And then, a couple of years later, I experienced West-Baylor. (There was also "O"-Jerry Lucas; but they were not equals on the court in terms of ability - so those two didn't move me nearly as much as did Jerry & Elgin). It was the virtual equality of skills of Mr. Inside and Mr. Outside, their TEAM-work, their artistry, their "bi-racial" harmony that pulled me out of my youthful "desperation" of thinking things would never change.

Those two caused me to decide to dedicate ALL my free time for the rest of my life to heavy-duty peace-justice activism.

So that's both why I've been a Lakers fan ever since West came into the League and joined Baylor; and why, they are really the only two players for whom I have a personal bias in favor of.

Which makes it not easy for me to argue ANYONE over either of them - even Dr J; but he really was a phenom.



Wow! Thanks for that story was really inspiring actually.I'm white and racism has def had it's mark throughout my family however, it never completely dominated my mind growing up as I began having african american friends at a very young age.

I feel racism if you look at where it was back in the 50's and 60's is not even close to where it is now. I know that the media will magnify racism stories but in terms of the overall population. You gave me a great story I may tell in an article. My second line of passion aside from sports is spirituality and I want to shed this light to people and show where we currently are. In fact, because it's much less racist I think race's as a whole are going to transform throughout the next few generations and beyond.

I'm going to DM you and ask you some questions about those times.
Pablo Novi
Senior
Posts: 683
And1: 233
Joined: Dec 11, 2015
Location: Mexico City, Mexico
Contact:
   

Re: RealGM Top 100 List 2017: #12 

Post#166 » by Pablo Novi » Fri Jul 14, 2017 3:35 am

SuperDario wrote:Is this where I express my disappointment on Wilt being criminally underrated? #6 is mind-boggling to me.

I've just gotten (and responded to) a PM from a fellow poster in this thread. He / she(?) asked me three questions (bolded below). Seeing as it was heavily about Wilt; this seems to me to be a good-enough "opportunity" to post it here. ...
-----
Thanx a lot for the compliments. You humble me.

Some thoughts:
In general, I've been weirdly-unique all my life (dad had a 190 IQ; and his relatively unique tolerance - that combo just made me different. It took me til my teen years to finally realize that nobody else was like me - and that that was the reason why I often found myself in unusual inter-personal relationships. I just didn't see the ideological-philosophical barriers that stopped others from examining questions as deeply. I don't see that I merit any credit - seeing as I mostly inherited this stuff and/or was raised that way.

His "genius" was a kind of all-purpose one - he was good at tons of stuff; and later in life worked high up in the Nixon administration; often purposed with either setting up brand new departments (like NOAA) or being head arbitrator in union-vs-industry negotiations.

My "genius" was/is more "localized". By age 8, my math ability became evident - to try to solve a math problem I ran across in a sports magazine. Somehow, I took one look at their humongous number (of the odds against a perfect bridge hand happening - somehow I "knew" their number was wrong.

My dad took my notebooks full of scribbles to the accounting department of one of the top NYC accounting firms, of which he was an exec. vp - and they came back to him a few days later and said, "No 8-year old could do this work. He completely solved this problem. See here, here he's reinvented the Calculus and Trig. He made ONLY one mistake - he solved for each player getting a specific suite rather than for any player getting any suite. Can we hire him?"

So, "naturally" I've been counting EVERYTHIING before and since then. I've made GOAT lists for the NBA-ABA-NBL since the end of the 1960 season; I've got my own version of the greatest hard-rock songs "Pablo's Top 1,000 Hard Rock Songs"; and more than a dozen others.

-------------
#1. Being that West and Baylor were your favorite players who among them was better to you and why!?
PABLO: Almost every time I think about the two of them I come up with a different order for who was better. Early on Elgin was clearly better; but West caught up relatively quickly. Later on, West was clearly better; to no small degree because of Elgin's knee problems.

For my GOAT list, I rank players first BY POSITION - and I have West as GOAT #3 SG (not far behind either MJ or Kobe); whereas, I have Elgin behind: LBJ, Dr J, and bird or GOAT #4 SF (barely ahead of Barry).

The way I build my GOAT list from these POSITIONAL GOAT sub-lists is that in each descending set of 5 GOAT players, I include one player from each position.
So my GOAT Top 5 are:
1. KAJ
2. Magic
3. MJ
4. LBJ
5. TD

my next 5 are:
6. Wilt
7. Dr J
8. Kobe
9. "O"
10. Karl Malone

my next 5 are:
11. Shaq
12. West
13. Bird
14. Cousy
15. Pettit ("Shaq and the white boys")

16. Hakeem
17. Elgin Baylor
18. Stockton
19. Dirk
20. Gervin

21. Bill Russell
22. Barry
23. Kidd
24. KG
25. D. Wade


So, the net result of this system is that I have West in the GOAT #s 11-15 group; and Elgin in the next group.

Another thing for me is that the ONLY significant gap I have is between KAJ and Magic for the first two GOAT spots - for me KAJ was just that dominant with both an incredible PEAK and incredibly long PRIME. Given this, I have the gap between say MJ and Kobe as tiny - Kobe's Reg. Seas. career ranks higher for me than MJ; so MJ BARELY squeezes past him because his Post-Season was just enough superior. Likewise, I don't have West far behind MJ, nor Elgin far behind Bird.

#2. How would you rank these players based on overall skill/talent/ability/impact
Wilt Chamberlain
Bill Russell
Oscar Robertson
Dr. J
Jerry West
Elgin Baylor

PABLO: I have ALl 6 as All-Time Greats, For the "decade" of the "1960's" I've got the 5 of them in this order:
1: Wilt (THE most-Era-dominant player ever - not counting Mikan who more dominated a much weaker Era).
2-4: "O", West, Baylor (though I can entirely live with any other order of them.
5. Bill Russell.

On my overall GOAT list, I have Dr J, just behind Wilt and a bit ahead of "O"-West-Baylor.

About Wilt vs Bill Russell
In my opinion, while Russell was a once-in-a-decade athlete, Wilt was a once-in-a-century FREAK of nature. Wilt had truly WORLD-CLASS skills: endurance, speed, quicks, explosiveness, strength.

The KEY to Russell's success was RED Auerbach. For me (though he's the only coach or player I ever "disliked" (I didn't care for his arrogance); Red was THE Era-Wise most dominant coach AND GM. The C's won so many of their series vs Wilt's teams in 7th games and/or in games decided by 5 points or less. Red was EASILY worth those few points - in both how he BUILT the C's and how he coached them.

During the filming of Conan The Barbarian, Wilt went with Aaaanold (Schwarzenneger) to a gym. Arnold says that Wilt lifted weights that the BIGGEST guys couldn't approach. I personally remember a game where Wilt picked up an opposing big man who was about to get into a fight and said, "We'll have none of that here." His contemporaries spoke of him picking up two guys simultaneously at arms length to stop fights. He WAS that strong.

In college, he showed up at a track meet; his school was short a high jumper. He went out and, with basically no training, jumped a world-class height. Well after his b-ball career, he went into pro Volleyball and was competitive.

Another way to put it is: Were Wilt to have been on the C's, they would have won as many Chips; while if Russell had been on Wilt's teams, they would have won LESS Chips and less Reg. Seas. games.

I TEND to think that if the Cs had had Nate the Great, they would have done about as well; and we'd be hearing as little about Russell as we do now about Nate Thurmond.

Of all my GOAT Top 50, only Mikan and Russell for me have debatable "transferability". Mikan because the play back then was just so inferior; Russell because, while he'd dominate any decade on defense, is inability to score at a decent percent for a Center - says to me that he'd not be an All-Time Great in subsequent decades. (I don't find it easy to say this about him, because his absolute DIGNITY in the face of the nasty racism of his own fans - just blew me away.)

One more thing about Wilt:
HE WAS WORLD-CLASS IN "CITIZENSHIP".
Wilt, mostly, single-handedly integrated first an entire city, Kansas City, then an entire region. This was no small feat; nor without tremendous personal risks. Southern whites were nasty and ARMED! Wilt's insistence on entering segregated establishments, and then sitting up front - EVERY TIME he did that, and he did it all the time, each time he risked his very life. That such a SELFLESS person would somehow be a "stat-stuffing" "only cared about himself and his numbers" b-ball player; I find that not just unreasonable; but downright obnoxious.

#3. Who was better to you and why between Bill Russell and Wilt Chamberlain!?
PABLO: In "head-to-head" Reg. Seas. "evaluations"; THE one I consider, by far, THE best "measuring stick": the ALL-NBA (ALL-ABA, ALL-NBL) selections, at the Center position: Wilt & Russell finished 1st and 2nd in 9 seasons. In SEVEN of those seasons, Wilt was ALL-NBA 1st-Team - that, for me, is more than being slightly better; it is sheer dominance.

N.B. I've had big problems with the MVP voting. Russell didn't deserve it over Pettit in 1958; and Wilt deserved it over Russell in both 1961 and 1962 (!!!); KAJ deserved it over Cowens in 1973. In all FOUR cases, a Celtics player, who was ALL-NBA SECOND-Team was voted MVP over THE Center who was voted ALL-NBA 1st-Team over him. There WAS a pro-C's bias back then.

If you take away 3 of Russell's 5 MVPs and give 2 of them to Wilt; Wilt suddenly looks a heck of a lot greater; and Russell not nearly as great. That is in fact how I see them.

Keep in mind, the REPUTATION of the League then NOWADAYS is that Wilt dominated a bunch of shortish white guys. Yet, with the help of the entire C's all-world DEFENSE, Wilt only scored about 5 ppg less on Russell than he did on the rest of the League's Centers. I don't question Russell as being THE #1 DEFENSIVE force ever; but what does this then say about Wilt?

P.S. Having written all of this out; I feel like I should just go ahead and post it to the board. So, assuming I have your "permission"; I think I'll go ahead and do that.

Again, thanx for your compliments and for asking me these questions. I feel honored. Hopefully, I've provided some useful info to you.

Yours Sincerely,
Pablo
Pablo Novi
Senior
Posts: 683
And1: 233
Joined: Dec 11, 2015
Location: Mexico City, Mexico
Contact:
   

Re: RealGM Top 100 List 2017: #12 

Post#167 » by Pablo Novi » Fri Jul 14, 2017 3:53 am

[SNIP OUT of everything I posted]


Wow! Thanks for that story was really inspiring actually.I'm white and racism has def had it's mark throughout my family however, it never completely dominated my mind growing up as I began having african american friends at a very young age.

I feel racism if you look at where it was back in the 50's and 60's is not even close to where it is now. I know that the media will magnify racism stories but in terms of the overall population. You gave me a great story I may tell in an article. My second line of passion aside from sports is spirituality and I want to shed this light to people and show where we currently are. In fact, because it's much less racist I think race's as a whole are going to transform throughout the next few generations and beyond.

I'm going to DM you and ask you some questions about those times.

I'm into "spirituality" also; but perhaps in a very different way. I've been a highly-moral atheist since mid-1967 (IMO, great husband & father, good friend, heavy-duty peace-just activist & ALWAYS putting the needs of others before my own personal considerations; coach; shrink, etc); call it a solid half-century of TRYING with all my might to do my best for others. I'd call that highly moral; again a kind of "spirituality" (though certainly not-religious based).

Hopefully my atheism isn't a problem for you (or others). I keep it to myself pretty strictly; the only exception I make is if someone else addresses "spirituality" issues; I sometimes weigh in. (But NEVER to put down the personal views/beliefs of others.)

About the possibility of racial divisiveness being finally overcome any time soon; I'm less optimistic about progress on this issue than on most other social issues (except about ending: poverty, wars and police states); but I sure HOPE so. (I've sequentially lived with two: white women; two blacks and two Mexican-(American)s - including the last 30.5+ years with a truly one-in-a-million Mexican marvel - so I guess you could say I've been "practicing in my personal life what I've been 'preaching' in my public life).

Hey mods, et al, sorry about the off-topic nature of this post.
Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 53,766
And1: 22,683
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Cali
     

Re: RealGM Top 100 List 2017: #12 

Post#168 » by Doctor MJ » Fri Jul 14, 2017 10:04 pm

Winsome Gerbil wrote:
Doctor MJ wrote:
Had no separation from...a bunch of guys already voted in.



I keep wondering as to when it will strike people as a tad odd that amazingly nearly 50% of the Top 12 NBA players of all time apparently played within the last 5 years. And I can assume that the Dirk thing will start up soon too, and maybe we can get a few spare votes for Wade, CP3, Curry and KD and take a run at half of the Top 20.


Ah, cool. That's a good thing to discuss. There's something happening here beyond just recency bias. Players today:

1) Have much better care from the training staff.
2) Are being coached by more knowledgeable coaches.
3) Have spent more time practicing the most valuable skills of today.

These are things that people need to consider if they should be adjusted for and how.

ElGee has talked about relative longevity based on the era in question, and I think data analysis looking to adjust for that would be a good thing, though it will always need to be done by a case by case basis. There's always going to be disagreement in how to apply that to a degree, but I think people probably can come together on it largely, and it may well be that in the future that big longevity guys from recent eras fall in people's lists.

The second thing is tricky because it means the actual impact of being able to figure things out for yourself is highly variable. It's conceivable if you work granularly enough that an NBA-wide realization makes a particular clever advantage totally disappear. If a guy relied on that advantage while he played, should he lose the edge he gained over his peers when we do all-time comparisons?

3rd thing isn't so much a GOAT issue in my mind as it is an issue for all-time fantasy leagues. I feel like whenever I draft a guy who clearly has solid shooting form it's considered inappropriate to say he'd be able to shoot 3's in the eyes of most. Aside from the fact it doesn't make sense to me, it tends to depress the value of players from earlier era in the eyes of the fantasy league, and so to some degree it might be having a GOAT effect.

As I say all that though, it's a pretty normal thing for a list to be dominated by the era where the thing in question peaked. And we are at peak basketball right now. It may be surpassed by quite a lot in the future, but the advancements in the game in the 15 years have been huge, so it makes sense that those who thrived in this new era would figure prominently on the list.
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board

Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,513
And1: 10,004
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: RealGM Top 100 List 2017: #12 

Post#169 » by penbeast0 » Sat Jul 15, 2017 5:52 am

Pablo Novi wrote: ...Were Wilt to have been on the C's, they would have won as many Chips; while if Russell had been on Wilt's teams, they would have won LESS Chips and less Reg. Seas. games.. . .

Keep in mind, the REPUTATION of the League then NOWADAYS is that Wilt dominated a bunch of shortish white guys. Yet, with the help of the entire C's all-world DEFENSE, Wilt only scored about 5 ppg less on Russell than he did on the rest of the League's Centers. I don't question Russell as being THE #1 DEFENSIVE force ever; but what does this then say about Wilt?...


Two things:

(1)I did a thread in the last month about the Wilt as a Celtic/Russell with Wilt's team question. I basically found that Wilt would win less titles as a Celtic (one injury year plus the Celtics fell apart in 1970 so no title plus a couple of titles that Russell won where you wouldn't have expected it); Russell won significantly more titles in Wilt's position than Wilt did (Russell came into the league a couple of years earlier so he would have been playing with Arizin in his prime without himself/Wilt as competition plus he would probably have been a much better fit on the Lakers, not fighting with the coach and allowing Baylor to work from his sweet spots offensively). Look it up if you wish, the analysis is there (it's long and looks at each year holistically).

(2) You can't just look at the opposing center, even if it's Wilt, to analyze Russell's impact. What made him special defensively was his ability to impact the entire opposition team (horizontal game) compared to someone like Wilt or Thurmond who might be able to impact his man equally while also rim protecting (vertical game). So, if you see Wilt doing fine but the rest of Wilt's team underperforming v. weak defenders (Heinsohn, Cousy, etc.), that's probably Russell's impact showing up even where Wilt's impact offensively stays constant.
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.

Return to Player Comparisons